Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Utter horseshit. The constraints on sentencing are written into the law. The judge is free to set the sentence anywhere within those constraints. Where do these so called "judicial guidelines" come from? All we know is that Mueller wanted him to get 20 years. All other claims are obvious manure.that's simply NOT TRUE.... the sentence time is judicial guidelines.... guidelines are set so that we do not face HUGE disparities among those who face the same crime convictions.Horseshit. They are Mueller guidelines.Actually, they are the normal federal sentencing guidelines. So you think the other judges that set those standards in the past were operating from hatred? Come on, you're being ridiculous.However, these demands for 20-30 years in prison are the product of pure hatred
Prove this "probation office" drew up this recommendation.Prove what, exactly? Be specific.ROFL! Prove it.
Well, thats clearly a retarded point to try to make, as, while you may forego some of your rights when you are a criminal , you don't forego those rights ny being elected to congress.Tell that to Mr. Manafort who was sent to solitary because he exercised his right to freely speak to his witnesses and his President
First, i want you to use a search engine to search for "probation office Manafort". The first result will do it. If you still can't find anything, let me know. Then I will post a link for you.Prove this "probation office" drew up this recommendation.
It's a system of calculation used by the probation office of the court (of the court, not of the defense or the prosecution) to recommend sentencing ranges to the judge. It's a point system resulting in a number which is called the "offender level", which is then used against precedent.Where do these so called "judicial guidelines" come from?
Well, thats clearly a retarded point to try to make, as, while you may forego some of your rights when you are a criminal , you don't forego those rights ny being elected to congress.Tell that to Mr. Manafort who was sent to solitary because he exercised his right to freely speak to his witnesses and his President
It's a system of calculation used by the probation office of the court to recommend sentencing ranges to the judge. It's a point system resulting in a number which is called the "offender level".Where do these so called "judicial guidelines" come from?
Manafort scored a 38.
ROFL! Just as expected, you want me to do your work for you.First, i want you to use a search engine to search for "probation office Manafort". The first result will do it. If you still can't find anything, let me know. Then I will post a link for you.Prove this "probation office" drew up this recommendation.
And the judge did not send him to solitary. The prison did.Mr. Manafort wasn't convicted of anything when he was sent to solitary
I doubt he scored higher than zero. You're making all this up.It's a system of calculation used by the probation office of the court (of the court, not of the defense or the prosecution) to recommend sentencing ranges to the judge. It's a point system resulting in a number which is called the "offender level", which is then used against precedent.Where do these so called "judicial guidelines" come from?
Manafort scored a 38.
Hmm, no, I offered to provide a link, if you demonstrated any honest interest at all by doing a 2 second web search. The fact that you won't shows me you don't have any real interest in understanding any of this. And it does not phase me for you to throw a little tantrum .Those who do have honest interest in this and have looked up how this stuff works know you are being a fucking retard, and their opinions are the only ones that matter to me.Just as expected, you want me to do your work for you.
Wrong. He scored a 38. And now we get to see how he is scored by the DC court probation office, at his next sentencing.I doubt he scored higher than zero.
They did it on orders of the judge, moron.And the judge did not send him to solitary. The prison did.Mr. Manafort wasn't convicted of anything when he was sent to solitary
It's a system of calculation used by the probation office of the court to recommend sentencing ranges to the judge. It's a point system resulting in a number which is called the "offender level".Where do these so called "judicial guidelines" come from?
Manafort scored a 38.
Manafort is highly unlikely to commit another offense. He's non-violent and a first time offender.
Probation would be appropriate.
Wrong.They did it on orders of the judge, moron.And the judge did not send him to solitary. The prison did.Mr. Manafort wasn't convicted of anything when he was sent to solitary
You're right, I have no interest in swallowing your propaganda. If you have proof, then post it. Otherwise quit wasting eveyone's time.Hmm, no, I offered to provide a link, if you demonstrated any honest interest at all by doing a 2 second web search. The fact that you won't shows me you don't have any real interest in understanding any of this. And it does not phase me for you to throw a little tantrum .Those who do have honest interest in this and have looked up how this stuff works know you are being a fucking retard, and their opinions are the only ones that matter to me.Just as expected, you want me to do your work for you.
Yes, non-violent offenders are not the same as violent offenders.It's a system of calculation used by the probation office of the court to recommend sentencing ranges to the judge. It's a point system resulting in a number which is called the "offender level".Where do these so called "judicial guidelines" come from?
Manafort scored a 38.
Manafort is highly unlikely to commit another offense. He's non-violent and a first time offender.
Probation would be appropriate.
So now are you saying NON violient offenders are not the same as violent, they erode the US judicial system and all Americans need to pay for their crimes.
What Manafort did and his sentence was to encourage money laundering and bank fraud.
No he is not a first time offender, what he is , is the first time getting caught.
Of course I have proof. It's literally the SOP of every felony court in the country, federal or otherwise. Any child can find proof, if they care to do so. Your little tailspin doesn't compel me to spoonfeed it to you.You're right, I have no interest in swallowing your propaganda. If you have proof, then post it. Otherwise quit wasting eveyone's time.Hmm, no, I offered to provide a link, if you demonstrated any honest interest at all by doing a 2 second web search. The fact that you won't shows me you don't have any real interest in understanding any of this. And it does not phase me for you to throw a little tantrum .Those who do have honest interest in this and have looked up how this stuff works know you are being a fucking retard, and their opinions are the only ones that matter to me.Just as expected, you want me to do your work for you.
