Leo123
Diamond Member
- Aug 26, 2017
- 30,608
- 23,448
- 2,915
He legally had to. That doesn’t mean he’s guilty you flaming idiot.![]()
Hey, you should have told that to Trump so he knew he didn't need show up at has arraignment on felony charges.
WW
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
He legally had to. That doesn’t mean he’s guilty you flaming idiot.![]()
Hey, you should have told that to Trump so he knew he didn't need show up at has arraignment on felony charges.
WW
So if he fails to pull a rabbit out of his hat and convert a misdemeanor, out of SOL into felony charge, I'd guess he would either pay it back or be found in violation of the law.
Well Cohen is a convicted criminal with time in the slammer. But this is NY, home of the deranged wokers with TDS.Who will jurors trust
Trump or Cohen?
He legally had to. That doesn’t mean he’s guilty you flaming idiot.
He legally had to. That doesn’t mean he’s guilty you flaming idiot.
Getting charged by the “I”ll get him!” anti-Trump biased DA is meaningless. Just like with Pelosi’s “I’ll get him!” impeachments. Meaningless.Didn't say he's guilty, I said he's charged.
We won't know his legal guilt or innocence until some time next year after all the evidence is presented to a trial jury.
Wait what? You call me an flaming idiot when you are the one that thinks he was charged with misdemeanors?
That's funny.
WW
he was referring only to those who threatened election officials and officials in the Justice system, not everyone. but the vast majority of those who threatened were MAGA extremists.Garland himself needs to be indicted! Labeling parents as “domestic terrorists”
Please provide evidence of this, thanks.and lying to Congress. Now a whistleblower has reported that he’s placed FBI spies in churches and Orthodox* communities! What is this….the Soviet Union circa 1962?
* what is meant by “Orthodox?” I belong to an orthodox shul.
Getting charged by the “I”ll get him!” anti-Trump biased DA is meaningless. Just like with Pelosi’s “I’ll get him!” impeachments. Meaningless.
1) So why didn’t Garland label the leftist who was threatening the life of a SCOTUS justice a domestic terrorist? The guy was right on the front lawn! Oh, right….he was on the left’s side.he was referring only to those who threatened election officials and officials in the Justice system, not everyone. but the vast majority of those who threatened were MAGA extremists.
Please provide evidence of this, thanks.
I’m not doing all your homework for you. It’s been repeatedly reported that this was his campaign promise.Please provide evidence where DA Bragg says 'I'll get him'.
Thanks,
Rumpole
You idiot, you don't have the knowledge to discuss this do you? Here, educate yourself, fool.Didn't say he's guilty, I said he's charged.
We won't know his legal guilt or innocence until some time next year after all the evidence is presented to a trial jury.
Wait what? You call me an flaming idiot when you are the one that thinks he was charged with misdemeanors?
That's funny.
WW
Bragg doesn't know his ass from his briefcase. The second he used federal funds in his pursuit of Trump it gave Congress oversight authority. Jordan is chairman of the oversight committee. So, Bragg stepped into this of his own free will."Members of Congress are not free to invade New York's sovereign authority for their or Mr. Trump's political aims," Bragg's office wrote in the lawsuit, accusing Jordan of searching for a pretext for "hauling Mr. Pomerantz to Washington for a retaliatory political circus."
Bragg is just not particularly bright. Trump maintained a home in New York with an official address. Trump's business has always been in New York with a designated agent for service of process. No. The statute was not tolled.You idiot, you don't have the knowledge to discuss this do you? Here, educate yourself, fool.
Alvin Bragg’s theory is that because Trump lived in D.C., then Florida, the felony limitations period in New York is still open. He’s wrong.
The D.A. has charged Trump with felonies for a variety of reasons, one of which is to trigger the five- rather than two-year limitations period on bad bookkeeping crimes. Felonies often bring jail time, which is the left’s fever dream for Trump.
According to Cohen’s filed-in-federal-court sentencing memorandum, the Trump Organization “falsely accounted for these (hush money) payments as ‘legal expenses'” sometime in 2017. Thus, the D.A. had to bring any misdemeanor charge related to that transaction in 2019 and any felony charge in 2022 to survive a defense motion to dismiss. Bragg’s grand jury handed up charges in 2023 after the five-year limitations period expired.
On one hand, Bragg has alleged a factually unprovable charge (a post-election, election interference) to try to reach a more favorable time limit for charges. On the other, he has charged crimes that are plainly time-barred based on the chronology he wrote and published. Either way, he loses badly. The push and pull are tearing apart Bragg’s indictment, leaving him nothing on which to proceed.
![]()
Statute Of Limitations Has Passed On Bragg’s 'Get Trump' Case
Alvin Bragg’s theory is that because Trump lived in D.C., then Florida, the felony limitations period in New York is still open. He's wrong.thefederalist.com
You idiot,
crazy shit hereBWHAAAAAAaa Bragg has no case... The fact that the persecution is political in nature destroys his premise... Braggs abuse of power, trying to use a federal crime where he has no statutory right to do so, is going to sink this fool. GOOD LUCK LEFTITS... You're going to need it... Once this hits SCOTUS its going into the trash bin where it belongs.
You idiot, you don't have the knowledge to discuss this do you? Here, educate yourself, fool.
Alvin Bragg’s theory is that because Trump lived in D.C., then Florida, the felony limitations period in New York is still open. He’s wrong.
The D.A. has charged Trump with felonies for a variety of reasons, one of which is to trigger the five- rather than two-year limitations period on bad bookkeeping crimes. Felonies often bring jail time, which is the left’s fever dream for Trump.
According to Cohen’s filed-in-federal-court sentencing memorandum, the Trump Organization “falsely accounted for these (hush money) payments as ‘legal expenses'” sometime in 2017. Thus, the D.A. had to bring any misdemeanor charge related to that transaction in 2019 and any felony charge in 2022 to survive a defense motion to dismiss. Bragg’s grand jury handed up charges in 2023 after the five-year limitations period expired.
On one hand, Bragg has alleged a factually unprovable charge (a post-election, election interference) to try to reach a more favorable time limit for charges. On the other, he has charged crimes that are plainly time-barred based on the chronology he wrote and published. Either way, he loses badly. The push and pull are tearing apart Bragg’s indictment, leaving him nothing on which to proceed.
![]()
Statute Of Limitations Has Passed On Bragg’s 'Get Trump' Case
Alvin Bragg’s theory is that because Trump lived in D.C., then Florida, the felony limitations period in New York is still open. He's wrong.thefederalist.com
Bragg doesn't know his ass from his briefcase. The second he used federal funds in his pursuit of Trump it gave Congress oversight authority. Jordan is chairman of the oversight committee. So, Bragg stepped into this of his own free will.
Let him sue, I hope he is sanctioned personally.
Yes he did. Too late to think about that.He didn't use federal funds in pursuit of Trump.
Because the next court date is in December. Motions will be heard then.If Bragg is wrong about the statute if limitations, how come Trump hasn't filed a motion yet to dismiss the case based on that?
Yeah I know what Bragg charged him with. I gave you evidence that it's not going anywhere which you refuse to discuss...You just diss the link....what a fool.
This charging document trumps (pun intended) your talking heads link to The Federalist. They of course can say whatever they want, they aren't charged with felonies.
WW