Marriage Equality Does Not Exist In Any State

[Silhouette]

Because you see homosexuality as "adult deviant sex lifestyles".. to the detriment of children", you will never be convinced. Your ossified attitude will have to quite literally die before everyone, and I mean everyone sees marriage as access to contract law not to be hindered by bigotry.

And what about your ossified bigotry towards all the other adults and their children currently banned from marriage because of your exclusive class status based on your special deviant sex lifestyle? Read the thread title. Explain why polygamy is still illegal.. And use the 14th Amendment in your answer..

Fot the record, I'm not Gay. I am an American citizen who believes that homophobia is an arcane fear based in lies, suspicions and unwarranted fear. Hardly a philosophy to make laws upon.

Hey, I notice you didn't answer my question. Get back to the conversation when you're ready to offer substance instead of carefully placed ad hominems and strawmen.. In fact you did that because you CAN'T answer the question without admitting that either polygamy is already legal or that gay marriage is not..

 

[Skylar]

That's an evasive post.

You're really going to babble about 'evasive posts'? You, who still can't show us any mention of polygamy in the entire Obergefell ruling? Yet laughably insists that polygamy is authorized. While at the same time insisting that same sex marriages are not authorized by the ruling, despite Obergefell being about nothing else?

Really?

 

[Skylar]

Because you see homosexuality as "adult deviant sex lifestyles".. to the detriment of children", you will never be convinced. Your ossified attitude will have to quite literally die before everyone, and I mean everyone sees marriage as access to contract law not to be hindered by bigotry.

And what about your ossified bigotry towards all the other adults and their children currently banned from marriage because of your exclusive class status based on your special deviant sex lifestyle? Read the thread title. Explain why polygamy is still illegal.. And use the 14th Amendment in your answer..

Fot the record, I'm not Gay. I am an American citizen who believes that homophobia is an arcane fear based in lies, suspicions and unwarranted fear. Hardly a philosophy to make laws upon.

Hey, I notice you didn't answer my question. Get back to the conversation when you're ready to offer substance instead of carefully placed ad hominems and strawmen.. In fact you did that because you CAN'T answer the question without admitting that either polygamy is already legal or that gay marriage is not..

Or.....option 3: You have no idea what you're talking about. And none of your 'requirements' actually exist. Remember, you make shit up all the time about the law. And none of it has the slightest relevance to the real world. Remember when you insisted that unless 'all children' had a 'representative' at a Supreme Court hearing, the hearing was a 'mistrial'? Remember when you insisted that children were married to their parents? Remember when you cited *entertainment* law as defining marriage?

If you have an argument to make about polygamy, make it. As your rambling history of pseudo-legal gibberish demonstrates elegantly, we're obligated to do jack shit.

 

[Silhouette]

Skylar, instead of cussing and using ad hominems to divert the topic as you ALWAYS do..why not just tell the readers here how polygamy is illegal...using citations to the 14th Amendment in your answer.

It can't be that hard. Just give it a try and stop all your obvious shielding of that question's answer..

 

[Skylar]

Skylar, instead of cussing and using ad hominems to divert the topic as you ALWAYS do..why not just tell the readers here how polygamy is illegal...using citations to the 14th Amendment in your answer.

It can't be that hard. Just give it a try and stop all your obvious shielding of that question's answer..

Its not a personal attack. You simply don't understand the law. None of the 'requirements' that you insist bind the courts actually exist. You made them up.

For example, your insistence that unless the court had a 'Representative' for 'all children' then a Supreme Court hearing is a 'mistrial'.....that's just pseudo-legal gibberish. There's no such requirement, no such outcome. A hearing isn't even a trial. Making a 'mistrial' impossible.

As for your insistence that I 'prove you wrong' on polygamy, prove that you're right. Remember, same sex marriage is still legal in all 50 states. And polygamy still illegal in all 50. So the burden is on you to demonstrate that the law is wrong...and you are right.

And you can't.

 

[Silhouette]

You haven't answered the question yet...."..tell the readers here how polygamy is illegal...using citations to the 14th Amendment in your answer." Also you can use citations from Obergefell added to your citations from the 14th.

 

[Skylar]

You haven't answered the question yet...."..tell the readers here how polygamy is illegal...using citations to the 14th Amendment in your answer." Also you can use citations from Obergefell added to your citations from the 14th.

That's not a question. That's a demand that I 'prove you wrong'.

Prove your argument right. The obligation is on you to prove your case. As remember, same sex marriage is still legal in 50 of 50 states. And polygamy is still illegal in 50 of 50 States.

Prove that the law is wrong and you are right. You can't.

 

[Katzndogz]

The only true marriage equality is no marriage at all.

 

[Skylar]

The only true marriage equality is no marriage at all.

Or, rather than voiding all marriage certificates everywhere in a vast nation wide pout......we can recognize same sex marriage.

Which is what we did!

 

[Katzndogz]

The only true marriage equality is no marriage at all.

Or, rather than voiding all marriage certificates everywhere in a vast nation wide pout......we can recognize same sex marriage.

Which is what we did!

As you should have learned by now, marriage equality means more than gays. As long as one form of marriage is illegal there is no marriage equality. You may not like some forms of marriage. Too bad. Your moralizing value judgment can't be used to deny someone else marriage rights.

Only if there is no marriage at all is everything equal for everyone.

 

[Skylar]

The only true marriage equality is no marriage at all.

Or, rather than voiding all marriage certificates everywhere in a vast nation wide pout......we can recognize same sex marriage.

Which is what we did!

As you should have learned by now, marriage equality means more than gays. As long as one form of marriage is illegal there is no marriage equality. You may not like some forms of marriage. Too bad. Your moralizing value judgment can't be used to deny someone else marriage rights.

Is this where you try and argue that gay sex is the same thing as murder/cannibalism?

 

[Katzndogz]

The only true marriage equality is no marriage at all.

Or, rather than voiding all marriage certificates everywhere in a vast nation wide pout......we can recognize same sex marriage.

Which is what we did!

As you should have learned by now, marriage equality means more than gays. As long as one form of marriage is illegal there is no marriage equality. You may not like some forms of marriage. Too bad. Your moralizing value judgment can't be used to deny someone else marriage rights.

Is this where you try and argue that gay sex is the same thing as murder/cannibalism?

Not the same as. You made that up. The issue is two adults consenting to what kind of sex they want to have. There never was any murder. You made that up too. Now you are making up some bizarre circumstance where marriage equality is limited to same sex couples. It has been abundantly explained to you that there are other forms of marriage.
As long as there is a single limitation on someone marriage equality doesn't exist.

 

[Skylar]

The only true marriage equality is no marriage at all.

Or, rather than voiding all marriage certificates everywhere in a vast nation wide pout......we can recognize same sex marriage.

Which is what we did!

As you should have learned by now, marriage equality means more than gays. As long as one form of marriage is illegal there is no marriage equality. You may not like some forms of marriage. Too bad. Your moralizing value judgment can't be used to deny someone else marriage rights.

Is this where you try and argue that gay sex is the same thing as murder/cannibalism?

Not the same as. You made that up.

Really? So you didn't offer murder/cannibalism as an example of 'gay sex'?

 

[Katzndogz]

The only true marriage equality is no marriage at all.

Or, rather than voiding all marriage certificates everywhere in a vast nation wide pout......we can recognize same sex marriage.

Which is what we did!

As you should have learned by now, marriage equality means more than gays. As long as one form of marriage is illegal there is no marriage equality. You may not like some forms of marriage. Too bad. Your moralizing value judgment can't be used to deny someone else marriage rights.

Is this where you try and argue that gay sex is the same thing as murder/cannibalism?

Not the same as. You made that up.

Really? So you didn't offer murder/cannibalism as an example of 'gay sex'?

Of course! It certainly was. Two consenting adults mutually agreeing to satisfy both their desires by an act of cannibalism. You find it icky. They didn't. Except there never was any murder. That part you made up.

 

[Skylar]

Or, rather than voiding all marriage certificates everywhere in a vast nation wide pout......we can recognize same sex marriage.

Which is what we did!

As you should have learned by now, marriage equality means more than gays. As long as one form of marriage is illegal there is no marriage equality. You may not like some forms of marriage. Too bad. Your moralizing value judgment can't be used to deny someone else marriage rights.

Is this where you try and argue that gay sex is the same thing as murder/cannibalism?

Not the same as. You made that up.

Really? So you didn't offer murder/cannibalism as an example of 'gay sex'?

Of course! It certainly was. Two consenting adults mutually agreeing to satisfy both their desires by an act of cannibalism. You find it icky. They didn't. Except there never was any murder. That part you made up.

So you did equate gay sex with murder/cannibalism.

 

[Katzndogz]

As you should have learned by now, marriage equality means more than gays. As long as one form of marriage is illegal there is no marriage equality. You may not like some forms of marriage. Too bad. Your moralizing value judgment can't be used to deny someone else marriage rights.

Is this where you try and argue that gay sex is the same thing as murder/cannibalism?

Not the same as. You made that up.

Really? So you didn't offer murder/cannibalism as an example of 'gay sex'?

Of course! It certainly was. Two consenting adults mutually agreeing to satisfy both their desires by an act of cannibalism. You find it icky. They didn't. Except there never was any murder. That part you made up.

So you did equate gay sex with murder/cannibalism.

There was no murder you ignorant slut. Gay sex inarguably included cannibalism. Consensual cannibalism. Goodness gracious you brainless fool. One man is dead and another spent 8 years in prison. Now you want to deny that it ever happened!

No doubt the OP doesn't appreciate you fouling this thread with your delusions. Dragging your ass over here isn't going to come out with a different result. Or, are you intending to shit in every thread on this board?

 

[Skylar]

Is this where you try and argue that gay sex is the same thing as murder/cannibalism?

Not the same as. You made that up.

Really? So you didn't offer murder/cannibalism as an example of 'gay sex'?

Of course! It certainly was. Two consenting adults mutually agreeing to satisfy both their desires by an act of cannibalism. You find it icky. They didn't. Except there never was any murder. That part you made up.

So you did equate gay sex with murder/cannibalism.

There was no murder you ignorant slut.

Then explain the murder trial, whore.

 

[Katzndogz]

Not the same as. You made that up.

Really? So you didn't offer murder/cannibalism as an example of 'gay sex'?

Of course! It certainly was. Two consenting adults mutually agreeing to satisfy both their desires by an act of cannibalism. You find it icky. They didn't. Except there never was any murder. That part you made up.

So you did equate gay sex with murder/cannibalism.

There was no murder you ignorant slut.

Then explain the murder trial, whore.

There was no murder trial. You've been sniffing pussy too long. It's affected your brain. There was no murder trial.

 

[Skylar]

There was no murder trial. You've been sniffing pussy too long. It's affected your brain. There was no murder trial.

FRANKFURT, Germany — A man who admitted killing and eating an acquaintance he met on the Internet was convicted of murder and sentenced to life in prison Tuesday, following his retrial in a case that engrossed and appalled Germany.

German court sentences cannibal to life in jail

You were saying, whore?

 

[Syriusly]

Nice dance around the point bro. If even one family of polygamists wants to marry but can't (The Browns of Brown v Utah) that's a travesty and violation of the spirit and faith of the 14th Amendment..that you just used to make "gay marriage" "legal"..

Neither Loving or Obergefell have anything to do with polygamist marriage. Because of Loving and Obergefell, mixed race couples and same gender couples are treated equally with same race couples and mixed gender couples when it comes to marriage law.

Silhouette is still pissed about that.