Martin Luther King was not the only black leader

Status
Not open for further replies.
It must be Whitey's fault that Rhodesia was White, and the most advanced of countries in Africa, let Blacks run it like Mugabe, and it ends up as the least advanced of countries in the whole World.

Leftists have a very warped view of reality.

Blacks colonized for a longer period of time, tend to be richer, like Trinidad vs Haiti
or
South Africa vs Ethiopia.

It seems Leftists have pulled the wool over our eyes... Telling us that Colonialism is the culprit behind the African condition.

.Colonization is the culprit. These nations were quite fine before whitey decided to split up Africa to steal the resources.

Ethiopia was not colonized, and Liberia was setup as a country for African Americans, both ended up poor by African standards.

How can that be colonialism?

Colonization is what created the problems in Africa today. This s really not debatable. Especially with an idiot who believes in genetic inferiority by race.

How is it not debatable?

Ireland, Finland, Poland, Estonia, Czech, Slovakia are examples of countries "Colonized too" but which have moved well beyond African countries "Not Colonized" like Ethiopia, or Liberia.
 
There is no such thing as black racism.

Ridiculous lies.
It's totally racist to have Black History Month, Black Music Awards, Black only magazines... If whites had White Music Awards or something like that, all the snowflakes, white and brown, would go apeshit. And there would be a massive run on bananas.

You do have white history months. Every month but February. You do have white music awards. It's called the american music awards. You do have white magazines. Cosmo, Newsweek, etc. You suffer from psychosis.
There's no such thing as White History Month, White Awards, or White magazines, they are all open to, and have in them, blacks. You just enjoy living in a fantasy world where your failures in life are the white man's fault, not your own incompetence.

Well your psychosis doesn't allow you to understand that.for most of American history all of the things you cry about were whites only.. And as for your crying whites work in every single one of the things you cry about. Our problems have been caused by white racism. That's the way it is.
Like I said elsewhere, you're living in the past.
 
White people are not allowed to have any agency ANYWHERE concerning race.
Name me an area of human activity that is not dominated by racism-white supremacy ?
Idiot Republicans insist on white people not having a group identity

White students are only half to one-third as likely as blacks youth to be suspended or expelled and despite higher rates of drug use, white youth are far less likely to be arrested, prosecuted or incarcerated for a drug offense than are black youth and whites run virtually every major institution in the USA

So are White students some how less likely to be obnoxious, aggressive, and violent in class?

So are Black drug users more likely to use drugs in urban centers outdoors where they're more likely to be caught?

White students are not less likely to be anything. Whites do drugs outdoors and it doesn't matter were the drugs are done if whites are doing them and not getting caught that's a problem.

If you think America is so mean to Black people, you can feel free to leave.

Why do you repeat this? Don't you have a better one?

So if you don't like blacks, and since we ain't leaving, why don't you move your ass back to Poland?
 
It must be Whitey's fault that Rhodesia was White, and the most advanced of countries in Africa, let Blacks run it like Mugabe, and it ends up as the least advanced of countries in the whole World.

Leftists have a very warped view of reality.

Blacks colonized for a longer period of time, tend to be richer, like Trinidad vs Haiti
or
South Africa vs Ethiopia.

It seems Leftists have pulled the wool over our eyes... Telling us that Colonialism is the culprit behind the African condition.

.Colonization is the culprit. These nations were quite fine before whitey decided to split up Africa to steal the resources.

Ethiopia was not colonized, and Liberia was setup as a country for African Americans, both ended up poor by African standards.

How can that be colonialism?

Colonization is what created the problems in Africa today. This s really not debatable. Especially with an idiot who believes in genetic inferiority by race.

How is it not debatable?

Ireland, Finland, Poland, Estonia, Czech, Slovakia are examples of countries "Colonized too" but which have moved well beyond African countries "Not Colonized" like Ethiopia, or Liberia.

No so.
 
It's totally racist to have Black History Month, Black Music Awards, Black only magazines... If whites had White Music Awards or something like that, all the snowflakes, white and brown, would go apeshit. And there would be a massive run on bananas.

You do have white history months. Every month but February. You do have white music awards. It's called the american music awards. You do have white magazines. Cosmo, Newsweek, etc. You suffer from psychosis.
There's no such thing as White History Month, White Awards, or White magazines, they are all open to, and have in them, blacks. You just enjoy living in a fantasy world where your failures in life are the white man's fault, not your own incompetence.

Our problems have been caused by white racism. That's the way it is.

So, Black murder rates increased after Civil Rights because of???????????????????????????

You can't possibly explain that one away.

Because.

A.) More rights for Blacks.

B.) Less oppression for Blacks.

C.) Less poverty for Blacks for 2 reasons, being :LBJ's civil rights opportunities to Blacks, and also LBJ's great society

So, this is very contrary to the Liberal opinion on the matter.

White murder rates increased after civil rights act because of?????????????????????????????????????

Maybe you explain that and shut the fuck up.

Well, Whites also saw a decrease in poverty in the 1960's.... So....
 
It must be Whitey's fault that Rhodesia was White, and the most advanced of countries in Africa, let Blacks run it like Mugabe, and it ends up as the least advanced of countries in the whole World.

Leftists have a very warped view of reality.

Blacks colonized for a longer period of time, tend to be richer, like Trinidad vs Haiti
or
South Africa vs Ethiopia.

It seems Leftists have pulled the wool over our eyes... Telling us that Colonialism is the culprit behind the African condition.

.Colonization is the culprit. These nations were quite fine before whitey decided to split up Africa to steal the resources.

Ethiopia was not colonized, and Liberia was setup as a country for African Americans, both ended up poor by African standards.

How can that be colonialism?

Colonization is what created the problems in Africa today. This s really not debatable. Especially with an idiot who believes in genetic inferiority by race.

How is it not debatable?

Ireland, Finland, Poland, Estonia, Czech, Slovakia are examples of countries "Colonized too" but which have moved well beyond African countries "Not Colonized" like Ethiopia, or Liberia.

No so.

So, Ireland's not in better shape than Ethiopia?

Is that what you mean by "No so"??
 
Ridiculous lies.
It's totally racist to have Black History Month, Black Music Awards, Black only magazines... If whites had White Music Awards or something like that, all the snowflakes, white and brown, would go apeshit. And there would be a massive run on bananas.

You do have white history months. Every month but February. You do have white music awards. It's called the american music awards. You do have white magazines. Cosmo, Newsweek, etc. You suffer from psychosis.
There's no such thing as White History Month, White Awards, or White magazines, they are all open to, and have in them, blacks. You just enjoy living in a fantasy world where your failures in life are the white man's fault, not your own incompetence.

Well your psychosis doesn't allow you to understand that.for most of American history all of the things you cry about were whites only.. And as for your crying whites work in every single one of the things you cry about. Our problems have been caused by white racism. That's the way it is.
Like I said elsewhere, you're living in the past.

Well since you believe the same age old racist shit your grandparents did it's pretty safe to say that you are the one living in the past, I mea you dumb asses crack me up. You are here posting volumes of racist belief, then claim it's not racism. Then as you do repeat the same old racist shit you have for 400 years, you tell someone like me not to live in the past.:badgrin:
 
You do have white history months. Every month but February. You do have white music awards. It's called the american music awards. You do have white magazines. Cosmo, Newsweek, etc. You suffer from psychosis.
There's no such thing as White History Month, White Awards, or White magazines, they are all open to, and have in them, blacks. You just enjoy living in a fantasy world where your failures in life are the white man's fault, not your own incompetence.

Our problems have been caused by white racism. That's the way it is.

So, Black murder rates increased after Civil Rights because of???????????????????????????

You can't possibly explain that one away.

Because.

A.) More rights for Blacks.

B.) Less oppression for Blacks.

C.) Less poverty for Blacks for 2 reasons, being :LBJ's civil rights opportunities to Blacks, and also LBJ's great society

So, this is very contrary to the Liberal opinion on the matter.

White murder rates increased after civil rights act because of?????????????????????????????????????

Maybe you explain that and shut the fuck up.

Well, Whites also saw a decrease in poverty in the 1960's.... So....

So did blacks.

White murder rates increased after civil rights act because of?????????????????????????????????????

Maybe you explain that and shut the fuck up
 
.Colonization is the culprit. These nations were quite fine before whitey decided to split up Africa to steal the resources.

Ethiopia was not colonized, and Liberia was setup as a country for African Americans, both ended up poor by African standards.

How can that be colonialism?

Colonization is what created the problems in Africa today. This s really not debatable. Especially with an idiot who believes in genetic inferiority by race.

How is it not debatable?

Ireland, Finland, Poland, Estonia, Czech, Slovakia are examples of countries "Colonized too" but which have moved well beyond African countries "Not Colonized" like Ethiopia, or Liberia.

No so.

So, Ireland's not in better shape than Ethiopia?

Is that what you mean by "No so"??

Ireland was not colonized. On top of that Ireland s a pat f the UK. It's Basically like a state according to British people I know.
 
Last edited:
There's no such thing as White History Month, White Awards, or White magazines, they are all open to, and have in them, blacks. You just enjoy living in a fantasy world where your failures in life are the white man's fault, not your own incompetence.

Our problems have been caused by white racism. That's the way it is.

So, Black murder rates increased after Civil Rights because of???????????????????????????

You can't possibly explain that one away.

Because.

A.) More rights for Blacks.

B.) Less oppression for Blacks.

C.) Less poverty for Blacks for 2 reasons, being :LBJ's civil rights opportunities to Blacks, and also LBJ's great society

So, this is very contrary to the Liberal opinion on the matter.

White murder rates increased after civil rights act because of?????????????????????????????????????

Maybe you explain that and shut the fuck up.

Well, Whites also saw a decrease in poverty in the 1960's.... So....

So did blacks.

White murder rates increased after civil rights act because of?????????????????????????????????????

Maybe you explain that and shut the fuck up

Well, if Black, and White murder rates increased after civil rights / great society..... How could it be poverty causing the climbing murder rates, when poverty dropped significantly?
 
Ethiopia was not colonized, and Liberia was setup as a country for African Americans, both ended up poor by African standards.

How can that be colonialism?

Colonization is what created the problems in Africa today. This s really not debatable. Especially with an idiot who believes in genetic inferiority by race.

How is it not debatable?

Ireland, Finland, Poland, Estonia, Czech, Slovakia are examples of countries "Colonized too" but which have moved well beyond African countries "Not Colonized" like Ethiopia, or Liberia.

No so.

So, Ireland's not in better shape than Ethiopia?

Is that what you mean by "No so"??

Ireland was not colonized.

Ireland was actually in worse shape than Africa... Irish couldn't own land, in their own country. a huge chunk of their population was killed by Cromwell, and the Irish Potato Famine genocide.

Only the Belgian Congo Genocide can compare by King Leopold II.
 
Colonization is what created the problems in Africa today. This s really not debatable. Especially with an idiot who believes in genetic inferiority by race.

How is it not debatable?

Ireland, Finland, Poland, Estonia, Czech, Slovakia are examples of countries "Colonized too" but which have moved well beyond African countries "Not Colonized" like Ethiopia, or Liberia.

No so.

So, Ireland's not in better shape than Ethiopia?

Is that what you mean by "No so"??

Ireland was not colonized.

Ireland was actually in worse shape than Africa... Irish couldn't own land, in their own country. a huge chunk of their population was killed by Cromwell, and the Irish Potato Famine genocide.

Only the Belgian Congo Genocide can compare by King Leopold II.

Wrong.
 
How is it not debatable?

Ireland, Finland, Poland, Estonia, Czech, Slovakia are examples of countries "Colonized too" but which have moved well beyond African countries "Not Colonized" like Ethiopia, or Liberia.

No so.

So, Ireland's not in better shape than Ethiopia?

Is that what you mean by "No so"??

Ireland was not colonized.

Ireland was actually in worse shape than Africa... Irish couldn't own land, in their own country. a huge chunk of their population was killed by Cromwell, and the Irish Potato Famine genocide.

Only the Belgian Congo Genocide can compare by King Leopold II.

Wrong.

Right, and also....

Ireland's resources were actually taken much more intensely than Africa's.

That's why Ireland basically has little - no forests.

The British Empire chopped down Ireland's trees for ships.... and well everything else trees are used for.
 

So, Ireland's not in better shape than Ethiopia?

Is that what you mean by "No so"??

Ireland was not colonized.

Ireland was actually in worse shape than Africa... Irish couldn't own land, in their own country. a huge chunk of their population was killed by Cromwell, and the Irish Potato Famine genocide.

Only the Belgian Congo Genocide can compare by King Leopold II.

Wrong.

Right, and also....

Ireland's resources were actually taken much more intensely than Africa's.

That's why Ireland basically has little - no forests.

The British Empire chopped down Ireland's trees for ships.... and well everything else trees are used for.

You are incorrect. Time to get back on topic.
 
MLK: Give Us the Ballot



Now if you can find a place where King says please, let me know.
 
Last edited:
Why and how did the state of Alabama ban the NAACP in 1956?

Why: Because the NAACP was effective in using the court system to promote the gradual desegregation of Jim Crow Alabama

How: In addition to issuing an outright ban, Alabama subpoenaed NAACP membership lists. The idea was that the Alabama state government could pass around the membership lists to white employers and landlords, which would lead to Alabama NAACP members getting fired and evicted. Basically, Alabama planned to shut down the NAACP in Alabama by threatening the economic livelihood of all its members.

Epilogue: Banning the NAACP in Alabama completely backfired, not only because the Supreme Court ruled it went against the Constitutional right of freedom of association, but also because the temporary hiatus of the NAACP in Alabama (and other Southern states that tried to ban it) inspired the formation of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, an organization led by Martin Luther King Jr. which became one of the most effective civil rights groups of the late 1950s and 1960s.

The state of Alabama worked to deny blacks their rights. This is the history of racism in America. Each time blacks organize to air our grievances in peace whites try stopping us. Thanks to Alabama, we got King.
 
Inevitably in any conversation about race there is always one white person who wants to bring up how Martin Luther King would npt like how a particular black person is saying things. They seem to believe that King was running around preaching a colorblind message whereby no one sees color or racism. That King was a happy non angry black man who spent all his speeches asking why can't we all get along. But what that INDIVIDUAL white person never wants to say is King was killed by a white man. So let us discuss King.

And other black leaders because Kings message was not the only one nor has it been the only one. So let us start off with the interview many white INDIVIDUALS seem to miss. The interview where he came to the realization that his dream had become a night mare. At that point todays white INDIVIDUAL needs to understand that all the don't be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character shit was gone.

Dream to a Nightmare" MLK full interview with Sander Vancour

.


Bullshit. You obviously didn't listen to the interview yourself. Dr. King throughout the interview continued his message of equality and non-violence. His reference to a nightmare referred to his hope for the speed of change (especially in the Northern ghettos).
Dr. King's message was indeed "colorblind" in that he believed that people should not be judged by the color of their skin and there is no reason to believe-and plenty of reasons NOT to-that applies to any more to one color than another. There is no reason to assume that Dr. King was any more in favor of Black racism than White or any other.
Yes, Dr. King was killed by a White man. Would it have made a difference had it been a Black man? Is there some point you are trying to make with that observation?
And WTF are you trying to say with all the "INDIVIDUAL" crap?
The simple truth remains: You cannot fight racism by becoming a racist.
 
So? JFK was dead. You whites don't get tp credit yourselves for signing the Civil Rights Act because in 1776 you had declared all men were equal and at that point we had civil rights. But you whites decided t make it so we didn't have then for 188 years. So then to fix a problem you knowingly created when you knew you were wrong to begin with gets no credit.

Lyndon Johnson signed Civil Rights into action, not Martin Luther King.

Oh okay, I knew I was wrong... About?

Not only are you kind of wrong for blaming Whites of today, for the crimes of Whites of the past.

You're point blank bonkers, for thinking a person of Polish heritage, somehow is behind it, and owes you.

Exactly why I've never really liked Blacks, among various other reasons.

The "You're White card"
King also warned the nation of whites that if they thought they would get to continue business as usual, hard times were coming. This along with Malcolm X's popularity scared Johnson.

Hard times were coming for "Whites", huh?

So, MLK was a racist, right?

I thought you said the Polish participated in Racism.

Your Blacks are the biggest racists.

Look at Black Racist Farrakhan n 1995 getting a million Blacks to march in Washington DC.

If Racist White Racist D. Duke were to get a million Whites to march in Washington DC, it would be racist.

But, somehow when you, and your ilk do it, it's "Cool"
Of course its cool. Obviously you have no clue what the Million Man marches were about. Typically your comments expose you as a idiot. You have outdone yourself trying to pretend they were racist in nature.


If you replaced everything with a White, it would not be taken well by minorities of this country.
I.E replace Farrakhan with David Duke, and replace African American valuyes, with White American values... How would minorities react to that?

It might not be exactly "Racist" but very close to it, as it's "Exclusive to ones race" and general "Supremacy of race"

Million Man March | American history

Million Man March, political demonstration in Washington, D.C., on Oct. 16, 1995, to promote African American unity and family values. Estimates of the number of marchers, most of whom were African American men, ranged from 400,000 to nearly 1.1 million, ranking it among the largest gatherings of its kind in American history.

The event was organized by Louis Farrakhan, the often controversial leader of the Nation of Islam, and directed by Benjamin F. Chavis, Jr., the former executive director of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, to bring about a spiritual renewal that would instill a sense of personal responsibility in African American men for improving the condition of African Americans. Among other prominent African Americans who supported and spoke at the event were Jesse Jackson, Rosa Parks, Cornel West, and Maya Angelou, along with Marion Barry and Mall. It was reported that in response to the march some 1.7 million African American men registered to vote.

A number of African American leaders did not support the march, including Mary Frances Berry, chairman of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, and Rep. John Lewis, the latter of whom saw Farrakhan’s message as an effort to “resegregate America.”

LEARN MORE in these related articles:

Louis Farrakhan
In 1995 the Nation sponsored the Million Man March in Washington, D.C., to promote African American unity and family values. Estimates of the number of marchers, most of whom were men, ranged from 400...
READ THIS ARTICLE

African Americans
one of the largest of the many ethnic groups in the United States. African Americans are mainly of African ancestry, but many have nonblack ancestors as well. ...
READ THIS ARTICLE

Nation of Islam
African American movement and organization, founded in 1930 and known for its teachings combining elements of traditional Islam with black nationalist ideas. The Nation also promotes racial unity and...
READ THIS ARTICLE


in United States
Country in North America, a federal republic of 50 states. Besides the 48 conterminous states that occupy the middle latitudes of the continent, the United States includes the...
READ THIS ARTICLE


in Washington, D.C.
Washington, D.C., capital of the United States, coextensive with the District of Columbia, located on the northern shore of the Potomac River.
READ THIS ARTICLE

MORE ABOUT Million Man March
1 REFERENCE FOUND IN BRITANNICA ARTICLES
Assorted Reference
EXTERNAL LINKS
BRITANNICA WEB SITES
Articles from Britannica encyclopedias for elementary and high school students.

Million Man March - Student Encyclopedia (Ages 11 and up)
On October 16, 1995, marchers gathered together in Washington, D.C., to promote African American unity and family values. Estimates of the number of people, most of whom were African American men, ranged from 400,000 to nearly 1.1 million. This political demonstration ranked among the largest gatherings of its kind in U.S. history.

ARTICLE HISTORY

FEEDBACK
Corrections? Updates? Help us improve this article!Contact our editors with your feedback.
Like I said. You keep proving what an idiot you are. We cant replace white with Black. Whites have never been subjected to the treatment Blacks have received in this country. We cant substitute Duke with Farrakhan. Duke is part of the KKK which is responsible for the large majority of domestic terrorism in the US. Something you cant ever say about Farrakhan and the NOI. You cant equate the corrupt values of whites with Black values. Whites have no real values. They only have stated values but a careful peruse of their history shows you they in no way live by them. Blacks on the other hand had values they lived by that made them successful prior to the advent of Civil Rights. Back when they couldnt go in the front door of many white establishments. The Million Man March was about getting those values back and applied to all of our people instead of following white fake values that creeped into the Black communities and assisted and tearing it apart. MLK had an idea that maybe integration wasnt the best idea and he was right. Individual success has been elevated over group success in the Black community and has cost us.
 
So? JFK was dead. You whites don't get tp credit yourselves for signing the Civil Rights Act because in 1776 you had declared all men were equal and at that point we had civil rights. But you whites decided t make it so we didn't have then for 188 years. So then to fix a problem you knowingly created when you knew you were wrong to begin with gets no credit.

Lyndon Johnson signed Civil Rights into action, not Martin Luther King.

Oh okay, I knew I was wrong... About?

Not only are you kind of wrong for blaming Whites of today, for the crimes of Whites of the past.

You're point blank bonkers, for thinking a person of Polish heritage, somehow is behind it, and owes you.

Exactly why I've never really liked Blacks, among various other reasons.

The "You're White card"
King also warned the nation of whites that if they thought they would get to continue business as usual, hard times were coming. This along with Malcolm X's popularity scared Johnson.

Hard times were coming for "Whites", huh?

So, MLK was a racist, right?

I thought you said the Polish participated in Racism.

Your Blacks are the biggest racists.

Look at Black Racist Farrakhan n 1995 getting a million Blacks to march in Washington DC.

If Racist White Racist D. Duke were to get a million Whites to march in Washington DC, it would be racist.

But, somehow when you, and your ilk do it, it's "Cool"

Really? You think this makes sense?

MLK is a racist for saying things are going to be tough for whites in 1963 who were practicing legalized racial segregation?

Really?

I was at the Million a March fool. So where whites.

Some Blacks have started calling for segregation all over again.

Not that I support that, I just support for you to get out of our country ASAP.

If Whites in South Africa, or Zimbabwe rioted every time they didn't get their way, I don't think it would go very well.

But, we're supposed to tolerate it from you guys here?
You dont have a country you lazy monkey. We built this country. You will leave before we leave. This I can guarantee you. Prior to that this was the NA's country so its never been white country. I think voluntary segregation would be ideal. I have no problem with whites that wish to live with only whites. In fact I say more power to you.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum List

Back
Top