defcon4
Platinum Member
- Jan 26, 2015
- 20,001
- 8,660
- 950
Meddling with our Constitutional rights again? What is it to you when you are not an American citizen and do not live in the U.S.?Yes the consistently lower murder rates are relevant.
And Our murder rate is exactly the same as it was 60 years ago
And I never mentioned any future trends but if you want to put money on it I'll bet you that the murder rate in the UK will be lower than in the US 60 years from now.
ANd just what exactly do you want to change? Do you want to limit gun ownership? We already do that. Do you want to ban certain guns? We already do that
So just what exactly is it you think we should do tp curb gun crime and not curb the rights of law abiding citizens?
It might be the same as it was 60 years ago, but what? Guns were there before, guns are there now. Nothing has changed, and the whole time other first world countries have had lower crime, even if they've had an increase (which the US had also).
You want to bet the UK murder rate will be lower? I'd bet that too, mostly out of knowledge that the US doesn't solve problems much, and other countries do.
What do I want to change? It's a complex issue. But right now it's complex and nothing is being done about it, and people just say "but we have a right", but is the right sensible any more. Times have changed. Limits on firearms aren't very limited. It's like stopping someone from eating 250 bowls of cereal a day, 249 is okay though.
Not curb the rights of citizens? Haha, you put that in at the end. Well, firstly I think people should be open about the issue. That's never going to happen. I mean the partisan nonsense isn't going to change because it's in the interests of the politicians to keep it going.
I do think other things need to change first, like how people vote for one, without that changing nothing else is going to change.
However people need to take a look at the murder rate. When you get people calling for all Muslims to be deported and all that nonsense, and yet the number of murders and killings by Muslims is far, far, far lower than the gun problem in the US, yet they won't do anything about the gun problem but will do something about curbing OTHER PEOPLE.
Nothing has changed?
The UK passed the strictest guns laws ever seen in that country in 1968 and the murder rate is still the same as it was 60 years ago
We have passed thousands of gun laws and our murder rate is the same as it was 60 years ago
Seems to me it's not guns at all that drive murder rtaes
Passing guns laws doesn't automatically change things. It depends on the gun law. No gun law in the US has stopped there being guns. So.... The thousands of gun laws in the US don't equate to one gun law in Europe. The number of laws makes no difference. It's the substance.
But times have also changed. Had nothing been done in the UK then murder rates would be much higher. In fact there was a time when the Yardies were a major problem and gun violence soared. Nottingham was nicknamed Shottingham. But it was actually dealt with and the gun murder rate dropped.
![]()
It went from 50 in 1999 to 100 in 2002. That's a massive increase. But then it went down to 40 by 2010. Why? It's called being active, solving problems.
How do you know if nothing had been done the rates would be much higher?
And if you can prove your prescience why haven't you won the lottery?
Read my post.