Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I've just never seen anything like what's going on today. When I was a teenager kids pretty much stuck in their immediate neighborhoods but just about all the elementary or junior high schools had playgrounds opened every night in summer and that's where the kids of all ages hung out. All kinds of activities available and kids walked home when the playgrounds closed for the night. Nobody was scared of the dark, feared getting attacked, no rapes, robberies, murders, kidnapping ... it was nice and quiet. I'm glad my kids are grown - I don't know what I would do today with young kids facing the world we now live in.
It happened in downtown Ft. Myers, not in Lehigh.They have several gangs in Lehigh Acres where this occurred.
Lehigh Acres Kings, Latin Kings, Bloods, Crips, La Raza, etc. Are all n the area.
They have made a number of arrests there the last few years.
here is the poster for the party-
![]()
It happened in downtown Ft. Myers, not in Lehigh.They have several gangs in Lehigh Acres where this occurred.
Lehigh Acres Kings, Latin Kings, Bloods, Crips, La Raza, etc. Are all n the area.
They have made a number of arrests there the last few years.
here is the poster for the party-
![]()
I know its insanity and I completely agree. This is what Hillary said though. Sanders disagreed and was treated like he caused Sandy Hook.Alright then we disagree. I hope that you respect my opinion and realize that I agree Hillary's plan to make gun manufacturers liable for shootings is outrageous and the way they are trying to control guns. This plan to allow lawsuits against manufacturers is the biggest threat against legal gun owners as I see it. I voted for Sanders who is absolutely against suing manufactures and has never pushed gun control in his state.It will not. There is no govt restriction that will completely, and that is a good reason why we all should be able to bear arms. That said I don't think having to sell your gun through a licensed shop is too much of a burden to gun owners, and would likely stop some of them getting into the wrong hands. It makes it easy to trace guns to illegal transfers.How will that stop criminals getting guns? Please be specific.
I'll be happy to go through that hassle, just as soon as you can guarantee criminals will do it too.
You can't make a manufacturer responsible for customers who misuse their products. That's like making liquor or car manufactures responsible for DUI injuries and deaths. There's no legal basis for it. Plus gun makers only sell their product to federally licensed dealers.
Just another reason I wont vote for Hillary she wants to ban guns and sue the manufacturers, see the democratic debates for proof..
I don't see that comment as being relevant to the issue.
In the UK you can still be murdered.
And so in the UK you must still defend yourself.
Since guns are essentially prohibited in the UK then you must defend yourself with another weapon.
And even then there is still a possibility that the criminal who assaults has a gun and brought it into the UK from France or Belgium.
Yes, you can still be murdered in the UK. You can be murdered anywhere with any weapon, hands, feet, TV, guns.
Murder will always happen.
You can be murdered with a gun in your hand, with a gun in your holster, if you are an armed police officer, etc etc.
However in the UK you are 4 times less likely to be murdered. You are safer.
You may not be able to defend yourself as effectively without a gun in a comparable situation, however the fact is many situations aren't comparable. In the US you're going to come up against people wielding guns.
Alaska has the highest rape rate in the US, 5 times higher than in NY. But they have laxer guns laws, more guns, etc etc.
How is this the case if guns make you safer?
Climb a mountain and fall off a cliff, the mountain murdered you with that sneaky cliff.
As has been stated many times on here, and ignored many times, guns exacerbate a situation, rather than make the situation. I don't need to explain this simple concept to you, do I?
Squirrel gravy over hot biscuits is a mouth watering breakfast. I humbly disagree with you, guns lessen a situation and the bigger the gun the better to prevent a fight.
So how do you account for the US murder rate being 4 times higher than other first world countries then?
You have a guy who can get a gun and wants to kill people, and a guy who can't get a gun and wants to kill people, who's going to kill the most?
Even if people have guns to fight back, you're always going to get in there first and cause the damage before anyone can react. Knives allow for longer reaction times.
But I do notice you didn't use anything to back up your statement.
You have a guy who can get a gun and wants to kill people, and a guy who can't get a gun and wants to kill people, who's going to kill the most?
The root cause of gun crime is not the second amendmentThe United States provides the right for citizens to have guns. This is not going away. The debate should be about access, liscensing, and getting rid of selling guns in a parking lot; with the aim to keep guns out of criminals hands and allow them to remain in lawful citizens hands.Mass Shooting In Florida Nightclub - Report
Oh wait, it's in Florida which already has loads of guns.....
After spending days telling the Germans they are wrong for having strict gun control...... the right will probably give their reasons why there should be MORE guns.... right?
The debate can be about many things. About the impact of guns on society, which the right generally try and ignore. Why shouldn't people look for the root cause of problems and change the Constitution if they think it's wrong?
so changing it will not stop gun crimes
So why has the right blocked all money going to scientifically researching Gun Crime?
Mass Shooting In Florida Nightclub - Report
Oh wait, it's in Florida which already has loads of guns.....
After spending days telling the Germans they are wrong for having strict gun control...... the right will probably give their reasons why there should be MORE guns.... right?
Mass Shooting In Florida Nightclub - Report
Oh wait, it's in Florida which already has loads of guns.....
After spending days telling the Germans they are wrong for having strict gun control...... the right will probably give their reasons why there should be MORE guns.... right?
It was in the parking lot, not the club. It was teen night so most likely gang related. Isn't it already illegal for teens to have guns? Go figure, a criminal ignoring laws, who'd have thunk?
1 - there are not enough police to protect you everywhere and at all times (a priori).Mass Shooting In Florida Nightclub - Report
Oh wait, it's in Florida which already has loads of guns.....
After spending days telling the Germans they are wrong for having strict gun control...... the right will probably give their reasons why there should be MORE guns.... right?
2 - if you want to be protected you need to protect yourself (a posteriori).
3 - to protect yourself against a gun you need a better gun and you need to be a better shot (a priori).
4 - to be a better shot you need to practice (a priori).
5 - to practice you need a gun (a prior).
6 - ergo everybody needs a gun (a posteriori).
A priori means self evident.
A posteriori means logically deduced.
No, there aren't enough police. However you're more likely to die in the US where you can get a gun, than Germany where you can't.
So, it's a choice isn't it? A choice between a safer society or a more dangerous society. You may get the chance to protect yourself more in the more dangerous society, but you're more likely to be confronted by people with guns.