Massachusetts: This Is The Nation’s Toughest Gun Law

[danielpalos]

Only that which is Necessary, may not be Infringed.

"...the right of the people....shall not be infringed."

Must be necessary.

Our Second Amendment is clear.

Yes, that is why we Americans can own guns if we choose. Many guns, many types of guns and the leftwing nuts cannot stop it because of the 2nd Amendment. The courts have ruled this over and over. They believe, a well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

So it is written, so it shall be done.

we should have no security problems in our free States.

 

[Pop23]

Only that which is Necessary, may not be Infringed.

"...the right of the people....shall not be infringed."

Must be necessary.

Our Second Amendment is clear.

Yes, that is why we Americans can own guns if we choose. Many guns, many types of guns and the leftwing nuts cannot stop it because of the 2nd Amendment. The courts have ruled this over and over. They believe, a well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

So it is written, so it shall be done.

we should have no security problems in our free States.

Should is speculative. Do you have anything real to discuss?

 

[danielpalos]

Only that which is Necessary, may not be Infringed.

"...the right of the people....shall not be infringed."

Must be necessary.

Our Second Amendment is clear.

Yes, that is why we Americans can own guns if we choose. Many guns, many types of guns and the leftwing nuts cannot stop it because of the 2nd Amendment. The courts have ruled this over and over. They believe, a well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

So it is written, so it shall be done.

we should have no security problems in our free States.

Should is speculative. Do you have anything real to discuss?

we should have no security problems in our free States. Yet, we have alleged wars on crime, drugs, and terror, that the right wing refuses to pay for, with appropriate Tax Rates.

 

[Pop23]

"...the right of the people....shall not be infringed."

Must be necessary.

Our Second Amendment is clear.

Yes, that is why we Americans can own guns if we choose. Many guns, many types of guns and the leftwing nuts cannot stop it because of the 2nd Amendment. The courts have ruled this over and over. They believe, a well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

So it is written, so it shall be done.

we should have no security problems in our free States.

Should is speculative. Do you have anything real to discuss?

we should have no security problems in our free States. Yet, we have alleged wars on crime, drugs, and terror, that the right wing refuses to pay for, with appropriate Tax Rates.

Take your meds kid, the adults are done with you.

 

[danielpalos]

Our Second Amendment is clear.

Yes, that is why we Americans can own guns if we choose. Many guns, many types of guns and the leftwing nuts cannot stop it because of the 2nd Amendment. The courts have ruled this over and over. They believe, a well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

So it is written, so it shall be done.

we should have no security problems in our free States.

Should is speculative. Do you have anything real to discuss?

we should have no security problems in our free States. Yet, we have alleged wars on crime, drugs, and terror, that the right wing refuses to pay for, with appropriate Tax Rates.

Take your meds kid, the adults are done with you.

like always claim; the right wing has nothing but fallacy. they should have better solutions at lower cost.

 

[Pop23]

Yes, that is why we Americans can own guns if we choose. Many guns, many types of guns and the leftwing nuts cannot stop it because of the 2nd Amendment. The courts have ruled this over and over. They believe, a well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

So it is written, so it shall be done.

we should have no security problems in our free States.

Should is speculative. Do you have anything real to discuss?

we should have no security problems in our free States. Yet, we have alleged wars on crime, drugs, and terror, that the right wing refuses to pay for, with appropriate Tax Rates.

Take your meds kid, the adults are done with you.

like always claim; the right wing has nothing but fallacy. they should have better solutions at lower cost.

 

[bgrouse]

Does it matter what it means to me? If you don't like my answer, you'll start writing versions of the court case that don't exist outside of your imagination. Just like you do with the second amendment.

And no, I'm not digging up court cases for you. YOU quote it if you want to discuss it.

it clearly states, well regulated militia are not infringed when dealing with the security needs of a free State, unlike the unorganized militia.

Where does it say that? Go ahead and quote it.

Our Second Amendment is Express, not Implied. Nowhere is the unorganized militia declared necessary.

...which does absolutely nothing to make the right of the people to bear arms go away.

Only that which is Necessary, may not be Infringed.

You should write and pass an amendment like that. Number it 2.5 or something. Otherwise, it has absolutely no bearing on anything, including the law.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

we should have no security problems in our free States. Yet, we have alleged wars on crime, drugs, and terror, that the right wing refuses to pay for, with appropriate Tax Rates.

No argument from me. Fuck the wars on terror, drugs, crime, and poverty. They are all bullshit.

...shall not be infringed.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

like always claim; the right wing has nothing but fallacy. they should have better solutions at lower cost.

As long as you concede ....shall not be infringed.

 

[Papageorgio]

Only that which is Necessary, may not be Infringed.

"...the right of the people....shall not be infringed."

Must be necessary.

Our Second Amendment is clear.

Yes, that is why we Americans can own guns if we choose. Many guns, many types of guns and the leftwing nuts cannot stop it because of the 2nd Amendment. The courts have ruled this over and over. They believe, a well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

So it is written, so it shall be done.

we should have no security problems in our free States.

a well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

 

[danielpalos]

it clearly states, well regulated militia are not infringed when dealing with the security needs of a free State, unlike the unorganized militia.

Where does it say that? Go ahead and quote it.

Our Second Amendment is Express, not Implied. Nowhere is the unorganized militia declared necessary.

...which does absolutely nothing to make the right of the people to bear arms go away.

Only that which is Necessary, may not be Infringed.

You should write and pass an amendment like that. Number it 2.5 or something. Otherwise, it has absolutely no bearing on anything, including the law.

you merely don't understand the language or the context.

 

[danielpalos]

like always claim; the right wing has nothing but fallacy. they should have better solutions at lower cost.

As long as you concede ....shall not be infringed.

We have a Second Amendment; we should have no security problems.

That is my story; I can stick to it.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

you merely don't understand the language or the context.

Said the Spanish speaking guy who leaves out words.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

We have a Second Amendment; we should have no security problems.

Because the right of the people shall not be infringed?

 

[danielpalos]

you merely don't understand the language or the context.

Said the Spanish speaking guy who leaves out words.

i leave out the fallacies. the right wing has nothing but stories.

 

[danielpalos]

We have a Second Amendment; we should have no security problems.

Because the right of the people shall not be infringed?

exactly; well regulated militia of the People shall not be Infringed when keeping and bearing Arms for their State or the Union.

The unorganized militia is subject to the Police power.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

exactly; well regulated militia of the People shall not be Infringed when keeping and bearing Arms for their State or the Union.

You quoted the Amendment incorrectly.

 

[danielpalos]

exactly; well regulated militia of the People shall not be Infringed when keeping and bearing Arms for their State or the Union.

You quoted the Amendment incorrectly.

it is not, incorrect.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

it is not, incorrect.

Where did you learn to use commas?

Let's eat Grandma.

v.

Let's eat, Grandma.

No wonder you don't understand the 2nd Amendment. Comma trouble.

 

[danielpalos]

it is not, incorrect.

Where did you learn to use commas?

Let's eat Grandma.

v.

Let's eat, Grandma.

No wonder you don't understand the 2nd Amendment. Comma trouble.

non sequiturs are usually considered fallacies.