Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You thought?I explained why I thought your evidence did not support your hypothesis and then asked you two more questions which, if you still believed your hypothesis
and what? So?
well sure it matters. I want to know where sea level has increased? Here's a video of where it was reported the Hudson river would overflow and take out a NY street (6:32 of the video)! From decades ago. Not true. Do you think if the arctic ice melts the sea will rise? hahahahahhahahhahaha I have confidence you do.
I provided references to support my case including data I obtained from YOUR FUCKING LINK. And, if you still believe your hypothesis, answer my two questions or explain why you cannot or choose not to.You thought?
You gave an opinion without support, and then redirect to him? It isn’t how it works, your opinions aren’t fact in case you don’t know that. Support your post with evidence that debunked his!
Greenland's largest ice sheet is thawing at a much higher rate than expected, a new study has revealed, suggesting it will add six times more water to the rising sea levels than previously thought. And the trend may not be limited to Greenland, scientists worry.well sure it matters. I want to know where sea level has increased? Here's a video of where it was reported the Hudson river would overflow and take out a NY street (6:32 of the video)! From decades ago. Not true. Do you think if the arctic ice melts the sea will rise? hahahahahhahahhahaha I have confidence you do.
You put forth a hypothesis: that humans haven't been responsible for the increasing levels of CO2 in our atmosphere. You attempted to support that hypothesis with evidence: that the dip in emissions during the pandemic wasn't visible on graphs of CO2 and other GHGs. I explained why I thought your evidence did not support your hypothesis and then asked you two more questions which, if you still believed your hypothesis, you needed to be able to answer. It was a reviewed study right there in front of you and you thought I was being anti-scientific.
jc456 says: "You gave an opinion without support, and then redirect to him? It isn’t how it works, your opinions aren’t fact in case you don’t know that. Support your post with evidence that debunked his!"Ummm, no. It is YOUR heroes who have put forth that hypothesis. Ice core data proves it is wrong.
jc456 says: "You gave an opinion without support, and then redirect to him? It isn’t how it works, your opinions aren’t fact in case you don’t know that. Support your post with evidence that debunked his!"
A meme? Hmm how is that an answer?
"and what? So?" How are those questions?A meme? Hmm how is that an answer?
I was looking for your explanation!"and what? So?" How are those questions?
No, you didn't like my explanation. Very different.I was looking for your explanation!
Thawing or breaking apart because of it being old ice? You know old ice cracks? You realize that the Titanic hit an iceberg off of greenland right? Ice bergs have existed since Ice shelves formed. Again, old ice in sheets will crack because of drying out!!!! hahahahhahahahahahaha, you don't know shit.Greenland's largest ice sheet is thawing at a much higher rate than expected, a new study has revealed, suggesting it will add six times more water to the rising sea levels than previously thought. And the trend may not be limited to Greenland, scientists worry.
It didn't make any sense to your argument.No, you didn't like my explanation. Very different.
I provided references to support my case including data I obtained from YOUR FUCKING LINK. And, if you still believe your hypothesis, answer my two questions or explain why you cannot or choose not to.
Where? Where's your link for support? I provided your post.You put forth a hypothesis: that humans haven't been responsible for the increasing levels of CO2 in our atmosphere. You attempted to support that hypothesis with evidence: that the dip in emissions during the pandemic wasn't visible on graphs of CO2 and other GHGs. I explained why I thought your evidence did not support your hypothesis and then asked you two more questions which, if you still believed your hypothesis, you needed to be able to answer. It was a reviewed study right there in front of you and you thought I was being anti-scientific.
Are you completely unaware of the many manmade ruins that have now been underwater for ages?
^ Cuba
^ Japan
^ Michigan
However, while carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions fell by 5.4 percent in 2020 compared to the previous year, the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere continued to grow at about the same rate as in preceding years. While the drop in emissions was significant, the growth in atmospheric concentrations of CO2 was within the normal range of year-to-year variation caused by natural processes. Also, the ocean did not absorb as much carbon dioxide from the atmosphere as it has in recent years, probably due to the reduced pressure of carbon dioxide in the air at the ocean’s surface."However, while carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions fell by 5.4 percent in 2020 compared to the previous year, the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere continued to grow at about the same rate as in preceding years."
Why Didn't Atmospheric CO2 Fall During COVID? — Caltech Magazine
The COVID-19 pandemic decreased air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions within a few weeks. However, while carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions fell by 5.4 percent in 2020, the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere continued to grow.magazine.caltech.edu
Where is your source that shows it down by 54%
They're not melting though, they are cracking from the cold and drying out!Scientists once thought the East Antarctic ice sheet, which contains enough water to raise sea levels 52m (170ft), was stable. But now its ice shelves are beginning to melt.
www.newsweek.com
How's it melting in Antarctica?Greenland's largest ice sheet is thawing at a much higher rate than expected, a new study has revealed, suggesting it will add six times more water to the rising sea levels than previously thought. And the trend may not be limited to Greenland, scientists worry.
Scientists once thought the East Antarctic ice sheet, which contains enough water to raise sea levels 52m (170ft), was stable. But now its ice shelves are beginning to melt.
www.cnn.com
It is PHYSICALLY IMPOSSIBLE for the Egyptians to have built Giza. Never mind the logistics involved in cutting, carving, transporting and PERFECTLY placing 2.5 MILLION blocks. The engineering on the interior, the Kings Chamber for example, is realistically beyond our capabilities. The stones in the ceiling are 70 tons and they were raised several hundred feet into place.
It’s actually laughably that “scholars” still cling to the impossible notion that our recent ancestors, with deer antlers, stone tools and bronze chisels made Giza.
