Media coverage of gang violence sure looks different when the perpetrators are white

[orogenicman]

Why destroy your own community!?!?!?!?!

Most of those bikers weren't from Waco.

 

[Uncensored2008]

9 people died and the white boys say "well at least they werent looting" LOL

Actually they said; "good riddance."

 

[Uncensored2008]

Why destroy your own community!?!?!?!?!

Most of those bikers weren't from Waco.

False.

The Mexican gang, the Bandidos is a nation wide gang. The Cossacks were local. The fight was over the Cossacks claiming Waco as their turf.

 

[ClosedCaption]

Why would white leaders (as if there are any) say anything about a gang fight between white and Hispanic meth dealers?

You're whacked.

Because its an obvious problem in their community silly

Only each other, moron. Why do you care if a bunch of whites and Mexicans kill each other?

You don't grasp the difference between that and burning down a CVS after robbing it?

Arent you against violence? Why wouldnt you care? This happened while other whites were there with their families. How could they have so little regard for life?

And why were those bad moms in a bar with kids?

 

[ClosedCaption]

Why destroy your own community!?!?!?!?!

Most of those bikers weren't from Waco.

False.

The Mexican gang, the Bandidos is a nation wide gang. The Cossacks were local. The fight was over the Cossacks claiming Waco as their turf.

Why destroy your own community!?!?!?!?!

 

[AmericanFirst]

Media coverage of gang violence sure looks different when the perpetrators are white - Vox

Over the weekend, a shootout between three rival biker gangsat a bar in Waco, Texas, left at least nine gang members dead and 18 others hospitalized with gunshot and stab wounds.

It was a huge, devastating tragedy. The New York Times reported that law enforcement sources called it "the worst violence in the Waco area since the siege on the Branch Davidian compound in 1993 that left 86 people dead."

With the Waco incident, we got just the news — not the racial pathology
Those who are using what happened in Waco to start conversations about stereotypes and media biases against black people aren't complaining about the tenor of this weekend's media coverage. They're saying something a little different: thatby being pretty reasonable and sticking to the facts, this coverage highlights the absurdity of the language and analysis that have been deployed in other instances, when the accused criminals are black.

"9 killed in Waco biker gang shootout - where are the white leaders decrying this white-on-white violence?" #stuffthemedianeversays

Hey @CNN and @FoxNews: Are you gonna talk about white on white crime tonight. Waco is plagued with biker gang violence.

I blame Sons of Anarchy for glorifying white-on-white biker gang violence. #Waco #TwinsPeakShooting

Where are Dick Cheney and Newt Gingrich when their country needs them? This white violence must cease!!! #StopWhiteOnWhiteCrime

Another line of commentary that's predictable in media coverage and commentary surrounding violence involving black people has to do with black cultural pathology.

Politicians and pundits are notorious for grasping for problems in African-American communities — especially fatherlessness — to explain the kind of violence that, when it happens in a white community, is treated as an isolated crime versus an indictment of an entire racial group's way of life.

Has Rand Paul blamed the fatal shooting in Waco on the "lack of fathers," for in that community, yet?

Another post by a retarded lib misses the mark. The press isn't reporting on it like the others because they don't care about white victims, only black victims.

 

[AmericanFirst]

Why destroy your own community!?!?!?!?!

Most of those bikers weren't from Waco.

False.

The Mexican gang, the Bandidos is a nation wide gang. The Cossacks were local. The fight was over the Cossacks claiming Waco as their turf.

Why destroy your own community!?!?!?!?!

The blacks do after one of their fellow thugs gets killed.

 

[ClosedCaption]

Media coverage of gang violence sure looks different when the perpetrators are white - Vox

Over the weekend, a shootout between three rival biker gangsat a bar in Waco, Texas, left at least nine gang members dead and 18 others hospitalized with gunshot and stab wounds.

It was a huge, devastating tragedy. The New York Times reported that law enforcement sources called it "the worst violence in the Waco area since the siege on the Branch Davidian compound in 1993 that left 86 people dead."

With the Waco incident, we got just the news — not the racial pathology
Those who are using what happened in Waco to start conversations about stereotypes and media biases against black people aren't complaining about the tenor of this weekend's media coverage. They're saying something a little different: thatby being pretty reasonable and sticking to the facts, this coverage highlights the absurdity of the language and analysis that have been deployed in other instances, when the accused criminals are black.

"9 killed in Waco biker gang shootout - where are the white leaders decrying this white-on-white violence?" #stuffthemedianeversays

Hey @CNN and @FoxNews: Are you gonna talk about white on white crime tonight. Waco is plagued with biker gang violence.

I blame Sons of Anarchy for glorifying white-on-white biker gang violence. #Waco #TwinsPeakShooting

Where are Dick Cheney and Newt Gingrich when their country needs them? This white violence must cease!!! #StopWhiteOnWhiteCrime

Another line of commentary that's predictable in media coverage and commentary surrounding violence involving black people has to do with black cultural pathology.

Politicians and pundits are notorious for grasping for problems in African-American communities — especially fatherlessness — to explain the kind of violence that, when it happens in a white community, is treated as an isolated crime versus an indictment of an entire racial group's way of life.

Has Rand Paul blamed the fatal shooting in Waco on the "lack of fathers," for in that community, yet?

Another post by a retarded lib misses the mark. The press isn't reporting on it like the others because they don't care about white victims, only black victims.

Is that what you call biker gangs? Victims? lmao

 

[Correll]

Where were the white leaders to denounce this violence?

As white leaders don't identify with, or excuse or champion these thugs, there is no need for them to thus distance themselves.

If Romney came out and said something moronic like, "My son looks like those cossacks", then he would need to do something to walk it back.

SInce neither he, nor any other "white leaders" have done anything like that, they don't.

 

[ClosedCaption]

Why destroy your own community!?!?!?!?!

Most of those bikers weren't from Waco.

False.

The Mexican gang, the Bandidos is a nation wide gang. The Cossacks were local. The fight was over the Cossacks claiming Waco as their turf.

Why destroy your own community!?!?!?!?!

The blacks do after one of their fellow thugs gets killed.

Why did the whites do it? Now the businesses will move out and their community will suffer

 

[AmericanFirst]

Media coverage of gang violence sure looks different when the perpetrators are white - Vox

Over the weekend, a shootout between three rival biker gangsat a bar in Waco, Texas, left at least nine gang members dead and 18 others hospitalized with gunshot and stab wounds.

It was a huge, devastating tragedy. The New York Times reported that law enforcement sources called it "the worst violence in the Waco area since the siege on the Branch Davidian compound in 1993 that left 86 people dead."

With the Waco incident, we got just the news — not the racial pathology
Those who are using what happened in Waco to start conversations about stereotypes and media biases against black people aren't complaining about the tenor of this weekend's media coverage. They're saying something a little different: thatby being pretty reasonable and sticking to the facts, this coverage highlights the absurdity of the language and analysis that have been deployed in other instances, when the accused criminals are black.

"9 killed in Waco biker gang shootout - where are the white leaders decrying this white-on-white violence?" #stuffthemedianeversays

Hey @CNN and @FoxNews: Are you gonna talk about white on white crime tonight. Waco is plagued with biker gang violence.

I blame Sons of Anarchy for glorifying white-on-white biker gang violence. #Waco #TwinsPeakShooting

Where are Dick Cheney and Newt Gingrich when their country needs them? This white violence must cease!!! #StopWhiteOnWhiteCrime

Another line of commentary that's predictable in media coverage and commentary surrounding violence involving black people has to do with black cultural pathology.

Politicians and pundits are notorious for grasping for problems in African-American communities — especially fatherlessness — to explain the kind of violence that, when it happens in a white community, is treated as an isolated crime versus an indictment of an entire racial group's way of life.

Has Rand Paul blamed the fatal shooting in Waco on the "lack of fathers," for in that community, yet?

Another post by a retarded lib misses the mark. The press isn't reporting on it like the others because they don't care about white victims, only black victims.

Is that what you call biker gangs? Victims? lmao

You still missed the point retard.

 

[Correll]

Black culture seems devastated by crime and it's effects. As you libs admit with your discussions recently about the way incarceration contributes to fatherlessness.


White culture does not seem devastated by crime and it's effects. Such instances do seem more like isolated crimes and not social problems.

That being said, I would be surprised if those dead and arrested, hell, all the bikers are not more likely to be the children of single mothers than law abiding whites.

 

[ClosedCaption]

Where were the white leaders to denounce this violence?

As white leaders don't identify with, or excuse or champion these thugs, there is no need for them to thus distance themselves.

They dont denounce it either. Must be because they dont care or looking for a payday. Why condone it with silence?

If Romney came out and said something moronic like, "My son looks like those cossacks", then he would need to do something to walk it back.

SInce neither he, nor any other "white leaders" have done anything like that, they don't.

I agree, thats why I didnt ask anything about walking back. I asked where are the white leaders to tell whites this is not acceptable behavior

 

[bucs90]

Where were the white leaders to denounce this violence?

As white leaders don't identify with, or excuse or champion these thugs, there is no need for them to thus distance themselves.

They dont denounce it either. Must be because they dont care or looking for a payday. Why condone it with silence?

If Romney came out and said something moronic like, "My son looks like those cossacks", then he would need to do something to walk it back.

SInce neither he, nor any other "white leaders" have done anything like that, they don't.

I agree, thats why I didnt ask anything about walking back. I asked where are the white leaders to tell whites this is not acceptable behavior

Well...do we need to? This behavior is not widespread in white culture. Whites have long ostracized this behavior and rejected it out of our mainstream culture.

 

[Correll]

Where were the white leaders to denounce this violence?

As white leaders don't identify with, or excuse or champion these thugs, there is no need for them to thus distance themselves.

They dont denounce it either. Must be because they dont care or looking for a payday. Why condone it with silence?

If Romney came out and said something moronic like, "My son looks like those cossacks", then he would need to do something to walk it back.

SInce neither he, nor any other "white leaders" have done anything like that, they don't.

I agree, thats why I didnt ask anything about walking back. I asked where are the white leaders to tell whites this is not acceptable behavior

I answered that. As white leaders don't have a history of identifying with, or defending white criminals, the situation is different.

You are trying to draw similarities that are not there.

The problem here is that you refuse to admit that the behavior of black leaders, such as Obama (my son would look like Martin) does make demanding them denounce criminal behavior a reasonable response.

While the "white leaders" do not behave in that fashion.

 

[Correll]

Where were the white leaders to denounce this violence?

As white leaders don't identify with, or excuse or champion these thugs, there is no need for them to thus distance themselves.

They dont denounce it either. Must be because they dont care or looking for a payday. Why condone it with silence?

If Romney came out and said something moronic like, "My son looks like those cossacks", then he would need to do something to walk it back.

SInce neither he, nor any other "white leaders" have done anything like that, they don't.

I agree, thats why I didnt ask anything about walking back. I asked where are the white leaders to tell whites this is not acceptable behavior

Well...do we need to? This behavior is not widespread in white culture. Whites have long ostracized this behavior and rejected it out of our mainstream culture.

What he can't allow himself to see, is that blacks (leaders) have NOT done that, and thus the requests for them to do so, is reasonable.

He NEEDS for that to be a form of racism.

He actually thinks he is "gotcha" ing us.

 

[ClosedCaption]

Where were the white leaders to denounce this violence?

As white leaders don't identify with, or excuse or champion these thugs, there is no need for them to thus distance themselves.

They dont denounce it either. Must be because they dont care or looking for a payday. Why condone it with silence?

If Romney came out and said something moronic like, "My son looks like those cossacks", then he would need to do something to walk it back.

SInce neither he, nor any other "white leaders" have done anything like that, they don't.

I agree, thats why I didnt ask anything about walking back. I asked where are the white leaders to tell whites this is not acceptable behavior

Well...do we need to? This behavior is not widespread in white culture. Whites have long ostracized this behavior and rejected it out of our mainstream culture.

Yes it is, you have higher numbers across the board.

 

[ClosedCaption]

Where were the white leaders to denounce this violence?

As white leaders don't identify with, or excuse or champion these thugs, there is no need for them to thus distance themselves.

They dont denounce it either. Must be because they dont care or looking for a payday. Why condone it with silence?

If Romney came out and said something moronic like, "My son looks like those cossacks", then he would need to do something to walk it back.

SInce neither he, nor any other "white leaders" have done anything like that, they don't.

I agree, thats why I didnt ask anything about walking back. I asked where are the white leaders to tell whites this is not acceptable behavior

I answered that. As white leaders don't have a history of identifying with, or defending white criminals, the situation is different.

You are trying to draw similarities that are not there.

The problem here is that you refuse to admit that the behavior of black leaders, such as Obama (my son would look like Martin) does make demanding them denounce criminal behavior a reasonable response.

While the "white leaders" do not behave in that fashion.

Trayvon was a criminal? Do you mean he wasnt a criminal but could've been? And Obama defended a criminal but not really?

 

[Uncensored2008]

Is that what you call biker gangs? Victims? lmao

You called Michael Brown a victim. One thug shot by cops is as much a victim as another thug shot by cops.

In reality, the world is a better place with Brown AND the bikers dead.

 

[ClosedCaption]

Is that what you call biker gangs? Victims? lmao

You called Michael Brown a victim. One thug shot by cops is as much a victim as another thug shot by cops.

In reality, the world is a better place with Brown AND the bikers dead.

I said Biker gangs? And calling them victims? Then crying that the news doesnt care about white "victims".

Try to keep up