Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Pretty sure I didnt lose. I'll still watch documentaries about the Civil War. But I dont have to see statues steeped in racism in public places. Most everyone wins. Except for deplorables like yourself.We all lost. You just don't see it yet.
I don't see how I am losing with another state removing the statue of a slave owning traitor. Sounds like a definite win.We all lost. You just don't see it yet.
Pretty sure I didnt lose. I'll still watch documentaries about the Civil War. But I dont have to see statues steeped in racism in public places. Most everyone wins. Except for deplorables like yourself.
I don't see how I am losing with another state removing the statue of a slave owning traitor. Sounds like a definite win.
Well I am not a slave owning traitor to the Union, so I will take the risk.Until they come after your statues, or you. As I said in a post before, in the end the montagnards always come for the Jacobins.
My people outlasted Robespierre. Vive le Emperor.Wait until it's your turn, or something you support being removed. Robespierre was sure of himself right before the guillotine when snip.
Right. They had state rights. That's why they had to end slavery when lord Lincoln proclaimed it.
Imbecile, they didn't end slavery in the south when Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation. Lincoln had no control over those states. Many escaped to the north to join the Union but the vast majority remained slaves until the nation reunified and the 13th Amendment was ratified. Before declaring secession, slavery was not outlawed constitutionally and states were able to decide for themselves if slavery could be legal within their borders, i.e., state rights. So they already had states rights. Had they not seceded, they would have been able to keep their slaves. But after the Civil War broke out, Lincoln used slavery as a tool to aid the north's war efforts against the south. Without that war, Lincoln, who was indifferent to slavery, would never have done that. But the south didn't think they'd get to keep their slaves so they seceded. So no, states rights isn't what compelled the south to secede... slavery was their number one issue.Right. They had state rights. That's why they had to end slavery when lord Lincoln proclaimed it.
You are that dumb.
Slavery was the reason, States' rights the issue. Your defective brain can't comprehend the difference.
You've got paranoid delusions. I hope you know that the way you think isnt normal.Until they come after your statues, or you. As I said in a post before, in the end the montagnards always come for the Jacobins.
Well I am not a slave owning traitor to the Union, so I will take the risk.
My people outlasted Robespierre. Vive le Emperor.
You've got paranoid delusions. I hope you know that the way you think isnt normal.
More proof you are delusional. I never said I was afraid of statues. Not wanting statues of slave supporting confederates on public property makes me fit to live in a civilized society. You are not fit for such a life. You're a deplorable animal.This coming from someone afraid of statues.
But they didn't have statues. King Dick killer of American soldiers did.The majority of southerners didn't own slaves.
Crushing the statues of traitors is never a mistake. mortem proditoribusAnd yet you are poised to make the same mistakes.
More proof you are delusional. I never said I was afraid of statues. Not wanting statues of slave supporting confederates on public property makes me fit to live in a civilized society. You are not fit for such a life. You're a deplorable animal.
But they didn't have statues. King Dick killer of American soldiers did.
Crushing the statues of traitors is never a mistake. mortem proditoribus
So? Confederate soldiers still fought for the preservation of slavery.The majority of southerners didn't own slaves.
So? Confederate soldiers still fought for the preservation of slavery.
