Vastator
Platinum Member
- Oct 14, 2014
- 23,031
- 10,658
- 950
One of my faves...Poor,kids are just as smart as white kids.
One of my all time favorites from the guy who showered with his daughter.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
One of my faves...Poor,kids are just as smart as white kids.
One of my all time favorites from the guy who showered with his daughter.
No. It comes from rate payers.Your 'government' salary doesn't come from tax revenue...riiiiiiiiight Report to HR, your fired!
Cocaine Mitch stooped Garland's nomination because he's a fucking hack & an amoral bastard. And he gets away with his shit because you MAGA Trump asseater's are too ignorant to know any better.Apparently Garland had been an okay judge--nominated by Bill Clinton to the U.S. Court of Appeals. So he was nominated for the Supreme Court by Barack Obama but the fact that Obama nominated him strongly suggests Garland holds some Marxist opinions and ideas about things. Then Biden tapped him for Attorney General pretty much underscoring my opinion about that.
If Mitch had not prevented a hearing and vote on Garland's nomination to the high court, he would surely be on the Supreme Court now. We can debate the merits of the situation, but Mitch in my opinion rightfully argued that a lame duck President in the waning months of his administration should not nominate a justice of the Supreme Court but should leave that to the incoming President. (Which of course most at that time, all the polls, even Las Vegas assumed would be Hillary.)
So Merrick Garland is now part of the "stolen election " bullshit?He needs to be prosecuted along with the other traitors who manipulated the 2020 election.
Sure it does. If you are in the Biden administration, you are above the law. Ask Bannon and Navarro.Well duh. This is what the tRumplings have been concentrating on for weeks. It was a foregone conclusion.
And it doesn't mean anything at all.
yeh. McConnell dosn't look so bad nowMerrick Garland refused to comply with Congress.
Just like that POS Holder.
He refused to hand over Biden communications requested by Congress because he is corrupt.
THANK GOODNESS HE IS NOT ON SCOTUS. SCUMBAG.
No worries.Merrick Garland refused to comply with Congress.
Just like that POS Holder.
He refused to hand over Biden communications requested by Congress because he is corrupt.
THANK GOODNESS HE IS NOT ON SCOTUS. SCUMBAG.
I'm the boss of you.No. It comes from rate payers.
You're not very good at this are you? Lol.
They waived Executive Privilege when they provided the written transcript.No worries.
Biden asserted executive privilege on that information so it should only take 4 or 5 years of court delays to get it figured out.
Lol.
Lol. Funny statement. I like it.I'm the boss of you.
Your county gets federal assistance I fund. Your county should hold a celebration in my honor to thank me.Lol. Funny statement. I like it.
Are you a rate payer in my county?
Link that law please.They waived Executive Privilege when they provided the written transcript.
So? I don't get that money nor does the company I work for.Your county gets federal assistance I fund. Your county should hold a celebration in my honor to thank me.
Republicans are slow to follow the examples of Progressives to the chagrin of their voters. If Progs win the House in November, I guarantee you it will be Hollywood/prog media supported impeacharama and insurrectionist allegations again.So what? It's only the GOP led House. They should try to impeach him next.
Executive privilege is a doctrine invoked by the President, not a law.Link that law please.
“The privilege claim is bogus on two grounds. First, once a President waives a privilege right, it can’t be reclaimed. Mr. Biden conceded that the interview wasn’t privileged, and there’s no legal basis to say that a recording is different from a transcript.
“Even if Mr. Biden had first claimed privilege over the interview, that wouldn’t pass legal muster because the interview subject didn’t concern his presidential duties or White House deliberations. It concerned his handling of documents while in the Senate, as Vice President, or as a private citizen.
“Mr. Siskel’s claim that the goal is to protect the Justice Department’s ‘law enforcement investigations’ also doesn’t work. Such a claim of law-enforcement privilege typically attends to a continuing investigation, but Mr. Hur’s work is complete. He has filed his report and closed up shop.
[…]
“The White House claim of privilege over the recordings isn’t intended to protect executive power. It’s intended to avoid presidential embarrassment. That’s a political goal, not a legitimate legal justification.”
Lock him up like Merritless Gesapoland did Bannon for the same thing, right?What does that mean?
What is the next step?
Got Bannon 4 months in prison.By the legislative branch?
That's a neat trick.
Isn't contempt of Congress a misdemeanor?
Thanks for that.Executive privilege is a doctrine invoked by the President, not a law.
The Wall Street Journal lays out the case fairly well.
Loading…
www.wsj.com
You are part of the 70% of the government "non-essential" employees who get a paid vacation every time we have a government shutdown.No you don't.
I work for the county.
Do you live in my county?
That said, I'm off today.