Must be terribly worried about the content.Executive privilege. Sorry.
BTW- invest in a spell check.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Must be terribly worried about the content.Executive privilege. Sorry.
The trumpanzees always have a new fantasy queued up, for when the last one fails.Must be terribly worried about the content.
Dude, you're on another roll............go for it.The trumpanzees always have a new fantasy queued up, for when the last one fails.
Must be terribly worried about the content.
I'm on my phone. Don't care about spelling.BTW- invest in a spell check.
So are you.Dude, you're on another roll............go for it.
In this instance, obviously concerned on the interview audio being released prior to the election.Regardless, is it your contention that if a president asserts executive privilege that he is guilty of something?
In this instance, obviously concerned on the interview audio being released prior to the election.
Yep. That is why we have the video.Biden Aims for “Highest Standards of Transparency”
Laptop 2.0?
Then there should not be any issue releasing the audio, unless he is hiding something.In this instance.
If that is true, why is Biden's DOJ trying to rewrite FOIA law by inserting an executive privilege exemption to FOIA?Your thots and feels are not the predicate that executive privilege is based on.
Yes, you are that simple.Then there should not be any issue releasing the audio, unless he is hiding something.
That simple.
Speculation.Then there should not be any issue releasing the audio, unless he is hiding something.
That simple.
Speculation.
Executive privilege is a bitch.
I wonder what other presidents asserted it and what you opinions were?
Hmmm..
I love the search function.
Want to keep on going?
If that is true, why is Biden's DOJ trying to rewrite FOIA law by inserting an executive privilege exemption to FOIA?
So Biden is once again flaunting the law?No idea. I guess SCOTUS will decide.
It will take a while but after many appeals and objections etc etc, they will figure it out...by 2027 for sure.
Maybe they will ask for your input?
So Biden is once again flaunting the law?
Yep. Like I have stated, after the decision is finalized in a couple years, let me know what happened.In court as we speak.....of course you know that.
Apparently not under FOIA.He has a right to declare executive privilege and appeal to SCOTUS.
So Biden is once again interfering in another election and engaging in lawfare.Like I have stated, after the decision is finalized in a couple years, let me know what happened.
You can't.........one can only flout the law as Biden has been doing since day one.How is that flaunting the law?
Apparently not under FOIA.
So Biden is once again interfering in another election and engaging in lawfare.
Again, a President claiming executive privilege is not flaunting the law.You can't.........one can only flout the law as Biden has been doing since day one.
FFS........you clowns believe then SPREAD lies.This is ridiculous if true. And being that Biden and Garland are involved, I have little doubt this is true.
Yea, but Trump is a threat to the Republic. FFS.
This is a legislated Act. It would have to be amended by congress. SCOTUS would toss it back.That is for SCOTUS to decide.
Again, a President claiming executive privilege is not flaunting the law.
Biden is engaging his right to executive privilege.
Fuck you clowns and your total disrespect for anything NOT cult45 related.