META (Facebook) Banning Conservatives over their opinions.....

[MinTrut]

You might want to buy a dictionary and look up that word.

One of us should, yes.

It seems a Nazi lover like you would know what the word means.

Projection.

FB controlling what is said on their platform is no more fascism than you doing so in your own home.

Holy crap - I am SHOCKED that you don't know what fascism is.

 

[dblack]

What about government involvement in the regulation of speech and fascist collusion with private industry turns you on the most?

Obviously, we should prosecute any attempts by the government to bully the media. Gather up your evidence and take them to court. I'll support that effort all the way. But so far, it hasn't happened.

Instead, your solution to an imagined crime, is to codify state control of the media in law. To use state power to bully the media the way you want.

So, you know, fuck off and die. Or move to North Korea. We don't want your totalitarian government wet dream.

 

[MinTrut]

The Constitution does not apply to FB, it does not apply to any private company.

Already addressed.

The Constitution is restrictions on what the Govt can do.

In part.

Have you ever actually read the Constitution?

More projection...

 

[Harpy Eagle]

So, you know, fuck off and die. Or move to North Korea. We don't want your totalitarian government wet dream.

POST OF THE DAY!

 

[dblack]

Conservatives et al object to fascism and gross unconstitutional conduct, and are accused of desiring it.

This thread is ample evidence.

 

[MinTrut]

Obviously, we should prosecute any attempts by the government to bully the media.

Bully, control, collaborate with, silence free speech thereupon - so many words could describe the conduct we're seeing...

Gather up your evidence and take them to court.

That's the spirit - make The People beg for their basic constitutional rights, and pay lawyers to seek them to boot!

I'll support that effort all the way.

So gracious!

But so far, it hasn't happened.

Oh it will, but it'll take someone with the means to do it.

Instead, your solution to an imagined crime,

Sayeth a liberal who did nothing but imagine crimes by Trump for 6 years...?

is to codify state control of the media in law.

Projecting again; so liberal!

To use state power to bully the media the way you want.

Projection...

So, you know, fuck off and die.

There's that liberal graciousness again, and all based on a projected straw man.

Or move to North Korea. We don't want your totalitarian government wet dream.

See above.

 

[MinTrut]

POST OF THE DAY!

What little credibility you've ever had just perished.

RIP

 

[MinTrut]

This thread is ample evidence.

Liberal confusion or liberal delusion?

Throw in a death wish or two and wrap it up in a pretty bow of intolerance, and what do you have?

The modern liberal standing up for fascism.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

What little credibility you've ever had just perished.

RIP

Oh dear, I have no credibility with the Nazi.

How will I ever sleep at night?

 

[dblack]

Bully, control, collaborate with, silence free speech thereupon - so many words could describe the conduct we're seeing...

Well, you need more than words. You need evidence. I'm not even saying it didn't happen. It might have, and we should take it very seriously. If the government is bullying the media it needs to stop.

But you're not taking it seriously. You're not offering evidence or pursuing convictions. You're just using it as an excuse for another cathartic Trumpster circle jerk. Along with destroying freedom of the press in the process.

That's the spirit - make The People beg for their basic constitutional rights, and pay lawyers to seek them to boot!

You haven't the slightest clue when it comes to Constitutional rights. Aren't you the jackass always trolling for theocracy? You clearly want to do away with the First Amendment.

 

[Curried Goats]

Liberal confusion or liberal delusion?

Throw in a death wish or two and wrap it up in a pretty bow of intolerance, and what do you have?

The modern liberal standing up for fascism.

Private entities have no obligation to tolerate you you crying little bitch.

 

[MinTrut]

Oh dear, I have no credibility with the Nazi.

Let's keep Hillary out if this, shall we?

How will I ever sleep at night?

Count alligators?

 

[MinTrut]

Well, you need more than words. You need evidence. I'm not even saying it didn't happen. It might have, and we should take it very seriously. If the government is bullying the media it needs to stop.

But you're not taking it seriously. You're not offering evidence or pursuing convictions. You're just using it as an excuse for another cathartic Trumpster circle jerk. Along with destroying freedom of the press in the process.


You haven't the slightest clue when it comes to Constitutional rights. Aren't you the jackass always trolling for theocracy? You clearly want to do away with the First Amendment.

^ Confusion, delusion, willful ignorance, projection, false claims, failure to comprehend...

The bright weed of modern liberalism.

 

[MinTrut]

Private entities have no obligation to tolerate you you crying little bitch.

^ Full of hate for the Constitution, full of love for fascism and ignorance.

I'm getting turned on again...

 

[Curried Goats]

^ Full of hate for the Constitution, full of love for fascism and ignorance.

I'm getting turned on again...

Young dumb and full of cum?

 

[Canon Shooter]

No, it is NOT simple as that. There is nowhere else to go.

I'm wondering, what did you, and those like you, do before the internet?

 

[Canon Shooter]

^ Full of hate for the Constitution, full of love for fascism and ignorance.

I'm getting turned on again...

How does restricting what's posted on a private forum, that you don't pay to use, equate to "hate" for the Constitution?

 

[Harpy Eagle]

I'm wondering, what did you, and those like you, do before the internet?

I am wondering how someone posting on this forum can claim there is nowhere else to go

 

[BlackSand]

The discussion of FB comes down to "if you do not like how they do things, then do not use their free service".

Nothing else really needs to be said about it

.

I don't know ... Sometimes it still just fun to talk about, and laugh at, how META's stock price is tanking.

META has 2.9 billion shares that fell from a high of $378.69 per share last year to $167.98 currently.
That is losing $210.71 per share on 2.9 billion shares.

That's over $611 billion in value they lost in a year, and the majority of it over politics.

I bet they are just trying to outpace Disney.
Disney has only managed to lose a maximum of $53 billion in a single quarter, and META has to be beating that by now.

It a race to the gutter ...

.​

 

[Canon Shooter]

Because your premise is a lie. Google and META own the platforms and servers. Parlor is a perfect example of this. They start up and are doing a booming business and META, APPLE, and Google shut donw thier servers to protect their own. They are acting as one and must be broken up.

META, Apple and Google are already separate entities...