🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

Michelle Claims Fat Kids Are A National Security Threat

Just pass another stupid Law allowing the Government to intrude in your life. WTG stupid Goose Stepping America.

Have the Twinkie Control Police taken over yet?

Are we now REQUIRED by the Federal Government to buy a product whether we want to or not?

Yes the Gestapo now has orders to arrest and fine American Citizens if they don't buy Health Insurance. Is this still America? What happened to my country? :(
 
Just pass another stupid Law allowing the Government to intrude in your life. WTG stupid Goose Stepping America.

Have the Twinkie Control Police taken over yet?

it's really funny... they yell and scream if they can't have cupcakes, but they think it's ok to invade people's bodies, tell people who to love, and interfere in the ability of a next of kin to make end of life decisions.

nothing wrong there. :cuckoo:

No, what's really funny is you're cool with a teen girl having an abortion without mom knowing, but not with her having a cupcake without Lady O knowing. Now THAT is funny.
 
Have the Twinkie Control Police taken over yet?

it's really funny... they yell and scream if they can't have cupcakes, but they think it's ok to invade people's bodies, tell people who to love, and interfere in the ability of a next of kin to make end of life decisions.

nothing wrong there. :cuckoo:

No, what's really funny is you're cool with a teen girl having an abortion without mom knowing, but not with her having a cupcake without Lady O knowing. Now THAT is funny.

i think your's is funnier...

and who said anything about a cupcake without "lady o"?

there might be a discussion there... but the absurdity of that comment kind of makes it difficult.
 
Absurdity? Well, I am dealing with a broad who thinks it's odd that someone would stop a girl from having an abortion, but it makes perfect sense to take her cupcake away. Truth be told, I don't care if she has either. But you were saying? Absurd? Hmmm...

Under those rules, bake sales cannot be held on school grounds unless the items meet nutrition standards that specifically limit portion sizes, fat content, sodium and sugars. That two-ounce, low-fat granola bar? Probably OK, depending what's in it. But grandma's homemade oversized brownie with cream cheese frosting and chocolate chips inside? Probably not.

One loophole in Connecticut: The nutritional standards apply if the food is being sold at a bake sale, but not if it's being given away free, such as by a parent for a child's birthday.

Hold the brownies! Bill could limit bake sales - Yahoo! News

Hence, Mrs. Obama's new law determines if the kid can eat the cupcake, unless her mom brings it in. So, either Mom or Obama have to approve if she is to have a cupcake. If she has an abortion, however, that is her private business.

Yet you don't find that odd?
 
what i find odd is someone who thinks it's ok to interfere with fundamental rights like our control over our body and our right to marriage but scream about their liberty being infringed upon because they don't serve soda in school and they may have to wear a seatbelt.

i think that's kind of retarded

just sayin. :)
 
Who messed with your right to marriage? Are you kidding me? Are you wanting to marry your brother or something?
 
Who messed with your right to marriage? Are you kidding me? Are you wanting to marry your brother or something?

you know very well what i'm talking about.

but carry on.

cause we sooooooooooo needed more rightwingnuts here.
 
I do? I have no clue what you're talking about if you honestly think that the Government passed a law that says you can't get married. I would suggest you wear a tin foil hat and don't post any public announcements. Try it then, maybe you will have better luck?
 
I do? I have no clue what you're talking about if you honestly think that the Government passed a law that says you can't get married. I would suggest you wear a tin foil hat and don't post any public announcements. Try it then, maybe you will have better luck?

Wow you're dense ... :eek: Whatever it is that you're smoking, maybe you should take a break from it ... ;)
 
what i find odd is someone who thinks it's ok to interfere with fundamental rights like our control over our body and our right to marriage but scream about their liberty being infringed upon because they don't serve soda in school and they may have to wear a seatbelt.

i think that's kind of retarded

just sayin. :)

So if someone tells me I can't get a pick axe and hit someone in the temple with it, killing that person, aren't they interfering with my fundamental right of control over my body just as much as telling a woman with a growing human being inside of her not to have it killed?
 
Absurdity? Well, I am dealing with a broad who thinks it's odd that someone would stop a girl from having an abortion, but it makes perfect sense to take her cupcake away. Truth be told, I don't care if she has either. But you were saying? Absurd? Hmmm...

Under those rules, bake sales cannot be held on school grounds unless the items meet nutrition standards that specifically limit portion sizes, fat content, sodium and sugars. That two-ounce, low-fat granola bar? Probably OK, depending what's in it. But grandma's homemade oversized brownie with cream cheese frosting and chocolate chips inside? Probably not.

One loophole in Connecticut: The nutritional standards apply if the food is being sold at a bake sale, but not if it's being given away free, such as by a parent for a child's birthday.

Hold the brownies! Bill could limit bake sales - Yahoo! News

Hence, Mrs. Obama's new law determines if the kid can eat the cupcake, unless her mom brings it in. So, either Mom or Obama have to approve if she is to have a cupcake. If she has an abortion, however, that is her private business.

Yet you don't find that odd?

Wow I wonder if the Planned Parenthood folks will have to get permission to give her cookies and juice after the procedure. :eusa_whistle:
 
what i find odd is someone who thinks it's ok to interfere with fundamental rights like our control over our body and our right to marriage but scream about their liberty being infringed upon because they don't serve soda in school and they may have to wear a seatbelt.

i think that's kind of retarded

just sayin. :)

So if someone tells me I can't get a pick axe and hit someone in the temple with it, killing that person, aren't they interfering with my fundamental right of control over my body just as much as telling a woman with a growing human being inside of her not to have it killed?

you know that's really sad, right? i kind of expect better from you.

but in answer to your question. what roe decided, and what the approrpriate inquiry was and is... was at one point does the governmental interest in protecting a PROSPECTIVE life outweigh the woman's interest in determining her own body.

since that life exists on a continuum, the decision was correct.

but the 'small government', "give me liberty" wingers seem to think their right to a cupcake is more fundamental.
 
Can you imagine the frikken NERVE of this lady?

Telling OUR CHILDREN they are a National Security Threat..

If that's the case, then I think Michelle's ASS is a National Security risk.

She's lobbying CONGRESS for BILLIONS OF DOLLARS to take care of, THE PROBLEM.

What a witch.
 
Last edited:
what i find odd is someone who thinks it's ok to interfere with fundamental rights like our control over our body and our right to marriage but scream about their liberty being infringed upon because they don't serve soda in school and they may have to wear a seatbelt.

i think that's kind of retarded

just sayin. :)

So if someone tells me I can't get a pick axe and hit someone in the temple with it, killing that person, aren't they interfering with my fundamental right of control over my body just as much as telling a woman with a growing human being inside of her not to have it killed?

you know that's really sad, right? i kind of expect better from you.

but in answer to your question. what roe decided, and what the approrpriate inquiry was and is... was at one point does the governmental interest in protecting a PROSPECTIVE life outweigh the woman's interest in determining her own body.

since that life exists on a continuum, the decision was correct.

but the 'small government', "give me liberty" wingers seem to think their right to a cupcake is more fundamental.

In the continuum of what matters in life, your expectations of me are rather low on the totem pole.

While I respect the supreme court's decision in this matter, I still can not agree with abortion on demand. Even the supreme court's opinions are not legion when it comes to my own personal opinions.
 
Can you imagine the frikken NERVE of this lady?

Telling OUR CHILDREN they are a National Security Threat..

If that's the case, then I think Michelle's ASS is a National Security risk.

She's lobbying CONGRESS for BILLIONS OF DOLLARS to take care of, THE PROBLEM.

What a witch.

Oh, this is what she said....that children are a national security threat?
 
Happy Meals are next. Can't have those evil toys in them anymore. The Government must stop Evil McDonalds from conspiring to kill our children by making them fat. Seriously,Socialists/Progressives are fucking idiots. Stop Goose Stepping and wake up America.
 

Forum List

Back
Top