Michelle Malkin

Everybody in the crowd was a target.

Sitting around attempting to blame everyone and anyone but the deranged shooter is plain old childish.

He had a primary target and that was Congresswoman Giffords
...whom he'd been stalking since 2007, long before Palin's image was published. You know, the image no one can seem to prove he saw.

Doesn't matter..

It was in poor taste then and even more so now.

Palin was put on notice at the time that her choice of crosshairs as a symbol was innapropriate. Giffords herself even complained about the imagery. Palin laughed it off as liberals being whiny.
The crosshairs proved to be prophetic and Palin must answer for her chosen rhetoric
 
That makes perfect sense if you are completely nuts.

====

The Sheriff is simply great that he isn't backing down.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KFU5PX5U_P4&feature=youtube_gdata

It would have been greater if he'd actually done his job.

RPT-Arizona suspect had made death threats-sheriff
an 8 (Reuters) - The suspect in Saturday's shooting rampage in which a U.S. congresswoman was critically wounded was unstable and had been known to make death threats in the past, the local sheriff said.

The FBI is investigating whether the man is the same person who posted a rambling Internet manifesto accusing the government of mind control and demanding a new currency.

Jared Lee Loughner, 22, of Tucson, was taken into custody moments after the shooting at a political meeting held by Democratic Representative Gabrielle Giffords in a supermarket parking lot. Six people died and Giffords had a critical head wound. [ID:nN08246649]

Sheriff Clarence Dupnik of Pima County, where the shooting happened, told reporters the suspect had a troubled past. "All I can tell you is that this person may have a mental issue," Dupnik said.

Dupnik said there had been earlier contact between Loughner and law enforcement after he had made death threats, although they had not been against Giffords.​

Ah...so now the new talking point is to put this on the Sheriff....one wonders if this discussion would be going on if he had not had the NERVE to question the lucrative Golden Goose of right wing talk radio/tv. Their $$$$ must be protected at all costs so get the minions to swarm over the Sheriff.....

Wasn't the sherriff willing to dump it onto someone else? Ya reap what you sow.
 
He had a primary target and that was Congresswoman Giffords
...whom he'd been stalking since 2007, long before Palin's image was published. You know, the image no one can seem to prove he saw.

Doesn't matter..

It was in poor taste then and even more so now.

Palin was put on notice at the time that her choice of crosshairs as a symbol was innapropriate. Giffords herself even complained about the imagery. Palin laughed it off as liberals being whiny.
The crosshairs proved to be prophetic and Palin must answer for her chosen rhetoric

Just who the hell are you people to think you can put PALIN on notice?
It is your lefties who is stirring up this hate with your ignorant accusations that her map had anything to do with anything and hopefully, NOTHING will happen to Palin or her family. If it does, it will be you all who will BLOOD ON YOUR HANDS.
 
:lol:
...whom he'd been stalking since 2007, long before Palin's image was published. You know, the image no one can seem to prove he saw.

Doesn't matter..

It was in poor taste then and even more so now.

Palin was put on notice at the time that her choice of crosshairs as a symbol was innapropriate. Giffords herself even complained about the imagery. Palin laughed it off as liberals being whiny.
The crosshairs proved to be prophetic and Palin must answer for her chosen rhetoric

Just who the hell are you people to think you can put PALIN on notice?
It is your lefties who is stirring up this hate with your ignorant accusations that her map had anything to do with anything and hopefully, NOTHING will happen to Palin or her family. If it does, it will be you all who will BLOOD ON YOUR HANDS.

Notice he gives no mention that the democrats published a similiar map with bullseys on it? Didyahuh?
 
:lol:
Doesn't matter..

It was in poor taste then and even more so now.

Palin was put on notice at the time that her choice of crosshairs as a symbol was innapropriate. Giffords herself even complained about the imagery. Palin laughed it off as liberals being whiny.
The crosshairs proved to be prophetic and Palin must answer for her chosen rhetoric

Just who the hell are you people to think you can put PALIN on notice?
It is your lefties who is stirring up this hate with your ignorant accusations that her map had anything to do with anything and hopefully, NOTHING will happen to Palin or her family. If it does, it will be you all who will BLOOD ON YOUR HANDS.

Notice he gives no mention that the democrats published a similiar map with bullseys on it? Didyahuh?

they make me sick.
 
...whom he'd been stalking since 2007, long before Palin's image was published. You know, the image no one can seem to prove he saw.

Doesn't matter..

It was in poor taste then and even more so now.

Palin was put on notice at the time that her choice of crosshairs as a symbol was innapropriate. Giffords herself even complained about the imagery. Palin laughed it off as liberals being whiny.
The crosshairs proved to be prophetic and Palin must answer for her chosen rhetoric

Just who the hell are you people to think you can put PALIN on notice?
It is your lefties who is stirring up this hate with your ignorant accusations that her map had anything to do with anything and hopefully, NOTHING will happen to Palin or her family. If it does, it will be you all who will BLOOD ON YOUR HANDS.

Is Palin somehow ...above criticism?

Giffords specifically pointed out to her that the crosshairs on her campaign was a personal threat and innapropriate. Did Palin show some compassion and make minor changes to her rhetoric?

No she did't ....she ramped up the gun rhetoric
 
Doesn't matter..

It was in poor taste then and even more so now.

Palin was put on notice at the time that her choice of crosshairs as a symbol was innapropriate. Giffords herself even complained about the imagery. Palin laughed it off as liberals being whiny.
The crosshairs proved to be prophetic and Palin must answer for her chosen rhetoric

Just who the hell are you people to think you can put PALIN on notice?
It is your lefties who is stirring up this hate with your ignorant accusations that her map had anything to do with anything and hopefully, NOTHING will happen to Palin or her family. If it does, it will be you all who will BLOOD ON YOUR HANDS.

Is Palin somehow ...above criticism?

Giffords specifically pointed out to her that the crosshairs on her campaign was a personal threat and innapropriate. Did Palin show some compassion and make minor changes to her rhetoric?

No she did't ....she ramped up the gun rhetoric

blaa blaaa blaaa your ignorant shit.
Goosestepping useful tool parrot.
 
Last edited:
...whom he'd been stalking since 2007, long before Palin's image was published. You know, the image no one can seem to prove he saw.

Doesn't matter..

It was in poor taste then and even more so now.

Palin was put on notice at the time that her choice of crosshairs as a symbol was innapropriate. Giffords herself even complained about the imagery. Palin laughed it off as liberals being whiny.
The crosshairs proved to be prophetic and Palin must answer for her chosen rhetoric

Just who the hell are you people to think you can put PALIN on notice?
It is your lefties who is stirring up this hate with your ignorant accusations that her map had anything to do with anything and hopefully, NOTHING will happen to Palin or her family. If it does, it will be you all who will BLOOD ON YOUR HANDS.

Ok, it's blood on our hands if something happens to one of the Palins but it is not blood on her hands that she had Gabby in the crosshairs, talked about it everyday and something actually happened?

:cuckoo:
 
Doesn't matter..

It was in poor taste then and even more so now.

Palin was put on notice at the time that her choice of crosshairs as a symbol was innapropriate. Giffords herself even complained about the imagery. Palin laughed it off as liberals being whiny.
The crosshairs proved to be prophetic and Palin must answer for her chosen rhetoric

Just who the hell are you people to think you can put PALIN on notice?
It is your lefties who is stirring up this hate with your ignorant accusations that her map had anything to do with anything and hopefully, NOTHING will happen to Palin or her family. If it does, it will be you all who will BLOOD ON YOUR HANDS.

Ok, it's blood on our hands if something happens to one of the Palins but it is not blood on her hands that she had Gabby in the crosshairs, talked about it everyday and something actually happened?

:cuckoo:

you really are THAT STUPID, aren't you?
 
Sorry....you already tried your Obama/Ayers bullshit

It drew a collective yawn
That's because the left sees nothing wrong with the President being friends with an unrepentant terrorist.

If there's a wrong side to an issue, you jump on it with both feet.

You tried to sell the phony connection before the election. Remember Palins "Obama pals around with terrorists" Didn't work then....doesn't fly now

but keep trying

But Hey, cheer up.....You always have Rev Wright and Larry Sinclair
Phony? Only to those with a vested interest in denying the truth. You leftists are good at that.
 
Just who the hell are you people to think you can put PALIN on notice?
It is your lefties who is stirring up this hate with your ignorant accusations that her map had anything to do with anything and hopefully, NOTHING will happen to Palin or her family. If it does, it will be you all who will BLOOD ON YOUR HANDS.

Ok, it's blood on our hands if something happens to one of the Palins but it is not blood on her hands that she had Gabby in the crosshairs, talked about it everyday and something actually happened?

:cuckoo:

you really are THAT STUPID, aren't you?

Are you incapable of differentiating Palin saying "Here are your targets....here are our enemy's and using gun metaphors from those who say Palin was wrong to do so?
 
He had a primary target and that was Congresswoman Giffords
...whom he'd been stalking since 2007, long before Palin's image was published. You know, the image no one can seem to prove he saw.

Doesn't matter..

It was in poor taste then and even more so now.

Palin was put on notice at the time that her choice of crosshairs as a symbol was innapropriate. Giffords herself even complained about the imagery. Palin laughed it off as liberals being whiny.
The crosshairs proved to be prophetic and Palin must answer for her chosen rhetoric
And yet you refuse to hold Democrats responsible for the same rhetoric.

Your outrage is quite selective.
 
Ok, it's blood on our hands if something happens to one of the Palins but it is not blood on her hands that she had Gabby in the crosshairs, talked about it everyday and something actually happened?

:cuckoo:

you really are THAT STUPID, aren't you?

Are you incapable of differentiating Palin saying "Here are your targets....here are our enemy's and using gun metaphors from those who say Palin was wrong to do so?

we don't have to ask you if you are "that stupid". we know you are.
polly wanna cracker?
 
...whom he'd been stalking since 2007, long before Palin's image was published. You know, the image no one can seem to prove he saw.

Doesn't matter..

It was in poor taste then and even more so now.

Palin was put on notice at the time that her choice of crosshairs as a symbol was innapropriate. Giffords herself even complained about the imagery. Palin laughed it off as liberals being whiny.
The crosshairs proved to be prophetic and Palin must answer for her chosen rhetoric
And yet you refuse to hold Democrats responsible for the same rhetoric.

Your outrage is quite selective.

Could you imagine the right wing outrage if Democratic Politicians put up "bulls-eyes" "targeting" Republicans?

Right wingers had zero problems sending hundreds of thousands of Americans off so tens of thousand could be maimed or die. Whatever their goal was, the outcome was all the women of an entire nation enslaved under radical Islam. Republicans are "surprised" that happened. Democrats are "surprised" Republicans were too incompetent to see that coming.

And what has Obama done? He worked to give health care to millions of American children. For this, the right threatens to go on a bloody rampage.

Talk about "misplaced priorities".
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Doesn't matter..

It was in poor taste then and even more so now.

Palin was put on notice at the time that her choice of crosshairs as a symbol was innapropriate. Giffords herself even complained about the imagery. Palin laughed it off as liberals being whiny.
The crosshairs proved to be prophetic and Palin must answer for her chosen rhetoric
And yet you refuse to hold Democrats responsible for the same rhetoric.

Your outrage is quite selective.

Could you imagine the right wing outrage if Democratic Politicians put up "bulls-eyes" "targeting" Republicans?

Right wingers had zero problems sending hundreds of thousands of Americans off so tens of thousand could be maimed or die. Whatever their goal was, the outcome was all the women of an entire nation enslaved under radical Islam. Republicans are "surprised" that happened. Democrats are "surprised" Republicans were too incompetent to see that coming.

And what has Obama done? He worked to give health care to millions of American children.
For this, the right threatens to go on a bloody rampage.

Talk about "misplaced priorities".

:lol::cuckoo:
 
Anyone in this thread think Palin should put the map back up?

After all, there was nothing wrong with it, correct? It was not inappropriate, or tasteless, or classless, correct?

Wouldn't the PRINCIPLED thing for her to do be to put the map back up and defend it?

Anyone?
 
Anyone in this thread think Palin should put the map back up?

After all, there was nothing wrong with it, correct? It was not inappropriate, or tasteless, or classless, correct?

Wouldn't the PRINCIPLED thing for her to do be to put the map back up and defend it?

Anyone?

Sure why not, this guy woke one day and thought jeez, think I'll shoot somebody and then he thought for a long, long time.....and then he thought some more seeing as he thought about this all on his own. Isn't it curious he didn't just shoot the nearest bystander. Guess in thinking about something he must have thought of Gifford as a target. Interesting that she was selected. But surely he thought about nothing else but his inner thoughts. For surely he lives in a vacuum and surely he wasn't influenced by anything at all. Surely.
 
Anyone in this thread think Palin should put the map back up?

After all, there was nothing wrong with it, correct? It was not inappropriate, or tasteless, or classless, correct?

Wouldn't the PRINCIPLED thing for her to do be to put the map back up and defend it?

Anyone?

Maybe a petition by some of our staunchest Palin supporters asking her to put it back up since there's nothing wrong with it......Hmmmmmmm.
 

Forum List

Back
Top