Mr Natural
Platinum Member
- Aug 23, 2009
- 23,018
- 10,873
- 950
If minimum wage kills jobs, wouldn't the opposite would have to create jobs?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This has been an excuse for a long time now. It's time for these cheap employers to pony up with the American workers. $10.10 isn't even enough for minimum wage, just stfu and start being fair to your workers.
Republicans can't stand Unions because they've forced them to be fair this far.
Do you understand basic economics?
To keep prices low, a manufacturer has to keep overhead low!
And overhead includes personnel costs. You increase overhead and you must increase prices.
![]()
Do you understand the greed factor?![]()
Raise the minimum wage and jobs will disappear the same way they do every time the minimum wage is raised. Those minimum wage jobs that remain will be closed to entry level workers.
Let's approach this debate from this perspective:
1. Yes, the minimum wage kills jobs. It kills jobs that pay pennies a day, jobs that pay 20cents an hour, or 30, or 50, or a buck, or 2 bucks, etc. Those jobs at those rates of pay don't exist in an economy with a mandated minimum wage higher than the rates cited.
2. That's a good thing, not a bad thing. When the 50 cents an hour job comes back to America,
this won't be an America to be proud of.
Do you understand basic economics?
To keep prices low, a manufacturer has to keep overhead low!
And overhead includes personnel costs. You increase overhead and you must increase prices.
![]()
Do you understand the greed factor?![]()
The greed factor?
Greed is a sacrament to these people.
Why do multibillion-dollar corporations have to raise prices? They already profit billions every year. Isn't the entire point of "trickle down" theory that when these "job creators" have more money, then they can increase wages, pay real benefits, and raise the standard of living for their employees?
When do those billions begin to trickle down?
[Another concept difficult to understand]
The billions trickle down to the stockholders!
![]()
Ooooooh, okay. I was under the impression that trickle down theory benefits everyone. So you're saying that all of the broke, unemployed Americans on food stamps just need to invest a couple of hundred-thousand dollars into a multibillion-dollar corporation and live off of their capital gains?
That makes perfect sense to a Teabagger.
If minimum wage kills jobs, wouldn't the opposite would have to create jobs?
Let's approach this debate from this perspective:
1. Yes, the minimum wage kills jobs. It kills jobs that pay pennies a day, jobs that pay 20cents an hour, or 30, or 50, or a buck, or 2 bucks, etc. Those jobs at those rates of pay don't exist in an economy with a mandated minimum wage higher than the rates cited.
2. That's a good thing, not a bad thing. When the 50 cents an hour job comes back to America,
this won't be an America to be proud of.
If the prices come back with the 50 cents an hour, that's be just fine.
All minimum wage increases do is raise prices and that negates the wage increase. My 70 years of living experience taught me that. Sure, there's a temporary increase in buying power for the minimum wage earner, but it's very short lived.
My Dad told me about working for 50 cents a day, but he also told me that he could buy two big bags of groceries for that fifty cents, and those were big bags, not these puny little shit bags they have today.
Let's approach this debate from this perspective:
1. Yes, the minimum wage kills jobs. It kills jobs that pay pennies a day, jobs that pay 20cents an hour, or 30, or 50, or a buck, or 2 bucks, etc. Those jobs at those rates of pay don't exist in an economy with a mandated minimum wage higher than the rates cited.
2. That's a good thing, not a bad thing. When the 50 cents an hour job comes back to America,
this won't be an America to be proud of.
If the prices come back with the 50 cents an hour, that's be just fine.
All minimum wage increases do is raise prices and that negates the wage increase. My 70 years of living experience taught me that. Sure, there's a temporary increase in buying power for the minimum wage earner, but it's very short lived.
My Dad told me about working for 50 cents a day, but he also told me that he could buy two big bags of groceries for that fifty cents, and those were big bags, not these puny little shit bags they have today.
The minimum wage has been falling for 45 years shit for brains.
If the prices come back with the 50 cents an hour, that's be just fine.
All minimum wage increases do is raise prices and that negates the wage increase. My 70 years of living experience taught me that. Sure, there's a temporary increase in buying power for the minimum wage earner, but it's very short lived.
My Dad told me about working for 50 cents a day, but he also told me that he could buy two big bags of groceries for that fifty cents, and those were big bags, not these puny little shit bags they have today.
The minimum wage has been falling for 45 years shit for brains.
No it hasn't, shit for brains!!
And don't throw inflation at me for proof. Wage increases are part of what causes inflation.
Government spending more money than it has also causes inflation.
When the Government doubles the number of dollars in circulation, after the dust settles a dollar's value is cut in half!
By Steve H. Hanke
President Obama set the chattering classes abuzz after his unilateral announcement to raise the minimum wage for newly hired Federal contract workers. During his State of the Union address, he sang the praises for his action, saying that Its good for the economy; its good for America.[1] Yet this conclusion doesnt pass the economic smell test; just look at the data from Europe.
Okay, so don't confront the messenger read the piece and then jump in. Read more @ Minimum Wage Laws Kill Jobs | Cato @ Liberty
![]()
No..they absolutely did not.
You have trouble reading the Constitution.
And understanding it.
Citizens are not "sovereign" apart from the government in this country.
The Constitution does not bestow that sort of "power" to each and every citizen.
It would be impossible to have a nation if that was done.
This is a crazy and patently stupid argument.
Excuse me but, isn't it We The People who established a new form of government to replace that which they opposed?
![]()
Conservatives LOVE the Declaration of Independence but don't you DARE mention The Preamble to The US Constitution.
We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
Why do multibillion-dollar corporations have to raise prices? They already profit billions every year. Isn't the entire point of "trickle down" theory that when these "job creators" have more money, then they can increase wages, pay real benefits, and raise the standard of living for their employees?
When do those billions begin to trickle down?
[Another concept difficult to understand]
The billions trickle down to the stockholders!
![]()
Ooooooh, okay. I was under the impression that trickle down theory benefits everyone. So you're saying that all of the broke, unemployed Americans on food stamps just need to invest a couple of hundred-thousand dollars into a multibillion-dollar corporation and live off of their capital gains?
That makes perfect sense to a Teabagger.
these republicans get even more stupid as they post here day in and day out... the reason democrats get more votes is because what we do.... the reason you republicans don't get more votes is because what you do ... please show us anywhere on the internet where ever has jobs been cut when the min wage went up ... I challenge you ... if you want to say stupid shit I can't stop ya ...cause its a free country ... but don't start saying shit that you know nothing about ... the raising of the min wage you know nothing about ...
aka You guys don't know jack squat, and we are always right by being leftist.............
LOL........Billy Bob.............We have something on you that you have no understanding of.............It's called COMMON SENSE...........You post your emotions and create policy based on emotion............Not facts and figures............
Anyone with a brain larger than a pea should understand that business will raise prices to compensate for overhead costs such as labor........Anyone with any common sense would understand that this will lead to making decisions on hiring more people because of the increased costs of doing so.......
Anyone with any common sense wouldn't say, I'm going to tax the S.......out of you you you 1%'s and then say create jobs for my state or city..........Which part of the brain damage are you afflicted with Billy Bob.....................
Hey eagle, you are free to tell your employer that you will work for ever how much he wants to pay you. If that is 5 bucks an hour, oh well.
Matter of fact, why don't ALL you republicans that hate the idea of raising the minimum wage, go to your employer (if you have one) and tell him/her this; say Boss, I know that an increase in minimum wage is gonna hurt you boss, so I and my fellow repubs on the job at your company, we all want to work for 5 dollars an hour.
Will you do that eagle? And if not, why? I know, you would be overpaid at 5 bucks. Right?
By Steve H. Hanke
Okay, so don't confront the messenger read the piece and then jump in. Read more @ Minimum Wage Laws Kill Jobs | Cato @ LibertyPresident Obama set the chattering classes abuzz after his unilateral announcement to raise the minimum wage for newly hired Federal contract workers. During his State of the Union address, he sang the praises for his action, saying that Its good for the economy; its good for America.[1] Yet this conclusion doesnt pass the economic smell test; just look at the data from Europe.
![]()
Economic Recovery? We'll Take Reagan's, Thanks | NewsBusters
Total job growth during the first four years of the Obama recovery has been 4,657,000 or just 97,020 jobs per month. That's not even enough to hit the breakeven level of 150,000 jobs per month when population growth is taken into account. (video after break)
Now, contrast that with the Reagan recovery. That generated a total of 11.2 million new jobs or 233,333 per month, more than enough to put people back to work. Reagan's best job month garnered the very top ranking since WWII with 1,114,000 jobs added in September 1983. A single month with more than a million jobs added. So far Obama can only wish for such a total.
Economic Recovery? We'll Take Reagan's, Thanks | NewsBusters
Total job growth during the first four years of the Obama recovery has been 4,657,000 or just 97,020 jobs per month. That's not even enough to hit the breakeven level of 150,000 jobs per month when population growth is taken into account. (video after break)
Now, contrast that with the Reagan recovery. That generated a total of 11.2 million new jobs or 233,333 per month, more than enough to put people back to work. Reagan's best job month garnered the very top ranking since WWII with 1,114,000 jobs added in September 1983. A single month with more than a million jobs added. So far Obama can only wish for such a total.
Tried and true recovery from Reagan after dealing Mr. Stagflation himself...............
Obama's recovery is BS.........
One sides plan worked.......Current admin is a failure.