Moderate Cannabis Use Has Adverse Effects on Cognitive Functioning,

[pknopp]

That shit went out the window circa 1930’s when father government starting forcing me to pay for the bad decisions of others. I now have an equity share in all bodies...I have a say.

Agreed

end the wipe-every-nose welfare state and drug zombies are no longer any of my business

Things like Quantitative Easing is a part of the welfare state. End the Fed and I will quit arguing for other welfare programs.

That is nothing more than a cop out.

What cop out?

Two wrongs do not make a right

You trying to define welfare as to being what you want it to be is the cop out. Welfare consists of far more than direct payments to people.

Our founders spelled it out perfectly when they said “GENERAL WELFARE”
American taxpayers take great pride in investing in the GENERAL WELFARE of our nation, they love ROi.
Government has taken on the role of inducing economic growth and improving the GENERAL WELFARE through public investment....Ignorant Leftarded fools among us want to view investing in commerce as synonymous with investing in ShaQuita and Guadalupe.
DON’TBE A LEFTARDED FOOL. There is no ROi to be had in ShaQuita and or Guadalupe and forcing taxpayers to award them/pay them to give birth to more of their filthy same is detrimental to American society.

You will define it to provide welfare for yourself and others will do the same according to them.

NEGATIVE
There’s nothing trivial about it...no semantics.
“GENERAL WELFARE” can not be trivialized.
Ain’t that right progressive hunter ?

general welfare means it has to help everyone,,,and paying people that refuse to work hurts everyone and helps no one,,,

Q.E. did not help everyone. The rich did very well. The poor fell further behind.

I agree,,,if a company has hard times and theres a possibility of it getting through it with more money they can go get a loan,,,if not they should be allowed to fail,,,

the fed needed to end decades ago just like welfare,,,at least at the fed level,,,

That's great but let's both agree that is not going to happen so I am going to defend those hurt by those actions.

only tax payers are hurt,,,the unemployed are not,,,

As I said......... your excuses change nothing.

if it is at the state or local level I have little problem with it,,,at the fed level is where I contest it,,,

States may better be able to afford it if they weren't being blamed for the federal government not doing their job and paying out billions a year in settlements with their citizens over police actions.

blah blah blah,,,,

You don't want the states to enforce immigration even though the courts and the constitution says it's a federal matter?

do try and stay on topic,,,youre all over the place,,,

Cowardly reply. You say you want the states to address welfare but you don't want to address the costs the states are undergoing because of the failures of the federal government.

the remedy for that is not paying off the states with federal tax dollars

change what the feds are doing that you dont like

I've argued and argued that the Fed needs to quit blaming the states for immigration. I get pushed back over that all the time.

 

[pknopp]

That shit went out the window circa 1930’s when father government starting forcing me to pay for the bad decisions of others. I now have an equity share in all bodies...I have a say.

Agreed

end the wipe-every-nose welfare state and drug zombies are no longer any of my business

Things like Quantitative Easing is a part of the welfare state. End the Fed and I will quit arguing for other welfare programs.

That is nothing more than a cop out.

What cop out?

Two wrongs do not make a right

You trying to define welfare as to being what you want it to be is the cop out. Welfare consists of far more than direct payments to people.

Our founders spelled it out perfectly when they said “GENERAL WELFARE”
American taxpayers take great pride in investing in the GENERAL WELFARE of our nation, they love ROi.
Government has taken on the role of inducing economic growth and improving the GENERAL WELFARE through public investment....Ignorant Leftarded fools among us want to view investing in commerce as synonymous with investing in ShaQuita and Guadalupe.
DON’TBE A LEFTARDED FOOL. There is no ROi to be had in ShaQuita and or Guadalupe and forcing taxpayers to award them/pay them to give birth to more of their filthy same is detrimental to American society.

You will define it to provide welfare for yourself and others will do the same according to them.

NEGATIVE
There’s nothing trivial about it...no semantics.
“GENERAL WELFARE” can not be trivialized.
Ain’t that right progressive hunter ?

general welfare means it has to help everyone,,,and paying people that refuse to work hurts everyone and helps no one,,,

Q.E. did not help everyone. The rich did very well. The poor fell further behind.

I agree,,,if a company has hard times and theres a possibility of it getting through it with more money they can go get a loan,,,if not they should be allowed to fail,,,

the fed needed to end decades ago just like welfare,,,at least at the fed level,,,

That's great but let's both agree that is not going to happen so I am going to defend those hurt by those actions.

only tax payers are hurt,,,the unemployed are not,,,

As I said......... your excuses change nothing.

if it is at the state or local level I have little problem with it,,,at the fed level is where I contest it,,,

States may better be able to afford it if they weren't being blamed for the federal government not doing their job and paying out billions a year in settlements with their citizens over police actions.

? police misbehavior is a federal issue?

I explained my position. You can address what I said or try and spin it. I didn't say it was a federal issue. I said it is a state issue that many do not want to address. If addressed the state would have more for the welfare of the citizens.

I don't understand what "If addressed the state
would have more for the welfare of the citizens"
As far as I understand your writing "IT" refers to
settlement payments for lawsuits against the police??? I may be entirely wrong about "IT"

That was one part of my argument.

New York couldn't better spend these millions elsehwhere?

Spending billions on policing, then millions on police misconduct

Its black criminal misconduct that creates the need for police in the hood

There are police everywhere.

 

[progressive hunter]

That shit went out the window circa 1930’s when father government starting forcing me to pay for the bad decisions of others. I now have an equity share in all bodies...I have a say.

Agreed

end the wipe-every-nose welfare state and drug zombies are no longer any of my business

Things like Quantitative Easing is a part of the welfare state. End the Fed and I will quit arguing for other welfare programs.

That is nothing more than a cop out.

What cop out?

Two wrongs do not make a right

You trying to define welfare as to being what you want it to be is the cop out. Welfare consists of far more than direct payments to people.

Our founders spelled it out perfectly when they said “GENERAL WELFARE”
American taxpayers take great pride in investing in the GENERAL WELFARE of our nation, they love ROi.
Government has taken on the role of inducing economic growth and improving the GENERAL WELFARE through public investment....Ignorant Leftarded fools among us want to view investing in commerce as synonymous with investing in ShaQuita and Guadalupe.
DON’TBE A LEFTARDED FOOL. There is no ROi to be had in ShaQuita and or Guadalupe and forcing taxpayers to award them/pay them to give birth to more of their filthy same is detrimental to American society.

You will define it to provide welfare for yourself and others will do the same according to them.

NEGATIVE
There’s nothing trivial about it...no semantics.
“GENERAL WELFARE” can not be trivialized.
Ain’t that right progressive hunter ?

general welfare means it has to help everyone,,,and paying people that refuse to work hurts everyone and helps no one,,,

Q.E. did not help everyone. The rich did very well. The poor fell further behind.

I agree,,,if a company has hard times and theres a possibility of it getting through it with more money they can go get a loan,,,if not they should be allowed to fail,,,

the fed needed to end decades ago just like welfare,,,at least at the fed level,,,

That's great but let's both agree that is not going to happen so I am going to defend those hurt by those actions.

only tax payers are hurt,,,the unemployed are not,,,

As I said......... your excuses change nothing.

if it is at the state or local level I have little problem with it,,,at the fed level is where I contest it,,,

States may better be able to afford it if they weren't being blamed for the federal government not doing their job and paying out billions a year in settlements with their citizens over police actions.

blah blah blah,,,,

You don't want the states to enforce immigration even though the courts and the constitution says it's a federal matter?

do try and stay on topic,,,youre all over the place,,,

Cowardly reply. You say you want the states to address welfare but you don't want to address the costs the states are undergoing because of the failures of the federal government.

the remedy for that is not paying off the states with federal tax dollars

change what the feds are doing that you dont like

I've argued and argued that the Fed needs to quit blaming the states for immigration. I get pushed back over that all the time.

when the states are creating sanctuary states and cities it is their fault,,,

we are either a nation of laws or we arent,,,

 

[jasonnfree]

Careful people. The extremely wealthy are getting wealthier as their taxes get lower. In the meantime, poverty increases.
'We can either have democracy in this country or we can have great wealth concentrated in the hands of a few, but we can not have both.' said
Justice Louis Brandeis.

 

[pknopp]

That shit went out the window circa 1930’s when father government starting forcing me to pay for the bad decisions of others. I now have an equity share in all bodies...I have a say.

Agreed

end the wipe-every-nose welfare state and drug zombies are no longer any of my business

Things like Quantitative Easing is a part of the welfare state. End the Fed and I will quit arguing for other welfare programs.

That is nothing more than a cop out.

What cop out?

Two wrongs do not make a right

You trying to define welfare as to being what you want it to be is the cop out. Welfare consists of far more than direct payments to people.

Our founders spelled it out perfectly when they said “GENERAL WELFARE”
American taxpayers take great pride in investing in the GENERAL WELFARE of our nation, they love ROi.
Government has taken on the role of inducing economic growth and improving the GENERAL WELFARE through public investment....Ignorant Leftarded fools among us want to view investing in commerce as synonymous with investing in ShaQuita and Guadalupe.
DON’TBE A LEFTARDED FOOL. There is no ROi to be had in ShaQuita and or Guadalupe and forcing taxpayers to award them/pay them to give birth to more of their filthy same is detrimental to American society.

You will define it to provide welfare for yourself and others will do the same according to them.

NEGATIVE
There’s nothing trivial about it...no semantics.
“GENERAL WELFARE” can not be trivialized.
Ain’t that right progressive hunter ?

general welfare means it has to help everyone,,,and paying people that refuse to work hurts everyone and helps no one,,,

Q.E. did not help everyone. The rich did very well. The poor fell further behind.

I agree,,,if a company has hard times and theres a possibility of it getting through it with more money they can go get a loan,,,if not they should be allowed to fail,,,

the fed needed to end decades ago just like welfare,,,at least at the fed level,,,

That's great but let's both agree that is not going to happen so I am going to defend those hurt by those actions.

only tax payers are hurt,,,the unemployed are not,,,

As I said......... your excuses change nothing.

if it is at the state or local level I have little problem with it,,,at the fed level is where I contest it,,,

States may better be able to afford it if they weren't being blamed for the federal government not doing their job and paying out billions a year in settlements with their citizens over police actions.

blah blah blah,,,,

You don't want the states to enforce immigration even though the courts and the constitution says it's a federal matter?

do try and stay on topic,,,youre all over the place,,,

Cowardly reply. You say you want the states to address welfare but you don't want to address the costs the states are undergoing because of the failures of the federal government.

the remedy for that is not paying off the states with federal tax dollars

change what the feds are doing that you dont like

I've argued and argued that the Fed needs to quit blaming the states for immigration. I get pushed back over that all the time.

when the states are creating sanctuary states and cities it is their fault,,,

we are either a nation of laws or we arent,,,

A state can not create a sanctuary city. That is nothing more than an excuse for the federal government not doing it's job.

Only the federal government can enforce immigration laws.

 

[progressive hunter]

That shit went out the window circa 1930’s when father government starting forcing me to pay for the bad decisions of others. I now have an equity share in all bodies...I have a say.

Agreed

end the wipe-every-nose welfare state and drug zombies are no longer any of my business

Things like Quantitative Easing is a part of the welfare state. End the Fed and I will quit arguing for other welfare programs.

That is nothing more than a cop out.

What cop out?

Two wrongs do not make a right

You trying to define welfare as to being what you want it to be is the cop out. Welfare consists of far more than direct payments to people.

Our founders spelled it out perfectly when they said “GENERAL WELFARE”
American taxpayers take great pride in investing in the GENERAL WELFARE of our nation, they love ROi.
Government has taken on the role of inducing economic growth and improving the GENERAL WELFARE through public investment....Ignorant Leftarded fools among us want to view investing in commerce as synonymous with investing in ShaQuita and Guadalupe.
DON’TBE A LEFTARDED FOOL. There is no ROi to be had in ShaQuita and or Guadalupe and forcing taxpayers to award them/pay them to give birth to more of their filthy same is detrimental to American society.

You will define it to provide welfare for yourself and others will do the same according to them.

NEGATIVE
There’s nothing trivial about it...no semantics.
“GENERAL WELFARE” can not be trivialized.
Ain’t that right progressive hunter ?

general welfare means it has to help everyone,,,and paying people that refuse to work hurts everyone and helps no one,,,

Q.E. did not help everyone. The rich did very well. The poor fell further behind.

I agree,,,if a company has hard times and theres a possibility of it getting through it with more money they can go get a loan,,,if not they should be allowed to fail,,,

the fed needed to end decades ago just like welfare,,,at least at the fed level,,,

That's great but let's both agree that is not going to happen so I am going to defend those hurt by those actions.

only tax payers are hurt,,,the unemployed are not,,,

As I said......... your excuses change nothing.

if it is at the state or local level I have little problem with it,,,at the fed level is where I contest it,,,

States may better be able to afford it if they weren't being blamed for the federal government not doing their job and paying out billions a year in settlements with their citizens over police actions.

blah blah blah,,,,

You don't want the states to enforce immigration even though the courts and the constitution says it's a federal matter?

do try and stay on topic,,,youre all over the place,,,

Cowardly reply. You say you want the states to address welfare but you don't want to address the costs the states are undergoing because of the failures of the federal government.

the remedy for that is not paying off the states with federal tax dollars

change what the feds are doing that you dont like

I've argued and argued that the Fed needs to quit blaming the states for immigration. I get pushed back over that all the time.

when the states are creating sanctuary states and cities it is their fault,,,

we are either a nation of laws or we arent,,,

A state can not create a sanctuary city. That is nothing more than an excuse for the federal government not doing it's job.

Only the federal government can enforce immigration laws.

funny thing is they did create them,,,

I'm sure you have a link that says only feds can enforce fed law???

you need to get out more cause the world is spinning around you and youre missing it,,,

 

[pknopp]

That shit went out the window circa 1930’s when father government starting forcing me to pay for the bad decisions of others. I now have an equity share in all bodies...I have a say.

Agreed

end the wipe-every-nose welfare state and drug zombies are no longer any of my business

Things like Quantitative Easing is a part of the welfare state. End the Fed and I will quit arguing for other welfare programs.

That is nothing more than a cop out.

What cop out?

Two wrongs do not make a right

You trying to define welfare as to being what you want it to be is the cop out. Welfare consists of far more than direct payments to people.

Our founders spelled it out perfectly when they said “GENERAL WELFARE”
American taxpayers take great pride in investing in the GENERAL WELFARE of our nation, they love ROi.
Government has taken on the role of inducing economic growth and improving the GENERAL WELFARE through public investment....Ignorant Leftarded fools among us want to view investing in commerce as synonymous with investing in ShaQuita and Guadalupe.
DON’TBE A LEFTARDED FOOL. There is no ROi to be had in ShaQuita and or Guadalupe and forcing taxpayers to award them/pay them to give birth to more of their filthy same is detrimental to American society.

You will define it to provide welfare for yourself and others will do the same according to them.

NEGATIVE
There’s nothing trivial about it...no semantics.
“GENERAL WELFARE” can not be trivialized.
Ain’t that right progressive hunter ?

general welfare means it has to help everyone,,,and paying people that refuse to work hurts everyone and helps no one,,,

Q.E. did not help everyone. The rich did very well. The poor fell further behind.

I agree,,,if a company has hard times and theres a possibility of it getting through it with more money they can go get a loan,,,if not they should be allowed to fail,,,

the fed needed to end decades ago just like welfare,,,at least at the fed level,,,

That's great but let's both agree that is not going to happen so I am going to defend those hurt by those actions.

only tax payers are hurt,,,the unemployed are not,,,

As I said......... your excuses change nothing.

if it is at the state or local level I have little problem with it,,,at the fed level is where I contest it,,,

States may better be able to afford it if they weren't being blamed for the federal government not doing their job and paying out billions a year in settlements with their citizens over police actions.

blah blah blah,,,,

You don't want the states to enforce immigration even though the courts and the constitution says it's a federal matter?

do try and stay on topic,,,youre all over the place,,,

Cowardly reply. You say you want the states to address welfare but you don't want to address the costs the states are undergoing because of the failures of the federal government.

the remedy for that is not paying off the states with federal tax dollars

change what the feds are doing that you dont like

I've argued and argued that the Fed needs to quit blaming the states for immigration. I get pushed back over that all the time.

when the states are creating sanctuary states and cities it is their fault,,,

we are either a nation of laws or we arent,,,

A state can not create a sanctuary city. That is nothing more than an excuse for the federal government not doing it's job.

Only the federal government can enforce immigration laws.

funny thing is they did create them,,,

I'm sure you have a link that says only feds can enforce fed law???

you need to get out more cause the world is spinning around you and youre missing it,,,

I've done this many times. Its in the Constitution.

A state has no means to determine who is here legally and who isn't.

Its why Sheriff Arpaio was found guilty.

 

[progressive hunter]

That shit went out the window circa 1930’s when father government starting forcing me to pay for the bad decisions of others. I now have an equity share in all bodies...I have a say.

Agreed

end the wipe-every-nose welfare state and drug zombies are no longer any of my business

Things like Quantitative Easing is a part of the welfare state. End the Fed and I will quit arguing for other welfare programs.

That is nothing more than a cop out.

What cop out?

Two wrongs do not make a right

You trying to define welfare as to being what you want it to be is the cop out. Welfare consists of far more than direct payments to people.

Our founders spelled it out perfectly when they said “GENERAL WELFARE”
American taxpayers take great pride in investing in the GENERAL WELFARE of our nation, they love ROi.
Government has taken on the role of inducing economic growth and improving the GENERAL WELFARE through public investment....Ignorant Leftarded fools among us want to view investing in commerce as synonymous with investing in ShaQuita and Guadalupe.
DON’TBE A LEFTARDED FOOL. There is no ROi to be had in ShaQuita and or Guadalupe and forcing taxpayers to award them/pay them to give birth to more of their filthy same is detrimental to American society.

You will define it to provide welfare for yourself and others will do the same according to them.

NEGATIVE
There’s nothing trivial about it...no semantics.
“GENERAL WELFARE” can not be trivialized.
Ain’t that right progressive hunter ?

general welfare means it has to help everyone,,,and paying people that refuse to work hurts everyone and helps no one,,,

Q.E. did not help everyone. The rich did very well. The poor fell further behind.

I agree,,,if a company has hard times and theres a possibility of it getting through it with more money they can go get a loan,,,if not they should be allowed to fail,,,

the fed needed to end decades ago just like welfare,,,at least at the fed level,,,

That's great but let's both agree that is not going to happen so I am going to defend those hurt by those actions.

only tax payers are hurt,,,the unemployed are not,,,

As I said......... your excuses change nothing.

if it is at the state or local level I have little problem with it,,,at the fed level is where I contest it,,,

States may better be able to afford it if they weren't being blamed for the federal government not doing their job and paying out billions a year in settlements with their citizens over police actions.

blah blah blah,,,,

You don't want the states to enforce immigration even though the courts and the constitution says it's a federal matter?

do try and stay on topic,,,youre all over the place,,,

Cowardly reply. You say you want the states to address welfare but you don't want to address the costs the states are undergoing because of the failures of the federal government.

the remedy for that is not paying off the states with federal tax dollars

change what the feds are doing that you dont like

I've argued and argued that the Fed needs to quit blaming the states for immigration. I get pushed back over that all the time.

when the states are creating sanctuary states and cities it is their fault,,,

we are either a nation of laws or we arent,,,

A state can not create a sanctuary city. That is nothing more than an excuse for the federal government not doing it's job.

Only the federal government can enforce immigration laws.

funny thing is they did create them,,,

I'm sure you have a link that says only feds can enforce fed law???

you need to get out more cause the world is spinning around you and youre missing it,,,

I've done this many times. Its in the Constitution.

A state has no means to determine who is here legally and who isn't.

Its why Sheriff Arpaio was found guilty.

now youre just playing word games,,,


they have the means if they call the feds and ask them,,,

 

[BrokeLoser]

Careful people. The extremely wealthy are getting wealthier as their taxes get lower. In the meantime, poverty increases.
'We can either have democracy in this country or we can have great wealth concentrated in the hands of a few, but we can not have both.' said
Justice Louis Brandeis.

Meanwhile, disgusting leftists continue recruiting millions of Mexico’s filth and forcing them in the laps of those terrible wealthy people whom pay all of this nations taxes.
Haha...It’s comical to hear you ignorant pukes beg to fuck over those who fund our nation while begging to grow our needy underclass of filth, while bitching about the number of underclass filth all at the same time. You people are just plain fucking bizarre.

 

[BrokeLoser]

That shit went out the window circa 1930’s when father government starting forcing me to pay for the bad decisions of others. I now have an equity share in all bodies...I have a say.

Agreed

end the wipe-every-nose welfare state and drug zombies are no longer any of my business

Things like Quantitative Easing is a part of the welfare state. End the Fed and I will quit arguing for other welfare programs.

That is nothing more than a cop out.

What cop out?

Two wrongs do not make a right

You trying to define welfare as to being what you want it to be is the cop out. Welfare consists of far more than direct payments to people.

Our founders spelled it out perfectly when they said “GENERAL WELFARE”
American taxpayers take great pride in investing in the GENERAL WELFARE of our nation, they love ROi.
Government has taken on the role of inducing economic growth and improving the GENERAL WELFARE through public investment....Ignorant Leftarded fools among us want to view investing in commerce as synonymous with investing in ShaQuita and Guadalupe.
DON’TBE A LEFTARDED FOOL. There is no ROi to be had in ShaQuita and or Guadalupe and forcing taxpayers to award them/pay them to give birth to more of their filthy same is detrimental to American society.

You will define it to provide welfare for yourself and others will do the same according to them.

NEGATIVE
There’s nothing trivial about it...no semantics.
“GENERAL WELFARE” can not be trivialized.
Ain’t that right progressive hunter ?

You don't get to define general welfare.

Haha...You’re trying awfully hard...I’m guessing you ride the backs of legit Americans?
You should probably look up the definition of “GENERAL”.
Look, NOBODY benefits when Guadalupe expands her litter...while EVERYBODY benefits when commerce thrives.

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

And alcohol. Don't forget that powerful, mood altering drug.

Alcohol is already legal everywhere. Why do we need to compound the effects of a drug like alcohol by
adding weed to the mix? We actually don't.

Why do right wingers insist on practicing the abomination of hypocrisy regarding nanny-Statism?

Are you for legalizing crack cocaine? Heroin? Meth? Fentanyl?

I want to see to see how far you will deny your own hypocrisy.

 

[esalla]

The stoners and their Political Supporters have been lying to us since the beginning. Nothing that alters your psyche is good for you, including alcohol. BUT!!!!!!!!!! you can drink 1 or 2 drinks a day and not have any adverse affects. You cant smoke weed moderately, you smoke a joint your high...weed has one purpose to get you stoned.

Moderate adolescent cannabis use may have adverse effects on cognitive functioning, specifically verbal memory, that cannot be explained by familial factors, according to a study of siblings led by the University of Colorado School of Medicine.


We wanted to expand our understanding of whether cannabis use is related to lower cognitive functioning,” said study lead author Dr. Jarrod Ellingson, a researcher in the Department of Psychiatry at the University of Colorado School of Medicine and the Institute for Behavioral Genetics at the University of Colorado.


“There’s a large body of evidence that cannabis use is linked to cognitive functioning, but we know that cannabis use is not isolated from other important risk factors (e.g. peer group influence, parental behavior, socioeconomic status).”


“That was the primary motivation behind this study, in which we compared siblings to account for many of these risk factors.”


In the study, Dr. Ellingson and colleagues were able to establish comparisons between siblings and then determine that differential levels of cannabis use were related to poorer cognitive functioning, particularly verbal memory.

Moderate Cannabis Use Has Adverse Effects on Cognitive Functioning, Study Suggests | Sci.News

Moderate adolescent cannabis use may have adverse effects on cognitive functioning, specifically verbal memory, that cannot be explained by familial factors, according to a study of siblings led by the University of Colorado School of Medicine.

www.sci-news.com

Pot creates a person who does not give a shit about life, which is why dying people smoke

 

[Mac-7]

Inanimate objects don't create jobs or engage in corporate downsizing for their bottom line.

I dont approve of corporate welfare eithdr

but you are correct that corporations do create jobs that welfare bums on the street try to avoid

 

[Mac-7]

I've argued and argued that the Fed needs to quit blaming the states for immigration. I get pushed back over that all the time.

The states are not to blame for the ILLEGAL ALIEN INVASION that conservatives criticize and want to entirely put a stop to

the blame for that is primarily the blame of the swamp rats in washington dc

and yes, the feds are responsible for LEGAL IMMIGRATION that conservative merely want to reform rather than end

 

[Mac-7]

There are police everywhere.

Only criminals in the hood are complaining about the police cramping their style

 

[Mac-7]

That shit went out the window circa 1930’s when father government starting forcing me to pay for the bad decisions of others. I now have an equity share in all bodies...I have a say.

Agreed

end the wipe-every-nose welfare state and drug zombies are no longer any of my business

Things like Quantitative Easing is a part of the welfare state. End the Fed and I will quit arguing for other welfare programs.

That is nothing more than a cop out.

What cop out?

Two wrongs do not make a right

You trying to define welfare as to being what you want it to be is the cop out. Welfare consists of far more than direct payments to people.

Our founders spelled it out perfectly when they said “GENERAL WELFARE”
American taxpayers take great pride in investing in the GENERAL WELFARE of our nation, they love ROi.
Government has taken on the role of inducing economic growth and improving the GENERAL WELFARE through public investment....Ignorant Leftarded fools among us want to view investing in commerce as synonymous with investing in ShaQuita and Guadalupe.
DON’TBE A LEFTARDED FOOL. There is no ROi to be had in ShaQuita and or Guadalupe and forcing taxpayers to award them/pay them to give birth to more of their filthy same is detrimental to American society.

You will define it to provide welfare for yourself and others will do the same according to them.

NEGATIVE
There’s nothing trivial about it...no semantics.
“GENERAL WELFARE” can not be trivialized.
Ain’t that right progressive hunter ?

general welfare means it has to help everyone,,,and paying people that refuse to work hurts everyone and helps no one,,,

Q.E. did not help everyone. The rich did very well. The poor fell further behind.

I agree,,,if a company has hard times and theres a possibility of it getting through it with more money they can go get a loan,,,if not they should be allowed to fail,,,

the fed needed to end decades ago just like welfare,,,at least at the fed level,,,

That's great but let's both agree that is not going to happen so I am going to defend those hurt by those actions.

only tax payers are hurt,,,the unemployed are not,,,

As I said......... your excuses change nothing.

if it is at the state or local level I have little problem with it,,,at the fed level is where I contest it,,,

States may better be able to afford it if they weren't being blamed for the federal government not doing their job and paying out billions a year in settlements with their citizens over police actions.

blah blah blah,,,,

You don't want the states to enforce immigration even though the courts and the constitution says it's a federal matter?

do try and stay on topic,,,youre all over the place,,,

Cowardly reply. You say you want the states to address welfare but you don't want to address the costs the states are undergoing because of the failures of the federal government.

the remedy for that is not paying off the states with federal tax dollars

change what the feds are doing that you dont like

I've argued and argued that the Fed needs to quit blaming the states for immigration. I get pushed back over that all the time.

when the states are creating sanctuary states and cities it is their fault,,,

we are either a nation of laws or we arent,,,

A state can not create a sanctuary city. That is nothing more than an excuse for the federal government not doing it's job.

Only the federal government can enforce immigration laws.

California is passing sanctuary laws that apply to the cities

California “Sanctuary State” Bill (SB 54) Summary and History | FAIRUS.org

California Senate Bill 54 effectively makes California a “sanctuary state” by legalizing and standardizing statewide non-cooperation policies between California law enforcement agencies and federal immigration authorities.

www.fairus.org

 

[danielpalos]

And alcohol. Don't forget that powerful, mood altering drug.

Alcohol is already legal everywhere. Why do we need to compound the effects of a drug like alcohol by
adding weed to the mix? We actually don't.

Why do right wingers insist on practicing the abomination of hypocrisy regarding nanny-Statism?

Are you for legalizing crack cocaine? Heroin? Meth? Fentanyl?

I want to see to see how far you will deny your own hypocrisy.

Better drugs at lower cost; soma anyone?

 

[danielpalos]

The stoners and their Political Supporters have been lying to us since the beginning. Nothing that alters your psyche is good for you, including alcohol. BUT!!!!!!!!!! you can drink 1 or 2 drinks a day and not have any adverse affects. You cant smoke weed moderately, you smoke a joint your high...weed has one purpose to get you stoned.

Moderate adolescent cannabis use may have adverse effects on cognitive functioning, specifically verbal memory, that cannot be explained by familial factors, according to a study of siblings led by the University of Colorado School of Medicine.


We wanted to expand our understanding of whether cannabis use is related to lower cognitive functioning,” said study lead author Dr. Jarrod Ellingson, a researcher in the Department of Psychiatry at the University of Colorado School of Medicine and the Institute for Behavioral Genetics at the University of Colorado.


“There’s a large body of evidence that cannabis use is linked to cognitive functioning, but we know that cannabis use is not isolated from other important risk factors (e.g. peer group influence, parental behavior, socioeconomic status).”


“That was the primary motivation behind this study, in which we compared siblings to account for many of these risk factors.”


In the study, Dr. Ellingson and colleagues were able to establish comparisons between siblings and then determine that differential levels of cannabis use were related to poorer cognitive functioning, particularly verbal memory.

Moderate Cannabis Use Has Adverse Effects on Cognitive Functioning, Study Suggests | Sci.News

Moderate adolescent cannabis use may have adverse effects on cognitive functioning, specifically verbal memory, that cannot be explained by familial factors, according to a study of siblings led by the University of Colorado School of Medicine.

www.sci-news.com

Pot creates a person who does not give a shit about life, which is why dying people smoke

It couldn't be the cbd which helps alleviate pain, could it?

 

[danielpalos]

That shit went out the window circa 1930’s when father government starting forcing me to pay for the bad decisions of others. I now have an equity share in all bodies...I have a say.

Agreed

end the wipe-every-nose welfare state and drug zombies are no longer any of my business

Things like Quantitative Easing is a part of the welfare state. End the Fed and I will quit arguing for other welfare programs.

That is nothing more than a cop out.

What cop out?

Two wrongs do not make a right

You trying to define welfare as to being what you want it to be is the cop out. Welfare consists of far more than direct payments to people.

Our founders spelled it out perfectly when they said “GENERAL WELFARE”
American taxpayers take great pride in investing in the GENERAL WELFARE of our nation, they love ROi.
Government has taken on the role of inducing economic growth and improving the GENERAL WELFARE through public investment....Ignorant Leftarded fools among us want to view investing in commerce as synonymous with investing in ShaQuita and Guadalupe.
DON’TBE A LEFTARDED FOOL. There is no ROi to be had in ShaQuita and or Guadalupe and forcing taxpayers to award them/pay them to give birth to more of their filthy same is detrimental to American society.

You will define it to provide welfare for yourself and others will do the same according to them.

NEGATIVE
There’s nothing trivial about it...no semantics.
“GENERAL WELFARE” can not be trivialized.
Ain’t that right progressive hunter ?

general welfare means it has to help everyone,,,and paying people that refuse to work hurts everyone and helps no one,,,

Q.E. did not help everyone. The rich did very well. The poor fell further behind.

I agree,,,if a company has hard times and theres a possibility of it getting through it with more money they can go get a loan,,,if not they should be allowed to fail,,,

the fed needed to end decades ago just like welfare,,,at least at the fed level,,,

That's great but let's both agree that is not going to happen so I am going to defend those hurt by those actions.

only tax payers are hurt,,,the unemployed are not,,,

As I said......... your excuses change nothing.

if it is at the state or local level I have little problem with it,,,at the fed level is where I contest it,,,

States may better be able to afford it if they weren't being blamed for the federal government not doing their job and paying out billions a year in settlements with their citizens over police actions.

blah blah blah,,,,

You don't want the states to enforce immigration even though the courts and the constitution says it's a federal matter?

do try and stay on topic,,,youre all over the place,,,

Cowardly reply. You say you want the states to address welfare but you don't want to address the costs the states are undergoing because of the failures of the federal government.

the remedy for that is not paying off the states with federal tax dollars

change what the feds are doing that you dont like

I've argued and argued that the Fed needs to quit blaming the states for immigration. I get pushed back over that all the time.

when the states are creating sanctuary states and cities it is their fault,,,

we are either a nation of laws or we arent,,,

A state can not create a sanctuary city. That is nothing more than an excuse for the federal government not doing it's job.

Only the federal government can enforce immigration laws.

California is passing sanctuary laws that apply to the cities

California “Sanctuary State” Bill (SB 54) Summary and History | FAIRUS.org

California Senate Bill 54 effectively makes California a “sanctuary state” by legalizing and standardizing statewide non-cooperation policies between California law enforcement agencies and federal immigration authorities.

www.fairus.org

There is no express Immigration clause in our federal Constitution right wingers. Obey the laws.

 

[esalla]

The stoners and their Political Supporters have been lying to us since the beginning. Nothing that alters your psyche is good for you, including alcohol. BUT!!!!!!!!!! you can drink 1 or 2 drinks a day and not have any adverse affects. You cant smoke weed moderately, you smoke a joint your high...weed has one purpose to get you stoned.

Moderate adolescent cannabis use may have adverse effects on cognitive functioning, specifically verbal memory, that cannot be explained by familial factors, according to a study of siblings led by the University of Colorado School of Medicine.


We wanted to expand our understanding of whether cannabis use is related to lower cognitive functioning,” said study lead author Dr. Jarrod Ellingson, a researcher in the Department of Psychiatry at the University of Colorado School of Medicine and the Institute for Behavioral Genetics at the University of Colorado.


“There’s a large body of evidence that cannabis use is linked to cognitive functioning, but we know that cannabis use is not isolated from other important risk factors (e.g. peer group influence, parental behavior, socioeconomic status).”


“That was the primary motivation behind this study, in which we compared siblings to account for many of these risk factors.”


In the study, Dr. Ellingson and colleagues were able to establish comparisons between siblings and then determine that differential levels of cannabis use were related to poorer cognitive functioning, particularly verbal memory.

Moderate Cannabis Use Has Adverse Effects on Cognitive Functioning, Study Suggests | Sci.News

Moderate adolescent cannabis use may have adverse effects on cognitive functioning, specifically verbal memory, that cannot be explained by familial factors, according to a study of siblings led by the University of Colorado School of Medicine.

www.sci-news.com

Pot creates a person who does not give a shit about life, which is why dying people smoke

It couldn't be the cbd which helps alleviate pain, could it?

Pot has many substances, that work together to spoil life. Pain can be an inspiring reason to move, pot just hides the pain resulting in more pain