More Proof the skeptics are WINNING!!

[Mertex]

More bad news for the climate crusading nutters.......


Less people than ever believe in global warming!!!



As Ive said many times and been 100% accurate......nobody cares about the science!!

Who are so smart they peer review a paper that is destroyed in 10 hours by a mere statistician. Yeah, I wouldn't hang my reputation with a bunch of 'tards like that missy...

A statistician? You trust a statistician over Meteorologists and Climatologists? What would a statistician know about climate/weather? You must be one of those who believes Rush! Look at the stats, your group is getting smaller.....

After years of hemming and hawing, the American Meteorological Society released its official position on climate change yesterday, saying the Earth is warming and that warming is caused by humans.

Weather forecasters have been criticized for their silence on connecting the dots between the extreme weather they report and climate change, even amidst the drought that has effected most of the US this summer.
"There is unequivocal evidence that Earth’s lower atmosphere, ocean, and land surface are warming; sea "level is rising; and snow cover, mountain glaciers, and Arctic sea ice are shrinking," they says in the policy statement.

"The dominant cause of the warming since the 1950s is human activities. This scientific finding is based on a large and persuasive body of research. The observed warming will be irreversible for many years into the future, and even larger temperature increases will occur as greenhouse gases continue to accumulate in the atmosphere."
Meteorologists Finally Take a Stand on Climate Change



"The number of American adults who are "very certain that global warming is not occurring" has dropped from 16 percent in 2010 to 8 percent in 2012, according to a survey released Wednesday by Yale University.

Individual weather events cannot be pinned on climate change, of course. Storms happen, and always have with some regularity. Still, Satterfield suggested that superstorm Sandy was a "watershed" moment for raising the public's climate consciousness. He's noticed that his meteorologist peers seem to be coming along as well.
Meteorologist On Climate Change: Viewers Are Less Skeptical, Forecasts Getting Fuzzier

Youve tuned in about 220 pages too late. No one I know here denies that the climate is changing and warming.. The intelligient and ONGOING debate is about WHY and how much.

You mean no one but the OP? I didn't see where he refuted his own OP. See where I highlighted his words up above, from his OP.

Besides, the posts that I have responded to don't seem to be in agreement with what you are saying - they seem to still hold on to their belief that there is no climate change or warming!

 

[Mertex]

What climate change? Fewer people than EVER believe the world is really warming up | UK | News | Daily Express






Who cares what the bought scientists say........science is gay anyway. I care only about how it is having an effect in the real world = ZERO

You may want to tell Flatcaltenn that you are still part of the 8%!

 

[Mertex]

Nobody cares about climate science except the internet nutters >>>>


Global surveys show environmental concerns rank low among public concerns

I'm so glad you posted pictures of the 8% group that you belong to. They look just as dumb as I pictured them.

 

[flacaltenn]

Ummmmn...after living almost sixty years on this planet, I don't need a lecture on much of anything. Global warming is real. I have seen it happen. What a coincidence there has been 6 zillion people driving this with the whole carbon driven denial ethos going here. What a surprise. I have ownership in the market. I get it.

So Mary tell us all how a half degree change in temperature over your lifetime has appearwd to you? Did ur tomatoes not do well this year?

Hate to tell ya this.. But all those scary things about climate change are SUPPOSED to happen in the future.. Almost NO science they happening now... Except on the network news and the NYTimes

Hmm....

You? Nasa? You? Nasa?

Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet

Global climate change has already had observable effects on the environment. Glaciers have shrunk, ice on rivers and lakes is breaking up earlier, plant and animal ranges have shifted and trees are flowering sooner.

Effects that scientists had predicted in the past would result from global climate change are now occurring: loss of sea ice, accelerated sea level rise and longer, more intense heat waves.

Gee, I wonder....

(been sniffing a lot of glue lately?)

Wow stuff is flowering SOONER? Is that every spring everywhere. How many have died?
Ya know grasshopper. A lot of shit didnt bloom at all in the 1700s.

 

[westwall]

Ummmmn...after living almost sixty years on this planet, I don't need a lecture on much of anything. Global warming is real. I have seen it happen. What a coincidence there has been 6 zillion people driving this with the whole carbon driven denial ethos going here. What a surprise. I have ownership in the market. I get it.

Well, I've been on this planet LONGER than you have my friend and I have seen both the cooling scare, AND the warming scare....perpetrated by the SAME people mind you. The common denominator? Their desire to relieve you of your cash.

 

[westwall]

Yes, and it never ceases to amaze me how dumb some people really are. Some take the word of an ignoramus like Rush Limbaugh, whose only claim to fame is that he has figured out what extremists want to hear, over well-studied, well-versed, and educated scientists!

Who are so smart they peer review a paper that is destroyed in 10 hours by a mere statistician. Yeah, I wouldn't hang my reputation with a bunch of 'tards like that missy...

A statistician? You trust a statistician over Meteorologists and Climatologists? What would a statistician know about climate/weather? You must be one of those who believes Rush! Look at the stats, your group is getting smaller.....

After years of hemming and hawing, the American Meteorological Society released its official position on climate change yesterday, saying the Earth is warming and that warming is caused by humans.

Weather forecasters have been criticized for their silence on connecting the dots between the extreme weather they report and climate change, even amidst the drought that has effected most of the US this summer.
"There is unequivocal evidence that Earth’s lower atmosphere, ocean, and land surface are warming; sea "level is rising; and snow cover, mountain glaciers, and Arctic sea ice are shrinking," they says in the policy statement.

"The dominant cause of the warming since the 1950s is human activities. This scientific finding is based on a large and persuasive body of research. The observed warming will be irreversible for many years into the future, and even larger temperature increases will occur as greenhouse gases continue to accumulate in the atmosphere."
Meteorologists Finally Take a Stand on Climate Change



"The number of American adults who are "very certain that global warming is not occurring" has dropped from 16 percent in 2010 to 8 percent in 2012, according to a survey released Wednesday by Yale University.

Individual weather events cannot be pinned on climate change, of course. Storms happen, and always have with some regularity. Still, Satterfield suggested that superstorm Sandy was a "watershed" moment for raising the public's climate consciousness. He's noticed that his meteorologist peers seem to be coming along as well.
Meteorologist On Climate Change: Viewers Are Less Skeptical, Forecasts Getting Fuzzier

Here's how science works....well how it's supposed to work.... Listen to what he says...this man WAS a genius and won the Nobel Prize in physics, something your precious climatologists couldn't even begin to understand.



It's not about WHO is making the assertion, it's about whether they are CORRECT or not. I will take an accurate statistician over an inaccurate climatologist any day.

 

[skookerasbil]

Geee......that consensus is really having an impact on the real world!!!!!

 

[flacaltenn]

More bad news for the climate crusading nutters.......


Less people than ever believe in global warming!!!



As Ive said many times and been 100% accurate......nobody cares about the science!!

A statistician? You trust a statistician over Meteorologists and Climatologists? What would a statistician know about climate/weather? You must be one of those who believes Rush! Look at the stats, your group is getting smaller.....

After years of hemming and hawing, the American Meteorological Society released its official position on climate change yesterday, saying the Earth is warming and that warming is caused by humans.

Weather forecasters have been criticized for their silence on connecting the dots between the extreme weather they report and climate change, even amidst the drought that has effected most of the US this summer.
"There is unequivocal evidence that Earth’s lower atmosphere, ocean, and land surface are warming; sea "level is rising; and snow cover, mountain glaciers, and Arctic sea ice are shrinking," they says in the policy statement.

"The dominant cause of the warming since the 1950s is human activities. This scientific finding is based on a large and persuasive body of research. The observed warming will be irreversible for many years into the future, and even larger temperature increases will occur as greenhouse gases continue to accumulate in the atmosphere."
Meteorologists Finally Take a Stand on Climate Change



"The number of American adults who are "very certain that global warming is not occurring" has dropped from 16 percent in 2010 to 8 percent in 2012, according to a survey released Wednesday by Yale University.

Individual weather events cannot be pinned on climate change, of course. Storms happen, and always have with some regularity. Still, Satterfield suggested that superstorm Sandy was a "watershed" moment for raising the public's climate consciousness. He's noticed that his meteorologist peers seem to be coming along as well.
Meteorologist On Climate Change: Viewers Are Less Skeptical, Forecasts Getting Fuzzier

Youve tuned in about 220 pages too late. No one I know here denies that the climate is changing and warming.. The intelligient and ONGOING debate is about WHY and how much.

You mean no one but the OP? I didn't see where he refuted his own OP. See where I highlighted his words up above, from his OP.

Besides, the posts that I have responded to don't seem to be in agreement with what you are saying - they seem to still hold on to their belief that there is no climate change or warming!

You might be confused by the OP if it was reffering to the lack of warming observed for the last 15 years or so.. Thats actually true in that the OBSERVED rate of warming is near 0 for that period.

Still doesnt mean that anyone here DENYS that the earth is in along term warming trend.
its just that CO2 is not the total answer..

Do you know why it hasnt warmed considerably in12 or 15 years while CO2 continued to skyrocket?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Unfortunately the only cure for ignorance is education and denialists seem to have spent their lives avoiding that. Great examples why adult ignorance is mostly incurable.

Unfortunately the only cure for ignorance is education

Still waiting for you to cure my ignorance about drastic European budget cuts.
I'm not sure if you were lying or just repeating the lies you heard.....

Why don't you cure it?

You made the stupid claim. I can't cure your stupidity.

I can continue to mock you for making claims with no proof.

 

[flacaltenn]

Mertex---- I saw what u meant... just because less people deny the earth is warming doesnt mean that
more people are buying the failed science that tried to explain it and scare the shit out of the youngins..

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Unfortunately the only cure for ignorance is education and denialists seem to have spent their lives avoiding that. Great examples why adult ignorance is mostly incurable.

Unfortunately the only cure for ignorance is education

Still waiting for you to cure my ignorance about drastic European budget cuts.
I'm not sure if you were lying or just repeating the lies you heard.....

Todd bro......don't even waste your time. These people are mental cases......they'll go into their box not getting it. Do like I do.....just make fun of 'em........its a fucking hoot!! Just out-absurd them.

Making Fun of Liberals: More Obama Cartoons

Wild Bill: Making fun of liberals... | Opinion - Conservative


Independent and Conservative: How to Piss off Liberals on Twitter




And check out REALCLEAR ENERGY every day........always some meaty stuff that makes them look like k00ks!!!


This is from today >>>>>


Sen. Sanders: Global warming ?far more serious problem than Al Qaeda? - The Hill's E2-Wire


Only the uber fringe take that guy seriously!!

I know, but for some reason, the idiocy of PMS bothers me more than the idiocy of most other liberals.
It must be the sheer scope of his ignorance. Sets my teeth on edge.

 

[mamooth]

Well, I've been on this planet LONGER than you have my friend and I have seen both the cooling scare, AND the warming scare....perpetrated by the SAME people mind you.

That looks like a flat-out lie on your part. Please name these specific people who predicted both cooling and warming.

The common denominator? Their desire to relieve you of your cash.

So, on the orders of your political cult, you undertook a quest to self-lobotomize, and succeeded. Now you get to pound the keyboard and rave along with the same half-dozen 'tards about your glorious victories. Well done. The Americans have been driven out of Iraq, and the denialists have proven global warming is a hoax.

 

[Mertex]

Who are so smart they peer review a paper that is destroyed in 10 hours by a mere statistician. Yeah, I wouldn't hang my reputation with a bunch of 'tards like that missy...

A statistician? You trust a statistician over Meteorologists and Climatologists? What would a statistician know about climate/weather? You must be one of those who believes Rush! Look at the stats, your group is getting smaller.....

After years of hemming and hawing, the American Meteorological Society released its official position on climate change yesterday, saying the Earth is warming and that warming is caused by humans.

Weather forecasters have been criticized for their silence on connecting the dots between the extreme weather they report and climate change, even amidst the drought that has effected most of the US this summer.
"There is unequivocal evidence that Earth’s lower atmosphere, ocean, and land surface are warming; sea "level is rising; and snow cover, mountain glaciers, and Arctic sea ice are shrinking," they says in the policy statement.

"The dominant cause of the warming since the 1950s is human activities. This scientific finding is based on a large and persuasive body of research. The observed warming will be irreversible for many years into the future, and even larger temperature increases will occur as greenhouse gases continue to accumulate in the atmosphere."
Meteorologists Finally Take a Stand on Climate Change



"The number of American adults who are "very certain that global warming is not occurring" has dropped from 16 percent in 2010 to 8 percent in 2012, according to a survey released Wednesday by Yale University.

Individual weather events cannot be pinned on climate change, of course. Storms happen, and always have with some regularity. Still, Satterfield suggested that superstorm Sandy was a "watershed" moment for raising the public's climate consciousness. He's noticed that his meteorologist peers seem to be coming along as well.
Meteorologist On Climate Change: Viewers Are Less Skeptical, Forecasts Getting Fuzzier

Here's how science works....well how it's supposed to work.... Listen to what he says...this man WAS a genius and won the Nobel Prize in physics, something your precious climatologists couldn't even begin to understand.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OL6-x0modwY]The Scientific Method-Richard Feynman - YouTube[/ame]

It's not about WHO is making the assertion, it's about whether they are CORRECT or not. I will take an accurate statistician over an inaccurate climatologist any day.

Statistician may be accurate in statistics, but know squat about climate. And FYI, the dude you posted, he died in 1988 - that's quite some time back - great leaps have been made in that area. If you're going to put your faith on people from the past, you might want to join up with The Flat Earth Society.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

A statistician? You trust a statistician over Meteorologists and Climatologists? What would a statistician know about climate/weather? You must be one of those who believes Rush! Look at the stats, your group is getting smaller.....

After years of hemming and hawing, the American Meteorological Society released its official position on climate change yesterday, saying the Earth is warming and that warming is caused by humans.

Weather forecasters have been criticized for their silence on connecting the dots between the extreme weather they report and climate change, even amidst the drought that has effected most of the US this summer.
"There is unequivocal evidence that Earth’s lower atmosphere, ocean, and land surface are warming; sea "level is rising; and snow cover, mountain glaciers, and Arctic sea ice are shrinking," they says in the policy statement.

"The dominant cause of the warming since the 1950s is human activities. This scientific finding is based on a large and persuasive body of research. The observed warming will be irreversible for many years into the future, and even larger temperature increases will occur as greenhouse gases continue to accumulate in the atmosphere."
Meteorologists Finally Take a Stand on Climate Change



"The number of American adults who are "very certain that global warming is not occurring" has dropped from 16 percent in 2010 to 8 percent in 2012, according to a survey released Wednesday by Yale University.

Individual weather events cannot be pinned on climate change, of course. Storms happen, and always have with some regularity. Still, Satterfield suggested that superstorm Sandy was a "watershed" moment for raising the public's climate consciousness. He's noticed that his meteorologist peers seem to be coming along as well.
Meteorologist On Climate Change: Viewers Are Less Skeptical, Forecasts Getting Fuzzier

Here's how science works....well how it's supposed to work.... Listen to what he says...this man WAS a genius and won the Nobel Prize in physics, something your precious climatologists couldn't even begin to understand.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OL6-x0modwY]The Scientific Method-Richard Feynman - YouTube[/ame]

It's not about WHO is making the assertion, it's about whether they are CORRECT or not. I will take an accurate statistician over an inaccurate climatologist any day.

Statistician may be accurate in statistics, but know squat about climate. And FYI, the dude you posted, he died in 1988 - that's quite some time back - great leaps have been made in that area. If you're going to put your faith on people from the past, you might want to join up with The Flat Earth Society.

And FYI, the dude you posted, he died in 1988

If he were still alive, he'd be bitch slapping the AGW pushers with their bad science and fake hockey sticks.

And idiots like you would be whining that the oil companies must be paying him off.

 

[mamooth]

Here's how science works....well how it's supposed to work.... Listen to what he says...

So it's exactly how AGW science works. Thanks for the example. AGW science has been making correct predictions for decades now, hence why it has such credibility.

That's the exact opposite of your unfalsifiable denialism pseudoscience, a superstition so craven and worthless that its acolytes won't even attempt to make predictions.

In other words, Feynman says you're a 'tard.

And no, making up bizarre fables about the models won't change that. Yes, we know you want to. Try to resist.

 

[Mertex]

Here's how science works....well how it's supposed to work.... Listen to what he says...this man WAS a genius and won the Nobel Prize in physics, something your precious climatologists couldn't even begin to understand.

The Scientific Method-Richard Feynman - YouTube

It's not about WHO is making the assertion, it's about whether they are CORRECT or not. I will take an accurate statistician over an inaccurate climatologist any day.

Statistician may be accurate in statistics, but know squat about climate. And FYI, the dude you posted, he died in 1988 - that's quite some time back - great leaps have been made in that area. If you're going to put your faith on people from the past, you might want to join up with The Flat Earth Society.

And FYI, the dude you posted, he died in 1988

If he were still alive, he'd be bitch slapping the AGW pushers with their bad science and fake hockey sticks.

You would hope, but for all you know, he might be bitch slapping you for being such a dunce.

And idiots like you would be whining that the oil companies must be paying him off.

No, idiots like you would be saying Obama was paying him off!

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Here's how science works....well how it's supposed to work.... Listen to what he says...

So it's exactly how AGW science works. Thanks for the example. AGW science has been making correct predictions for decades now, hence why it has such credibility.

That's the exact opposite of your unfalsifiable denialism pseudoscience, a superstition so craven and worthless that its acolytes won't even attempt to make predictions.

In other words, Feynman says you're a 'tard.

And no, making up bizarre fables about the models won't change that. Yes, we know you want to. Try to resist.

Age prediction: there will be weather tomorrow

 

[PMZ]

And it will be a small contribution to climate!

 

[westwall]

Well, I've been on this planet LONGER than you have my friend and I have seen both the cooling scare, AND the warming scare....perpetrated by the SAME people mind you.

That looks like a flat-out lie on your part. Please name these specific people who predicted both cooling and warming.

The common denominator? Their desire to relieve you of your cash.

So, on the orders of your political cult, you undertook a quest to self-lobotomize, and succeeded. Now you get to pound the keyboard and rave along with the same half-dozen 'tards about your glorious victories. Well done. The Americans have been driven out of Iraq, and the denialists have proven global warming is a hoax.

What was that admiral? You say you are too ignorant and stupid to do a simple check on what I stated? Here you go silly person. read 'em and weep. After you have read those then look up their views on global warming

"The evidence in support of these predictions has now begun to accumulate so massively that meteorologists are hard-pressed to keep up with it. In England, farmers have seen their growing season decline by about two weeks since 1950, with a resultant overall loss in grain production estimated at up to 100,000 tons annually… Last April, in the most devastating outbreak of tornadoes ever recorded, 148 twisters killed more than 300 people and caused half a billion dollars’ worth of damage in 13 U.S. states. To scientists, these seemingly disparate incidents represent the advance signs of fundamental changes in the world’s weather. The central fact is that after three quarters of a century of extraordinarily mild conditions, the earth’s climate seems to be cooling down. Meteorologists… are almost unanimous in the view that the trend will reduce agricultural productivity for the rest of the century. If the climatic change is as profound as some of the pessimists fear, the resulting famines could be catastrophic." -Paul Ehrlich

Rearview: Paul Ehrlich; Global Cooling | The SPPI Blog



"Predictions of future climate trends by Stephen Schneider and other leading climatologists, based on the prevailing knowledge of the atmosphere in the early 1970s, gave more weight to the potential problem of global cooling than it now appears to merit.”

- Paul and Anne Ehrlich, Betrayal of Science and Reason (Washington: Island Press, 1996), p. 34.

Recent attention has been paid to the coming Ice Age talk of John Holdren and Steven Schneider before they got global warming religion.

Here are some “global cooling” quotations and comments from an earlier era. While such concern was not a scientific ‘consensus,’ such as that created by the United Nations’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change in favor of high-sensitivity anthropogenic global warming, the Ice Age scare was a very active hypothesis that should give pause to the Boiling Age purveyors of today.


“Certainly the threat of another ice age was the topic of much scientific and popular discussion in the 1970s. Books and articles entitled ‘The Cooling,’ ‘Blizzard,’ ‘Ice,’ and ‘A Mini Ice Age Could Begin in a Decade,’ abounded. The ‘snow blitz’ theory was popularized on the public television presentation of ‘The Weather Machine’ in 1975. And certainly the winters of the late 1970s were enough to send shivers through our imaginations.”

- Harold Bernard, Jr., The Greenhouse Effect (Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing, 1980), p. 20.

“The worriers about cooling included Science, the most influential scientific journal in the world, quoting an official of the World Meteorological Organization; the National Academy of Sciences worrying about the onset of a 10,000 year ice age; Newsweek warning that food production could be adversely affected within a decade; the New York Times quoting an official of the National Center for Atmospheric Research; and Science Digest, the science periodical with the largest circulation.”

- Julian Simon, “What Does the Future Hold? The Forecast in a Nutshell,” in Simon, ed., The State of Humanity (Cambridge, Mass: Blackwell, 1995), p. 646.

“In the early 1970s, the northern hemisphere appeared to have been cooling at an alarming rate. There was frequent talk of a new ice age. Books and documentaries appeared, hypothesizing a snowblitz or sporting titles such as The Cooling. Even the CIA got into the act, sponsoring several meetings and writing a controversial report warning of threats to American security from the potential collapse of Third World Governments in the wake of climate change.”

- Stephen Schneider, Global Warming: Are We Entering the Greenhouse Century? (San Francisco: Sierra Club Books, 1989), p. 199.

“Some climatologists believe that the average temperature in the Northern Hemisphere, at least, may decline by two or three degrees by the end of the century. If that climate change occurs, there will be megadeaths and social upheaval because grain production in high latitudes (Canada, northern regions of China and the Soviet Union) will decrease.”

- George Will, “A Change in the Weather,” Washington Post, January 24, 1975, quoted in James Fleming, Historical Perspectives on Climate Change (New York: Oxford University Press, 1998), pp. 132-33.

“The dramatic importance of climate changes to the world’s future has been dangerously underestimated by many, often because we have been lulled by modern technology into thinking we have conquered nature. This well-written book points out in clear language that the climatic threat could be as awesome as any we might face, and that massive world-wide actions to hedge against that threat deserve immediate consideration.”

- Stephen Schneider, Back cover endorsement, Lowell Ponte, The Cooling: Has The Next Ice Age Already Begun? Can We Survive It (Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1976).

“Our climate has swung wildly from severe warming during the Dust Bowl era of the 1930s to severe cooling during the 1960s. . . . The cooling is a fact.”

- Lowell Ponte, The Cooling: Has The Next Ice Age Already Begun? Can We Survive It (Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1976), p. 31.

“Earth’s climate has been cooling. This fact seems to contradict theories that say it should be warming. But the prophets of warming are describing real forces that influence climate, and like other scientists they are still learning how these forces interact to produce a balance of heating and cooling on our planet. It may well turn out that the growing instability of Earth’s climate is caused by human influences adding both heating and cooling forces to the balance, thereby making it more and more ‘unnatural’ and precarious. The prophets of both warming and cooling agree on at least one thing: climatic changes can come quickly, within centuries or even decades, and can have devastating consequences for humankind. Climatology has ceased to be a drab science. Its findings have taken on an urgent importance for all of us.”

- Lowell Ponte, The Cooling: Has The Next Ice Age Already Begun? Can We Survive It (Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1976), p. 31.

“The continued rapid cooling of the earth since World War II is also in accord with the increased global air pollution associated with industrialization, mechanization, urbanization, and an exploding population, added to a renewal of volcanic activity.”

- Reid Bryson, “‘All Other Factors Being Constant . . .’ A Reconciliation of Several Theories of Climate Change,” in John Holdren and Paul Ehrlich, eds., Global Ecology: Readings Towards a Rational Strategy for Man (New York: Harcourt, Brace Jovanovich, 1971), p. 84.

“The generally cold period worldwide during the 1960s and early 1970s caused speculation that the world was heading for an ice age. A British television programme about climate change called ‘The ice age cometh’ was prepared early in the early 1970s and widely screened—but the cold trend soon came to an end. We must not be misled by our relatively short memories.”

- John Houghton, Global Warming: The Complete Briefing (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1997), p. 7.

“Reid Bryson of the University of Wisconsin points out that the Earth’s average temperature during the great Ice Ages was only about seven degrees lower than during its warmest eras—and that the present decline has taken the planet about a sixth of the way toward the Ice Age average. Others regard the cooling as a reversion to the “little ice age” conditions that brought bitter winters to much of Europe and northern America between 1600 and 1900.

- Peter Gwynne, “The Cooling World,” Newsweek, April 28, 1975, p. 64.

“There are ominous signs that the Earth’s weather patterns have begun to change dramatically and that these changes may portend a drastic decline in food production—with serious political implications for just about every nation on Earth. The drop in food output could begin quite soon, perhaps only 10 years from now.”

- Peter Gwynne, “The Cooling World,” Newsweek, April 28, 1975, p. 64.

“Climatologists are pessimistic that political leaders will take any positive action to compensate for the climatic change, or even to allay its effects. They concede that some of the more spectacular solutions proposed, such as melting the Arctic ice cap by covering it with black soot or diverting arctic rivers, might create problems far greater than those they solve. . . . The longer the planners delay, the more difficult will they find it to cope with climatic change once the results become grim reality.”

- Peter Gwynne, “The Cooling World,” Newsweek, April 28, 1975, p. 64.

“Several schools of thought in climate science interpret existing data in different ways. One argues that, instead of growing warmer, the Earth may enter an Ice Age as a result of man-made fuels combustion. The combustion of fossil fuels releases large quantities of particulate matter into the atmosphere, which may reflect sunlight away from the Earth, thus cooling the planet.”

- Wilson Clark, Energy for Survival: The Alternative to Extinction (Garden City, NY: Anchor Books, 1974), p. 117.
- See more at: The Global Cooling Scare Revisited (?Ice Age' Holdren had plenty of company) ? MasterResource

 

[westwall]

Here's how science works....well how it's supposed to work.... Listen to what he says...

So it's exactly how AGW science works. Thanks for the example. AGW science has been making correct predictions for decades now, hence why it has such credibility.

That's the exact opposite of your unfalsifiable denialism pseudoscience, a superstition so craven and worthless that its acolytes won't even attempt to make predictions.

In other words, Feynman says you're a 'tard.

And no, making up bizarre fables about the models won't change that. Yes, we know you want to. Try to resist.

"You would take the word of a statistician over that of a climatologist?" What utter complete jackasses you are.

Remember silly person, it's not WHO you are but whether you're accurate.... And you guys haven't gotten anything right in 16 years.