Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So, when the men met the Savior after the resurrection on the road, did they not know because of the burning in their bosoms that the stranger was the Lord? The Bible says this is the way you know. It’s called the Holy Ghost testifying to you. It’s not the only way. A still small voice that’s undeniable.
James 1 tells how to study. We preach this to study the things you read out in your own mind. Then, with real intent, faith not wavering, without a double mind, you will know by the influence of the Holy Ghost. The truth will be manifested to you. All parts are important. But the key one that most people have the most difficulty with is the double mind. They let their experiences and former teachings influence how they read and comprehend. How they study isn’t with real intent to find the truth. The double mind is the key. And you have a huge double mind. The list I provided is Biblical. The double mind, which today we use “normalcy bias” clouds your reading. And it causes you to spew hatred towards others and attack other’s beliefs.
Your description can be applied to all Christians, not just Mormon Christians. There are a lot of problems with the Bible, and most honest, thoughtful Christians know that, but they don't care. Christianity for them is more experiential and it enriches their lives and creates a sense of belonging in a community where they feel like they are part of something valuable, even if it's not 100%, absolutely perfect with an "inerrant Holy Book". Even if all of the Biblical stories aren't historically accurate.
People identify as Christians, even when they know the Bible isn't perfect because of how a Christian way of life helps them cope with the challenges and pains of a mortal existence. You're not saying anything unique to Mormon Christians, this is true for all forms of Christianity (And all religions in general; Judaism, Islam, Hinduism, Buddhism. etc). You're pretending that your critique of the LDS doesn't apply to you too. Everything that you said in your attempt to discredit the Mormon Christian faith, can be said of Evangelicals with their Bible full of contradictions and fabrications (Ancient Middle Eastern Mythology, Greek-Platonic/Gnostic Philosophy..etc). Welcome to the club.
Mormons have an economic philosophy called "United Order", which is essentially a theistic form of communism.Are you a communist again?
Assuming that what you're claiming is a fact and not just your opinion, you're critiquing another faith, as if your faith is squicky clean or doesn't suffer from the same level of corruption. You're quite confused and self-deluded, thinking you have the high ground to point your finger at the LDS. Don't throw stones at your neighbor from a glass house.Telling you that your beliefs are wrong is not "hatred" and it is not an "attack". I am not obligated to believe the lies of Joseph Smith, and am allowed to call them lies. Sorry, those are just facts
Assuming that what you're claiming is a fact and not just your opinion, you're critiquing another faith, as if your faith is squicky clean or doesn't suffer from the same level of corruption. You're quite confused and self-deluded, thinking you have the high ground to point your finger at the LDS. Don't throw stones at your neighbor from a glass house.
Squeaky. Simple typo. Whenever someone begins to play this English grammar game with me, I just go to their post history and I always find plenty of misspellings and grammatical errors. It doesn't take me more than a minute to find typos.What's "squicky"
Squeaky. Simple typo. Whenever someone begins to play this English grammar game with me, I just go to their post history and I always find plenty of misspellings and grammatical errors. It doesn't take me more than a minute to find typos.
I found God without the lds. Millions of people do. Your arrogance is astounding.I don't expect or even desire to convince belligerent, rude, condescending, close-minded, anti-LDS polemicists. If I take the time and exert the effort to respond to your rhetoric it's for the sake of others, who might be genuinely searching for the truth and don't have a personal and irrational, emotionally charged ax to grind against my faith. I don't even bother with people like you unless you're on a forum like this spewing your vitriol against the LDS, which might confuse or even influence someone who is sincerely searching for God. I respond to your posts for them, not you.
Yet, you say all Christian churches are wrong. The body of Christ is the Church, not an organization. Do you know what is meant by "the body of Christ"?Assuming that what you're claiming is a fact and not just your opinion, you're critiquing another faith, as if your faith is squicky clean or doesn't suffer from the same level of corruption. You're quite confused and self-deluded, thinking you have the high ground to point your finger at the LDS. Don't throw stones at your neighbor from a glass house.
I was once an atheist-agnostic/materialist, a naturalist until I began to do research using "radio sweepers" a.k.a. "Spirit/Ghost Boxes", about 8 years ago when I was living in Tucson, Arizona, and taking some courses at U of A. The method of using radios or other electrical devices to communicate with "spirits" is called ITC (i.e. Instrumental TeleCommunications), which includes the EVP or Electronic Voice Phenomenon, mostly done with voice recorders. You don't have to "believe" that this is real, you can do some simple, not-too-expensive experiments and confirm it for yourself, as I did, no faith required.
You can remain an atheist-agnostic because the paranormal doesn't "prove" the existence of a personal God or religious dogmas, but it does open the door to another dimension of life, that we don't fully understand yet. It will broaden your view of reality.
Here are some examples of two types of methods using radios:
Radio Sweepers:
John Huntington, US
Shannon a.k.a. "Mortis The Wizard", UK (He's a bit dramatic and even silly sometimes, but I know the phenomena he's filming is real out of my personal experience using radio-sweepers or "spirit boxes".)
Marcello Bacci, Italy (He didn't use radio sweepers, he used shortwave radios, which is a more advanced method of ITC, rendering even better results.):
Ernst Senkowski (German Physicist):
On National Television in Germany, back in 1983, Senkowski and Hans Otto Konig (An Acoutic Engineer), established contact with two intelligences that presented themselves as the deceased children of the mothers who were there with them during the event. The two women admitted that the spirits had the voices of their children:
E.V.P. / Transkommunikation ( Teil 3 von 4 )
Tonbandstimmen sind sprachliche Äußerungen auf Tonträgern (Audio- und Videobändern, MiniDisc, Computer etc.), deren Herkunft und Entstehung physikalisch nich...www.youtube.com
Hans Otto Konig (German Acoustic Engineer):
Anabela Cordoso (ITC researcher and Portuguese diplomat, who collaborated with both Senkowski and Konig.):https://www.youtube.com/watch? v=keOfFmHKvm0&list=PLGBiItTSb8uwiN6wpwMiVGIK5YW5bP2E6
VIDEO FIVE. A visit to Anabela Cardoso’s studio
In this short segment Anabela shows her recording studio, a small acoustically well insulated room at her house. She reports on the frequencies she uses in h...
Instrumental Trans Communication (ITC) with Anabela Cardoso
Anabela Cardoso is a former Portuguese diplomat. She is author of Electronic Voices: Contact with Another Dimension, Electronic Contact with the Dead: What t...
Friedrich Jürgenson: Pioneer of EVP and ITC with Anabela Cardoso
Anabela Cardoso was Portuguese career diplomat. In 2000 shefounded the ITC Journal. She is author of Electronic Voices: Contact with Another Dimension, Elect...
Scole Experiments:
You don't have to believe anything, just confirm it for yourself. Do what I did, and you will know for yourself, if it's true or not. No faith or belief is required.- YouTube
Enjoy the videos and music you love, upload original content, and share it all with friends, family, and the world on YouTube.
The Scole Experiment (3/4) - Rupert Sheldrake Full Interview
The Scole Experiment is now widely regarded as the most important scientific investigation of evidence for life after death in history. Highly-qualified and ...
The Scole Experiment with Robin Foy
Robin Foy is possibly the most experienced and successful organizer and promoter of physical mediumship circles in the last century. He is the founder of the...
The Scole Experiment: Witness Testimony from Emeritus Professor Ivor Grattan-Guinness
Emeritus Professor of Mathematics, Ivor Gratton-Guinness, attended The Scole Experiment sessions. His witness testimony, to 'The Scole Experiment' author, Gr...
The Scole Experiment: Witness Testimony from Walter and Karin Schnitger
German investigator, Walter Schnitger, is a consultant automotive engineer and his wife, Karin, is an interpreter. They attended a number of experimental ses...
The Scole Experiment - Witness Testimony from Jennifer Jones
#paranormal #paranormalinvestigation #afterlife Jennifer Jones attended an early session of The Scole Experiment, prior to the start of the photographic phe...
The Scole Experiment: Witness Testimony from George Dalzell
American investigator, George Dalzell, is a licensed clinical social worker and bereavement counsellor. He is the author of 'Messages', a book which explores...
Witness to The Scole Experiment Brenda Sawyer 03.08.1997. Interview by GrantandJane.com 14.12.2021
Brenda Sawyer, now in her nineties, and her husband, Tom, were among many witnesses to the light phenomena at The Scole Experiment (1993-1998). On 3rd August...
Seattle VIdeo-ITC:
It's you refusing the Bible. Paul spoke to several of the priesthood during his ministry well after the death and resurrection of Christ. He named the orders as well as some of the offices in the priesthood. Other apostles did likewise when they pointed out the offices of the priesthood shall only have one wife. That is Biblical. So, your understanding of the priesthood is shallow and incomplete. And, completely wrong. But, you can believe as you may. You can ignore the Bible after the Lord had risen.Now you're refusing the authority of Scripture. You obviously don't understand the difference between the OT and the NT. Jesus is the fulfillment. The beginning and the end. An OT priest was the intercession between God and man. Jesus was the final sacrifice. Now every believer has access to the Holy of Holies, the presence of God. Scripture says I'm a priest. You can't do anything about that.
You are not obligated to believe the doctrine of any Church. You aren't obligated to attack another's beliefs. You are a sinner if you do. If I were to ask you to give my what you believe and I agree, that's my prerogative. For you to attempt to show opinions of others and state that their opinions are doctrines of the Church and what all Church members believe is a false bearer, liar and an attack. It's pure hatred. You are stirring up contention. Contention is of the devil.Telling you that your beliefs are wrong is not "hatred" and it is not an "attack". I am not obligated to believe the lies of Joseph Smith, and am allowed to call them lies. Sorry, those are just facts
You are not obligated to believe the doctrine of any Church. You aren't obligated to attack another's beliefs. You are a sinner if you do. If I were to ask you to give my what you believe and I agree, that's my prerogative. For you to attempt to show opinions of others and state that their opinions are doctrines of the Church and what all Church members believe is a false bearer, liar and an attack. It's pure hatred. You are stirring up contention. Contention is of the devil.Telling you that your beliefs are wrong is not "hatred" and it is not an "attack". I am not obligated to believe the lies of Joseph Smith, and am allowed to call them lies. Sorry, those are just facts
Show me the Scriptures you're referring to about Paul and other Apostles and the Priesthood.It's you refusing the Bible. Paul spoke to several of the priesthood during his ministry well after the death and resurrection of Christ. He named the orders as well as some of the offices in the priesthood. Other apostles did likewise when they pointed out the offices of the priesthood shall only have one wife. That is Biblical. So, your understanding of the priesthood is shallow and incomplete. And, completely wrong. But, you can believe as you may. You can ignore the Bible after the Lord had risen.
Aaronic Priesthood after the order of Aaron the LeviteShow me the Scriptures you're referring to about Paul and other Apostles and the Priesthood.
Don't you see that every believer is a priest?Aaronic Priesthood after the order of Aaron the Levite
Melchizedek Priesthood after the order of the Son of God
- he that is called of God, as was Aaron, Heb. 5:4.
- sons of Levi, who receive the office of the priesthood, Heb. 7:5.
- If … perfection were by the Levitical priesthood, Heb. 7:11.
- those priests were made without an oath, Heb. 7:21.
- confer the Priesthood of Aaron, which holds the keys, D&C 13.
- to ordain you unto the first priesthood, D&C 27:8.
- literal descendants of Aaron they have a legal right, D&C 68:16.
- the lesser priesthood continued, which priesthood holdeth the key, D&C 84:26.
- law of carnal commandments … continue with the house of Aaron … until John, D&C 84:27.
- two priesthoods, namely, the Melchizedek and Aaronic, D&C 107:1.
- other is the Aaronic or Levitical Priesthood, D&C 107:6.
- second priesthood is called the Priesthood of Aaron, D&C 107:13.
- authority of the lesser, or Aaronic Priesthood, D&C 107:20.
- man be called of my Father, as was Aaron, D&C 132:59.
- Upon you … I confer the Priesthood of Aaron, JS—H 1:69.
- Priest of our profession, Heb. 3:1.
- Called of God an high priest after the order of Melchisedec, Heb. 5:10.
- Jesus, made an high priest, Heb. 6:20.
- such an high priest became us, who is holy, Heb. 7:26.
- We have such an high priest, who is set on the right, Heb. 8:1.
- Christ being come an high priest, Heb. 9:11.
- having an high priest over the house of God, Heb. 10:21.
- priests of God and of Christ … reign with him, Rev. 20:6.
- ordained after the manner of his holy order, 2 Ne. 6:2.
- priests … should labor with their own hands, Mosiah 18:24.
- Alma, who was the high priest, Mosiah 26:7 (Alma 4:4).
- he retained the office of high priest unto himself, Alma 4:18.
- Lord God ordained priests, after his holy order, Alma 13:1.
- Every … high priest, is to be ordained, D&C 20:67.
- as a high priest of the Melchizedek Priesthood, D&C 68:19.
- priests of the Most High, after the order of Melchizedek, D&C 76:57.
- those who are sealed are high priests, D&C 77:11 (Rev. 7:3).
- high priests should travel, D&C 84:111.
- High priests after the order of the Melchizedek Priesthood, D&C 107:10.
- called Seth, Enos … Enoch … all high priests, D&C 107:53.
- Presiding High Priest over the High Priesthood, D&C 107:66.
- duty of the President … of the High Priesthood, D&C 107:91.
- Shem, the great high priest, D&C 138:41.
- I became a rightful heir, a High Priest, Abr. 1:2.
- See also 3 Ne. 6:21.
Doesn’t say that at all. That would be ludicrous in the days of the apostles as it would have been in the OT. You are making up things.Don't you see that every believer is a priest?
1 Peter 2:9.Doesn’t say that at all. That would be ludicrous in the days of the apostles as it would have been in the OT. You are making up things.
There are many. But here's ONE:Show me the Scripture that says Jesus is my elder brother.
"Satan" created himself thru rebellionMy Jesus isn't the brother of Satan. My Jesus created Satan, so says Scripture.
