Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That was US territory.
Read the fucking Constitution.
which constitution?
USA or CSA ?
The US one.
The CSA was in violation of the US constitution. Which means they were treasonous traitors.
Race pimps have lost this one. It really has damaged the black community even further.
How?
Q: How come some folks are so desperate to see Zimmerman walk and others are so eager to see him fry?
Had Martin not attacked Zimmerman, he'd be alive today. FACT.
It isn't even a "fact" Martin "attacked" Zimmerman.
Martin may have been the one defending himself.
2 people, a white guy saying the prosecution wasn't doing a good job and a black man saying people believe a black kid can't get justice.
MSNBC was critical of Obama in the debates and the right used that as proof Obama would lose.
Let's stick with the evidence. This is what happens when you judge things based on emotions.
The evidence looks good for Zimmerman.
There's no evidence of Zimmerman chasing Martin down.
Zimmerman ADMITS to chasing Martin.
How do you know what Zimmerman felt at that moment?
I think Zimmerman's actions shows his rage but what Zimmerman felt is not the only element of self defense law.
What actions show his "rage?"
No problem. After the Race Riots, we'll just file Federal Civil Rights charges.
You can't file such a charge against someone who isn't in the government, numbnuts.
Really?
Government Prosecution of Criminal Civil Rights Violations Q & A - FindLaw
Conspiracy to threaten, assault, and murder African-Americans. United States v. Saldana: Four members of a violent Latino street gang in Los Angeles were convicted of participating in a conspiracy aimed at threatening, assaulting, and murdering African-Americans in a neighborhood claimed by the defendants gang. Three of the defendants were also charged with, and convicted of, a federal hate crime violation stemming from the murder of an African American who was killed because he was black and because he was using a public street claimed by the gang. All four defendants received life sentences. In recognition of the success in this case, the prosecution team was awarded the Anti-Defamation Leagues 2007 Sherwood Prize for Combating Hate and the International Association of Chiefs of Police 2007 Civil Rights Award.
I'm willing to bet that zimmerman already had his hand on his weapon (if it wasn't drawn already) and then Martin clocked him and they fell to the ground (head and nose wounds) and then he shot Martin. I don't know what kind of holster zimmerman had, but i think that it would be difficult to draw one's weapon if they were allegedly getting pummeled on the bottom. But if the gun weapon was already drawn it would seem more plausible to me.No..they absolutely have not been consistent. The whole incident happened during a 7 minute time span. And that's from the time Zimmerman first calls the police to the time he murders Trayvon Martin.
His story has so many holes in it, I am surprised that anyone still defends him.
For example:
Zimmerman can't remember the street names of an area he patrols regularly and has only three streets.
Zimmerman thinks Martin is armed, yet he pursues him into a darkened area used for walking dogs.
Zimmerman says he gives up the chase, yet manages to catch up to Martin.
Zimmerman says Martin appears from behind Bushes, but changes that when it's clear that wasn't the case.
Zimmerman says Martin asks "What's your problem?" which contradicts what the last person heard over the phone.
Zimmerman says that Martin was on top the entire fight, which contradicts what is heard on the phone and the testimony of 2 witnesses.
Zimmerman says that Martin was slamming his head into the concrete which contradicts his injuries.
Zimmerman says that Martin was holding his mouth and nose which contradicts the pictures of him showing no blood smears on his face. It also contradicts the cell phone recording which has multiple voices shouting.
Zimmerman says that after he shot Martin he put him on his belly and stretched his arms out. That contradicts the photos showing Martin's hands under the body.
Zimmerman describes a brutal onslaught of blows to his head that "felt like bricks" which contradict Zimmerman's injuries and injuries to Martin's hands.
Zimmerman says Martin went for his gun and he manages to lock his hand under his arm, grab his gun and shoot him in the chest. That, seems incredibly improbable.
There's a lot of possibilities. But I am willing to think that he managed to get it out and press it into Martin, who begged for his life before being shot.
Yeah.
They are.
They were admitted as evidence yesterday.
Got it?
They were admitted only to demonstrate the fact that Zimmerman was being assaulted.
Well no they weren't.
And in fact, the prosecution showed there may have been no more than 6 blows in the fight which caused injuries that were so insignificant they only required peroxide and two small bandages.
It was started when the rebel traitors attacked an American base.
That base was on South Carolina territory, and Lincoln sent ships to resupply it - a blatant act of war.
That was US territory.
Read the fucking Constitution.
Preface: No one knows exactly how this went down except Zimmerman and Martin. And only one of them is talking. So I'm content to let the jury decide this one.
MHO: Zimmerman is a hot-headed, cop wannabe who carried a gun when he was told not to and who kept following Martin after being told not to. Martin was a tough-guy wannabe who was eager to show he wasn't going to get pushed around or intimidated.
Bad recipe - especially given Florida's "hold your ground" law.
IMHO this is kinda like Florida's election screw up in 2000. Plenty of blame all around.
You obviously havent been paying attention.
There is no evidence Zimmerman is hot headed. There is no evidence he is a cop wannabe. The opposite, actually. There is no evidence he was ever told not to carry a gun, which he was licensed to do. Hold your ground does not exist. Stand your ground is what a particular tpiece of legislation is called. And it is irrelevant to this case.
So aside from being totally ignorant about the facts and the law your post makes no sense.
There's evidence of both.
And the cop wannabe thing got entered into evidence today.
That base was on South Carolina territory, and Lincoln sent ships to resupply it - a blatant act of war.
That was US territory.
It wasn't U.S. territory. South Carolina had seceded from the union.
Read the fucking Constitution.
I have. read the part that defines treason. According to that, Lincoln is the one who committed treason, not South Carolina.
That's sorta it in a nutshell.
You cannot go around shooting people you don't like.
You can shoot people who are punching you in the face and smashing your skull against the pavement.
That sorta depends on the context.
If you are walking down the street minding your own business, and someone jumps on you out of nowhere...and actually starts beating the shit out of you.
Yeah..there might be a case for self defense.
That didn't happen here.
Not at all.
2 people, a white guy saying the prosecution wasn't doing a good job and a black man saying people believe a black kid can't get justice.
MSNBC was critical of Obama in the debates and the right used that as proof Obama would lose.
Let's stick with the evidence. This is what happens when you judge things based on emotions.
The evidence looks good for Zimmerman.
The media was running with an emotional guilty verdict.
The lefties on this board even went to the extent of wanting a guilty plea because there will be blood in the streets without one. Good grief.....what would our justice system look like when facts and evidence are thrown out with the trash?
That base was on South Carolina territory, and Lincoln sent ships to resupply it - a blatant act of war.
That was US territory.
Read the fucking Constitution.
which constitution?
USA or CSA ?
Preface: No one knows exactly how this went down except Zimmerman and Martin. And only one of them is talking. So I'm content to let the jury decide this one.
MHO: Zimmerman is a hot-headed, cop wannabe who carried a gun when he was told not to and who kept following Martin after being told not to. Martin was a tough-guy wannabe who was eager to show he wasn't going to get pushed around or intimidated.
Bad recipe - especially given Florida's "hold your ground" law.
IMHO this is kinda like Florida's election screw up in 2000. Plenty of blame all around.
You obviously havent been paying attention.
There is no evidence Zimmerman is hot headed. There is no evidence he is a cop wannabe. The opposite, actually. There is no evidence he was ever told not to carry a gun, which he was licensed to do. Hold your ground does not exist. Stand your ground is what a particular tpiece of legislation is called. And it is irrelevant to this case.
So aside from being totally ignorant about the facts and the law your post makes no sense.
There's evidence of both.
And the cop wannabe thing got entered into evidence today.
That was US territory.
Read the fucking Constitution.
which constitution?
USA or CSA ?
He means the Soviet Constitution.
You obviously havent been paying attention.
There is no evidence Zimmerman is hot headed. There is no evidence he is a cop wannabe. The opposite, actually. There is no evidence he was ever told not to carry a gun, which he was licensed to do. Hold your ground does not exist. Stand your ground is what a particular tpiece of legislation is called. And it is irrelevant to this case.
So aside from being totally ignorant about the facts and the law your post makes no sense.
There's evidence of both.
And the cop wannabe thing got entered into evidence today.
There is no evidence of either. The "cap wannabe" argument was shot down by the testimony of the non-emergency dispatcher.
