Mueller files complaint against Manafort judge

The trump alt right are hoping against hope.

Good move, Mueller: let the judge know that he is being watched and judged.

The judge has every reason to be annoyed with the prosecution defying orders and wasting his time and tax payer money. He has every reason to be stopping irrelevant testimony to be going before the jury.

You seriously think pissing off the judge before the trial is over is a good idea?
but obviously you’re fine with Manafort defrauding the United States of America. You trump whores are pathetic.


Yup, pretty sure we don't need a special prosecutor trying to find tax evaders. If you feel we do let's start the list with the likes of Warren Buffet
Idiot doesn’t know a special prosecutor can’t look the other way when he uncovers crimes during his investigation.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Moderator
  • #83
The government has an airtight case against Manafort and has a mountain of documented evidence to prove their case.

Idiots: but but we need to defend him because of.... Trump.

Airtight?

I don’t think you know what that means.

Even he prosecution is aware that their case is dependent on the jury believing the testimony of a man who admitting being a criminal and a liar and defrauding the defendant. That’s not air tight by a long shot
Airtight is the word the former prosecutor used who has observed every minute of this trial. But I’m sure you know more from your easy chair.
Funny you’re still pulling for an obvious criminal who defrauded the United States because your devotion to the criminal president blinds your common sense.

Then he is clearly lying since even the prosecution admits that their case hinges on the testimony of an admitted criminal and liar

Just think about this logically. How air tight can a case that relies on an admitted liar be?
Did you mind that Gotti was convicted on the testimony of not only an admitted liar but murderer too?

Not at all. My problem is claiming it’s airtight when it’s nothing of the sort. The jury could reasonably go either way
 
The trump alt right are hoping against hope.

Good move, Mueller: let the judge know that he is being watched and judged.

The judge has every reason to be annoyed with the prosecution defying orders and wasting his time and tax payer money. He has every reason to be stopping irrelevant testimony to be going before the jury.

You seriously think pissing off the judge before the trial is over is a good idea?
but obviously you’re fine with Manafort defrauding the United States of America. You trump whores are pathetic.


Yup, pretty sure we don't need a special prosecutor trying to find tax evaders. If you feel we do let's start the list with the likes of Warren Buffet
Did we need a special prosecutor to find adulterers?

May want to check in with Reasonable.
 
The government has an airtight case against Manafort and has a mountain of documented evidence to prove their case.

Idiots: but but we need to defend him because of.... Trump.

Airtight?

I don’t think you know what that means.

Even he prosecution is aware that their case is dependent on the jury believing the testimony of a man who admitting being a criminal and a liar and defrauding the defendant. That’s not air tight by a long shot
Airtight is the word the former prosecutor spoke who has observed every minute of this trial.
Funny you’re still pulling for an obvious criminal who defrauded the United States because your devotion to the criminal president blinds your common sense.




And, once again, if it is so "airtight" why didn't the AUSA file charges 13 years ago?
Trumpster is going back 13 years concerning a trial in August 2018.
You do love your criminals. What happened in your life to get you this way? Didn’t your mother give you enough affection?





The crimes that manafort is accused of date back thirteen years you 'tard. Are you really this stupid?
I so love the way you get such stiffee’s when you refer to known criminals like Manafort and Trump.
 
There’s less than a 1 % chance your criminal will walk.
Interesting you just described your fuhrer when you used the phrase “ he’s a fucking prick and has the ethics of a snake.”
Best description of your serial sex offender I’ve ever heard.







No, based on case history there is a 5% chance he'll walk. I personally detest manafort. I absolutely believe he defrauded the US. I also know that the US Attorney passed on this case 13 years ago. The only reason why mueller brought this case forward is in an attempt to get trump. Yet another example of his lack of ethics.
Only reason? It couldn’t be that Mueller has volumes and volumes of damning evidence on Manafort is it?
Mueller has more ethics in his pinky than all you DEPLORABLES put together..
That’s why he was chosen for this investigation.





If he does why didn't the AUSA file the charges back then?
You’re still perpetuating this vendetta with Mueller even though you KNOW almost everyone in Congress agreed Mueller has the most distinguished record and the most respect of anyone in Washington.
Guess who doesn’t command the respect of most?
Initials DT.





His career is "distinguished" because he does the wet work for the politicians who use him. That is not a ringing endorsement. The fact that he is RESPONSIBLE for over 100 million dollars having to be paid to injured parties, because of HIS Actions, is the only facts that matter. Facts that you choose to ignore because you are extremist partisan whore
You still can’t get over the long distinguished career of this former marine. Plus you keep forgetting everyone in Congress agreed he was the best man for the job.
 
The trump alt right are hoping against hope.

Good move, Mueller: let the judge know that he is being watched and judged.

The judge has every reason to be annoyed with the prosecution defying orders and wasting his time and tax payer money. He has every reason to be stopping irrelevant testimony to be going before the jury.

You seriously think pissing off the judge before the trial is over is a good idea?
but obviously you’re fine with Manafort defrauding the United States of America. You trump whores are pathetic.


Yup, pretty sure we don't need a special prosecutor trying to find tax evaders. If you feel we do let's start the list with the likes of Warren Buffet
Idiot doesn’t know a special prosecutor can’t look the other way when he uncovers crimes during his investigation.

Yeah, evidently that's only reserved for the FBI and DOJ...dumbass.
 
The government has an airtight case against Manafort and has a mountain of documented evidence to prove their case.

Idiots: but but we need to defend him because of.... Trump.

Airtight?

I don’t think you know what that means.

Even he prosecution is aware that their case is dependent on the jury believing the testimony of a man who admitting being a criminal and a liar and defrauding the defendant. That’s not air tight by a long shot
Airtight is the word the former prosecutor used who has observed every minute of this trial. But I’m sure you know more from your easy chair.
Funny you’re still pulling for an obvious criminal who defrauded the United States because your devotion to the criminal president blinds your common sense.

Then he is clearly lying since even the prosecution admits that their case hinges on the testimony of an admitted criminal and liar

Just think about this logically. How air tight can a case that relies on an admitted liar be?
Did you mind that Gotti was convicted on the testimony of not only an admitted liar but murderer too?

Not at all. My problem is claiming it’s airtight when it’s nothing of the sort. The jury could reasonably go either way
Either way?
Roflmao. Thanks for admitting you don’t have a clue about the immense evidence against Manafort.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Moderator
  • #89
The government has an airtight case against Manafort and has a mountain of documented evidence to prove their case.

Idiots: but but we need to defend him because of.... Trump.

Airtight?

I don’t think you know what that means.

Even he prosecution is aware that their case is dependent on the jury believing the testimony of a man who admitting being a criminal and a liar and defrauding the defendant. That’s not air tight by a long shot
Airtight is the word the former prosecutor used who has observed every minute of this trial. But I’m sure you know more from your easy chair.
Funny you’re still pulling for an obvious criminal who defrauded the United States because your devotion to the criminal president blinds your common sense.

Then he is clearly lying since even the prosecution admits that their case hinges on the testimony of an admitted criminal and liar

Just think about this logically. How air tight can a case that relies on an admitted liar be?
Listen very closely you fucking idiot.
I’m going to say this for the last time.
Mueller doesn’t even need Gate’s testimony.
He had mountains and mountains of incriminating evidence against Manafort. He dot’s every I and crosses every T. He’s the consummate professional and Manafort left a trail a hundred miles long of his guilt.
But you are quite amusing sticking up for a criminal because of your blind devotion to a bigger criminal: Trump

So your theory is that despite having mountains of evidence, the prosecution opted instead to put up the worst witness ever to prove their case? And that Ethical mueller is lying about Gates being necessary?

That’s your great theory?
 
  • Thread starter
  • Moderator
  • #90
The trump alt right are hoping against hope.

Good move, Mueller: let the judge know that he is being watched and judged.

The judge has every reason to be annoyed with the prosecution defying orders and wasting his time and tax payer money. He has every reason to be stopping irrelevant testimony to be going before the jury.

You seriously think pissing off the judge before the trial is over is a good idea?
but obviously you’re fine with Manafort defrauding the United States of America. You trump whores are pathetic.


Yup, pretty sure we don't need a special prosecutor trying to find tax evaders. If you feel we do let's start the list with the likes of Warren Buffet
Idiot doesn’t know a special prosecutor can’t look the other way when he uncovers crimes during his investigation.

So why did Mueller look the other way when he had the evidence the first time?
 
The trump alt right are hoping against hope.

Good move, Mueller: let the judge know that he is being watched and judged.


Great move, Bob! First get on the judge's REAL BAD SIDE, then royally PISS HIM OFF some more! :113::21::auiqs.jpg::bye1::desk::bye1::auiqs.jpg::21::113:
So, what you’re saying is, judges should let personal feelings run their court instead of the rule of law

You mean like every liberal circuit court which has tried to overturn and block Trump but failed? I see you haven't spent much time around judges to know that most of them are heavily swayed by personal feelings, ie., they JUDGE.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Moderator
  • #92
Airtight?

I don’t think you know what that means.

Even he prosecution is aware that their case is dependent on the jury believing the testimony of a man who admitting being a criminal and a liar and defrauding the defendant. That’s not air tight by a long shot
Airtight is the word the former prosecutor spoke who has observed every minute of this trial.
Funny you’re still pulling for an obvious criminal who defrauded the United States because your devotion to the criminal president blinds your common sense.




And, once again, if it is so "airtight" why didn't the AUSA file charges 13 years ago?
Trumpster is going back 13 years concerning a trial in August 2018.
You do love your criminals. What happened in your life to get you this way? Didn’t your mother give you enough affection?





The crimes that manafort is accused of date back thirteen years you 'tard. Are you really this stupid?
I so love the way you get such stiffee’s when you refer to known criminals like Manafort and Trump.






Good, I'm glad you appreciate my efforts. You still haven't answered the question, why didn't the AUSA file charges 13 years ago?
 
  • Thread starter
  • Moderator
  • #94
Airtight is the word the former prosecutor spoke who has observed every minute of this trial.
Funny you’re still pulling for an obvious criminal who defrauded the United States because your devotion to the criminal president blinds your common sense.




And, once again, if it is so "airtight" why didn't the AUSA file charges 13 years ago?
Trumpster is going back 13 years concerning a trial in August 2018.
You do love your criminals. What happened in your life to get you this way? Didn’t your mother give you enough affection?





The crimes that manafort is accused of date back thirteen years you 'tard. Are you really this stupid?
I so love the way you get such stiffee’s when you refer to known criminals like Manafort and Trump.






Good, I'm glad you appreciate my efforts. You still haven't answered the question, why didn't the AUSA file charges 13 years ago?

He won’t answer. That would require him to think instead of regurgitating talking points
 
Mueller team files complaint against Manafort trial judge over latest reprimand

That does not sound like the actions of someone who expects to win.

Nor does it seem wise while the trial is ongoing

Mueller :
GOD DAMMIT!!!!:CryingCow:
I'M TRYING TO RAILROAD THIS SUM BITCH AND YOU'RE STANDING IN MY WAY!!!
Defrauding the US of $60 million dollars and money laundering are not crimes in your Trump book?
I don't give a flying fuck.
Techically the government defrauds Americans of billions every years and they never pay a price for it.
What do you think most of the debt came from???
 
The trump alt right are hoping against hope.

Good move, Mueller: let the judge know that he is being watched and judged.


Great move, Bob! First get on the judge's REAL BAD SIDE, then royally PISS HIM OFF some more! :113::21::auiqs.jpg::bye1::desk::bye1::auiqs.jpg::21::113:
So are you saying if a judge is pissed off -- he will rig a trial in favor of the defendant?
More like a judge can stop a prosecutor from getting away with railroading a defendant.
 
OK, AZGAL. Whatchu gonna do?

The defenses used here by the Trump alt right, if entered into the court by the defense, would end in Manafort being executed.
Hyperbolic? A bit. Not much.
 

Forum List

Back
Top