Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Giuliani stated that Mueller told them so......sent them that information. I haven't seen them say otherwise.Which would require them to either make a motion to the Supreme Court.............or try to charge him and let them appeal to the Supreme Court for implied powers of the president.There is only one way this goes to Trial.............In the Senate.I'm not saying that Mueller will try to indict Trump while he's President. In fact, I think it's incredibly unlikely that he will.
I'm just saying that there's no legal precedent, and no clear answer to the question.
You're almost certainly correct.
I'm just saying, the law isn't as clear as you seem to think it is.
This isn't going to happen...........Mueller has basically said so........So they can only gather for Impeachment........
Meaning.......unless Trump folds like Nixon............Nothing is really going to happen.
To be clear - Mueller didn't say that, Giuliani claimed that Mueller said that.
As I said already, I still don't think there's much of a chance that Mueller will attempt to criminally indict a sitting President.
Unlike Comey.........who ran walkabout running his mouth........suddenly quiet..........There are 2 sides to every story.Giuliani stated that Mueller told them so......sent them that information. I haven't seen them say otherwise.Which would require them to either make a motion to the Supreme Court.............or try to charge him and let them appeal to the Supreme Court for implied powers of the president.There is only one way this goes to Trial.............In the Senate.
You're almost certainly correct.
I'm just saying, the law isn't as clear as you seem to think it is.
This isn't going to happen...........Mueller has basically said so........So they can only gather for Impeachment........
Meaning.......unless Trump folds like Nixon............Nothing is really going to happen.
To be clear - Mueller didn't say that, Giuliani claimed that Mueller said that.
As I said already, I still don't think there's much of a chance that Mueller will attempt to criminally indict a sitting President.
Of course you haven't - because Mueller isn't playing silly games like Giuliani is.
If you haven't noticed, Mueller hasn't really been saying much of anything at all - just doing his job. He'll have something to say at the end of the investigation, I'm sure.
So is Trump.It's a shame that in USA innocent people like Trump are under investigation and real war criminals like Soros, both Clintons, Obama and his administration and many others are still enjoying their freedom.
soros, clinton, obama and trump are all innocent until proven guilty ..
yawnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn
Unlike Comey.........who ran walkabout running his mouth........suddenly quiet..........There are 2 sides to every story.Giuliani stated that Mueller told them so......sent them that information. I haven't seen them say otherwise.Which would require them to either make a motion to the Supreme Court.............or try to charge him and let them appeal to the Supreme Court for implied powers of the president.You're almost certainly correct.
I'm just saying, the law isn't as clear as you seem to think it is.
This isn't going to happen...........Mueller has basically said so........So they can only gather for Impeachment........
Meaning.......unless Trump folds like Nixon............Nothing is really going to happen.
To be clear - Mueller didn't say that, Giuliani claimed that Mueller said that.
As I said already, I still don't think there's much of a chance that Mueller will attempt to criminally indict a sitting President.
Of course you haven't - because Mueller isn't playing silly games like Giuliani is.
If you haven't noticed, Mueller hasn't really been saying much of anything at all - just doing his job. He'll have something to say at the end of the investigation, I'm sure.
Mueller isn't gonna go public on Jack Squat.........he knows this is a high level affair.........he can't make mistakes..........could cost him.
He went public right before the election and leaked information after he was fired for the purpose of getting Trump investigated......................Unlike Comey.........who ran walkabout running his mouth........suddenly quiet..........There are 2 sides to every story.Giuliani stated that Mueller told them so......sent them that information. I haven't seen them say otherwise.Which would require them to either make a motion to the Supreme Court.............or try to charge him and let them appeal to the Supreme Court for implied powers of the president.
This isn't going to happen...........Mueller has basically said so........So they can only gather for Impeachment........
Meaning.......unless Trump folds like Nixon............Nothing is really going to happen.
To be clear - Mueller didn't say that, Giuliani claimed that Mueller said that.
As I said already, I still don't think there's much of a chance that Mueller will attempt to criminally indict a sitting President.
Of course you haven't - because Mueller isn't playing silly games like Giuliani is.
If you haven't noticed, Mueller hasn't really been saying much of anything at all - just doing his job. He'll have something to say at the end of the investigation, I'm sure.
Mueller isn't gonna go public on Jack Squat.........he knows this is a high level affair.........he can't make mistakes..........could cost him.
Comey didn't start talking to the press until after he was fired.
Which would require them to either make a motion to the Supreme Court.............or try to charge him and let them appeal to the Supreme Court for implied powers of the president.There is only one way this goes to Trial.............In the Senate.The FBI has basically said the same thing.............Or did you miss that............the Mueller investigation is only for a Impeachment proceeding..............They can take out players but charging the POTUS directly is unlikely.You understand that's a student note, not a law - right?
Whether or not a sitting President can be prosecuted is an open legal question. It hasn't been answered yet, because no one has tried.
Congress is the proper place for impeachment.......Senate the proper place for a trial.
If Trump is no longer President then he can be charged as normal.
I'm not saying that Mueller will try to indict Trump while he's President. In fact, I think it's incredibly unlikely that he will.
I'm just saying that there's no legal precedent, and no clear answer to the question.
You're almost certainly correct.
I'm just saying, the law isn't as clear as you seem to think it is.
This isn't going to happen...........Mueller has basically said so........So they can only gather for Impeachment........
Meaning.......unless Trump folds like Nixon............Nothing is really going to happen.
Not necessarily true with this exception.Meaning.......unless Trump folds like Nixon............Nothing is really going to happen.
yes, this is ALL 'what ifs'.... we do not know one itty bitty bit of what Mueller has on the president either....it could be nothing...it could be something...it could be just his campaign team and not him....it could be just the Russians manipulating others unwittingly.That is a what IF scenario.............does not mesh to the current situation.that really has not been settled yet.... it's simply opinion or rules set, and when challenged...the Supreme court will decide.http://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1897&context=fss_papers
They can only move to Impeach..............The FBI has openly said that.........the Dems don't own the house.........
So......all they can do is lay Seige to the WH in hopes he resigns...................
It's hard to say how it will come out, once said and done.
NO ONE is above the law....
even the President....or rather...especially the President, who took an oath to defend the constitution and laws derived from it.
As example, if a president shot and murdered in cold blood a person on 5th avenue....
will the justice department's hands be tied and really not charge him, if Congress critters in the majority are cult followers of the President and refuse to impeach him? I dunno? hard call....
Mueller's hands are pretty much tied.............Unless you have a Blue Tidal Wave next election ............this is nothing but a political show.
SC is going nowhere. A blue wave is gathering for a mighty sweep in the fall. Trump's popularity continues to sit around 40 to 42%, the Dems have been winning from state seats to national elections steadily since fall, and so forth.
Keep looking backwards, alt righties, and you will trip onto your faces.
not a chance, jakey boy, not a chance in hell. Pelosi, Obama, Clinton, Reid, Schumer, Waters, Wasserman-Schultz, Bernie, Lynch, Obama, and the left wing media have destroyed the dem party. The party of Kennedy and Truman no longer exists, it is now the party of Marx and Mao.
Which would require them to either make a motion to the Supreme Court.............or try to charge him and let them appeal to the Supreme Court for implied powers of the president.There is only one way this goes to Trial.............In the Senate.The FBI has basically said the same thing.............Or did you miss that............the Mueller investigation is only for a Impeachment proceeding..............They can take out players but charging the POTUS directly is unlikely.
Congress is the proper place for impeachment.......Senate the proper place for a trial.
If Trump is no longer President then he can be charged as normal.
I'm not saying that Mueller will try to indict Trump while he's President. In fact, I think it's incredibly unlikely that he will.
I'm just saying that there's no legal precedent, and no clear answer to the question.
You're almost certainly correct.
I'm just saying, the law isn't as clear as you seem to think it is.
This isn't going to happen...........Mueller has basically said so........So they can only gather for Impeachment........
Meaning.......unless Trump folds like Nixon............Nothing is really going to happen.Not necessarily true with this exception.Meaning.......unless Trump folds like Nixon............Nothing is really going to happen.
Amendment XXV, § 4;
"Whenever the Vice President and a majority of either the principal officers of the executive departments or of such other body as Congress may by law provide, transmit to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives their written declaration that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office, the Vice President shall immediately assume the powers and duties of the office as Acting President."
Once the President is removed, even temporarily as Amendment XXV states, his ass can be indicted, given he is not a SITTING PRESIDENT at the time! Palace intrigue anyone? That would be Constitutional and something that power hungry ass from Indiana just might be looking at with tRump going down the tubes. Pence could be rearranging the deck chairs on the sinking Ship of State so he can be kept comfortable while remaining afloat! Stay tuned to see if Caesar crosses the Rubicon to ride down Pennsylvania Ave with his Legions behind!
Or after he leaves the Office of the President voluntarily or not.There is only one way this goes to Trial.............In the Senate.The FBI has basically said the same thing.............Or did you miss that............the Mueller investigation is only for a Impeachment proceeding..............They can take out players but charging the POTUS directly is unlikely.http://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1897&context=fss_papers
They can only move to Impeach..............The FBI has openly said that.........the Dems don't own the house.........
So......all they can do is lay Seige to the WH in hopes he resigns...................
You understand that's a student note, not a law - right?
Whether or not a sitting President can be prosecuted is an open legal question. It hasn't been answered yet, because no one has tried.
Congress is the proper place for impeachment.......Senate the proper place for a trial.
If Trump is no longer President then he can be charged as normal.
I'm not saying that Mueller will try to indict Trump while he's President. In fact, I think it's incredibly unlikely that he will.
I'm just saying that there's no legal precedent, and no clear answer to the question.
aka All the threads on WE GOT TRUMP are pure speculation............They abound in this forum and the MSM....every day.................yes, this is ALL 'what ifs'.... we do not know one itty bitty bit of what Mueller has on the president either....it could be nothing...it could be something...it could be just his campaign team and not him....That is a what IF scenario.............does not mesh to the current situation.that really has not been settled yet.... it's simply opinion or rules set, and when challenged...the Supreme court will decide.http://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1897&context=fss_papers
They can only move to Impeach..............The FBI has openly said that.........the Dems don't own the house.........
So......all they can do is lay Seige to the WH in hopes he resigns...................
It's hard to say how it will come out, once said and done.
NO ONE is above the law....
even the President....or rather...especially the President, who took an oath to defend the constitution and laws derived from it.
As example, if a president shot and murdered in cold blood a person on 5th avenue....
will the justice department's hands be tied and really not charge him, if Congress critters in the majority are cult followers of the President and refuse to impeach him? I dunno? hard call....
Mueller's hands are pretty much tied.............Unless you have a Blue Tidal Wave next election ............this is nothing but a political show.
Mueller would never think of bringing charges if it were just minor laws being broken, or just Trump's team being naive or incompetent or ignorant of the law..... it has to be WITH INTENT to break the law and something felonious or multiple felonies with intent before I think Mueller would ever even try to press charges on a president.
All the liberals, including myself, are simply speculating and giving it our best guesses on what we have been informed on by the investigations by the press.... or by whom Mueller has called as witnesses before the grand jury....and what these witnesses have said they were asked by investigators....
NOT by Mueller or his team that has not leaked a word... we are guessing....our best educated guesses, is what you are reading from us...they are opinions, based on what little we do know as facts.
You don't have the numbers to impeach.......not gonna happen.Or after he leaves the Office of the President voluntarily or not.There is only one way this goes to Trial.............In the Senate.The FBI has basically said the same thing.............Or did you miss that............the Mueller investigation is only for a Impeachment proceeding..............They can take out players but charging the POTUS directly is unlikely.http://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1897&context=fss_papers
They can only move to Impeach..............The FBI has openly said that.........the Dems don't own the house.........
So......all they can do is lay Seige to the WH in hopes he resigns...................
You understand that's a student note, not a law - right?
Whether or not a sitting President can be prosecuted is an open legal question. It hasn't been answered yet, because no one has tried.
Congress is the proper place for impeachment.......Senate the proper place for a trial.
If Trump is no longer President then he can be charged as normal.
I'm not saying that Mueller will try to indict Trump while he's President. In fact, I think it's incredibly unlikely that he will.
I'm just saying that there's no legal precedent, and no clear answer to the question.
yep, just like all the WE GOT CLINTON NOW threadsaka All the threads on WE GOT TRUMP are pure speculation............They abound in this forum and the MSM....every day.................
He is still in office now isn't he.....................Could be there 6 more years...............I think his age will play a factor there.Your reply about impeachment has nothing to do with what happens are Trump leaves office. He can be indicted if the FBI can make the charges feasible.
Actually there is sufficient evidence to prosecute there........wasn't prosecuted before because of who owned the DOJ...........yep, just like all the WE GOT CLINTON NOW treadsaka All the threads on WE GOT TRUMP are pure speculation............They abound in this forum and the MSM....every day.................
I'd vote for Bugs Bunny............not a problem.........Elmer Fudd for VP.........He could be in office six more years, and Bugs Bunny could come to life.
All things are possible, I supposed.
oh really...SC is going nowhere. A blue wave is gathering for a mighty sweep in the fall. Trump's popularity continues to sit around 40 to 42%, the Dems have been winning from state seats to national elections steadily since fall, and so forth.
Keep looking backwards, alt righties, and you will trip onto your faces.
not a chance, jakey boy, not a chance in hell. Pelosi, Obama, Clinton, Reid, Schumer, Waters, Wasserman-Schultz, Bernie, Lynch, Obama, and the left wing media have destroyed the dem party. The party of Kennedy and Truman no longer exists, it is now the party of Marx and Mao.
