Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AHEMMMM..... you are ill informed.Mueller is also keeping low as they are also under investigation.......which is why McCabe is gone just before retirement and is lawyering up..........there are 2 side to this story.
Lack of Candor is a Politically correct name for Lying.........enough for the IG to suggest charges...........AHEMMMM..... you are ill informed.Mueller is also keeping low as they are also under investigation.......which is why McCabe is gone just before retirement and is lawyering up..........there are 2 side to this story.
McCabe was fired for lack of candor regarding the leaking that the Clinton Foundation was still under investigation to the press during the campaign.
Investigators found NOTHING on McCabe and his handling or involvement in the Russian or Trump investigation.
McCabe hurt the clinton campaign....not Trump....silly, uninformed one!!!
Sorry, but that is incorrect. The constant posts about how the mueller investigation is "going down" or "unconstitutional" are nothing more than desperate twistings and turnings of people who know they have had it.One thing I've learned over the years is that when the Left tells you that you're "desperate," it is a sure sign you are too close for comfort! The only reason why Mueller's phony investigation has lasted this long is because of all the political wrangling not to touch it under threat of being accused of "obstruction." But it would have been better to let Trump shut it down rather than the inevitable now: Mueller coming up with nothing more than a few penny anti old specious charges on technicalities to people barely connected that get thrown out in court for their unconstitutionality.More desperate weaseling.
Which would require them to either make a motion to the Supreme Court.............or try to charge him and let them appeal to the Supreme Court for implied powers of the president.There is only one way this goes to Trial.............In the Senate.I'm not saying that Mueller will try to indict Trump while he's President. In fact, I think it's incredibly unlikely that he will.
I'm just saying that there's no legal precedent, and no clear answer to the question.
You're almost certainly correct.
I'm just saying, the law isn't as clear as you seem to think it is.
This isn't going to happen...........Mueller has basically said so........So they can only gather for Impeachment........
Meaning.......unless Trump folds like Nixon............Nothing is really going to happen.Not necessarily true with this exception.Meaning.......unless Trump folds like Nixon............Nothing is really going to happen.
Amendment XXV, § 4;
"Whenever the Vice President and a majority of either the principal officers of the executive departments or of such other body as Congress may by law provide, transmit to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives their written declaration that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office, the Vice President shall immediately assume the powers and duties of the office as Acting President."
Once the President is removed, even temporarily as Amendment XXV states, his ass can be indicted, given he is not a SITTING PRESIDENT at the time! Palace intrigue anyone? That would be Constitutional and something that power hungry ass from Indiana just might be looking at with tRump going down the tubes. Pence could be rearranging the deck chairs on the sinking Ship of State so he can be kept comfortable while remaining afloat! Stay tuned to see if Caesar crosses the Rubicon to ride down Pennsylvania Ave with his Legions behind!
Using the 25th is even less likely than impeachment.
Only if Pence is an honorable man, which he isn't. If the though has ever crossed his mind or been suggested to him (very probable), the odds would be much higher raising the possibility, especially as the Clown's behavior becomes more and more erratic and unpredictable. Pence wants the golden ring, but we'll both have to wait to see how this mess of an administration comes through this storm a tad longer!Using the 25th is even less likely than impeachment.
nope.... THEY ARE BOTH crimes, and ''lack of candor'' is a Lesser charge than ''Lying to official investigator''....Lack of Candor is a Politically correct name for Lying.........enough for the IG to suggest charges...........AHEMMMM..... you are ill informed.Mueller is also keeping low as they are also under investigation.......which is why McCabe is gone just before retirement and is lawyering up..........there are 2 side to this story.
McCabe was fired for lack of candor regarding the leaking that the Clinton Foundation was still under investigation to the press during the campaign.
Investigators found NOTHING on McCabe and his handling or involvement in the Russian or Trump investigation.
McCabe hurt the clinton campaign....not Trump....silly, uninformed one!!!
Whether they charge him for ........ahemm........lack of Candor is yet to be seen.
Still a crime............still can be charged.......and still can do plea deals.nope.... THEY ARE BOTH crimes, and ''lack of candor'' is a Lesser charge than ''Lying to official investigator''....Lack of Candor is a Politically correct name for Lying.........enough for the IG to suggest charges...........AHEMMMM..... you are ill informed.Mueller is also keeping low as they are also under investigation.......which is why McCabe is gone just before retirement and is lawyering up..........there are 2 side to this story.
McCabe was fired for lack of candor regarding the leaking that the Clinton Foundation was still under investigation to the press during the campaign.
Investigators found NOTHING on McCabe and his handling or involvement in the Russian or Trump investigation.
McCabe hurt the clinton campaign....not Trump....silly, uninformed one!!!
Whether they charge him for ........ahemm........lack of Candor is yet to be seen.
they are NOT the same crimes.
Ludlum vs. Dept. of Justice ?nope.... THEY ARE BOTH crimes, and ''lack of candor'' is a Lesser charge than ''Lying to official investigator''....Lack of Candor is a Politically correct name for Lying.........enough for the IG to suggest charges...........AHEMMMM..... you are ill informed.Mueller is also keeping low as they are also under investigation.......which is why McCabe is gone just before retirement and is lawyering up..........there are 2 side to this story.
McCabe was fired for lack of candor regarding the leaking that the Clinton Foundation was still under investigation to the press during the campaign.
Investigators found NOTHING on McCabe and his handling or involvement in the Russian or Trump investigation.
McCabe hurt the clinton campaign....not Trump....silly, uninformed one!!!
Whether they charge him for ........ahemm........lack of Candor is yet to be seen.
they are NOT the same crimes.
I'd vote for Bugs Bunny............not a problem.........Elmer Fudd for VP.........He could be in office six more years, and Bugs Bunny could come to life.
All things are possible, I supposed.
But your side has been so good in predictions.........nation seems pretty red to me...............your losing.
Keep telling yourself. Keep saying, "we are safe, they don't know." Mueller is MAGA, and he won't stop.Sorry, but that is incorrect. The constant posts about how the mueller investigation is "going down" or "unconstitutional" are nothing more than desperate twistings and turnings of people who know they have had it.One thing I've learned over the years is that when the Left tells you that you're "desperate," it is a sure sign you are too close for comfort! The only reason why Mueller's phony investigation has lasted this long is because of all the political wrangling not to touch it under threat of being accused of "obstruction." But it would have been better to let Trump shut it down rather than the inevitable now: Mueller coming up with nothing more than a few penny anti old specious charges on technicalities to people barely connected that get thrown out in court for their unconstitutionality.More desperate weaseling.
Keep saying that right up to the day he closes it with JACK for a conviction against Trump or Russia. Once again, no one ever had a WORD about Trump being tied to Russia his entire life until he won the election, Obama even scoffed at the idea, meantime, we had YEARS of constant overt ass-sucking and tongue licking with the Russians between Hillary and Obama. I still have yet to meet ONE PERSON whose vote was influenced or changed by Facebook ads! Oh, yeah, the Facebook Hillary wants in charge of now? Too funny! Thanks for a good laugh!
Comey didn't start talking to the press until after he was fired.
Comey was still working in July 2016 as head of the FBI I'm pretty sure!
/——-/ “We now find out that the Obama Administration put the opposing campaigns presidential candidate, or his campaign, under investigation. That raises legitimate questions. I just find this really odd...this goes to the heart of our electoral system.” Jonathan Turley on @FoxNewsThe "Appointments Clause" provides that "principal officers" must be appointed by the President with the Senate's consent." But the Mueller team was given "special status" to several prosecutors on his team, by Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein in their probe of former Trump campaign chief Paul Manafort, the entire investigation may be invalidated, thus "unconstitutional!"
The self-inflicted "catch-22" scenario by Rosenstein giving unlimited power to Mueller is exactly what the "Appointments Clause" under Article II of the Constitution was designed to prevent.
The Mueller attorneys presiding over the Manafort case before Federal Judge T.S. Ellis III, in Alexandria, VA., may have violated Article II of the Constitution because they not only represented the office of the special counsel, but also simultaneously considered "Special Assistant U.S. Attorneys." Therefore Mueller, (who's the direct supervisor) should be legally considered a "roving" U.S. Attorney.
Now here's where it gets dicey, under the Constitution only the President can nominate all "principal officers," including U.S. attorneys and cabinet members. However Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein appointed Mueller as special counsel. Moreover, Rosenstein is a "political appointee" and as such was never "confirmed" by the Senate, as anyone serving as a U.S. attorney by law must, thus the entire investigation may be invalid. The case can be made that Rosenstein usurped the authority of the President of the United States to nominate whoever he wants as a prosecutor. Mr. Mueller is serving unconstitutionally in violation of the Appointments Clause of the U.S. Constitution because of the way Rod Rosenstein appointed him. All attorneys involved could openly challenge whatever subpoenas the Mueller team throws out, to raise as a defense, the Appointments Clause in court.
This Mueller probe has been illegal since the start and is set to ultimately fail. This isn't a dodge by the Right, just another example of how desperate the Left is to try to hang this President any way they can to nullify his election.
The Special Counsel is exempted from Article II requirements.
No one can show where the President has the authority to interfere with Special Counsels.
The "Appointments Clause" provides that "principal officers" must be appointed by the President with the Senate's consent." But the Mueller team was given "special status" to several prosecutors on his team, by Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein in their probe of former Trump campaign chief Paul Manafort, the entire investigation may be invalidated, thus "unconstitutional!"
The self-inflicted "catch-22" scenario by Rosenstein giving unlimited power to Mueller is exactly what the "Appointments Clause" under Article II of the Constitution was designed to prevent.
The Mueller attorneys presiding over the Manafort case before Federal Judge T.S. Ellis III, in Alexandria, VA., may have violated Article II of the Constitution because they not only represented the office of the special counsel, but also simultaneously considered "Special Assistant U.S. Attorneys." Therefore Mueller, (who's the direct supervisor) should be legally considered a "roving" U.S. Attorney.
Now here's where it gets dicey, under the Constitution only the President can nominate all "principal officers," including U.S. attorneys and cabinet members. However Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein appointed Mueller as special counsel. Moreover, Rosenstein is a "political appointee" and as such was never "confirmed" by the Senate, as anyone serving as a U.S. attorney by law must, thus the entire investigation may be invalid. The case can be made that Rosenstein usurped the authority of the President of the United States to nominate whoever he wants as a prosecutor. Mr. Mueller is serving unconstitutionally in violation of the Appointments Clause of the U.S. Constitution because of the way Rod Rosenstein appointed him. All attorneys involved could openly challenge whatever subpoenas the Mueller team throws out, to raise as a defense, the Appointments Clause in court.
This Mueller probe has been illegal since the start and is set to ultimately fail. This isn't a dodge by the Right, just another example of how desperate the Left is to try to hang this President any way they can to nullify his election.
Even though I know the origin of this, do you have a link?
Where does the Constitution exempt anyone in the executive branch from Article II requirements?The Special Counsel is exempted from Article II requirements.
No one can show where the President has the authority to interfere with Special Counsels.
The Special Counsel is exempted from Article II requirements.
No one can show where the President has the authority to interfere with Special Counsels.
