Do you not remember Mueller's statement about recommending NO NEW INDICTMENTS?
1. Two people were indicted since that was said: Assange and Gregory Craig.
2. Mueller could not indict Trump untill the Congress convicts him.
You just cling to your fantasy Comrade.
Then on Thursday you go full hair on fire and say that the report would prove Trump guilty of something, because reasons, if not for the redaction....
lol you don't know what the fuck you are talking about.
I don't need a report to know that Trump is a completely unethical piece of shit, the only question is of legalities to hold him accountable for it.
Report will lay out evidence for the Obstruction of Justice (most of which we already know in general terms) but also counter evidence and/or what is missing in the case against Trump to explain why Mueller failed to make a descision either way.
The only mistake made in firing James Comey was not doing it immediately upon taking office. The argument that Trump should be impeached for obstructing an investigation based on gossip compiled for the Clintons and used as an "insurance policy" in case Trump got elected isn't likely to get very far in my opinion.