Mueller schedules interview with Hope Hicks

[bendog]

Mueller has probably talked to her already.

Now she has to cross the Ts and dot the Is she has already made. If she can't, she is in big trouble. If so, she will sell out Donald.

Mueller has evidence in the form of documents and testimony to fact check her and others, she cannot know what Mueller knows. Thus, the more evidence collected the more likely a lie will be recognized, and the more likely a lie under oath will lead to an indictment. Loyalty to Trump goes only so far, and stops well before the prison sally gate.

We all remember Scooter Libby, so she may hope to receive a pardon, but not before she is arrested and humiliated. Of course she can always expect one of the right wing think tanks to give her a job - secretary of truth working under Big Brother.

On the other hand integrity can have benefits, at least outside of the Trump Administration. The truth can set her free.

What's that? Have a nice romantic stay in federal prison. LOL

 

[Wry Catcher]

Mueller has probably talked to her already.

Now she has to cross the Ts and dot the Is she has already made. If she can't, she is in big trouble. If so, she will sell out Donald.

Mueller has evidence in the form of documents and testimony to fact check her and others, she cannot know what Mueller knows. Thus, the more evidence collected the more likely a lie will be recognized, and the more likely a lie under oath will lead to an indictment. Loyalty to Trump goes only so far, and stops well before the prison sally gate.

We all remember Scooter Libby, so she may hope to receive a pardon, but not before she is arrested and humiliated. Of course she can always expect one of the right wing think tanks to give her a job - secretary of truth working under Big Brother.

On the other hand integrity can have benefits, at least outside of the Trump Administration. The truth can set her free.

Q. Why do you go out of your way to prove your ignorance

A. My guess, you are too stupid to realize this ^^^ truth.

 

[Wry Catcher]

Mueller has probably talked to her already.

Now she has to cross the Ts and dot the Is she has already made. If she can't, she is in big trouble. If so, she will sell out Donald.

Mueller has evidence in the form of documents and testimony to fact check her and others, she cannot know what Mueller knows. Thus, the more evidence collected the more likely a lie will be recognized, and the more likely a lie under oath will lead to an indictment. Loyalty to Trump goes only so far, and stops well before the prison sally gate.

We all remember Scooter Libby, so she may hope to receive a pardon, but not before she is arrested and humiliated. Of course she can always expect one of the right wing think tanks to give her a job - secretary of truth working under Big Brother.

On the other hand integrity can have benefits, at least outside of the Trump Administration. The truth can set her free.

One thing you can make book on is that Mueller has questions he'll ask that he already knows the answer. I don't know that integrity has any benefit to her, but if she lies, she does time and will carry a felony for the rest of her life.

Of course, there's the advantage of a book and tv movie. The Trumpskys will eat that up.

But by law, she cannot legally benefit from it.

Q. Trumpskys can read? (it's clear the subset, trumpanzees, cannot comprehend).

 

[miketx]

Mueller has probably talked to her already.

Now she has to cross the Ts and dot the Is she has already made. If she can't, she is in big trouble. If so, she will sell out Donald.

Mueller has evidence in the form of documents and testimony to fact check her and others, she cannot know what Mueller knows. Thus, the more evidence collected the more likely a lie will be recognized, and the more likely a lie under oath will lead to an indictment. Loyalty to Trump goes only so far, and stops well before the prison sally gate.

We all remember Scooter Libby, so she may hope to receive a pardon, but not before she is arrested and humiliated. Of course she can always expect one of the right wing think tanks to give her a job - secretary of truth working under Big Brother.

On the other hand integrity can have benefits, at least outside of the Trump Administration. The truth can set her free.

Q. Why do you go out of your way to prove your ignorance

A. My guess, you are too stupid to realize this ^^^ truth.

Saying you live in a fantasy does not prove me ignorant, it only states my opinion of your simple minded conclusions, of which you have NO facts.

 

[Dragonlady]

Hope Hicks, 28, is one of only a small group of aides who has been at Donald Trump’s side and in the room since before he launched his presidential campaign.

President Donald Trump’s longtime aide and current communications director, Hope Hicks, is scheduled to speak with special counsel Robert Mueller’s team in mid-November, following the president’s trip to Asia, multiple people familiar with the schedule told POLITICO.

Earlier this fall, she retained a personal attorney, Robert Trout.

More: Mueller schedules interview with Hope Hicks

I'm sure she knows a lot of stuff that Mueller wants to hear about - or confirm.

Mewler's rain of terror continues. He's forcing hundreds of innocent people to pay big money for attorneys and threatending them with prison.

Over what? Nothing but the most delusional of conspiciy theories that are about something that isn't even a crime.

Funny. Adolf Trump should be paying their legal bills.

Actually, Trump is paying huge amounts towards his staff’s legal bills. I’m willing to bet he’s doing it in the hopes of buying their silence and “loyalty” but he is doing it.

 

[jc456]

jc is now flailing.

Miss Hicks is now spilling all she knows.

which is what? are you in the room with them? wow. lucky you. What is she wearing?

 

[bendog]

jc is now flailing.

Miss Hicks is now spilling all she knows.

which is what? are you in the room with them? wow. lucky you. What is she wearing?

Presumably she gets to keep her clothes on since Mueller probably isn't concerned that she's wearing a wire .... but you never know. It'd be pretty rich if he had somebody wave a body detector over her.

 

[jc456]

jc is now flailing.

Miss Hicks is now spilling all she knows.

what? I just looked this up for an update and looky here:

this says the plans are to interview Hicks within weeks. this is today's paper. you just wrote she's spilling now. How is that exactly?

Trump's ultimate insider Hope Hicks will talk with Mueller investigators as the screw turns on Russia collusion probe

• Special counsel Robert Mueller's investigators plan to interview Hicks within weeks
• She is among President Trump's longest serving aides, having served as press secretary throughout his campaign
• She previously worked for him at the Trump Organization
• Hicks is traveling with the President to Asia and is expected to talk upon her return
• White House lawyers continue to urge staff to cooperate with investigators
• Trump has blasted the probe as a 'witch hunt'
• Former campaign chair Paul Manafort and his partner Rick Gates were indicted on Monday

Read more: Trump insider Hope Hicks to talk to Mueller investigators | Daily Mail Online
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

 

[jc456]

How white of you. but no, see that is your fking opinion. Mine is that he is a genius and you mock me and insult me. so fk you and your angle. I give two shits what you believe or fking think with your opinion ass.

You're fixing that. meaning you want to take my vote away, again proving my point. fk dude you can't even stop trying to silence me in a four sentence response.

Please keep writing, because stopping you would be stopping the obvious fallibility of your positions. Keep writing.

You are crying because you get what you dish, and you can't handle it. Tough to be you, I get it.

"Fixing" it is not taking your vote away. Trump has created the mess, the campaign certainly and he probably have acted criminally, and he will be removed from office, and those who broke the law will be punished.

and he will be removed from office

Yeah and then you come back with that. again, you are trying to take my vote out. you can call it whatever you like, but a spade is a spade. Jake.

See it how you want, but it matters not.

well sure it does. see I'm American and i get the same vote as you for whatever the task. Right now, there is no evidence that russia did anything. ANYTHING. So do us all a favor and post what is evidence. Why can't you mr confident?

That's your prejudiced opinion. So do us all a favor and wait on Mueller's investigation. That's what mature citizens do.

you're not waiting. your mouthing off like you have some insider info. so again, as the band 'Who' use to sing, who the fk are you?

 

[jc456]

Mueller has probably talked to her already.

Now she has to cross the Ts and dot the Is she has already made. If she can't, she is in big trouble. If so, she will sell out Donald.

Mueller has evidence in the form of documents and testimony to fact check her and others, she cannot know what Mueller knows. Thus, the more evidence collected the more likely a lie will be recognized, and the more likely a lie under oath will lead to an indictment. Loyalty to Trump goes only so far, and stops well before the prison sally gate.

We all remember Scooter Libby, so she may hope to receive a pardon, but not before she is arrested and humiliated. Of course she can always expect one of the right wing think tanks to give her a job - secretary of truth working under Big Brother.

On the other hand integrity can have benefits, at least outside of the Trump Administration. The truth can set her free.

if Mueller hasn't released anything, how is it you know this:

Mueller has evidence in the form of documents and testimony to fact check her and others,

please explain this to me. that isn't logical unless you are mueller. LOL

 

[Hutch Starskey]

You've proven without a shadow of a doubt that you're no American.

thanks for making the point. see your way or no way. americans in your mind are not allowed to vote for who they wish to lead the country. just you. got it. thanks for your crazy.

See, a cultist Trump supporter would think that.

I'm against treason and those who support treason. You are willfully ignoring the evidence right in front of you... Why? Because you're ok with treason, you're not an American.

I'm against treason. I see treason behavior and you ignore it when evidence is available. you want me to address it when you have none. see the difference? you hate trump not treason. If you truly hate treason the Uranium One deal and the dossier would be of concern for you. BTW, what did the US get for the Uranium one deal?

Why do you only care about Uranium One now? This happened in 2010. Because the bullshit you call news is trying to distract you from the fact that the president is in trouble and will do anything it can to divert the focus of something every American should be paying cost attention to.

Open your eyes. Or keep them closed, your choice.

why? because it is consistent with the russia russia story, that's why. It has all sorts of implications in it. like why did we do it? can you answer that? why didn't the US receive anything for the deal? it seems like a one way only deal with a country you all want war with. I'm sorry, I work from logic and there is absolutely none in this story.

Next, I'd like to see the evidence that trump was dealing with russia that invoked the special prosecutor. still nothing. zip, the DNC not even looked at by our own intelligence agency when the accusation was about it. again, fking no logic.

why? because it is consistent with the russia russia story, that's why. It has all sorts of implications in it.

No, it really doesn't have any implications at all. The two US operated mines were owned by a Candian company. Those mines were licensed by the NRC to only sell their Uranium in the US. A Russian company petioned the US govt for approval to buy a controlling interest in the Canadian company. The deal was reviewed and approved. The licensure of the mines remains the same. The only thing that has changed is who makes the profits.

 

[g5000]

"Personal aide".

Is that what Trump's chicks are called these days?

 

[jc456]

thanks for making the point. see your way or no way. americans in your mind are not allowed to vote for who they wish to lead the country. just you. got it. thanks for your crazy.

See, a cultist Trump supporter would think that.

I'm against treason and those who support treason. You are willfully ignoring the evidence right in front of you... Why? Because you're ok with treason, you're not an American.

I'm against treason. I see treason behavior and you ignore it when evidence is available. you want me to address it when you have none. see the difference? you hate trump not treason. If you truly hate treason the Uranium One deal and the dossier would be of concern for you. BTW, what did the US get for the Uranium one deal?

Why do you only care about Uranium One now? This happened in 2010. Because the bullshit you call news is trying to distract you from the fact that the president is in trouble and will do anything it can to divert the focus of something every American should be paying cost attention to.

Open your eyes. Or keep them closed, your choice.

why? because it is consistent with the russia russia story, that's why. It has all sorts of implications in it. like why did we do it? can you answer that? why didn't the US receive anything for the deal? it seems like a one way only deal with a country you all want war with. I'm sorry, I work from logic and there is absolutely none in this story.

Next, I'd like to see the evidence that trump was dealing with russia that invoked the special prosecutor. still nothing. zip, the DNC not even looked at by our own intelligence agency when the accusation was about it. again, fking no logic.

why? because it is consistent with the russia russia story, that's why. It has all sorts of implications in it.

No, it really doesn't have any implications at all. The two US operated mines were owned by a Candian company. Those mines were licensed by the NRC to only sell their Uranium in the US. A Russian company petioned the US govt for approval to buy a controlling interest in the Canadian company. The deal was reviewed and approved. The licensure of the mines remains the same. The only thing that has changed is who makes the profits.

so where is the money? The US didn't get it. oh wait, the clinton's did. but you're ok with that. that is the problem.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

See, a cultist Trump supporter would think that.

I'm against treason and those who support treason. You are willfully ignoring the evidence right in front of you... Why? Because you're ok with treason, you're not an American.

I'm against treason. I see treason behavior and you ignore it when evidence is available. you want me to address it when you have none. see the difference? you hate trump not treason. If you truly hate treason the Uranium One deal and the dossier would be of concern for you. BTW, what did the US get for the Uranium one deal?

Why do you only care about Uranium One now? This happened in 2010. Because the bullshit you call news is trying to distract you from the fact that the president is in trouble and will do anything it can to divert the focus of something every American should be paying cost attention to.

Open your eyes. Or keep them closed, your choice.

why? because it is consistent with the russia russia story, that's why. It has all sorts of implications in it. like why did we do it? can you answer that? why didn't the US receive anything for the deal? it seems like a one way only deal with a country you all want war with. I'm sorry, I work from logic and there is absolutely none in this story.

Next, I'd like to see the evidence that trump was dealing with russia that invoked the special prosecutor. still nothing. zip, the DNC not even looked at by our own intelligence agency when the accusation was about it. again, fking no logic.

why? because it is consistent with the russia russia story, that's why. It has all sorts of implications in it.

No, it really doesn't have any implications at all. The two US operated mines were owned by a Candian company. Those mines were licensed by the NRC to only sell their Uranium in the US. A Russian company petioned the US govt for approval to buy a controlling interest in the Canadian company. The deal was reviewed and approved. The licensure of the mines remains the same. The only thing that has changed is who makes the profits.

so where is the money? The US didn't get it. oh wait, the clinton's did. but you're ok with that. that is the problem.

What money should the US have gotten from a deal between two foreign companies?

 

[JakeStarkey]

Mueller has probably talked to her already.

Now she has to cross the Ts and dot the Is she has already made. If she can't, she is in big trouble. If so, she will sell out Donald.

Mueller has evidence in the form of documents and testimony to fact check her and others, she cannot know what Mueller knows. Thus, the more evidence collected the more likely a lie will be recognized, and the more likely a lie under oath will lead to an indictment. Loyalty to Trump goes only so far, and stops well before the prison sally gate.

We all remember Scooter Libby, so she may hope to receive a pardon, but not before she is arrested and humiliated. Of course she can always expect one of the right wing think tanks to give her a job - secretary of truth working under Big Brother.

On the other hand integrity can have benefits, at least outside of the Trump Administration. The truth can set her free.

if Mueller hasn't released anything, how is it you know this:

Mueller has evidence in the form of documents and testimony to fact check her and others,

please explain this to me. that isn't logical unless you are mueller. LOL

Of course it is logical. It is you that is not logical.

 

[jc456]

Mueller has probably talked to her already.

Now she has to cross the Ts and dot the Is she has already made. If she can't, she is in big trouble. If so, she will sell out Donald.

Mueller has evidence in the form of documents and testimony to fact check her and others, she cannot know what Mueller knows. Thus, the more evidence collected the more likely a lie will be recognized, and the more likely a lie under oath will lead to an indictment. Loyalty to Trump goes only so far, and stops well before the prison sally gate.

We all remember Scooter Libby, so she may hope to receive a pardon, but not before she is arrested and humiliated. Of course she can always expect one of the right wing think tanks to give her a job - secretary of truth working under Big Brother.

On the other hand integrity can have benefits, at least outside of the Trump Administration. The truth can set her free.

if Mueller hasn't released anything, how is it you know this:

Mueller has evidence in the form of documents and testimony to fact check her and others,

please explain this to me. that isn't logical unless you are mueller. LOL

Of course it is logical. It is you that is not logical.

what's logical about it?

 

[jc456]

I'm against treason. I see treason behavior and you ignore it when evidence is available. you want me to address it when you have none. see the difference? you hate trump not treason. If you truly hate treason the Uranium One deal and the dossier would be of concern for you. BTW, what did the US get for the Uranium one deal?

Why do you only care about Uranium One now? This happened in 2010. Because the bullshit you call news is trying to distract you from the fact that the president is in trouble and will do anything it can to divert the focus of something every American should be paying cost attention to.

Open your eyes. Or keep them closed, your choice.

why? because it is consistent with the russia russia story, that's why. It has all sorts of implications in it. like why did we do it? can you answer that? why didn't the US receive anything for the deal? it seems like a one way only deal with a country you all want war with. I'm sorry, I work from logic and there is absolutely none in this story.

Next, I'd like to see the evidence that trump was dealing with russia that invoked the special prosecutor. still nothing. zip, the DNC not even looked at by our own intelligence agency when the accusation was about it. again, fking no logic.

why? because it is consistent with the russia russia story, that's why. It has all sorts of implications in it.

No, it really doesn't have any implications at all. The two US operated mines were owned by a Candian company. Those mines were licensed by the NRC to only sell their Uranium in the US. A Russian company petioned the US govt for approval to buy a controlling interest in the Canadian company. The deal was reviewed and approved. The licensure of the mines remains the same. The only thing that has changed is who makes the profits.

so where is the money? The US didn't get it. oh wait, the clinton's did. but you're ok with that. that is the problem.

What money should the US have gotten from a deal between two foreign companies?

so we give shit away is what you're saying? so when some country buys a jet, they get it for free? LOL, you're special. just more evidence you care not for the country.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Why do you only care about Uranium One now? This happened in 2010. Because the bullshit you call news is trying to distract you from the fact that the president is in trouble and will do anything it can to divert the focus of something every American should be paying cost attention to.

Open your eyes. Or keep them closed, your choice.

why? because it is consistent with the russia russia story, that's why. It has all sorts of implications in it. like why did we do it? can you answer that? why didn't the US receive anything for the deal? it seems like a one way only deal with a country you all want war with. I'm sorry, I work from logic and there is absolutely none in this story.

Next, I'd like to see the evidence that trump was dealing with russia that invoked the special prosecutor. still nothing. zip, the DNC not even looked at by our own intelligence agency when the accusation was about it. again, fking no logic.

why? because it is consistent with the russia russia story, that's why. It has all sorts of implications in it.

No, it really doesn't have any implications at all. The two US operated mines were owned by a Candian company. Those mines were licensed by the NRC to only sell their Uranium in the US. A Russian company petioned the US govt for approval to buy a controlling interest in the Canadian company. The deal was reviewed and approved. The licensure of the mines remains the same. The only thing that has changed is who makes the profits.

so where is the money? The US didn't get it. oh wait, the clinton's did. but you're ok with that. that is the problem.

What money should the US have gotten from a deal between two foreign companies?

so we give shit away is what you're saying? so when some country buys a jet, they get it for free? LOL, you're special. just more evidence you care not for the country.

so we give shit away is what you're saying?

What "shit" would that be?

 

[Wry Catcher]

Mueller has probably talked to her already.

Now she has to cross the Ts and dot the Is she has already made. If she can't, she is in big trouble. If so, she will sell out Donald.

Mueller has evidence in the form of documents and testimony to fact check her and others, she cannot know what Mueller knows. Thus, the more evidence collected the more likely a lie will be recognized, and the more likely a lie under oath will lead to an indictment. Loyalty to Trump goes only so far, and stops well before the prison sally gate.

We all remember Scooter Libby, so she may hope to receive a pardon, but not before she is arrested and humiliated. Of course she can always expect one of the right wing think tanks to give her a job - secretary of truth working under Big Brother.

On the other hand integrity can have benefits, at least outside of the Trump Administration. The truth can set her free.

if Mueller hasn't released anything, how is it you know this:

Mueller has evidence in the form of documents and testimony to fact check her and others,

please explain this to me. that isn't logical unless you are mueller. LOL

Mueller had one person arrested who become until yesterday a CRI when he plead guilty to a crime which seems to have been a wobbler instead of a felony; Two others were indicted after securing and presenting evidence to the Grand Jury sufficient to hold them to answer.

I wonder, since we have not heard anything from/about Gen. Flynn, if he has turned and given Mueller everything he needs to bring down others. One can only hope justice will be done.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Why do you only care about Uranium One now? This happened in 2010. Because the bullshit you call news is trying to distract you from the fact that the president is in trouble and will do anything it can to divert the focus of something every American should be paying cost attention to.

Open your eyes. Or keep them closed, your choice.

why? because it is consistent with the russia russia story, that's why. It has all sorts of implications in it. like why did we do it? can you answer that? why didn't the US receive anything for the deal? it seems like a one way only deal with a country you all want war with. I'm sorry, I work from logic and there is absolutely none in this story.

Next, I'd like to see the evidence that trump was dealing with russia that invoked the special prosecutor. still nothing. zip, the DNC not even looked at by our own intelligence agency when the accusation was about it. again, fking no logic.

why? because it is consistent with the russia russia story, that's why. It has all sorts of implications in it.

No, it really doesn't have any implications at all. The two US operated mines were owned by a Candian company. Those mines were licensed by the NRC to only sell their Uranium in the US. A Russian company petioned the US govt for approval to buy a controlling interest in the Canadian company. The deal was reviewed and approved. The licensure of the mines remains the same. The only thing that has changed is who makes the profits.

so where is the money? The US didn't get it. oh wait, the clinton's did. but you're ok with that. that is the problem.

What money should the US have gotten from a deal between two foreign companies?

so we give shit away is what you're saying? so when some country buys a jet, they get it for free? LOL, you're special. just more evidence you care not for the country.

What did we give away for free that belonged to another country? Think carefully before replying.