Mueller WILL NOT Present Collusion Evidence At Manafort Trial

[OODA_Loop]

Mueller WILL NOT Present Collusion Evidence At Manafort Trial

Special counsel Robert Mueller said in a court filing Friday that his prosecutors will not present evidence regarding Trump campaign collusion with Russia at an upcoming trial for former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort.

“The government does not intend to present at trial evidence or argument concerning collusion with the Russian government,” reads a filing submitted by Mueller’s team in federal court in Virginia on Friday.

 

[Oldstyle]

How can you present something that doesn't exist?

 

[Avatar4321]

He can’t present what doesn’t exist.

 

[Preacher]

Mueller WILL NOT Present Collusion Evidence At Manafort Trial

Special counsel Robert Mueller said in a court filing Friday that his prosecutors will not present evidence regarding Trump campaign collusion with Russia at an upcoming trial for former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort.

“The government does not intend to present at trial evidence or argument concerning collusion with the Russian government,” reads a filing submitted by Mueller’s team in federal court in Virginia on Friday.

That's because there was no collusion therefore no collusion evidence LOL.

 

[Snouter]

Imagine the democrat meltdown if The Donald says Prof. Alan Dershowitz is his selection for the Supreme Court. Dershowitz has said consistently that theoretically even if there were some kind of "collusion," it is not against any law.

 

[Care4all]

Uh oh, the next sentence says this:

As discussed above, however, the defendant's role in the Trump campaign IS RELEVANT to the bank fraud and bank fraud conspiracy charges in Counts 29 through 32 of the Superseding Indictment.

 

[bripat9643]

Uh oh, the next sentence says this:

As discussed above, however, the defendant's role in the Trump campaign IS RELEVANT to the bank fraud and bank fraud conspiracy charges in Counts 29 through 32 of the Superseding Indictment.

Of course it's relevant. That's the only reason he's being prosecuted.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Uh oh, the next sentence says this:

As discussed above, however, the defendant's role in the Trump campaign IS RELEVANT to the bank fraud and bank fraud conspiracy charges in Counts 29 through 32 of the Superseding Indictment.

Of course it's relevant. That's the only reason he's being prosecuted.

You misspelled "persecuted."

I'm just sayin......

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Mueller WILL NOT Present Collusion Evidence At Manafort Trial

Special counsel Robert Mueller said in a court filing Friday that his prosecutors will not present evidence regarding Trump campaign collusion with Russia at an upcoming trial for former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort.

“The government does not intend to present at trial evidence or argument concerning collusion with the Russian government,” reads a filing submitted by Mueller’s team in federal court in Virginia on Friday.

Why would they?

 

[OODA_Loop]

Those counts are for bank fraud during times Manafort was not involved with the campaign.

Read the new charges against Manafort, Gates

 

[OODA_Loop]

Why would they?

They would if there was a nexus to Trump.

 

[Oldstyle]

Uh oh, the next sentence says this:

As discussed above, however, the defendant's role in the Trump campaign IS RELEVANT to the bank fraud and bank fraud conspiracy charges in Counts 29 through 32 of the Superseding Indictment.

Of course it's "relevant" to Mueller...the entire reason for his investigation is to try and pin SOMETHING...ANYTHING...on Donald Trump or someone in his campaign. The fact that what he's got against Manafort goes back YEARS before the election simply underscores how Mueller has come up empty on Russian "collusion"...the excuse for the investigation in the first place.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Why would they?

They would if there was a nexus to Trump.

They do not need to show their hand with this guy, he is guilty as sin in so many other areas.

 

[Care4all]

Uh oh, the next sentence says this:

As discussed above, however, the defendant's role in the Trump campaign IS RELEVANT to the bank fraud and bank fraud conspiracy charges in Counts 29 through 32 of the Superseding Indictment.

Of course it's "relevant" to Mueller...the entire reason for his investigation is to try and pin SOMETHING...ANYTHING...on Donald Trump or someone in his campaign. The fact that what he's got against Manafort goes back YEARS before the election simply underscores how Mueller has come up empty on Russian "collusion"...the excuse for the investigation in the first place.

you have reading comprehension problems, eh?

29 through 32 in his indictment, FOR bank fraud WERE related to the campaign....

the defendant's role in the Trump campaign IS RELEVANT to the bank fraud and bank fraud conspiracy charges in Counts 29 through 32 of the Superseding Indictment


that means they were done recently, during his reign as campaign manager....


try again!

 

[bripat9643]

Uh oh, the next sentence says this:

As discussed above, however, the defendant's role in the Trump campaign IS RELEVANT to the bank fraud and bank fraud conspiracy charges in Counts 29 through 32 of the Superseding Indictment.

Of course it's "relevant" to Mueller...the entire reason for his investigation is to try and pin SOMETHING...ANYTHING...on Donald Trump or someone in his campaign. The fact that what he's got against Manafort goes back YEARS before the election simply underscores how Mueller has come up empty on Russian "collusion"...the excuse for the investigation in the first place.

you have reading comprehension problems, eh?

29 through 32 in his indictment, FOR bank fraud WERE related to the campaign....

the defendant's role in the Trump campaign IS RELEVANT to the bank fraud and bank fraud conspiracy charges in Counts 29 through 32 of the Superseding Indictment


that means they were done recently, during his reign as campaign manager....


try again!

That isn't what is says, dingbat. It says the campaign was relevant to the charges, not the other way around.

All you are proving is that you're too stupid to understand the facts and therefore too stupid to vote. Lots of things are relevant to the charges, like the prime rate of interest. What Herr Mueller did is state the situation in a highly dubious fashion to imply the somehow the Trump campaign was involved with something criminal when it couldn't possibly be since the alleged offenses occured before the Trump campaign even existed.

 

[bripat9643]

Why would they?

They would if there was a nexus to Trump.

They do not need to show their hand with this guy, he is guilty as sin in so many other areas.

Are you actually trying to claim that Mueller doesn't have to present any evidence in court?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Manafort is a political prisoner, separated from his children

Free Manafort!

 

[jc456]

Why would they?

They would if there was a nexus to Trump.

They do not need to show their hand with this guy, he is guilty as sin in so many other areas.

He’s guilty? Trials over?

 

[Stormy Daniels]

Uh oh, the next sentence says this:

As discussed above, however, the defendant's role in the Trump campaign IS RELEVANT to the bank fraud and bank fraud conspiracy charges in Counts 29 through 32 of the Superseding Indictment.

Of course it's relevant. That's the only reason he's being prosecuted.

He's being prosecuted because he's committed a litany of crimes.

 

[jc456]

Uh oh, the next sentence says this:

As discussed above, however, the defendant's role in the Trump campaign IS RELEVANT to the bank fraud and bank fraud conspiracy charges in Counts 29 through 32 of the Superseding Indictment.

Of course it's relevant. That's the only reason he's being prosecuted.

He's being prosecuted because he's committed a litany of crimes.

Such as?