JGalt
Diamond Member
- Mar 9, 2011
- 71,482
- 86,372
If by "predictable" you mean "racist asshat" then I agree!Every one of those guys were acting within their right and should not be debarred that right.They were thugs.You are pushing at an open door. I dont know anybody in the UK who bears a grudge or any resentment over this. You types seem to nurture it for some reason.The US was a few weeks away in those days and not really important.
Kicked your limey asses though, didn't they. Now everyone kicks your asses.
I am picking up from this thread that the rights and interests of a few hundred protestors outweigh those of a few million voters.
People in democracies are laughing at you. People who would like to live in a democracy are shaking their heads and wondering what the fuck is going on.
The police should not have to protect politicians from thugs whilst they do their jobs.
I'm assuming that you were referring to those armed protesters, when you used the word "thugs." The word "thug" is defined in the dictionary as "a violent person, especially a criminal."
Please show me where they did anything violent, criminal, or illegal.
So were these "thugs" too?
I will defend the black panthers' right to bear arms just like I will anyone else.
.
Actually I agree with you. I just used that as an example to point out IM2's disingenuousness and hypocrisy. I knew he was going to claim that the circumstances were different.
He's so predictable.
Yes. You stated it more eloquently than I did.