Muzzling Opposing Voices

Time and again, this essential truth about comes up: Liberalism is about closing down debate, shutting up opposing voices, slandering any with opposing ideas.

It's euphemistically known as "political correctness."


Political correctness is only a guideline and nothing more. To raise it to the height of the deafening silence heard nowadays is far too much of a "benefit of the doubt."


I absolutely disagree!

Political Correctness has become an operative mandate among MOST Americans. Especially liberals.

It was PC that turned Paula Deen into minced meat.

PC that almost got Phil Robertson and Duck Dynasty shot down.

And PC which caused the CEO of Mozilla to lose his connection to that job and that company.

It is our new 11th Commandment.

Thou shalt not speak except Politically Correctly.
 
Mozilla had the right morally, ethically, and legally to tell the CEO to shut up or get out. He chose the latter: his right to do so.

Far right wing nuts, particularly the social religious conservatives, are doing their best to shut down criticism of them.

Not surprising. The criticism is just.
 
Time and again, this essential truth about comes up: Liberalism is about closing down debate, shutting up opposing voices, slandering any with opposing ideas.

It's euphemistically known as "political correctness."


Political correctness is only a guideline and nothing more. To raise it to the height of the deafening silence heard nowadays is far too much of a "benefit of the doubt."


I absolutely disagree!

Political Correctness has become an operative mandate among MOST Americans. Especially liberals.

It was PC that turned Paula Deen into minced meat.

PC that almost got Phil Robertson and Duck Dynasty shot down.

And PC which caused the CEO of Mozilla to lose his connection to that job and that company.

It is our new 11th Commandment.

Thou shalt not speak except Politically Correctly.


Yep.

PC is not just some benign "guideline". It's a tactic, a strategy deployed to (1) control the conversation, or (2) avoid the conversation, and (3) keep your target intimidated and on the defensive.

It has been fabulously successful, and this success is the reason the PC Police have this obligation to defend or even deny it.

.
 
Time and again, this essential truth about comes up: Liberalism is about closing down debate, shutting up opposing voices, slandering any with opposing ideas.

It's euphemistically known as "political correctness."





1. The feelings-based nature of liberalism helps explain why people on the Left are much more likely to claim to be “offended” when faced with which they differ. Not, ‘I disagree,” but “I am offended!”

When are people ‘offended’? When their feelings are hurt.

A pro-choice woman is ‘offended’ by the pro-life position, ostensibly because her feelings are more worthwhile than the objective worth of a human fetus.
‘Political correctness’ is also based on not hurting people’s feelings.
Complaint about Senator Joseph McCarthy often center around how abusive he was to communists….again, feelings.
Dennis Prager






And now, this:

2. "Hypersensitive students and professors all over the country are about to score another victory for political correctness if they succeed in their mission to normalize the use of “trigger warnings,” which are intended to protect people from taking part in class discussions and media that might offend them.

3. Trigger warnings are most commonly attached to online news ....warn readers that the post contains specific, offensive content. An article about sexual violence, for instance, might come with a trigger warning for rape victims.

4. ...censorship-inclined activists are now eager to force professors to attach trigger warnings to their syllabi.

“Some students and professors argue that nearly everything should come with a trigger warning,” wrote Laurie Essig, a professor of psychology at Middlebury College and a contributor to the Chronicle of Higher Education.

a. The Great Gatsby? Trigger warning: suicide, domestic abuse, graphic violence.





5. ....“by creating trigger warnings for their students, professors can help to create a safe space for their students — one that fosters positive and compassionate intellectual discussion within the collegiate classroom.”

6. Students at the University of California-Santa Barbara are doing their best to make their PC dreams a reality. The student government passed a resolution that urged administrators to adopt mandatory trigger warnings as official university policy last month.

7. ....some liberals are condemning it in no uncertain terms. The Nation’s Michelle Goldberg called the pro-censorship agenda of the PC crowd “left-wing anti-liberalism,”:

"In the 1960s, longtime socialist intellectuals were horrified by the anarchic energies of the new left. Then some of those new leftists reached middle age and watched, aghast, as new speech codes proliferated on college campuses during the first iteration of political correctness. I was in college then and am now in my thirties, which means it’s my turn to be dismayed by a growing left-wing tendency towards censoriousness and hair-trigger offense."
Trigger warnings: New wave of political correctness hits campuses | The Daily Caller







8. "Oberlin College has published an official document on triggers, advising faculty members to "be aware of racism, classism, sexism, heterosexism, cissexism, ableism, and other issues of privilege and oppression," to remove triggering material when it doesn't "directly" contribute to learning goals....

a. Chinua Achebe's "Things Fall Apart," it states, is a novel that may "trigger readers who have experienced racism, colonialism, religious persecution, violence, suicide and more."

9. What began as a way of moderating Internet forums for the vulnerable and mentally ill now threatens to define public discussion both online and off. The trigger warning signals not only the growing precautionary approach to words and ideas in the university, but a wider cultural hypersensitivity to harm and a paranoia about giving offense.

10. Trigger warnings are presented as a gesture of empathy, but the irony is they lead only to more solipsism, an over-preoccupation with one’s own feelings—much to the detriment of society as a whole."
Trigger Warnings Have Spread from Blogs to College Classes. That's Bad | New Republic






Liberals should take the warning in Oscar Wilde's famous 'two tragedies'

“There are only two tragedies in life: one is not getting what one wants, and the other is getting it.”
Just another load of bullshit from the Queen of Crap. Oh, and if you want an example of the muzzling of the voices of opposition just listen to the conservatives screaming "LIBERAL MEDIA! LIBERAL MEDIA!"




There is no award for stupidity.


Stop competing.
 
Mozilla had the right morally, ethically, and legally to tell the CEO to shut up or get out. He chose the latter: his right to do so.

Far right wing nuts, particularly the social religious conservatives, are doing their best to shut down criticism of them.

Not surprising. The criticism is just.

Jake, I don't think even you believe what you just posted.

First, the CEO has legal standing to sue for wrongful termination. You cannot fire someone for having an opinion. He can also bring up charges of collusion against the board. You cannot pressure someone to leave for having a mere opinion. It would be like me being banned for no reason here because my views didn't match those of the authorities.

And we aren't shutting down anyone. WE are being shut down, from freely expressing ourselves. So, the man could say he supported gay marriage, and nobody would have been the wiser. He takes the opposite stance and he is run out of town. Just who do liberals think they are? This is supposed to be a land of ideas and expression, Jake.

You fought for freedom, not for oppression. And yet here you are clearly advocating it at the hands of self righteous gay rights activists. It takes a pretty blind person-- or a willfully ignorant one, to not acknowledge the bullying and subversion of ideas and opinion being enacted on people with a simple opinion they disagree with. Why must people get away with crushing dissent? Hmm?
 
Last edited:
Mozilla had the right morally, ethically, and legally to tell the CEO to shut up or get out. He chose the latter: his right to do so.

Far right wing nuts, particularly the social religious conservatives, are doing their best to shut down criticism of them.

Not surprising. The criticism is just.

Characterization is your forte? Everybody just shut the fuck up. If the right is nuts the left is nuts too. That's why we should all shut the fuck up. amirite. :lol:
 
Mozilla had the right morally, ethically, and legally to tell the CEO to shut up or get out. He chose the latter: his right to do so.

Far right wing nuts, particularly the social religious conservatives, are doing their best to shut down criticism of them.

Not surprising. The criticism is just.

Characterization is your forte? Everybody just shut the fuck up. If the right is nuts the left is nuts too. That's why we should all shut the fuck up. amirite. :lol:

^lol
 
Conservatives could make a valid point here if they could demonstrate that conservative colleges and universities are much less politically correct - as in conservative political correctness - than are the so-called liberal schools.

Can you?

They actually tend to be politically correct in exactly the same way as liberal universities.

I'm sure that was going to be PoliticalChic's next thread, since she prides herself in her objective allegiance to the facts.






Absolutely.


I have a proprietary pride in veracity.
 
political correctness

There is no such thing as ‘political correctness,’ it’s a myth contrived by the right in an effort to justify the ignorance and hate often exhibited by social conservatives.

Only government has the power to place restrictions on free speech, using arrest, detention, and punitive sanctions – not private individuals, organizations, or private society in general; and of course government is prohibited from restricting free speech if such restrictions are offensive to the Constitution.

Consequently, the conservative notion that ‘opposing voices’ are being ‘muzzled’ is ignorant partisan nonsense. Conservatives remain at liberty to express their ignorance and hate, just as private individuals, organizations, or private society in general are at liberty to express their opposition to the ignorance and hate advocated by conservatives – and these admonishments by private society in no way constitute ‘political correctness’ or ‘muzzling opposing voices.’

In the free marketplace of ideas, therefore, it’s simply a matter of private society not buying the garbage the right has to sell.

Conservatives have zealously embraced victimology mostly because they have run out of excuses to explain why conservatism is dying.

Of course the reason conservatism is dying in this generation is because the conservatism of almost every generation dies, felled by progress, because progress in the long run is invincible; conservatism is nothing more than a series of barriers in the road that have to be removed.

So victimology becomes the last excuse. Losing elections is tyranny. Losing in the Court is the result of demonic anti-constitutional forces having overtaken the SCOTUS.

The liberal media is a conspiracy against them.

The colleges and universities are a conspiracy against them.

and on and on...waaa.







"Conservatives have zealously embraced victimology....."

Speaking of 'victimology,'....

...which of the following could appear as a bumper-sticker on a Liberal's auto?




a. During the ‘Bush Years’ taxes on the wealthy have been slashed.
b. If your parents were rich, you’ll be rich. Otherwise, no chance.
c. Government is the answer to whatever ails us.
d. Ambition, determination, grit and sweat count for nothing.
e. Neither personal responsibility nor merit are necessary.
f. Whatever your personal failures, shortcomings, and weaknesses, your troubles are caused by anyone and everyone except yourself.
g. It’s not that I don’t want to succeed, it’s that I can’t succeed.
h. The deck is always stacked against me.
i. Anyone who is poor or black or short or old or handicapped or female or gay or uncoordinated shouldn’t even try.
j. The Constitution guaranteed me ‘Life, Liberty, and Happiness!’
k. The government must make sure we are all equal in everything.
l. The government should make poor people rich and rich people poor!
m. “George Bush doesn’t care about black people.” Kanye West.
n. There must be more I can complain about!



Right....every one of 'em.



I love when you own posts turn around and behave like a boomarang.
 
If it doesn't exist why the fuck do universities have speech codes?

Are speech codes limited to liberal universities?

Does government money only go to liberal universities?

Why can't you answer that question?

1. You cite speech codes as political correctness. 2. You claim there is no conservative political correctness, but,

if conservative colleges have speech codes, then your claim is false.

So what is the answer? Yes or no? Are speech codes limited to liberal universities?
 
... Anyway, bring your ideas forward and we'll beat the hell out of them but you are welcome to do so. ...

Bring forth, so I may shred your sacred cows like a wood chipper.




It is beyond laughable that someone with your limitations would think so highly of himself. I'll bet you got a trophy for coming in last every time, and now look what it's done to you.
 
... Anyway, bring your ideas forward and we'll beat the hell out of them but you are welcome to do so. ...

Bring forth, so I may shred your sacred cows like a wood chipper.
It is beyond laughable that someone with your limitations would think so highly of himself. I'll bet you got a trophy for coming in last every time, and now look what it's done to you.
They didn't do that in my day, and it's a terrible idea. It's not pride, I earned my stripes.
 
Ever see that twilight zone episode with the kid that could read minds and punishes them for being opposite? Yeah, thats what this reminds me of...it was a metaphor against oppression.
 
... Anyway, bring your ideas forward and we'll beat the hell out of them but you are welcome to do so. ...

Bring forth, so I may shred your sacred cows like a wood chipper.
It is beyond laughable that someone with your limitations would think so highly of himself. I'll bet you got a trophy for coming in last every time, and now look what it's done to you.
They didn't do that in my day, and it's a terrible idea. It's not pride, I earned my stripes.



Maybe if you cleaned your underwear once in a while you wouldn't be stupid AND smelly.
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top