Wyatt earp
Diamond Member
- Apr 21, 2012
- 69,975
- 16,396
- 2,180
If raising the minimum wage actually caused unemployment and inflation, if be against it too. But it doesn't.
Of course it does ..MW used to be 25 cents an hour.
.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If raising the minimum wage actually caused unemployment and inflation, if be against it too. But it doesn't.
It's not about "feel good", it's about avoiding electoral revolution.Sure it mitigates it, but it is still a net expense because it's not a credit. A business owner will point that out right away."Only getting deduction"?Yes. I do, and so do my business owner clients. The cash still has to be there. And they're still only getting deductions.You realize that businesses pay their quarterly taxes in advance...right?There is a significant difference between a tax deduction and a tax credit. They're only getting a deduction.
Plus they're still having to use current cash flow to pay the employees long before any deductions are claimed or realized.
This just isn't a selling point to a business owner. Anyone trying this one would get laughed out of a business owner's office.
.
.
That means that they come right off the top of gross revenue.
Make $100K in revenue and have $80K in expenses (including payroll) and you're taxed on $20K
Make $100K and have $90K in expenses and you're taxed on $10K
It's not dollar for dollar but it mitigates the increase tremendously
I'm actually not arguing against raising the MW (I give reasons for it in post 112), I'm just trying to stay factual. My reasons for supporting are more cultural than economic.
.
Yea you want it to feel good.
Yet instead of paying $1 buck for a coke you now pay $1.28.
.
Monetary policy causes inflation ...NOT increased minimum wageIf raising the minimum wage actually caused unemployment and inflation, if be against it too. But it doesn't.
Of course it does ..MW used to be 25 cents an hour.
.
It's not about "feel good", it's about avoiding electoral revolution.Sure it mitigates it, but it is still a net expense because it's not a credit. A business owner will point that out right away."Only getting deduction"?Yes. I do, and so do my business owner clients. The cash still has to be there. And they're still only getting deductions.You realize that businesses pay their quarterly taxes in advance...right?
.
That means that they come right off the top of gross revenue.
Make $100K in revenue and have $80K in expenses (including payroll) and you're taxed on $20K
Make $100K and have $90K in expenses and you're taxed on $10K
It's not dollar for dollar but it mitigates the increase tremendously
I'm actually not arguing against raising the MW (I give reasons for it in post 112), I'm just trying to stay factual. My reasons for supporting are more cultural than economic.
.
Yea you want it to feel good.
Yet instead of paying $1 buck for a coke you now pay $1.28.
.
.
Thats also a dumb argument. Welfare wasnt meant to be for anyone other than whites but that too changed with time. The facts are that people with families are working shitty jobs for low wages. The MW should be something that gives people with a work ethic a reason to not be on welfare.
So how does rasing minimum wage help?
If MW were raised to $11 an hour , welfare use would drop by at least 15% by most studies. That's a pretty good savings of tax dollars.
How much will inflation go up after they have to give me and every other worker above minimum wage another $4.00 an hour raise to keep my pay in line?
How silly. First of all, sorry you're only earning minimum wage, second of all, a small portion of wage earners are and would thus receive a $4 an hour raise. Most people are already around the $9-10 range (lower end workers we're talking about) and thus would receive at most a $2 an hour raise, and that is if we immediately raised it to the correct level, which I haven't advocated.
So people making $9 an hour would get a raise to make minimum wage
.
Monetary policy causes inflation ...NOT increased minimum wageIf raising the minimum wage actually caused unemployment and inflation, if be against it too. But it doesn't.
Of course it does ..MW used to be 25 cents an hour.
.
And guess what? We NEED (low) inflation. That's how we pay down our national debt and in fact our home mortgages
From your perspective, sure.It's not about "feel good", it's about avoiding electoral revolution.Sure it mitigates it, but it is still a net expense because it's not a credit. A business owner will point that out right away."Only getting deduction"?Yes. I do, and so do my business owner clients. The cash still has to be there. And they're still only getting deductions.
.
That means that they come right off the top of gross revenue.
Make $100K in revenue and have $80K in expenses (including payroll) and you're taxed on $20K
Make $100K and have $90K in expenses and you're taxed on $10K
It's not dollar for dollar but it mitigates the increase tremendously
I'm actually not arguing against raising the MW (I give reasons for it in post 112), I'm just trying to stay factual. My reasons for supporting are more cultural than economic.
.
Yea you want it to feel good.
Yet instead of paying $1 buck for a coke you now pay $1.28.
.
.
So it's throwing peanuts out .
Yea that's what I thought.
So how does rasing minimum wage help?
If MW were raised to $11 an hour , welfare use would drop by at least 15% by most studies. That's a pretty good savings of tax dollars.
How much will inflation go up after they have to give me and every other worker above minimum wage another $4.00 an hour raise to keep my pay in line?
How silly. First of all, sorry you're only earning minimum wage, second of all, a small portion of wage earners are and would thus receive a $4 an hour raise. Most people are already around the $9-10 range (lower end workers we're talking about) and thus would receive at most a $2 an hour raise, and that is if we immediately raised it to the correct level, which I haven't advocated.
So people making $9 an hour would get a raise to make minimum wage
.
The ripple effect would be huge. Everyone making $11-$12/hr, for instance, would also demand a raise because all of a sudden they would only be making a little above minimum and all their skill, training and experience wouldn't get them much more than a guy of the street sweeping floors. Many pharmacy techs, for example, make $10-$12/hr, have to be trained and licensed, and we trust them with our medications.
You can't get ahead if everyone gets a raise..
Duh!
Economics 101
.
From your perspective, sure.It's not about "feel good", it's about avoiding electoral revolution.Sure it mitigates it, but it is still a net expense because it's not a credit. A business owner will point that out right away."Only getting deduction"?
That means that they come right off the top of gross revenue.
Make $100K in revenue and have $80K in expenses (including payroll) and you're taxed on $20K
Make $100K and have $90K in expenses and you're taxed on $10K
It's not dollar for dollar but it mitigates the increase tremendously
I'm actually not arguing against raising the MW (I give reasons for it in post 112), I'm just trying to stay factual. My reasons for supporting are more cultural than economic.
.
Yea you want it to feel good.
Yet instead of paying $1 buck for a coke you now pay $1.28.
.
.
So it's throwing peanuts out .
Yea that's what I thought.
.
If MW were raised to $11 an hour , welfare use would drop by at least 15% by most studies. That's a pretty good savings of tax dollars.
How much will inflation go up after they have to give me and every other worker above minimum wage another $4.00 an hour raise to keep my pay in line?
How silly. First of all, sorry you're only earning minimum wage, second of all, a small portion of wage earners are and would thus receive a $4 an hour raise. Most people are already around the $9-10 range (lower end workers we're talking about) and thus would receive at most a $2 an hour raise, and that is if we immediately raised it to the correct level, which I haven't advocated.
So people making $9 an hour would get a raise to make minimum wage
.
The ripple effect would be huge. Everyone making $11-$12/hr, for instance, would also demand a raise because all of a sudden they would only be making a little above minimum and all their skill, training and experience wouldn't get them much more than a guy of the street sweeping floors. Many pharmacy techs, for example, make $10-$12/hr, have to be trained and licensed, and we trust them with our medications.
They can demand what ever the fuck they want, but the Money is not there, over 80% of the companies in the US are small business owners..
You can't get ahead if everyone gets a raise..
Duh!
Economics 101
.
Everyone having a million dollars is no different from no one having any dollars. It is the differential that makes money move.
Prove it ..
If raising the minimum wage doesn't cause inflation then we all would be rich.
If raising the minimum wage actually caused unemployment and inflation, if be against it too. But it doesn't.
Of course it does ..MW used to be 25 cents an hour.
.
From your perspective, sure.It's not about "feel good", it's about avoiding electoral revolution.Sure it mitigates it, but it is still a net expense because it's not a credit. A business owner will point that out right away."Only getting deduction"?
That means that they come right off the top of gross revenue.
Make $100K in revenue and have $80K in expenses (including payroll) and you're taxed on $20K
Make $100K and have $90K in expenses and you're taxed on $10K
It's not dollar for dollar but it mitigates the increase tremendously
I'm actually not arguing against raising the MW (I give reasons for it in post 112), I'm just trying to stay factual. My reasons for supporting are more cultural than economic.
.
Yea you want it to feel good.
Yet instead of paying $1 buck for a coke you now pay $1.28.
.
.
So it's throwing peanuts out .
Yea that's what I thought.
.
So how does rasing minimum wage help?
If MW were raised to $11 an hour , welfare use would drop by at least 15% by most studies. That's a pretty good savings of tax dollars.
How much will inflation go up after they have to give me and every other worker above minimum wage another $4.00 an hour raise to keep my pay in line?
How silly. First of all, sorry you're only earning minimum wage, second of all, a small portion of wage earners are and would thus receive a $4 an hour raise. Most people are already around the $9-10 range (lower end workers we're talking about) and thus would receive at most a $2 an hour raise, and that is if we immediately raised it to the correct level, which I haven't advocated.
So people making $9 an hour would get a raise to make minimum wage
.
The ripple effect would be huge. Everyone making $11-$12/hr, for instance, would also demand a raise because all of a sudden they would only be making a little above minimum and all their skill, training and experience wouldn't get them much more than a guy of the street sweeping floors. Many pharmacy techs, for example, make $10-$12/hr, have to be trained and licensed, and we trust them with our medications.
Is this really as deep as this conversation is going to get?From your perspective, sure.It's not about "feel good", it's about avoiding electoral revolution.Sure it mitigates it, but it is still a net expense because it's not a credit. A business owner will point that out right away.
I'm actually not arguing against raising the MW (I give reasons for it in post 112), I'm just trying to stay factual. My reasons for supporting are more cultural than economic.
.
Yea you want it to feel good.
Yet instead of paying $1 buck for a coke you now pay $1.28.
.
.
So it's throwing peanuts out .
Yea that's what I thought.
.
So you want to pay more money for a steak and why?
Because it makes you feel good?
You do know their is a tip box on your recipt right?
*Shrugs*
You can give your server what ever you like
.
If raising the minimum wage actually caused unemployment and inflation, if be against it too. But it doesn't.
Of course it does ..MW used to be 25 cents an hour.
.
Oh shocker , we've had inflation since 1938..... You just won the internet with that revelation.........
Inflation happens independent of the minimum wage. Which isn't to say that an outrageous rise in the MW wouldn't increase inflation, it most certainly would, but it is to say inflation is going to happen either way.
The HILARIOUS thing is I am quite sure that you argue that man made climate control is a joke because the climate changes whether man does anything to it or not, right?
The whole correlation without causation argument doesn't only exist where you want it to.
Stupid.
If raising the minimum wage actually caused unemployment and inflation, if be against it too. But it doesn't.
Of course it does ..MW used to be 25 cents an hour.
.
Oh shocker , we've had inflation since 1938..... You just won the internet with that revelation.........
Inflation happens independent of the minimum wage. Which isn't to say that an outrageous rise in the MW wouldn't increase inflation, it most certainly would, but it is to say inflation is going to happen either way.
The HILARIOUS thing is I am quite sure that you argue that man made climate control is a joke because the climate changes whether man does anything to it or not, right?
The whole correlation without causation argument doesn't only exist where you want it to.
Stupid.
You going in la la Land ?
What does natural climate change have to do with minimum wage?
View attachment 231859