Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Whose head did King George III take?
By George's time Britain had long passed the monarchy stage, Parliamnent was the big honcho, despite Jefferson's propaganda tirade against George.
Name one European monarchy where the rights of the common people were fewer and the amount of taxes they paid greater than under the current mob rule we all suffer under.
By George's time Britain had long passed the monarchy stage, Parliamnent was the big honcho, despite Jefferson's propaganda tirade against George.
Name one European monarchy where the rights of the common people were fewer and the amount of taxes they paid greater than under the current mob rule we all suffer under.
That largely depends on the monarchy and the time period. The people were, in the early monarchies, serfs and most did not pay taxes, why, because they had no money.
It was the nobles that paid the taxes and fought the wars, and finally in England the nobles did their Runnymede thing.
Hillary Clinton, FOX NEWS crew, Obama, Bush, prince Waleed Bin Talal and a few top Bankers from Federal reserve.Can you name a dozen people you would trust to rewrite the constitution?
ok, simplify: name 5
Which is just another reason that democracy is a terrible form of government.
as Churchill said
Democracy is the worst form of government..............except for all the rest
Monarchy was better than democracy. People had more individual freedoms and kept more of their money under the monarchy.
That being said, all forms of government suck. That's why abolishing government altogether is the only rational option.
as Churchill said
Democracy is the worst form of government..............except for all the rest
Monarchy was better than democracy. People had more individual freedoms and kept more of their money under the monarchy.
That being said, all forms of government suck. That's why abolishing government altogether is the only rational option.
people had more freedoms under monarchy? thats absurd......and the Revolutionary war generation would surely disagree with you
One Anthony Scalia, plus Marc Levin, Jonathan Turley, Leonard Peikoff, and Victor Davis Hansen.
Since republicans are always concerned about China getting stiffed by America if we default, they might be happy with the chinese leader Xi Jinping on the rewrite the constitution committee. So I name him along with Ted Nugent.
Those folks had a lot more freedom than we do now, so of course they would. But this nation is quickly descending into totalitarianism. An average person can't get through the day without breaking several laws. Government bureaucrats can expropriate your property at the stroke of a pen. Government destroys entire industries. If you think that's freedom, then you're a servile brainwashed troll.people had more freedoms under monarchy? thats absurd......and the Revolutionary war generation would surely disagree with youMonarchy was better than democracy. People had more individual freedoms and kept more of their money under the monarchy.
That being said, all forms of government suck. That's why abolishing government altogether is the only rational option.
Those folks had a lot more freedom than we do now, so of course they would. But this nation is quickly descending into totalitarianism. An average person can't get through the day without breaking several laws. Government bureaucrats can expropriate your property at the stroke of a pen. Government destroys entire industries. If you think that's freedom, then you're a servile brainwashed troll.people had more freedoms under monarchy? thats absurd......and the Revolutionary war generation would surely disagree with you
I disagreed wit the Kelo SC decision about expropriation of private property for private profit....but that is a problem with elitists courts....and the structure of our court system and choosing of judges.
Government destroys entire industries?...name one.....
name a dozen people you would trust to rewrite the constitution
How about a dozen U.S. Marines?
Because they would have no intention of rewriting anything. And they would make the best guards possible to make sure nobody else did, either.
name a dozen people you would trust to rewrite the constitution
Where did you get the silly notion that the Constitution needed rewriting?
.
name a dozen people you would trust to rewrite the constitution
How about a dozen U.S. Marines?
Because they would have no intention of rewriting anything. And they would make the best guards possible to make sure nobody else did, either.
gawd, how pathetic
