Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not so sure of the timing on that bubble burst.I think you will be singing a different tune by the beginning of next year after the asset bubble bursts.
We will only have the Central bankers to thank.
You and Robert E Lee got something in common, dumbass rednecks imagine they can win a war by not losing battles.
Industry wins wars dipshit. Not marksmanship
This was an interesting article from Ron Paul's site. Could it be that Paul is warming to Trump?
Neocon Panic Attack! What If Ron Paul Becomes Trump's Secretary of State?
Neocon Panic Attack! What If Ron Paul Becomes Trump's Secretary of State?
Under a Secretary Paul there would be no endless hectoring calls to the president demanding that this or that country be "liberated" with smart power and smart bombs. Under Secretary Paul there would be no legions of US-funded NGOers sent to undermine the electoral processes overseas. Under Secretary Paul there would be no fact-free, mindless propaganda sessions deceptively named "daily press briefings." Under Secretary Paul diplomacy would not mean "do what we say and we will give you money, refuse and we will bomb you." Under Secretary Paul diplomacy would serve the national interest instead of the special interests. Under Secretary Paul, the customary appearances by the Secretary before the House and Senate foreign affairs committees would actually be exercises in truth-telling instead of spin-making.
Well, you get the idea. It would be a total nightmare for Rubin and the neocons. So Jennifer has something to worry about...
Paul tweets:
Ron Paul Verified account @RonPaul
Neocon Panic Attack! What If Ron Paul Becomes Trump's Secretary of State? http://bit.ly/1rwnwa2
and Donald Responds!
I thought it was funny that some of the followers wanted him nominated for head of the FED.
You and Robert E Lee got something in common, dumbass rednecks imagine they can win a war by not losing battles.
Industry wins wars dipshit. Not marksmanship
Yeah the Brits thought the same thing in the War of 1812 and the Revolution, but they were shown how they were wrong.
But you are obviously too stupid to learn a damned thing.
The South lost because of many reasons, the biggest of which was that they had no overall strategy, but the second is the Irish Potato Famine.
You and Robert E Lee got something in common, dumbass rednecks imagine they can win a war by not losing battles.
Industry wins wars dipshit. Not marksmanship
Yeah the Brits thought the same thing in the War of 1812 and the Revolution, but they were shown how they were wrong.
But you are obviously too stupid to learn a damned thing.
The South lost because of many reasons, the biggest of which was that they had no overall strategy, but the second is the Irish Potato Famine.
You think we would have won any war against Britain if they had been willing to give up their interests around the globe?
You sound dumber every time you speak.
We didn't face the might of the British empire, we faced what htey were willing to expend. Not the might of the British empire
You and Robert E Lee got something in common, dumbass rednecks imagine they can win a war by not losing battles.
Industry wins wars dipshit. Not marksmanship
Yeah the Brits thought the same thing in the War of 1812 and the Revolution, but they were shown how they were wrong.
But you are obviously too stupid to learn a damned thing.
The South lost because of many reasons, the biggest of which was that they had no overall strategy, but the second is the Irish Potato Famine.
We were still worried about a British invasion in 1900, that's how strong they were
We would have invaded Canada if we thought we could just smack them around, we never did because we feared British reinforcements.
This was an interesting article from Ron Paul's site. Could it be that Paul is warming to Trump?
Neocon Panic Attack! What If Ron Paul Becomes Trump's Secretary of State?
Neocon Panic Attack! What If Ron Paul Becomes Trump's Secretary of State?
Under a Secretary Paul there would be no endless hectoring calls to the president demanding that this or that country be "liberated" with smart power and smart bombs. Under Secretary Paul there would be no legions of US-funded NGOers sent to undermine the electoral processes overseas. Under Secretary Paul there would be no fact-free, mindless propaganda sessions deceptively named "daily press briefings." Under Secretary Paul diplomacy would not mean "do what we say and we will give you money, refuse and we will bomb you." Under Secretary Paul diplomacy would serve the national interest instead of the special interests. Under Secretary Paul, the customary appearances by the Secretary before the House and Senate foreign affairs committees would actually be exercises in truth-telling instead of spin-making.
Well, you get the idea. It would be a total nightmare for Rubin and the neocons. So Jennifer has something to worry about...
Paul tweets:
Neocon Panic Attack! What If Ron Paul Becomes Trump's Secretary of State? http://bit.ly/1rwnwa2
and Donald Responds!
I thought it was funny that some of the followers wanted him nominated for head of the FED.
Donald does not NEED a Secretary of State.
You could be right.Not so sure of the timing on that bubble burst.I think you will be singing a different tune by the beginning of next year after the asset bubble bursts.
We will only have the Central bankers to thank.
IF Trump wins it will likely be next year as the Fed has always delayed popping bubbles till they had a GOP POTUS in place to do it.
IF Hillary wins, unlikely, but if she does, then it will eventually break still, but it might take 5 to 8 years instead.
Yea the Confederates thought the same thing, we killed a lot of them and put them under our heel.
YOU didnt kill jack shit, moron. That war was over a century ago, and any of those Confederate soldiers could have killed a hundred of you.
You and Robert E Lee got something in common, dumbass rednecks imagine they can win a war by not losing battles.
Industry and discipline wins wars dipshit. Not marksmanship
That being said I'm a lot better shot than you, you cross eyed son of a bitch. And my ancestors were sure as shit a lot better prepared to fight a war than yours.
Mine weren't too lazy to farm their own land
That's what it symbolizes to you. You don't speak for everyone though. Besides, even people who you disagree with have a right to free speech in THIS country.
No I can and do
They don't have that right, they lost it the last time they forced us into one of the bloodiest civil wars in history
Yes they do have rights, sorry to inform you.
Uhhh traitors don't have rights
Ask the white southerners who lived through reconstruction
Or Muslim Americans
All American citizens have rights.
You don't have rights if you're a Muslim bitching about American foreign policy
You sure as shit don't have rights if you're flying a flag that represents treason
You'll see the reality of this when half this country isn't white, rednecks going to be put in their place real soon. Muslims being treasonous doesn't really bother me, we don't treat them well enough to expect loyalty in 2016
Basically a lot of small government conservatives make the argument that reconstruction after the civil war is illegitimate. We talk about the New Deal but really it was the civil war that changed the federal government. And the amendments to the constitution like the 13th and 14th amendment weren't really democratically instituted.
Ron Paul's Christian Reconstructionist Roots
He dreams of Christian patriarchy in rural texas
Now he's a racist because he appeals to Christians? At any point are you going to show an actual racist position he has said or are you going to just keep making it up as you go?
Though at least you're better than Rabbi who claimed the same and ran away and hid when asked to back it up. Small government isn't racist, your view that other races need government more than whites do is racist
And again the man publishes neo nazi literature
Sorry, I haven't read the whole thread. Did you have a link to this neo nazi literature?
He was asked about it on CNN...he freaked out
Uncut version - (the aired bit was much shorter you can find it)
Ron Paul signed off on racist 1990s newsletters, associates say
Your link says he denied these accusations and denied knowing about any racist content in the newsletters. Though he may have been "hands on", that doesn't mean he read every newsletter from beginning to end, so that is insufficient evidence that he is a "racist" in my book.
Now he's a racist because he appeals to Christians? At any point are you going to show an actual racist position he has said or are you going to just keep making it up as you go?
Though at least you're better than Rabbi who claimed the same and ran away and hid when asked to back it up. Small government isn't racist, your view that other races need government more than whites do is racist
And again the man publishes neo nazi literature
Sorry, I haven't read the whole thread. Did you have a link to this neo nazi literature?
He was asked about it on CNN...he freaked out
Uncut version - (the aired bit was much shorter you can find it)
Ron Paul signed off on racist 1990s newsletters, associates say
Your link says he denied these accusations and denied knowing about any racist content in the newsletters. Though he may have been "hands on", that doesn't mean he read every newsletter from beginning to end, so that is insufficient evidence that he is a "racist" in my book.
Ron Paul introduced a "Sunlight Law" to make it a requirement every legislator read the entirety of the bills they voted on.
And you want us to believe he never read his own racist newsletters which bore his name on them?
And again the man publishes neo nazi literature
Sorry, I haven't read the whole thread. Did you have a link to this neo nazi literature?
He was asked about it on CNN...he freaked out
Uncut version - (the aired bit was much shorter you can find it)
Ron Paul signed off on racist 1990s newsletters, associates say
Your link says he denied these accusations and denied knowing about any racist content in the newsletters. Though he may have been "hands on", that doesn't mean he read every newsletter from beginning to end, so that is insufficient evidence that he is a "racist" in my book.
Ron Paul introduced a "Sunlight Law" to make it a requirement every legislator read the entirety of the bills they voted on.
And you want us to believe he never read his own racist newsletters which bore his name on them?
I don't know if he did or if he didn't, and neither do you. They are newsletters, not laws after all.
You and Robert E Lee got something in common, dumbass rednecks imagine they can win a war by not losing battles.
Industry wins wars dipshit. Not marksmanship
Yeah the Brits thought the same thing in the War of 1812 and the Revolution, but they were shown how they were wrong.
But you are obviously too stupid to learn a damned thing.
The South lost because of many reasons, the biggest of which was that they had no overall strategy, but the second is the Irish Potato Famine.
We were still worried about a British invasion in 1900, that's how strong they were
We would have invaded Canada if we thought we could just smack them around, we never did because we feared British reinforcements.
Sorry, I haven't read the whole thread. Did you have a link to this neo nazi literature?
He was asked about it on CNN...he freaked out
Uncut version - (the aired bit was much shorter you can find it)
Ron Paul signed off on racist 1990s newsletters, associates say
Your link says he denied these accusations and denied knowing about any racist content in the newsletters. Though he may have been "hands on", that doesn't mean he read every newsletter from beginning to end, so that is insufficient evidence that he is a "racist" in my book.
Ron Paul introduced a "Sunlight Law" to make it a requirement every legislator read the entirety of the bills they voted on.
And you want us to believe he never read his own racist newsletters which bore his name on them?
I don't know if he did or if he didn't, and neither do you. They are newsletters, not laws after all.
Would you buy that lame argument from Clinton?
Didn't think so.
The racist themes were not a one-off. It was an ongoing thing. And it went out with his name on it.
He was asked about it on CNN...he freaked out
Uncut version - (the aired bit was much shorter you can find it)
Ron Paul signed off on racist 1990s newsletters, associates say
Your link says he denied these accusations and denied knowing about any racist content in the newsletters. Though he may have been "hands on", that doesn't mean he read every newsletter from beginning to end, so that is insufficient evidence that he is a "racist" in my book.
Ron Paul introduced a "Sunlight Law" to make it a requirement every legislator read the entirety of the bills they voted on.
And you want us to believe he never read his own racist newsletters which bore his name on them?
I don't know if he did or if he didn't, and neither do you. They are newsletters, not laws after all.
Would you buy that lame argument from Clinton?
Didn't think so.
The racist themes were not a one-off. It was an ongoing thing. And it went out with his name on it.
So, you are thinking that this busy man sat there and read newsletters? He says he wasn't aware of any racist content. What else you got?
