New Benghazi E-mails Link White House to Doctoring of Talking Points

[Remodeling Maidiac]

The failure to hold every liar accountable - to excuse the lies of "your" people - only adds to the perception that the accusations are a "political witch hunt." To be credible, you MUST hold ALL liars accountable.

Says the liberal pretending not to be a liberal.

Real credibility there huh? Idiot

Still butt hurt about being held accountable for your crap, huh?

So you disagree with holding all liars accountable. Maybe just the black ones, huh?

Smarting bad enough to stalk me around, huh? (only the truth hurts THAT bad)

You wear a helmet around the house don't you?

Is ok.

And yes I'm butthurt cause a couple morons on the internet think im racist. Get real bro

 

[HenryBHough]

That fixation with "butt hurts" seems to have gone contagious. Perhaps all you folks should be rounded up to prevent further spread?

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

That fixation with "butt hurts" seems to have gone contagious. Perhaps all you folks should be rounded up to prevent further spread?

Funny stuff ain't it? It's like the high school locker room all over again. My dad's gonna beat up your dad nonsense is all many of these loons have.

 

[bendog]

Says the liberal pretending not to be a liberal.

Real credibility there huh? Idiot

Still butt hurt about being held accountable for your crap, huh?

So you disagree with holding all liars accountable. Maybe just the black ones, huh?

Smarting bad enough to stalk me around, huh? (only the truth hurts THAT bad)

You wear a helmet around the house don't you?

Is ok.

And yes I'm butthurt cause a couple morons on the internet think im racist. Get real bro

During the recent spat of tornadoes, we were encouraged to put on our bicycle helmets just in case. Just sayin.

 

[williepete]

I'll trust the first hand account of Greg Hicks over anything this White House puts out. He was flabbergasted to hear the video demonstration lie.



The Ambassador asked Hillary for reinforcements twice and was denied. He warned of the danger and was ignored. The British pulled their embassy personnel out. The Red Cross pulled their people out. Hillary ignored the threat and pleas for help. When the bodies returned to Andrews AFB, Hillary and the boy king were there to vomit their video demonstration lie right in the faces of the dead's families.

At the 6 minute point:


But what difference does it make?

 

[bendog]

Well, well, well. What do we have here? It appears that the narrative of Benghazi being a "spontaneous protest brought on by a video" was the work of none other than White House officials.

Newly released emails on the Benghazi terror attack suggest a senior White House aide played a central role in preparing former U.N. ambassador Susan Rice for her controversial Sunday show appearances -- where she wrongly blamed protests over an Internet video.

More than 100 pages of documents were released to the conservative watchdog group Judicial Watch as part of a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit. Among them was a Sept. 14, 2012, email from Ben Rhodes, an assistant to the president and deputy national security adviser for strategic communications.

The Rhodes email, with the subject line: "RE: PREP Call with Susan: Saturday at 4:00 pm ET," was sent to a dozen members of the administration's inner circle, including key members of the White House communications team such as Press Secretary Jay Carney.

In the email, Rhodes specifically draws attention to the anti-Islam Internet video, without distinguishing whether the Benghazi attack was different from protests elsewhere.

The email lists the following two goals, among others:

"To underscore that these protests are rooted in an Internet video, and not a broader failure of policy."

"To reinforce the President and Administration's strength and steadiness in dealing with difficult challenges."

The email goes on to state that the U.S. government rejected the message of the Internet video. "We find it disgusting and reprehensible. But there is absolutely no justification at all for responding to this movie with violence," the email stated

Benghazi emails suggest White House aide involved in prepping Rice for ?video? explanation | Fox News

Exactly. The OP engaged in a bait and switch by posting the Faux headline.

Benghazi emails suggest White House aide involved in prepping Rice for ‘video’ explanation

That's a subtle distortion to support the Faux assertion Rice tried to mislead. The Judcial Watch info shows more that the Obama WH set up Rice with the TPM that downplayed uncertainity as to the exact motivation for the attack.

 

[nodoginnafight]

wow - you are hurtin' bad aren't you?
Not MY fault you made a racist post.

 

[Duped]

How? (I just think she's hot, or are you trying to tell me that's a guy?)

Turn Off Fox
It's bad News for America.

Whom but YOU said anything about FOX NEWS? Try Judicial Watch.

MORON.

"Newly released emails on the Benghazi terror attack suggest a senior White House aide played a central role in preparing former U.N. ambassador Susan Rice for her controversial Sunday show appearances -- where she wrongly blamed protests over an Internet video."

This is the first paragraph in the link posted by the OP. It was written By Catherine Herridge of Fox News. As if prepping someone for TV is out of the ordinary. Furthermore my other point is that the video did in fact spark many protest. So Fox shoot themselves in the foot again and you, and many of the Other Nutters here just don't realize it.

Obama in full campaign mode ( the only mode he has ) just declared that al Qaeda was on the decline, and then the attack on Benghazi. The video was a convenient excuse; a political diversion from the truth. The attack happened on 911 - it was obviously pre planned!

Rice was prepped for 5, talk shows where the exclusive topic was to be Benghazi! Her going on was orchestrated specifically to mislead the American people for political expediency!

Stay in denial - it will be a harder fall when the preponderance finally overwhelms you. You liberals are going to pay a heavy price for the subterfuge, and you can kiss any hope for Hillary goodbye. Rice was but the first to fall!

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

wow - you are hurtin' bad aren't you?
Not MY fault you made a racist post.

If you want to play pattycake go start a fucking flame thread and keep this stupid bullshit out of all the other threads.

 

[The T]

Whom but YOU said anything about FOX NEWS? Try Judicial Watch.

MORON.

"Newly released emails on the Benghazi terror attack suggest a senior White House aide played a central role in preparing former U.N. ambassador Susan Rice for her controversial Sunday show appearances -- where she wrongly blamed protests over an Internet video."

This is the first paragraph in the link posted by the OP. It was written By Catherine Herridge of Fox News. As if prepping someone for TV is out of the ordinary. Furthermore my other point is that the video did in fact spark many protest. So Fox shoot themselves in the foot again and you, and many of the Other Nutters here just don't realize it.

Obama in full campaign mode ( the only mode he has ) just declared that al Qaeda was on the decline, and then the attack on Benghazi. The video was a convenient excuse; a political diversion from the truth. The attack happened on 911 - it was obviously pre planned!

Rice was prepped for 5, talk shows where the exclusive topic was to be Benghazi! Her going on was orchestrated specifically to mislead the American people for political expediency!

Stay in denial - it will be a harder fall when the preponderance finally overwhelms you. You liberals are going to pay a heavy price for the subterfuge, and you can kiss any hope for Hillary goodbye. Rice was but the first to fall!

Obama is leaving roadkill and speedbumps all over the place. Sacrificial lambs as it were...it's whom he is...because it's ALL about himself...IMAGE.

 

[BlindBoo]

Whom but YOU said anything about FOX NEWS? Try Judicial Watch.

MORON.

"Newly released emails on the Benghazi terror attack suggest a senior White House aide played a central role in preparing former U.N. ambassador Susan Rice for her controversial Sunday show appearances -- where she wrongly blamed protests over an Internet video."

This is the first paragraph in the link posted by the OP. It was written By Catherine Herridge of Fox News. As if prepping someone for TV is out of the ordinary. Furthermore my other point is that the video did in fact spark many protest. So Fox shoot themselves in the foot again and you, and many of the Other Nutters here just don't realize it.

Obama in full campaign mode ( the only mode he has ) just declared that al Qaeda was on the decline, and then the attack on Benghazi. The video was a convenient excuse; a political diversion from the truth. The attack happened on 911 - it was obviously pre planned!

Rice was prepped for 5, talk shows where the exclusive topic was to be Benghazi! Her going on was orchestrated specifically to mislead the American people for political expediency!

Stay in denial - it will be a harder fall when the preponderance finally overwhelms you. You liberals are going to pay a heavy price for the subterfuge, and you can kiss any hope for Hillary goodbye. Rice was but the first to fall!

To characterize the attack on the Consulate building as being an attack carried out by al Qaeda is disingenuous at best. The attack by an Islamic Militia with ties to al Qaeda is quite a bit different than the attacks planned and carried out by al Qaeda.

Here is the introduction on Meet the Press from Sept 16th.

MR. DAVID GREGORY: This morning, a special hour of MEET THE PRESS. Turmoil in the Middle East creates a flashpoint on the campaign trail. Set off by an American anti-Islamic video, rage against the U.S. sweeps the Arab world. And an attack on the U.S. Consulate in Libya kills ambassador Chris Stephens and three others.

September 16: Benjamin Netanyahu, Susan Rice, Keith Ellison, Peter King, Bob Woodward, Jeffrey Goldberg, Andrea Mitchell - Meet the Press - Transcripts | NBC News

 

[Theowl32]

What is really fucked up and what is not being discussed and what the white house is even more responsible for is the mass riots that did take place as a result of this lie.

There were riots around the world. They were a result of worked up frenzy. The white house not only abandoned the 4 and refused them more security after they requested it, but their lie nearly caused mass executions around the world.

Not only did this lying, disgusting piece of shit in chief lie, he then apologized to the world for America's freedom of speech and expression.

Anyone have a clearer picture as to why the world laughs at us?

 

[bendog]

Not that Obama did a good thing; he did the same thing most venal pols do. But, from what evidence do you infer that not telling the truth and saying they didn't know exactly what motivated the attacks or who did it, "worked up frenzy."

and frankly the world was owned an apology for the video, whether it's protected speech or not. Real leaders decry intolerance of any religion. I give Bushii credit for that, at least.

 

[The T]

What is really fucked up and what is not being discussed and what the white house is even more responsible for is the mass riots that did take place as a result of this lie.

There were riots around the world. They were a result of worked up frenzy. The white house not only abandoned the 4 and refused them more security after they requested it, but their lie nearly caused mass executions around the world.

Not only did this lying, disgusting piece of shit in chief lie, he then apologized to the world for America's freedom of speech and expression.

Anyone have a clearer picture as to why the world laughs at us?

It started in 2009 at Strasbourg, France...and he's done it more than once.

Five Times Obama Has Apologized for America | Washington Free Beacon

Obama: “In America, there’s a failure to appreciate Europe’s leading role in the world. Instead of celebrating your dynamic union and seeking to partner with you to meet common challenges, there have been times where America has shown arrogance and been dismissive, even derisive.”

Read the rest at the link...

 

[The Rabbi]

"...suggest a senior White House aide played a central role in preparing former U.N. ambassador Susan Rice for her controversial Sunday show appearances -- where she wrongly blamed protests over an Internet video."

Two things. One. OMFG, they prepped her for a TV appearance? Two. There were protest in several nations across the world over news of that video. I think more than 4 dozen people were killed in those protests. The talking points were accurate. The only thing the talking points got wrong was that there was no protest outside the consulate in Benghazi that the extremest, who attacked the place, used as cover or joined in prior to launching their attack.

Are you really so stupid? Why did they need to prep Rice at all? She has appeared hundreds of times on TV. She hardly needed prep. The prep was to make sure she had the WH talking points down. Those points were a deliberate deception. The White House lied, pure and simple, to improve Obama's re-election. Which part of that are you missing?

Why do professional athletes ever practice at all, they played hundreds of games, they hardly need to practice.

Mitt Romney was making an ass out of himself just fine to improve the Presidents chances of re-election. I've often wondered if the whole phony Benghazi "Cover-up" meme isn't just to deflect away from the unprecedented and unpatriotic way Mitt denigrated himself during the whole anti-Mohammad video crisis.

1) Irrelevant. Rice is not a professional athelete.
2) Polls predicted Romney would win. If the Dems hadnt committed massive voter fraud in key areas he probably would have. No president ever won re-election with economic numbers like Obama's.

 

[Redfish]

Not that Obama did a good thing; he did the same thing most venal pols do. But, from what evidence do you infer that not telling the truth and saying they didn't know exactly what motivated the attacks or who did it, "worked up frenzy."

and frankly the world was owned an apology for the video, whether it's protected speech or not. Real leaders decry intolerance of any religion. I give Bushii credit for that, at least.

They knew the attack had nothing to do with the video the day after it happened, but they all continued the lie for weeks and months------and fools like you are are still repeating the lie more than a year later.

 

[Darkwind]

Not one person who was involved with creating the talking points was a witness to what occurred outside the consulate building. From the General who knew in his gut immediately that it was a terrorist attack to the lowest pencil pusher who had a say. Everyone was engaging in speculation. Which is exactly why Ambassador Rice always qualified her statements (the Talking Points) with the fact that an investigation was ongoing and that we would look to the results of that investigation to learn the truth of what went on that night.

Not buying the spin. Stow it.

Facts are free.

You let us know when your peddling some then, ayah?

 

[williepete]

The attack happened on 911 - it was obviously pre planned!

Duped brings up two points here that I'd like to expand on. Every State Department outpost in the world should have been on full alert on 911--BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE. The Benghazi compound should have been crawling with Marines after our ambassador warned of the threat, asked for help twice, the Brits pulled out and the Red Cross pulled out--BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE. That this didn't happen was an act of pure criminal negligence.

Two, that crew served weapons and RPGs were used does not point to a spontaneous attack grown from a protest. Nor does a multi-pronged attack. When coordinating and converging forces attack, careful planning and practice needs to take place to prevent fratricide. There is no doubt this was planned logistically and tactically by trained professionals. As a Forward Air Controller, I've controlled artillery and mortar fire. It ain't easy. The easiest way to do it is to start lobbing mortars in the vicinity of the target, observe the hits and order corrections. Unfortunately, those ranging shots warn the enemy to take cover thus reducing the effect of the more accurate fire to come. The guys that conducted this attack got FIRST ROUND HITS with a mortar. To achieve a first round hit with an inherently inaccurate weapon like a mortar, the target range and elevation has to be carefully and precisely plotted out in relation to the location of the mortar. These have to be further tweaked at the time of firing by wind and density altitude.

These guys had the compound dialed in to the gnat's azz.

 

[The T]

Not that Obama did a good thing; he did the same thing most venal pols do. But, from what evidence do you infer that not telling the truth and saying they didn't know exactly what motivated the attacks or who did it, "worked up frenzy."

and frankly the world was owned an apology for the video, whether it's protected speech or not. Real leaders decry intolerance of any religion. I give Bushii credit for that, at least.

They knew the attack had nothing to do with the video the day after it happened, but they all continued the lie for weeks and months------and fools like you are are still repeating the lie more than a year later.

Jay Carney is out there today denying the E-Mails and their meaning...typical...

Benghazi Email Isn't About Benghazi, Says Carney | The Daily Caller

The smoking-gun White House email that directed U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice to deceptively blame an Internet video for the 2012 jihad attack on the U.S. diplomatic site in Benghazi, isn’t what critics say, White House spokesman Jay Carney declared today.
Instead, he insisted, it is really an email about protests outside embassies in Egypt, Yemen and other countries.
“If you look at the document, that document we’re talking about today was taking about the overall environment in the Muslim world,” Carney told reporters today.
Officials expected Rice to use a different CIA-drafted memos whenever she was asked about the Sept. 11 attack on the lightly guarded diplomatic site, which killed the U.S. ambassador and a State Department official, Carney said.
So the email was really about answers to questions about other protests in Cairo, Sanaa, and various Muslim capitals, Carney said.
In fact, Carney said, that’s why the officials didn’t release the email to congressional investigators who were examining the lead-up to the Benghazi attack on the embassy and a nearby CIA site.

The Circus Of Liars continues...isn't it infuriating that these jackwads piss on your leg and tell you it's just a passing shower...?

 

[bendog]

Not that Obama did a good thing; he did the same thing most venal pols do. But, from what evidence do you infer that not telling the truth and saying they didn't know exactly what motivated the attacks or who did it, "worked up frenzy."

and frankly the world was owned an apology for the video, whether it's protected speech or not. Real leaders decry intolerance of any religion. I give Bushii credit for that, at least.

They knew the attack had nothing to do with the video the day after it happened, but they all continued the lie for weeks and months------and fools like you are are still repeating the lie more than a year later.

Fcuk you silverfish. I did no such thing. First, I agreed the WH spun it ... and they left Rice out to twist in the wind btw. What I did do was ask upon what evidence one asserts the WH's spin led to further violence. And, I'll ask again.

fyi, I think the real pertinent doc as to the WH is on page 31.