Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
[
the bigotry and racism Rev Wright spews from the pulpit has everything to do with his politics; left-wing politics; and nothing to do with the fact he has the title of Reverend in front of his name
seriously you're nothing but a clown lying to himself
Rice a a professional politician. Nothing unusual about going over the Talking Points.
Give up the ghost
Yeah nothing to see here, folks.
Except we know the White House coached her to repeat the line they had concocted: that a video was responsible for a riot. They concocted it because the truth--it was a terrorist attack on a poorly defended position--might cost Obama the election.
Yes, we know this. Yes, it's proven. Yes, it's criminal. Yes, people desperately want to dismiss it in one way or another but they can't. Because it's the truth.
No scandal on the scale of Nixon. However the lesson about the negative consequences of our interventionist policy is largely ignored.
If that were true every presidential press secretary for um, ever, would be in jail.
Anyway, she's smart and a practiced politician, I'm sure it only took a few minutes to go over the Talking Points, it not like they are a new concept. Not like the GOP candidate from 2008. Now that was a candidate that was in need of a lot of coaching.
Here's the gop's basic problem. We haven't had a consistent FP that made since BushI. So, we're left snipe shooting.
Slick screwed the pooch in Somalia, but not because he intervened. Intervention was consistent because we had intl support. It was screwed up because Slick, didn't back it up with overwhelming firepower. In fact, Somalia would have been a convenient place for terrorists, and ..... it is so today.
Kosovo? OMG, nation building is actually working when the EU pours in billions.
Rwanda? Slick's biggest regret. But it's hindsight. We neither had nations nearby backing us or an ability to put in massive firepower (no port)
BushII. Enough said.
Now we're split between McCain and the isolationists. ARMING the syraiian rebels was actually what McCain wanted.
But what's our policy? The lesson in Benghazi isn't about not enough security. Of course we didn't have enough. But for God's sake don't you think it'd have been great In Hindsight if BushII had shut down the airports, or fi Truman hadn't bungled the 42 parallel or if JFK had pulled the plug on the Bay of Pigs? But MISTAKES AREN'T WHAT ELECTIONS ARE ABOUT.
Obama didn't troune McCain on for policy because Bushii didn't effecitively prosecute the Iraq war. He trounced him because NEOCON POLICY STARTED THE WAR.
The issue is OBAMA"S entire FOR POLICY. The gop has two options. 1) Rand Paul. Let's go home and do a bong. 2) McCain. Choose the best option, and give em anything less than nukes and chem weapons. And pray.
Here's the gop's basic problem. We haven't had a consistent FP that made since BushI. So, we're left snipe shooting.
Slick screwed the pooch in Somalia, but not because he intervened. Intervention was consistent because we had intl support. It was screwed up because Slick, didn't back it up with overwhelming firepower. In fact, Somalia would have been a convenient place for terrorists, and ..... it is so today.
Kosovo? OMG, nation building is actually working when the EU pours in billions.
Rwanda? Slick's biggest regret. But it's hindsight. We neither had nations nearby backing us or an ability to put in massive firepower (no port)
BushII. Enough said.
Now we're split between McCain and the isolationists. ARMING the syraiian rebels was actually what McCain wanted.
But what's our policy? The lesson in Benghazi isn't about not enough security. Of course we didn't have enough. But for God's sake don't you think it'd have been great In Hindsight if BushII had shut down the airports, or fi Truman hadn't bungled the 42 parallel or if JFK had pulled the plug on the Bay of Pigs? But MISTAKES AREN'T WHAT ELECTIONS ARE ABOUT.
Obama didn't troune McCain on for policy because Bushii didn't effecitively prosecute the Iraq war. He trounced him because NEOCON POLICY STARTED THE WAR.
The issue is OBAMA"S entire FOR POLICY. The gop has two options. 1) Rand Paul. Let's go home and do a bong. 2) McCain. Choose the best option, and give em anything less than nukes and chem weapons. And pray.
When McCain and Obama agree on anything, do the opposite.
I usually feel sorry for Jay "Bagdad Bob" Carney. Today, all I could do is shake my head and wonder how stupid he thinks the American people are. Given the boy king was elected twice, I guess he's got all the proof he needs the American people are dumb enough to believe such outrageous lies.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nszcn0-9eTM
Gotta love the doublespeak:
"The emails were not about Benghazi".
"You mean the emails that you withheld and were only released after a law suit forced you to release emails specific to Benghazi?"
"The emails were not about Benghazi."
"Oh, so these AREN'T the droids we're looking for?"
It doesn't. This dog never would hunt for you guys, and it still won't.Oh no! talking points altered!!!!
At this point what difference does it make?
Stevens made his bed, it was his call, he chose to be there that day, and now he lies in it. Let's mush on.
Bush Received More Warnings About 9/11 Than We Realized
On May 1 the CIA said that a terrorist group in the U.S. was planning an attack.
On June 22 it warned that this attack was "imminent."
On June 29 the brief warned of near-term attacks with "dramatic consequences" including major casualties.
On July 1, the briefing said that the terrorist attack had been delayed but "will occur soon."
On July 24, the president was told again that the attack had been delayed but would occur within months.
Bush Received More Warnings About 9/11 Than We Realized - Business Insider
The Deafness Before the Storm
On Aug. 6, 2001, President George W. Bush received a classified review of the threats posed by Osama bin Laden and his terrorist network, Al Qaeda
Bush administration ignored more terror warnings before 9/11 than previously thought
In the aftermath of 9/11, Bush officials attempted to deflect criticism that they had ignored C.I.A. warnings by saying they had not been told when and where the attack would occur. That is true, as far as it goes, but it misses the point. Throughout that summer, there were events that might have exposed the plans, had the government been on high alert. Indeed, even as the Aug. 6 brief was being prepared, Mohamed al-Kahtani, a Saudi believed to have been assigned a role in the 9/11 attacks, was stopped at an airport in Orlando, Fla., by a suspicious customs agent and sent back overseas on Aug. 4. Two weeks later, another co-conspirator, Zacarias Moussaoui, was arrested on immigration charges in Minnesota after arousing suspicions at a flight school. But the dots were not connected, and Washington did not react.
NYT: Bush administration ignored more terror warnings before 9/11 than previously thought | MSNBC
I can't connect the dots between Bush and the Benghazi email...
Watching Jay Carney at today's White House Press conference was more amusing than usual. Jay's facial expression during most of it was that of a man who was just forced to take a big bite out of a shit sandwich.
Sucks being the mouthpiece for an Administration that lies as often as this one does...
Watching Jay Carney at today's White House Press conference was more amusing than usual. Jay's facial expression during most of it was that of a man who was just forced to take a big bite out of a shit sandwich.
Sucks being the mouthpiece for an Administration that lies as often as this one does...
Still trying to launch that meme, huh?
LETS GET REAL THERE IS A DOUBLE STANDARD HERE.I can't connect the dots between Bush and the Benghazi email...
The White House press conference that just ended had to be seen to be believed. Bagdad Bob was in top form in asking the reporters to suspend reality and swallow his latest spin. After repeatedly saying Rice got her talking points from the CIA, Judicial Watch has made it clear they came from the White House. Not from the CIA. Not from the Pentagon.
The truly devoted who have sold their soul to this charlatan in the White House will do anything to protect the fantasy of the boy king. They are so delusional, if they looked out a window and saw Obama slaughtering his daughters, they'd blame the window for being transparent.
Carney, Karl in Heated Exchange Over Rices Benghazi Talking Points
On Wednesday, White House Press Secretary Jay Carney and ABC News White House Correspondent Jonathan Karl engaged in a heated back and forth over the emails recently uncovered that relate to the White House preparing National Security Advisor Susan Rice to discuss the attack on a consulate in Benghazi in 2012. Carney told Karl that the White House urged Rice to focus on an inflammatory video because the focus of her appearances was going to be on the protests around the Muslim world sparked by that video.
You knew full well that these Sunday show appearances were going to be dominated by the attacking Benghazi, as they were, Karl asserted after Carney insisted that Rices talking points were geared toward addressing region-wide protests as well as the Benghazi attack.
Carney said that those protests have been largely forgotten, and the talking points were created for members of Congress who were interested in them. Karl shot back that former CIA director Michael Morell contradicted Carneys claim in testimony before Congress last month.
You stood there, time after time, and said that she was referring to talking points created by the CIA, Karl recalled. Now we see a document that comes from the White House, not from the CIA, attributing the protests to the video.
Carney insisted that the protests outside of American embassies throughout the Muslim world were also a big story, and the White House prepared talking points to address that situation.
I know that you and I both are in a different time zone right now, Carney told Karl, But we are still in April of 2014.
He added that Rice went out there with the best information that we had at the time.
Watch the clip below via The White House:
http://www.mediaite.com/tv/carney-karl-in-heated-exchange-over-rices-benghazi-talking-points/
-----------------------------------
Ambassador Stevens warned of Islamic extremism before Benghazi consulate attack
In a diplomatic cable in June, the U.S. ambassador to Libya cited the rise of “Islamic extremism” and displays of “the Al-Qaeda flag” over buildings outside the city of Benghazi, where he and three other Americans would be killed in a terrorist attack on Sept. 11.
Ambassador Stevens warned of Islamic extremism before Benghazi consulate attack - Washington Times
why was he still there when others were evacuating???
Ambassador Stevens twice said no to military offers of more security, U.S. officials say
CAIRO — In the month before attackers stormed U.S. facilities in Benghazi and killed four Americans, U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens twice turned down offers of security assistance made by the senior U.S. military official in the region in response to concerns that Stevens had raised in a still secret memorandum, two government officials told McClatchy.
Why Stevens, who died of smoke inhalation in the first of two attacks that took place late Sept. 11 and early Sept. 12, 2012, would turn down the offers remains unclear. The deteriorating security situation in Benghazi had been the subject of a meeting that embassy officials held Aug. 15, where they concluded they could not defend the U.S. diplomatic compound in Benghazi. The next day, the embassy drafted a cable outlining the dire circumstances and saying it would spell out what it needed in a separate cable.
Read more here: http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2013/05/...-twice-said-no-to-military.html#storylink=cpy
