New Benghazi E-mails Link White House to Doctoring of Talking Points

[Redfish]

Marine Corps Embassy Security Group

"In Every Clime and Place"



MCESG - Mission


The primary mission of the Marine Security Guard (MSG) is to provide internal security at designated U.S. diplomatic and consular facilities in order to prevent the compromise of classified material vital to the national security of the United States. The secondary mission of the MSG is to provide protection for U.S. citizens and U.S government property located within designated U.S. diplomatic and consular premises during exigent circumstances (urgent temporary circumstances which require immediate aid or action).

Marine Corps Embassy Security Group (MCESG) Region Commands report to the Commanding Officer of MCESG and exercise command, less operational supervision, of Marines assigned to the Marine Security Guard (MSG) detachments in their respective regions. The MCESG Region Headquarters ensure the continued training, operational readiness, personnel administration, logistical support, as well as the morale, welfare, and discipline of Marines assigned for duty to MSG detachments at designated U.S. diplomatic missions in order to support the Department of State in the protection of classified material at foreign posts.


The Commanding Officer of MCESG reports to the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC), exercising command, less operational supervision, of Marines assigned to MSG detachments. MCESG Headquarters is responsible for the screening, training, assignment, administration, logistical support of Marine Corps unique items, and discipline of Marines assigned to MCESG. The Commanding Officer, MCESG also commands those Marines assigned to Headquarters, MCESG, and MCESG regional headquarters, and is the Director, MSG School. MSG School provides suitability screening and formal training for selected Marines to perform duties as MSGs at foreign Service Missions."


http://www.mcesg.marines.mil/About/MCESGMission.aspx

Was the Benghazi attack on an Embassy? No.

Was the Benghazi attack on a Consulate office? No.

It was a CIA mission facility and annex.

from your cite "The secondary mission of the MSG is to provide protection for U.S. citizens and U.S government property located within designated U.S. diplomatic and consular premises during exigent circumstances (urgent temporary circumstances which require immediate aid or action)."


do you think that maybe a terrorist attack falls within that definition?

 

[Theowl32]

Hilarious. The liberals think making the distinction between a consulate and an embassy makes a difference. I wonder why even Susan Rice did not make that distinction in her blatant lies to the American people on behalf of the white house, if that distinction is anything of actual consequence.

"It was not an embassy!!!! It was the consulate!!!!!!"

 

[Theowl32]

IT WAS AN ACT OF TERROR!!

IT WAS SPONTEOUS!!!

IT WAS BECAUSE OF A VIDEO!!!

THERE IS NO SCANDAL!!!!

WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE!!!!

BOOOOOOOOSH!!!!!

Please folks, the myth of sispyhus.

 

[paperview]

It wasn't a consulate either, you idiots. There was no consulate office in Benghazi.

It was a CIA mission facility and annex.

 

[Redfish]

It wasn't a consulate either, you idiots. There was no consulate office in Benghazi.

It was a CIA mission facility and annex.

and Hillary's state dept and obama's military failed to protect american citizens that they knew were in danger. Then they lied and blamed their failure on an obscure video that had nothing to do with it.

 

[Theowl32]

It wasn't a consulate either, you idiots. There was no consulate office in Benghazi.

It was a CIA mission facility and annex.

 

[paperview]

It wasn't a consulate either, you idiots. There was no consulate office in Benghazi.

It was a CIA mission facility and annex.

and Hillary's state dept and obama's military failed to protect american citizens that they knew were in danger. Then they lied and blamed their failure on an obscure video that had nothing to do with it.

We learned over a year ago
Ambassador Stevens twice said no to military offers of more security, U.S. officials say


CAIRO: Ambassador Stevens twice said no to military offers of more security, U.S. officials say | Middle East | McClatchy DC

 

[jon_berzerk]

It wasn't a consulate either, you idiots. There was no consulate office in Benghazi.

It was a CIA mission facility and annex.

and Hillary's state dept and obama's military failed to protect american citizens that they knew were in danger. Then they lied and blamed their failure on an obscure video that had nothing to do with it.

the place had been under attack just a couple of weeks before

 

[NYcarbineer]

It wasn't a consulate either, you idiots. There was no consulate office in Benghazi.

It was a CIA mission facility and annex.

and Hillary's state dept and obama's military failed to protect american citizens that they knew were in danger. Then they lied and blamed their failure on an obscure video that had nothing to do with it.

So if we'd gotten a few dozen Marines killed protecting the ambassador successfully that's a better deal?

 

[NYcarbineer]

It wasn't a consulate either, you idiots. There was no consulate office in Benghazi.

It was a CIA mission facility and annex.

and Hillary's state dept and obama's military failed to protect american citizens that they knew were in danger. Then they lied and blamed their failure on an obscure video that had nothing to do with it.

the place had been under attack just a couple of weeks before

So the ambassador could have chosen to leave.

 

[Theowl32]

It wasn't a consulate either, you idiots. There was no consulate office in Benghazi.

It was a CIA mission facility and annex.

and Hillary's state dept and obama's military failed to protect american citizens that they knew were in danger. Then they lied and blamed their failure on an obscure video that had nothing to do with it.

So if we'd gotten a few dozen Marines killed protecting the ambassador successfully that's a better deal?

^^^^^^^^^^^^

A liberal finally admitting that the Obama administration abandoned them for political expediency.

He is admitting that, in that statement, right?

 

[NYcarbineer]

Benghazi and the IRS, NSA, VA, BLM, I don't have time for all of the criminal activity that this administration is guilty of............

Yup, we're obsessed with only one scandal......

Sure beats toe-tapping and traffic cone scandals, huh?

You're obsessed with manufacturing scandals where none exist.

The GOP is politicizing Benghazi to try to win an election. Ironically, in order to prove wrongdoing by the Obama administration re Benghazi they will have to prove that the administration did then what the GOP is doing now.

You're obsessed with dismissing scandals that DO exist!

Obama lied about Benghazi to win an election. Ironically, in order to prove that the video caused this and the Republicans were idiots for pursuing the matter. They had to only prove the video was the cause; yet even they said it was a terrorist attack, completely unmotivated by the video.

You're simply hopeless. Immune to the realities that face you.

Obama did not lie to win an election. It's foolish on its face to say so.

Bush's approval rating went to 90% AFTER the ACT OF TERROR on 9/11.

If anything, a terrorist attack helps presidents politically, so if Obama was trying to politicize it, why would he attempt to diminish the terrorist nature of the attack?

 

[Mad_Cabbie]

IT WAS AN ACT OF TERROR!!

IT WAS SPONTEOUS!!!

IT WAS BECAUSE OF A VIDEO!!!

THERE IS NO SCANDAL!!!!

WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE!!!!

BOOOOOOOOSH!!!!!

Please folks, the myth of sispyhus.

I'm sorry, but all you did here was to mock people for saying that it wasn't a scandal. Why don't you add something relevant? Maybe you can't?

 

[Meister]

You're obsessed with manufacturing scandals where none exist.

The GOP is politicizing Benghazi to try to win an election. Ironically, in order to prove wrongdoing by the Obama administration re Benghazi they will have to prove that the administration did then what the GOP is doing now.

You're obsessed with dismissing scandals that DO exist!

Obama lied about Benghazi to win an election. Ironically, in order to prove that the video caused this and the Republicans were idiots for pursuing the matter. They had to only prove the video was the cause; yet even they said it was a terrorist attack, completely unmotivated by the video.

You're simply hopeless. Immune to the realities that face you.

Obama did not lie to win an election. It's foolish on its face to say so.

Bush's approval rating went to 90% AFTER the ACT OF TERROR on 9/11.

If anything, a terrorist attack helps presidents politically, so if Obama was trying to politicize it, why would he attempt to diminish the terrorist nature of the attack?

Ummmm, maybe because he had just said that AQ was on the run??????

 

[NYcarbineer]

and Hillary's state dept and obama's military failed to protect american citizens that they knew were in danger. Then they lied and blamed their failure on an obscure video that had nothing to do with it.

So if we'd gotten a few dozen Marines killed protecting the ambassador successfully that's a better deal?

^^^^^^^^^^^^

A liberal finally admitting that the Obama administration abandoned them for political expediency.

He is admitting that, in that statement, right?

We have Reagan to remind us what the potential consequences are of putting a few dozen Marines into a dangerous area,

that's what I'm saying.

 

[Mad_Cabbie]

and Hillary's state dept and obama's military failed to protect american citizens that they knew were in danger. Then they lied and blamed their failure on an obscure video that had nothing to do with it.

So if we'd gotten a few dozen Marines killed protecting the ambassador successfully that's a better deal?

^^^^^^^^^^^^

A liberal finally admitting that the Obama administration abandoned them for political expediency.

He is admitting that, in that statement, right?

If I agree, will join the debate and quit trolling?

 

[NYcarbineer]

You're obsessed with dismissing scandals that DO exist!

Obama lied about Benghazi to win an election. Ironically, in order to prove that the video caused this and the Republicans were idiots for pursuing the matter. They had to only prove the video was the cause; yet even they said it was a terrorist attack, completely unmotivated by the video.

You're simply hopeless. Immune to the realities that face you.

Obama did not lie to win an election. It's foolish on its face to say so.

Bush's approval rating went to 90% AFTER the ACT OF TERROR on 9/11.

If anything, a terrorist attack helps presidents politically, so if Obama was trying to politicize it, why would he attempt to diminish the terrorist nature of the attack?

Ummmm, maybe because he had just said that AQ was on the run??????

Americans were still getting killed in Afghanistan in 2012, remember?

 

[Theowl32]

So if we'd gotten a few dozen Marines killed protecting the ambassador successfully that's a better deal?

^^^^^^^^^^^^

A liberal finally admitting that the Obama administration abandoned them for political expediency.

He is admitting that, in that statement, right?

If I agree, will join the debate and quit trolling?

How is it trolling?

He said it was better if a dozen marines were not killed in their attempt to rescue them.

I said that pretty much exactly what the Obama administration was thinking when they abandoned them and what they were thinking when they sold the families and the American public the pack of lies.

For political expediency and this liberal just admitted that it was GOOD that they abandoned them.

Are you that fucking thick? Wait, look at who I am communicating with. A double talking brainwashed hack.

 

[jon_berzerk]

You're obsessed with dismissing scandals that DO exist!

Obama lied about Benghazi to win an election. Ironically, in order to prove that the video caused this and the Republicans were idiots for pursuing the matter. They had to only prove the video was the cause; yet even they said it was a terrorist attack, completely unmotivated by the video.

You're simply hopeless. Immune to the realities that face you.

Obama did not lie to win an election. It's foolish on its face to say so.

Bush's approval rating went to 90% AFTER the ACT OF TERROR on 9/11.

If anything, a terrorist attack helps presidents politically, so if Obama was trying to politicize it, why would he attempt to diminish the terrorist nature of the attack?

Ummmm, maybe because he had just said that AQ was on the run??????

thanks to the admins responsibility to protect policy

aq was on the run

on the run straight to Libyas unguarded arms depots

much of which has ended up in North Africa

in the hands of boko haram

 

[Meister]

Obama did not lie to win an election. It's foolish on its face to say so.

Bush's approval rating went to 90% AFTER the ACT OF TERROR on 9/11.

If anything, a terrorist attack helps presidents politically, so if Obama was trying to politicize it, why would he attempt to diminish the terrorist nature of the attack?

Ummmm, maybe because he had just said that AQ was on the run??????

Americans were still getting killed in Afghanistan in 2012, remember?

Obama said it, not me.
You know how fragile his ego is, he takes responsibility for nothing but unicorns and all that is good.