New Twist to Thug Killing!

What would you do if someone charged you and tried to take your shotgun way from you?

If someone was trying to attack me and take my weapon, I'd stay in the truck, with my weapon, and lock the doors until the police arrived. A truck with locks is a place of safety in that situation.

What was the driver doing in front of the truck if not trying to get a better aim?
well actually, he had a great shot while the running man was approaching him. why didn't he just take him out then? no truck in between and no need for contact.
Because he didn't want to shoot his own neighbor who was behind the jogger.
 
What would you do if someone charged you and tried to take your shotgun way from you?

If someone was trying to attack me and take my weapon, I'd stay in the truck, with my weapon, and lock the doors until the police arrived. A truck with locks is a place of safety in that situation.

What was the driver doing in front of the truck if not trying to get a better aim?
well actually, he had a great shot while the running man was approaching him. why didn't he just take him out then? no truck in between and no need for contact.
Yup these retards ignore the facts all the time, the runner ATTACKED the son, he tried to take the shotgun and died for his efforts when all he had to do was either talk to them or ignore them, those are NOT the actions of an innocent man.
Yes, self-defense involves attacking the person threatening their life.
 
well actually, he had a great shot while the running man was approaching him. why didn't he just take him out then? no truck in between and no need for contact

No need to take the man out at all. The shooters forced the scenario then used it to kill the man.
The shooter was safe in his truck. If he thought the jogger was a threat, roll up the windows and lock the doors. That is all of the "self defensive" action that was necessary. Threat disolved. Wait for the cops.
They took the law into their own hands, and face murder and a death penalty now because of their actions, not the actions of the one being hunted down. As well they should...
 
I have asked Irish Ram several times to show the video she claims to have watched....she refused....hmmmm I wonder why?

Irregardless..............here is the complete video.

This is the clearest one I have found....note.....the black so called jogger can be seen through the windshield of the truck running to the left to attack the white guy with the shotgun........it happens very,very quickly...you most likely will have to run the video a couple of times aka stop it back it up and watch thrugh the window of the truck and you will definitely see the black guy running across the front of the truck to attack the white guy.

This is undeniable proof that the so called black jogger attacked the white guy.

At the 20 sec. mark in the video you can see the black jogger running across the front of the truck to attack the white guy.

When this case goes to the jury....with the aid of slow motion and other technology it will be even easier for the jury to see the black guy initiating his attack....with this proof there is no way the prosecution can deny that Travis McMichael was entitled to use lethal force in defense of his life....the grand jury if it is not dominated by political pressure once seeing this video should toss the case out...but of course the political pressure on them most likely will keep them from doing that.

Note: those of you who have some technological ability probably can explain to the other viewers how to increase the size of the video so it is much easier to see the black jogger crossing the front of the truck...i can do it by hit and miss ....clicking around on the video somehow increases the size of the video picture...and if you can do this the image of the black guy running across the front of the truck to attack
Travis is much easier to see.

O.K. I figured out what you have to do to increase the size of the video...a no brainer actually hehheh....just click on the full page button to the bottom right of the video.







The video clearly shows the jogger holding on to the 'business end' of the gun and, he's not just holding it he appears to be trying to take it away. These are not the actions of a typical, neighborhood run of the mill jogger. They are the actions of a criminal and a seasoned one at that.

They are the actions of someone who's not armed, fighting in self-defense, against someone who is.

Well except no one was threatening the runner he CHOSE to attack as shown by the video.

Brandishing his firearm after chasing Arbery down for about 4 minutes while he was refusing to stop for the McMichaels is threatening.

Fighting back against that immediate threat is the very definition of self-defense in Georgia.

Nope at no time in the video did ANYONE point a firearm at the runner until AFTER he attacked and tried to take the weapon.

Prove it....

LOL the damn video PROVES IT and it is already posted IN THIS reply you are responding too.

The shot occurred out of sight in front of the truck. That is what the video shows. Surely you can see that.
 
It also clearly shows the runner charging the son who did not have the weapon pointed at the runner.
It shows no such thing, ya demented rube. The truck is obscuring the gun when the first shot was fired. All you can see of them is their shadows...

338224


So who knows how deranged you must be to think you can see the gun in that image.

:cuckoo: :cuckoo: :cuckoo:
 
Good pic of Dad taking aim though. Was someone threatening him too?
Who invited the neighbor/camera man along? Odd that the shooters were in a hurry to get to their "suspect", and yet took the time to ask someone to tag along and create a visual memory for them. Almost like they were up to something, as in premeditated.
Would an ex cop also own a pistol? Why take shotguns? Those are hunting weapons, intended to inflict massive damage and insure a kill.
 
well actually, he had a great shot while the running man was approaching him. why didn't he just take him out then? no truck in between and no need for contact

No need to take the man out at all. The shooters forced the scenario then used it to kill the man.
The shooter was safe in his truck. If he thought the jogger was a threat, roll up the windows and lock the doors. That is all of the "self defensive" action that was necessary. Threat disolved. Wait for the cops.
They took the law into their own hands, and face murder and a death penalty now because of their actions, not the actions of the one being hunted down. As well they should...
Exactly.

You are not the police. You have no right to chase down anyone.
 
well actually, he had a great shot while the running man was approaching him. why didn't he just take him out then? no truck in between and no need for contact

No need to take the man out at all. The shooters forced the scenario then used it to kill the man.
The shooter was safe in his truck. If he thought the jogger was a threat, roll up the windows and lock the doors. That is all of the "self defensive" action that was necessary. Threat disolved. Wait for the cops.
They took the law into their own hands, and face murder and a death penalty now because of their actions, not the actions of the one being hunted down. As well they should...
the runner was safe if he didn't attack the man with the gun. why is that a difficult solution for you?
 
It also clearly shows the runner charging the son who did not have the weapon pointed at the runner.

How can you see that through the truck?
when the video shows him do it from the passenger side and the fact they end up completely on the other side of the road and the white t-shirt through the windshield. that conclusion is simple. especially when you watch the kid with the gun getting pushed backward. watch the video.
 
well actually, he had a great shot while the running man was approaching him. why didn't he just take him out then? no truck in between and no need for contact

No need to take the man out at all. The shooters forced the scenario then used it to kill the man.
The shooter was safe in his truck. If he thought the jogger was a threat, roll up the windows and lock the doors. That is all of the "self defensive" action that was necessary. Threat disolved. Wait for the cops.
They took the law into their own hands, and face murder and a death penalty now because of their actions, not the actions of the one being hunted down. As well they should...
the runner was safe if he didn't attack the man with the gun. why is that a difficult solution for you?
How the fuck do you know he was safe? :cuckoo:

Even more salient, why shoukd Arbery have assumed he was safe?
 
well actually, he had a great shot while the running man was approaching him. why didn't he just take him out then? no truck in between and no need for contact

No need to take the man out at all. The shooters forced the scenario then used it to kill the man.
The shooter was safe in his truck. If he thought the jogger was a threat, roll up the windows and lock the doors. That is all of the "self defensive" action that was necessary. Threat disolved. Wait for the cops.
They took the law into their own hands, and face murder and a death penalty now because of their actions, not the actions of the one being hunted down. As well they should...

What nonsense you post.....how can you post such crap with a straight face.....anyhow....I will once again correct you..............how did the white dudes force anything? They were merely parked and the father in the bed of the truck and the son standing passively to the left and front of the truck.

Thus we see when the black jogged up to the truck....the shooter was not in the truck as you claim....he was already outside the truck...and as he watched the black dude approach he had no idea that he was going to attack...that came at a complete surprise. BTW they were waiting for the cops....they made the call to the police and now they were waiting for the police.

How does one take the law into their own hands? Irregardless....nothing like that happened in this case....what happened in this case and it has been pointed out to you many times....you even claimed you watched the video....but still yet you try and claim something that never happened.

As we all know what happened was the black attacked Travis McMichaels---punching him and trying to wrest his shotgun from him.....Travis thus was entitled to use lethal force in defense of his life.

What would you do....if you were standing beside the road and a negro attacks you ---starts punching you and tries to take your weapon from you?
 
It also clearly shows the runner charging the son who did not have the weapon pointed at the runner.

How can you see that through the truck?
when the video shows him do it from the passenger side and the fact they end up completely on the other side of the road and the white t-shirt through the windshield. that conclusion is simple. especially when you watch the kid with the gun getting pushed backward. watch the video.

Yes....in the video if you look through the windshield you will see the black running across the front of the truck....his white T shirt stands out....it happens very quickly and one might have to run the video a couple of times to see it....helpful if you put it on slow motion....
 
well actually, he had a great shot while the running man was approaching him. why didn't he just take him out then? no truck in between and no need for contact

No need to take the man out at all. The shooters forced the scenario then used it to kill the man.
The shooter was safe in his truck. If he thought the jogger was a threat, roll up the windows and lock the doors. That is all of the "self defensive" action that was necessary. Threat disolved. Wait for the cops.
They took the law into their own hands, and face murder and a death penalty now because of their actions, not the actions of the one being hunted down. As well they should...
the runner was safe if he didn't attack the man with the gun. why is that a difficult solution for you?
How the fuck do you know he was safe? :cuckoo:

Even more salient, why shoukd Arbery have assumed he was safe?

Lookee here boyo.....first of all it is beneath mah dignity to respond to such nonsense .....Irregardless........use some logic or at least a tad bit of common sense.

If Ahmaud believed he was not safe..........why did he keep jogging towards the truck? He could have gone in many different directions if he felt he was in danger.
He was safe because the white guys had no malice towards him, all they wanted to do was to talk to him......they had already told him that. Neither one of the two white guys had a criminal history nor a mental history......unlike Ahmaud.

Not even to mention they had already called the police and knew the police could arrive any second.....one does not call the police, wait for the police and thus knowing the police are on the way and suddenly decide to murder someone....absolute nonsense to think they would. Everyone should realize that makes no sense whatsoever.

However I do not claim that Ahmaud should have felt safe......I have no knowledge of his thoughts or how his mind operated.....what I am saying is that from his actions we can say one thing with absolute certainty....he was not in fear of his life.
 
One other thing stands out regarding this case is how some of the posters on here have little or no ability to figure this thing out....they require others to figure it out for them.

Now why is that? Anyone with even average intelligence should be able to figure out this case on their own....it is not complicated at all. Just requires a little bit of common sense and some ability to think logically.

There is one other possibility with these folks and when you combine that with a lack of intelligence it explains why they must rely on others to figure things out for them.........they are so biased that they let their bias blind them to what others can plainly and easily see ...quite easily....especially with the video that shows how it happened.
 
well actually, he had a great shot while the running man was approaching him. why didn't he just take him out then? no truck in between and no need for contact

No need to take the man out at all. The shooters forced the scenario then used it to kill the man.
The shooter was safe in his truck. If he thought the jogger was a threat, roll up the windows and lock the doors. That is all of the "self defensive" action that was necessary. Threat disolved. Wait for the cops.
They took the law into their own hands, and face murder and a death penalty now because of their actions, not the actions of the one being hunted down. As well they should...

What nonsense you post.....how can you post such crap with a straight face.....anyhow....I will once again correct you..............how did the white dudes force anything? They were merely parked and the father in the bed of the truck and the son standing passively to the left and front of the truck.

Thus we see when the black jogged up to the truck....the shooter was not in the truck as you claim....he was already outside the truck...and as he watched the black dude approach he had no idea that he was going to attack...that came at a complete surprise. BTW they were waiting for the cops....they made the call to the police and now they were waiting for the police.

How does one take the law into their own hands? Irregardless....nothing like that happened in this case....what happened in this case and it has been pointed out to you many times....you even claimed you watched the video....but still yet you try and claim something that never happened.

As we all know what happened was the black attacked Travis McMichaels---punching him and trying to wrest his shotgun from him.....Travis thus was entitled to use lethal force in defense of his life.

What would you do....if you were standing beside the road and a negro attacks you ---starts punching you and tries to take your weapon from you?
"They were merely parked and the father in the bed of the truck and the son standing passively to the left and front of the truck."

You dumb cuck, someone standing in the middle of a road, brandishing a shotgun, is "standing passively."

I swear, you morons spout the dumbest shit imaginable.
icon_rolleyes.gif
 
well actually, he had a great shot while the running man was approaching him. why didn't he just take him out then? no truck in between and no need for contact

No need to take the man out at all. The shooters forced the scenario then used it to kill the man.
The shooter was safe in his truck. If he thought the jogger was a threat, roll up the windows and lock the doors. That is all of the "self defensive" action that was necessary. Threat disolved. Wait for the cops.
They took the law into their own hands, and face murder and a death penalty now because of their actions, not the actions of the one being hunted down. As well they should...
the runner was safe if he didn't attack the man with the gun. why is that a difficult solution for you?
How the fuck do you know he was safe? :cuckoo:

Even more salient, why shoukd Arbery have assumed he was safe?

Lookee here boyo.....first of all it is beneath mah dignity to respond to such nonsense .....Irregardless........use some logic or at least a tad bit of common sense.

If Ahmaud believed he was not safe..........why did he keep jogging towards the truck? He could have gone in many different directions if he felt he was in danger.
He was safe because the white guys had no malice towards him, all they wanted to do was to talk to him......they had already told him that. Neither one of the two white guys had a criminal history nor a mental history......unlike Ahmaud.

Not even to mention they had already called the police and knew the police could arrive any second.....one does not call the police, wait for the police and thus knowing the police are on the way and suddenly decide to murder someone....absolute nonsense to think they would. Everyone should realize that makes no sense whatsoever.

However I do not claim that Ahmaud should have felt safe......I have no knowledge of his thoughts or how his mind operated.....what I am saying is that from his actions we can say one thing with absolute certainty....he was not in fear of his life.
Nope, you can't say that with any amount of certainty. He couldn't have even seen the shotgun until he was almost up to the truck; at which point, his options were limited.
 

Forum List

Back
Top