- Thread starter
- #41
In short: he didn't have enough evidence to indict. On other words, Trump is exonerated. Furthermore, exonerating people is not a legitimate function of a prosecutor.Fourth, if we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President
clearly did not commit obstruction of justice , we would so state. Based on the facts and the
applicable legal standards , however , we are unable to reach that judgment. The evidence we
obtained about the President ' s actions and intent presents difficult issues that prevent us from
conclusively determining that no criminal conduct occurred. Accordingly, while this report does
not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.
______________________________________________________________________________
Mueller never intended for Barr to come out and say NO OBSTRUCTION! The DOJ cannot indict a president and they should not be able to decide whether one should be indicted. Allow Congress to decide that...
Shit for Brains....the report clearly states that thump IS NOT EXONERATED..
Mueller did not have authority to Indict the POS....He clearly left it up to Congress....
Last edited: