No....Mr trump....you are not exonerated...

[Marion Morrison]

Fourth, if we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President
clearly did not commit obstruction of justice , we would so state. Based on the facts and the
applicable legal standards , however , we are unable to reach that judgment. The evidence we
obtained about the President ' s actions and intent presents difficult issues that prevent us from
conclusively determining that no criminal conduct occurred. Accordingly, while this report does
not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.
______________________________________________________________________________

Mueller never intended for Barr to come out and say NO OBSTRUCTION! The DOJ cannot indict a president and they should not be able to decide whether one should be indicted. Allow Congress to decide that...

In short: he didn't have enough evidence to indict. On other words, Trump is exonerated. Furthermore, exonerating people is not a legitimate function of a prosecutor.

Actually, he had enough to indict him, but he chose not to due to the protections afforded a sitting president.

The Obstruction Case Against Trump that Barr Tried to Hide

Mueller still could have reached a conclusion regarding obstruction of justice, but he believed it would be unfair to reach a conclusion that Trump could not rebut in court. How do we know this? Because Mueller says it. If he had reached a conclusion that Trump obstructed justice, Mueller wrote, Trump could not go to court to obtain a “speedy and public trial” with the “procedural protections” afforded to a criminal defendant by the Constitution.

 

[harmonica]

YES HE IS...as far as his voters are concerned he was totally exonerated...100%...

His cultists (you that is) would have claimed that no matter what the report said.

NOT guilty and exonerated
in fact, it was a ''nazi''' investigation--without probable cause

None of you fools have read the report, you're all just parroting what faux Noize told you.

hahahhahahahahhahaha
no need to

Typical RWNJ. Ignorant as fuck and happy with it.

hahahha
you people don't realize it?? do you???!!!!
you people are giving us many laughs and entertainment !!
hahahahahahah
Trump IS the POTUS--giving you all TDS
and you people keep posting very humorous posts!!
thank you
hahahahhahahahahahh

 

[OKTexas]

Fourth, if we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President
clearly did not commit obstruction of justice , we would so state. Based on the facts and the
applicable legal standards , however , we are unable to reach that judgment. The evidence we
obtained about the President ' s actions and intent presents difficult issues that prevent us from
conclusively determining that no criminal conduct occurred. Accordingly, while this report does
not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.
______________________________________________________________________________

Mueller never intended for Barr to come out and say NO OBSTRUCTION! The DOJ cannot indict a president and they should not be able to decide whether one should be indicted. Allow Congress to decide that...

In short: he didn't have enough evidence to indict. On other words, Trump is exonerated. Furthermore, exonerating people is not a legitimate function of a prosecutor.

Actually, he had enough to indict him, but he chose not to due to the protections afforded a sitting president.

The Obstruction Case Against Trump that Barr Tried to Hide

Mueller still could have reached a conclusion regarding obstruction of justice, but he believed it would be unfair to reach a conclusion that Trump could not rebut in court. How do we know this? Because Mueller says it. If he had reached a conclusion that Trump obstructed justice, Mueller wrote, Trump could not go to court to obtain a “speedy and public trial” with the “procedural protections” afforded to a criminal defendant by the Constitution.

Yet through innuendo Muller made accusatory statements, flipping the presumption of innocence on its head, and Trump is still denied his day in court, go fucking figure.

.

 

[Ambivalent1]

hahahhahahahahhahaha
no need to

Typical RWNJ. Ignorant as fuck and happy with it.

Prosecutors don't "exonerate" people dumbass. You're being played...…


Again.

Then why are you dingbats claiming he did?

Show me one place where I said anyone exonerated anyone?
You can't. His job was to "prosecute". He couldn't.
Lord give these people a brain.

Not you specifically, you as in the tRumpkins in general.

Prosecutors prosecute.
He isn't.

 

[blackhawk]

Mueller did not indict on obstruction of justice the AG and deputy AG looked at what Mueller found and also did not indict so that's it game, set, match it's over done finished the politicans can keep bitching they can threaten to impeach but it won't go anywhere the left put all their eggs in the collusion/obstruction basket and the bottom fell out.

 

[Lesh]

Fourth, if we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President
clearly did not commit obstruction of justice , we would so state. Based on the facts and the
applicable legal standards , however , we are unable to reach that judgment. The evidence we
obtained about the President ' s actions and intent presents difficult issues that prevent us from
conclusively determining that no criminal conduct occurred. Accordingly, while this report does
not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.
______________________________________________________________________________

Mueller never intended for Barr to come out and say NO OBSTRUCTION! The DOJ cannot indict a president and they should not be able to decide whether one should be indicted. Allow Congress to decide that...

Barr has been pretty effective as Trump’s Roy Cohen. Who was a disbarred Mob lawyer

 

[OKTexas]

Fourth, if we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President
clearly did not commit obstruction of justice , we would so state. Based on the facts and the
applicable legal standards , however , we are unable to reach that judgment. The evidence we
obtained about the President ' s actions and intent presents difficult issues that prevent us from
conclusively determining that no criminal conduct occurred. Accordingly, while this report does
not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.
______________________________________________________________________________

Mueller never intended for Barr to come out and say NO OBSTRUCTION! The DOJ cannot indict a president and they should not be able to decide whether one should be indicted. Allow Congress to decide that...

In short: he didn't have enough evidence to indict. On other words, Trump is exonerated. Furthermore, exonerating people is not a legitimate function of a prosecutor.

Actually no. "Not enough evidence to convict" and "exonerated" are two totally different things.

Not under our system of justice, the presumption of innocence is there until "convicted". You can play semantics all day, but that's the way it is.

.

 

[OKTexas]

Fourth, if we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President
clearly did not commit obstruction of justice , we would so state. Based on the facts and the
applicable legal standards , however , we are unable to reach that judgment. The evidence we
obtained about the President ' s actions and intent presents difficult issues that prevent us from
conclusively determining that no criminal conduct occurred. Accordingly, while this report does
not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.
______________________________________________________________________________

Mueller never intended for Barr to come out and say NO OBSTRUCTION! The DOJ cannot indict a president and they should not be able to decide whether one should be indicted. Allow Congress to decide that...

In short: he didn't have enough evidence to indict. On other words, Trump is exonerated. Furthermore, exonerating people is not a legitimate function of a prosecutor.

Shit for Brains....the report clearly states that thump IS NOT EXONERATED..

Mueller did not have authority to Indict the POS....He clearly left it up to Congress....

No he clearly left it to his two bosses.

.

 

[OKTexas]

Fourth, if we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President
clearly did not commit obstruction of justice , we would so state. Based on the facts and the
applicable legal standards , however , we are unable to reach that judgment. The evidence we
obtained about the President ' s actions and intent presents difficult issues that prevent us from
conclusively determining that no criminal conduct occurred. Accordingly, while this report does
not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.
______________________________________________________________________________

Mueller never intended for Barr to come out and say NO OBSTRUCTION! The DOJ cannot indict a president and they should not be able to decide whether one should be indicted. Allow Congress to decide that...

In short: he didn't have enough evidence to indict. On other words, Trump is exonerated. Furthermore, exonerating people is not a legitimate function of a prosecutor.

Shit for Brains....the report clearly stares that thump IS NOT EXONERATED..

Mueller did not have authority to Indict the POS....He clearly left it up to Congress....

Prosecutors don't "exonerate" people dumbass. You're being played...…

Again.

Wrong....that is what the political hack....Barr TRIED to do....

You're a LIAR, Barr in consultation with Rosenstein came to the conclusion there was no obstruction. You still haven't said what "actions" Trump took to obstruct justice.

.

 

[Marion Morrison]

YES HE IS...as far as his voters are concerned he was totally exonerated...100%...

His cultists (you that is) would have claimed that no matter what the report said.

NOT guilty and exonerated
in fact, it was a ''nazi''' investigation--without probable cause

None of you fools have read the report, you're all just parroting what faux Noize told you.

Link to the report so we can read it? I bet you can't come up with it, so you haven't read it, either.

 

[nat4900]

Fourth, if we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President
clearly did not commit obstruction of justice , we would so state. Based on the facts and the
applicable legal standards , however , we are unable to reach that judgment. The evidence we
obtained about the President ' s actions and intent presents difficult issues that prevent us from
conclusively determining that no criminal conduct occurred. Accordingly, while this report does
not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.
______________________________________________________________________________

Mueller never intended for Barr to come out and say NO OBSTRUCTION! The DOJ cannot indict a president and they should not be able to decide whether one should be indicted. Allow Congress to decide that...

You may have noticed how the whore, Barr, left out most of that verbiage with his "I love Trump" summary???

 

[nat4900]

Your president is a POS...and you applaud it...

Applauding a POS president, IS a requirement for cult members to be in "good" standing in the CULT.

 

[Marion Morrison]

Fourth, if we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President
clearly did not commit obstruction of justice , we would so state. Based on the facts and the
applicable legal standards , however , we are unable to reach that judgment. The evidence we
obtained about the President ' s actions and intent presents difficult issues that prevent us from
conclusively determining that no criminal conduct occurred. Accordingly, while this report does
not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.
______________________________________________________________________________

Mueller never intended for Barr to come out and say NO OBSTRUCTION! The DOJ cannot indict a president and they should not be able to decide whether one should be indicted. Allow Congress to decide that...

You may have noticed how the whore, Barr, left out most of that verbiage with his "I love Trump" summary???

Yeah, I kinda did, and wonder what polyp in your ass you pulled that bullshit from.

 

[nat4900]

And yet no charges....

....and THAT "yet no charges" is FULLY the flaw in the DOJ stupid policy (NOT LAQ) that a president is above the law and cannot be indicted.......

Trump's campaign slogan in 2020 is "VOTE FOR ME AND KEEP ME OUT OF PRISON"............LOL

 

[Marion Morrison]

Your president is a POS...and you applaud it...

Applauding a POS president, IS a requirement for cult members to be in "good" standing in the CULT.

Where does being an unAmerican POS Commie land you? God bless Trump, I couldn't put up with fucks like you. A man leaves his cushy lifestyle, (which he did not have to do) to try and do some good for America and this is how you act. For shame, for shame, you fucking turd.

 

[nat4900]

You might want to move on, like your leader has told you... she's given up.

REALLY?????..............LOL

House Votes, 420-to-0, to Demand Public Release of Mueller Report ...

Pelosi: Barr's report summary was "condescending" and "arrogant ...

 

[Marion Morrison]

You might want to move on, like your leader has told you... she's given up.

REALLY?????..............LOL

House Votes, 420-to-0, to Demand Public Release of Mueller Report ...

Pelosi: Barr's report summary was "condescending" and "arrogant ...

So you're rolling with Pelosi, aye? Good luck with that! Personally, I think you're a fucking tard.

 

[bripat9643]

Fourth, if we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President
clearly did not commit obstruction of justice , we would so state. Based on the facts and the
applicable legal standards , however , we are unable to reach that judgment. The evidence we
obtained about the President ' s actions and intent presents difficult issues that prevent us from
conclusively determining that no criminal conduct occurred. Accordingly, while this report does
not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.
______________________________________________________________________________

Mueller never intended for Barr to come out and say NO OBSTRUCTION! The DOJ cannot indict a president and they should not be able to decide whether one should be indicted. Allow Congress to decide that...

In short: he didn't have enough evidence to indict. On other words, Trump is exonerated. Furthermore, exonerating people is not a legitimate function of a prosecutor.

Shit for Brains....the report clearly states that thump IS NOT EXONERATED..

Mueller did not have authority to Indict the POS....He clearly left it up to Congress....

I've already told you turds at least 1000 times that exonerating people is not an official function of a prosecutor. He has no authority to exonerate anyone.

 

[nat4900]

Personally, I think you're a fucking tard.

Coming from a Trump cult member and ass kisser.......I consider the above a "badge of courage".......THANK YOU !!!

 

[Lakhota]

No....Mr trump....you are not exonerated...

Like OJ...?