No....Mr trump....you are not exonerated...

[Ambivalent1]

Then why are you dingbats claiming he did?

Show me one place where I said anyone exonerated anyone?
You can't. His job was to "prosecute". He couldn't.
Lord give these people a brain.

No...he wouldn't....this is a political issue now...Barr is no more than a trump butt kisser....just like most of you....

This white house is a lying den of thieves.

What part of
NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION
NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION
NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION
NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION

Don't you understand?

You do understand that that isn't what the Mueller report says, right?

The fat POS allowed the other day POS walk free...cause they have a syndicate....Barr....within weeks has ruined his reputation...He spoke contrary to what the Mueller report actually says....

He is nearly a bigger DICK than trump himself....

Now Christians will line up behind trump and praise him for his lies...

Can you prove any of that, or is it that you just FEEL that it is true?

 

[Darkwind]

Fourth, if we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President
clearly did not commit obstruction of justice , we would so state. Based on the facts and the
applicable legal standards , however , we are unable to reach that judgment. The evidence we
obtained about the President ' s actions and intent presents difficult issues that prevent us from
conclusively determining that no criminal conduct occurred. Accordingly, while this report does
not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.
______________________________________________________________________________

Mueller never intended for Barr to come out and say NO OBSTRUCTION! The DOJ cannot indict a president and they should not be able to decide whether one should be indicted. Allow Congress to decide that...

 

[kyzr]

Prosecutors don't "exonerate" people dumbass. You're being played...…


Again.

Then why are you dingbats claiming he did?

Show me one place where I said anyone exonerated anyone?
You can't. His job was to "prosecute". He couldn't.
Lord give these people a brain.

No...he wouldn't....this is a political issue now...Barr is no more than a trump butt kisser....just like most of you....

This white house is a lying den of thieves.

What part of
NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION
NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION
NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION
NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION

Don't you understand?

You do understand that that isn't what the Mueller report says, right?

That is exactly what the Mueller Report says. To make a long story short, investigators do not "exonerate", their grand juries either indict or don't indict. In Trump's case they did not indict. Trying to stretch 10 almost indictable events into an indictable event doesn't work. This is partisan politics, the dems want to see something impeachable, and its not there. The dems can impeach, but the Senate would not remove, so either impeach, or STFU.

 

[harmonica]

yes....Mr trump....you are exonerated.

 

[Care4all]

Then why are you dingbats claiming he did?

Show me one place where I said anyone exonerated anyone?
You can't. His job was to "prosecute". He couldn't.
Lord give these people a brain.

No...he wouldn't....this is a political issue now...Barr is no more than a trump butt kisser....just like most of you....

This white house is a lying den of thieves.

What part of
NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION
NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION
NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION
NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION

Don't you understand?

You do understand that that isn't what the Mueller report says, right?

That is exactly what the Mueller Report says. To make a long story short, investigators do not "exonerate", their grand juries either indict or don't indict. In Trump's case they did not indict. Trying to stretch 10 almost indictable events into an indictable event doesn't work. This is partisan politics, the dems want to see something impeachable, and its not there. The dems can impeach, but the Senate would not remove, so either impeach, or STFU.

When it comes to a president, the grand jury can NOT indict him.

What the grand jury and Mueller did, was leave a road map, for Congress, to bring impeachment hearings, and decide on impeachment.

THIS IS EXACTLY how it was done by the grand jury/prosecutor for watergate, and for the Starr report....

the road map for the president's impeachment was given by them,

NO CHARGES were brought by the grand juries for these other two presidents either.... not for Nixon, nor for Clinton.

Barr, overstepped his bounds, and jumped in, where he was not welcomed, nor needed, nor belonged.

The decision according to the way our constitution is laid out, was for CONGRESS TO MAKE.

Mueller was passing it on to Congress to make the decision.

 

[Kittymom1026]

Hey Don: Is the Mueller Report “100% exonerating and vindicating” or “total bullshit?” Just pick one, please.

 

[airplanemechanic]

I had no idea the DOJ's job was to exonerate people. I thought it was to either press charges or not.

 

[Care4all]

I had no idea the DOJ's job was to exonerate people. I thought it was to either press charges or not.

The DOJ does not exonerate people, never has, never will....

they either press charges, or they do not.

they always leave the door opened, for further evidence that could arise down the road.

 

[JimH52]

Show me one place where I said anyone exonerated anyone?
You can't. His job was to "prosecute". He couldn't.
Lord give these people a brain.

No...he wouldn't....this is a political issue now...Barr is no more than a trump butt kisser....just like most of you....

This white house is a lying den of thieves.

What part of
NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION
NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION
NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION
NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION

Don't you understand?

You do understand that that isn't what the Mueller report says, right?

That is exactly what the Mueller Report says. To make a long story short, investigators do not "exonerate", their grand juries either indict or don't indict. In Trump's case they did not indict. Trying to stretch 10 almost indictable events into an indictable event doesn't work. This is partisan politics, the dems want to see something impeachable, and its not there. The dems can impeach, but the Senate would not remove, so either impeach, or STFU.

When it comes to a president, the grand jury can NOT indict him.

What the grand jury and Mueller did, was leave a road map, for Congress, to bring impeachment hearings, and decide on impeachment.

THIS IS EXACTLY how it was done by the grand jury/prosecutor for watergate, and for the Starr report....

the road map for the president's impeachment was given by them,

NO CHARGES were brought by the grand juries for these other two presidents either.... not for Nixon, nor for Clinton.

Barr, overstepped his bounds, and jumped in, where he was not welcomed, nor needed, nor belonged.

The decision according to the way our constitution is laid out, was for CONGRESS TO MAKE.

Mueller was passing it on to Congress to make the decision.

Exactly! This is the statement that gives the road map for Congress

Under OLC's analysis, Congress can permissibly criminalize certain obstructive conduct
by the President, such as suborning perjury , intimidating witnesses, or fabricating evidence ,
because those prohibitions raise no separation-of-powers questions. See Application of 28 U.S.C.
§ 458 to Presidential Appointments of Federal Judges, 19 Op. O.L.C. at 357 n.11. The
Constitution does not authorize the President to engage in such conduct, and those actions would
transgress the President's duty to "take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed. " U.S . CONST.
ART IT, §§ 3.
_______________________________________________________________________________

No one can deny that trump did suborn perjury on multiple occasions...they are documented in the report. Fortunately for the people he asked to lie, they did not follow his directive...I fabricated evidence when he dictated the false letter concerning the meeting that Junior had with the Russians at trump tower. That also is undeniable....

 

[whitehall]

Lefties called for a two year investigation with over 3,000 subpoenas and over 500 witnesses and several midnight raids and now they DON'T HAVE CONFIDENCE in the results? Give me a freaking break

 

[Oldstyle]

Fourth, if we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President
clearly did not commit obstruction of justice , we would so state. Based on the facts and the
applicable legal standards , however , we are unable to reach that judgment. The evidence we
obtained about the President ' s actions and intent presents difficult issues that prevent us from
conclusively determining that no criminal conduct occurred. Accordingly, while this report does
not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.
______________________________________________________________________________

Mueller never intended for Barr to come out and say NO OBSTRUCTION! The DOJ cannot indict a president and they should not be able to decide whether one should be indicted. Allow Congress to decide that...

Oh so NOW it's not Mueller's job to decide whether Trump should be indicted? It's Congress that decides that? So did you want to take a crack at explaining why we just wasted two YEARS and 41 million dollars having Lurch investigate every single person Trump has said hi to over the past ten years!

You progressive buffoons have ranted about waiting for the Mueller Report for years now...and now that it's HERE and it didn't give you what you so desperately wanted...you're telling us to ignore it and move on to the NEXT witch hunt led by Congressional sleaze balls like Nadler and Schiff?

 

[Uncensored2008]

Fourth, if we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President
clearly did not commit obstruction of justice , we would so state. Based on the facts and the
applicable legal standards , however , we are unable to reach that judgment. The evidence we
obtained about the President ' s actions and intent presents difficult issues that prevent us from
conclusively determining that no criminal conduct occurred. Accordingly, while this report does
not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.
______________________________________________________________________________

Mueller never intended for Barr to come out and say NO OBSTRUCTION! The DOJ cannot indict a president and they should not be able to decide whether one should be indicted. Allow Congress to decide that...

What a fucking retard.

No crimes found - that is exoneration, dumbfuck.

 

[Oldstyle]

Fourth, if we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President
clearly did not commit obstruction of justice , we would so state. Based on the facts and the
applicable legal standards , however , we are unable to reach that judgment. The evidence we
obtained about the President ' s actions and intent presents difficult issues that prevent us from
conclusively determining that no criminal conduct occurred. Accordingly, while this report does
not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.
______________________________________________________________________________

Mueller never intended for Barr to come out and say NO OBSTRUCTION! The DOJ cannot indict a president and they should not be able to decide whether one should be indicted. Allow Congress to decide that...

This is far from over!

Oh...you're right about that, Lakhota! Barr is about to investigate the REAL collusion that took place leading up to that election! He's about to go after the scum that lied and used the power of their offices to try to steal an election by spying on an opposition party and paying for a smear campaign against an opposition candidate!

 

[Papageorgio]

Why didn’t Obama do anything in 2014? Why did he wait until late 2016 to even mention it?

Gee.....now you dimwits are looking to "blame" Obama for not doing enough to keep Russia from helping the orange buffoon from infesting the oval office???

Oh, the irony........LMAO

Not blaming Obama, just wondering why he did nothing for over two years.

 

[McRocket]

Fourth, if we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President
clearly did not commit obstruction of justice , we would so state. Based on the facts and the
applicable legal standards , however , we are unable to reach that judgment. The evidence we
obtained about the President ' s actions and intent presents difficult issues that prevent us from
conclusively determining that no criminal conduct occurred. Accordingly, while this report does
not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.
______________________________________________________________________________

Mueller never intended for Barr to come out and say NO OBSTRUCTION! The DOJ cannot indict a president and they should not be able to decide whether one should be indicted. Allow Congress to decide that...

And yet no charges....

Hello?

Mueller already said LONG ago that he was not going to lay charges NO MATTER WHAT.

Why can you Trumpbots not get that through your heads?

Sheesh...talk about delusional.

 

[kyzr]

Show me one place where I said anyone exonerated anyone?
You can't. His job was to "prosecute". He couldn't.
Lord give these people a brain.

No...he wouldn't....this is a political issue now...Barr is no more than a trump butt kisser....just like most of you....

This white house is a lying den of thieves.

What part of
NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION
NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION
NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION
NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION

Don't you understand?

You do understand that that isn't what the Mueller report says, right?

That is exactly what the Mueller Report says. To make a long story short, investigators do not "exonerate", their grand juries either indict or don't indict. In Trump's case they did not indict. Trying to stretch 10 almost indictable events into an indictable event doesn't work. This is partisan politics, the dems want to see something impeachable, and its not there. The dems can impeach, but the Senate would not remove, so either impeach, or STFU.

When it comes to a president, the grand jury can NOT indict him.

What the grand jury and Mueller did, was leave a road map, for Congress, to bring impeachment hearings, and decide on impeachment.

THIS IS EXACTLY how it was done by the grand jury/prosecutor for watergate, and for the Starr report....

the road map for the president's impeachment was given by them,

NO CHARGES were brought by the grand juries for these other two presidents either.... not for Nixon, nor for Clinton.

Barr, overstepped his bounds, and jumped in, where he was not welcomed, nor needed, nor belonged.

The decision according to the way our constitution is laid out, was for CONGRESS TO MAKE.

Mueller was passing it on to Congress to make the decision.

Ok, that's a lot of bullshit. Either Mueller finds something impeachable or he doesn't. He didn't. Congress can re-interpret the report findings and impeach, but the Senate would not remove. So all the whining by the dems is just political talking points, as Strzok said, "there is no there there".
The Mueller Investigation was done for Barr. It was illegally started by the Obama admin as a "counter-intelligence" investigation, but morphed into the Trump witch hunt, aka McCabe's and Strzok's "insurance policy". Barr followed the law to the letter summarizing the investigation. He did not need to show anyone the report.
Lets hope congress impeaches and then the loop can officially be closed, after Barr indicts the deep state coup perps.

 

[McRocket]

Your president is a POS...and you applaud it...

Trumpbots applaud Trump because he is a piece of shit because they are pieces of shit...and he makes them feel better about themselves.

He allows them to think it’s okay to be racist, xenophobic, misogynistic, to fool around on your wife and to openly crave sex with your daughter.

He has made being dusgusting...acceptable to his disgusting, neo-Nazilike, Trumpbot followers.

 

[nat4900]

How many votes did the Russians actually get Trump?
Was it more than Comey's outlining of Hillary's illegal server? <g>

"How many votes did the Russians get Trump???......".

Gee, hard to tell but probably YOURS and many more of your fellow morons.......

Regarding Comey..........the 11 days before "revelation" by Comey regarding Hillary's emails cost her the election; anyone who "doubts" that little factoid is a fucking idiot.

Comey NEVER mentioned tht the FBI ALSO had n open investigation on Trump's corrupt campaign cronies.

 

[Hale]

Fourth, if we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President clearly did not commit obstruction of justice , we would so state. Based on the facts and the applicable legal standards , however , we are unable to reach that judgment. The evidence we
obtained about the President ' s actions and intent presents difficult issues that prevent us from
conclusively determining that no criminal conduct occurred. Accordingly, while this report does
not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.

If any judge at any trial said what Mueller says here - "We can't prove you're guilty but that doesn't mean you're innocent" - he would be disbarred immediately.

Mueller had one job, he failed to find guilt, and the game is over. Saying "it does not exonerate him" is just childish ass-covering.

 

[Flash]

Fourth, if we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President
clearly did not commit obstruction of justice , we would so state. Based on the facts and the
applicable legal standards , however , we are unable to reach that judgment. The evidence we
obtained about the President ' s actions and intent presents difficult issues that prevent us from
conclusively determining that no criminal conduct occurred. Accordingly, while this report does
not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.
______________________________________________________________________________

Mueller never intended for Barr to come out and say NO OBSTRUCTION! The DOJ cannot indict a president and they should not be able to decide whether one should be indicted. Allow Congress to decide that...

Mueller Denial Syndrome, big time.

The filthy Democrats know that their agenda to make the US a socialist shithole will not fly so their only hope is Trump going to jail, or something.

They are unwilling to accept the reality that he was exonerated. That stupid post is a great example.