Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And the immoral party in which has the democrats name written all over it... No wait lets not fool ourselves by all this party verses party crap... How about just getting the bad out of both parties ? I mean it's not hard to know who that bad is, because it is the one trying to lead each of the parties off a cliff... Smoke'em out and get rid of them... Then the parties could come together for the ultimate duty call and service given for we the people.
Your disobedience comes through freedom of speech, freedom of the press , your right to voteI have never seen a worse interpretation of our ConstitutionBut if you accept being an American, you accept the decisions of We the People
The Constitution in no way requires unlimited obedience to majority rule. Indeed, it flat out denies it. I can't imagine what kind of authoritarian zealot would claim otherwise.
How so? Do you believe it does require unlimited obedience to majority rule?
Sent from my SPH-L720T using Tapatalk
<note I left off right to bear arms>
If you own a home and sell it at a profit, you pay no capital gains taxes if it's the first time you sold a home. Houses you sell after the first one are held to capital gains taxation.
You are full of shit dude. And yet claim to be educated. Educated at what?
Look up the Tax Payer Relief Act of 1997. Then read about the Housing Assistance Act of 2008.
Try to really educate yourself about something.
Because your ideas of the cap gains tax benefits for owner occupied homes is wrong.
Where did you get your education? A message board?
You are factually incorrect. I have a family member who had cancer and needed surgery. It was planned - surgery was scheduled 2-3 months after diagnosis. She had no insurance no means to pay. The surgery ended up costing her nearly $100k. I know this because I helped her negotiate and settle the bills. On the morning of the surgery I gave the hospital $1,000.00. She had the surgery. This was pre-ACA.Even prior to the ACA nobody was denied access to healthcare. If you walked into a publicly funded hospital with a stab wound or drug overdose they were required to take care of you.
If you walked in with cancer and needed treatment, they may or may not treat you. Hospitals only have to stabilize the person. They do not have to offer full treatment if the person is not capable of making payment. What I find a bit odd is that conservatives are against forcing people to buy health insurance, but they seem to have no problem with the idea, as false as it is, that hospitals must treat patients who cannot pay? How is that based on a free market economy? If you can't pay, the hospital should be able to tell you to go home and die if you truly believe in free markets without regulation.
I have worked through the process, and I do not make factual assertions unless I know them to be true, unlike 95% of you here.
Same thing with my late neighbor. She developed lung cancer and also had no insurance. She didn't make much money so she opted for cash instead of her work insurance program.
They took good care of her and even provided transportation to and from the hospital for chemo treatments. Unfortunately, she didn't make it. She died a little over two years ago. But she willed her house to her son and nobody ever tried to take it from him or her.. And the immoral party in which has the democrats name written all over it as well... No wait lets not fool ourselves by all this party verses party crap... How about just getting the bad out of both parties ? I mean it's not hard to know who that bad is, because it is the one trying to lead the parties off a cliff....But as we know, trial lawyers are big donors to the Democrat party come election time, so we will never see a law like that in the US.
As I've said before, you'll never get anything done unless you get rid of the corporate party....
The worst problem is that the feds have resided over the empowering of idiots all across this land when it came to influencing elections by use of it's authority and power wrongfully. This area of the federal government I do not like nor agree with because it has failed us in these areas badly. I mean look at the results.. When the fed acts in a bipartisan and more harmonious way, good things happen, but when it acts on the notions of a few we all get hammered.You are factually incorrect. I have a family member who had cancer and needed surgery. It was planned - surgery was scheduled 2-3 months after diagnosis. She had no insurance no means to pay. The surgery ended up costing her nearly $100k. I know this because I helped her negotiate and settle the bills. On the morning of the surgery I gave the hospital $1,000.00. She had the surgery. This was pre-ACA.Even prior to the ACA nobody was denied access to healthcare. If you walked into a publicly funded hospital with a stab wound or drug overdose they were required to take care of you.
If you walked in with cancer and needed treatment, they may or may not treat you. Hospitals only have to stabilize the person. They do not have to offer full treatment if the person is not capable of making payment. What I find a bit odd is that conservatives are against forcing people to buy health insurance, but they seem to have no problem with the idea, as false as it is, that hospitals must treat patients who cannot pay? How is that based on a free market economy? If you can't pay, the hospital should be able to tell you to go home and die if you truly believe in free markets without regulation.
I have worked through the process, and I do not make factual assertions unless I know them to be true, unlike 95% of you here.
Same thing with my late neighbor. She developed lung cancer and also had no insurance. She didn't make much money so she opted for cash instead of her work insurance program.
They took good care of her and even provided transportation to and from the hospital for chemo treatments. Unfortunately, she didn't make it. She died a little over two years ago. But she willed her house to her son and nobody ever tried to take it from him or her.. And the immoral party in which has the democrats name written all over it as well... No wait lets not fool ourselves by all this party verses party crap... How about just getting the bad out of both parties ? I mean it's not hard to know who that bad is, because it is the one trying to lead the parties off a cliff....But as we know, trial lawyers are big donors to the Democrat party come election time, so we will never see a law like that in the US.
As I've said before, you'll never get anything done unless you get rid of the corporate party....
We are trying on the right side. The left seems to keep moving more and more left with each election.
Getting rid of all the bad is easier said than done. Unfortunately, many Americans use the same criteria to vote their representatives in as they do their favorite American Idol contestants: how do they look, how do they dress, how nice does their family look, how well do they speak????
The worst problem is that the feds have resided over the empowering of idiots all across this land when it came to influencing elections by use of it's authority and power wrongfully. This area of the federal government I do not like nor agree with because it has failed us in these areas badly. I mean look at the results.. When the fed acts in a bipartisan and more harmonious way, good things happen, but when it acts on the notions of a few we all get hammered.You are factually incorrect. I have a family member who had cancer and needed surgery. It was planned - surgery was scheduled 2-3 months after diagnosis. She had no insurance no means to pay. The surgery ended up costing her nearly $100k. I know this because I helped her negotiate and settle the bills. On the morning of the surgery I gave the hospital $1,000.00. She had the surgery. This was pre-ACA.If you walked in with cancer and needed treatment, they may or may not treat you. Hospitals only have to stabilize the person. They do not have to offer full treatment if the person is not capable of making payment. What I find a bit odd is that conservatives are against forcing people to buy health insurance, but they seem to have no problem with the idea, as false as it is, that hospitals must treat patients who cannot pay? How is that based on a free market economy? If you can't pay, the hospital should be able to tell you to go home and die if you truly believe in free markets without regulation.
I have worked through the process, and I do not make factual assertions unless I know them to be true, unlike 95% of you here.
Same thing with my late neighbor. She developed lung cancer and also had no insurance. She didn't make much money so she opted for cash instead of her work insurance program.
They took good care of her and even provided transportation to and from the hospital for chemo treatments. Unfortunately, she didn't make it. She died a little over two years ago. But she willed her house to her son and nobody ever tried to take it from him or her.. And the immoral party in which has the democrats name written all over it as well... No wait lets not fool ourselves by all this party verses party crap... How about just getting the bad out of both parties ? I mean it's not hard to know who that bad is, because it is the one trying to lead the parties off a cliff....But as we know, trial lawyers are big donors to the Democrat party come election time, so we will never see a law like that in the US.
As I've said before, you'll never get anything done unless you get rid of the corporate party....
We are trying on the right side. The left seems to keep moving more and more left with each election.
Getting rid of all the bad is easier said than done. Unfortunately, many Americans use the same criteria to vote their representatives in as they do their favorite American Idol contestants: how do they look, how do they dress, how nice does their family look, how well do they speak????
Your disobedience comes through freedom of speech, freedom of the press , your right to voteI have never seen a worse interpretation of our ConstitutionBut if you accept being an American, you accept the decisions of We the People
The Constitution in no way requires unlimited obedience to majority rule. Indeed, it flat out denies it. I can't imagine what kind of authoritarian zealot would claim otherwise.
How so? Do you believe it does require unlimited obedience to majority rule?
Sent from my SPH-L720T using Tapatalk
<note I left off right to bear arms>
I note you leave off any freedom that you don't like, which is the hypocrisy your view is based on. It seems odd you wear it like a badge of honor.
What is the media?The worst problem is that the feds have resided over the empowering of idiots all across this land when it came to influencing elections by use of it's authority and power wrongfully. This area of the federal government I do not like nor agree with because it has failed us in these areas badly. I mean look at the results.. When the fed acts in a bipartisan and more harmonious way, good things happen, but when it acts on the notions of a few we all get hammered.You are factually incorrect. I have a family member who had cancer and needed surgery. It was planned - surgery was scheduled 2-3 months after diagnosis. She had no insurance no means to pay. The surgery ended up costing her nearly $100k. I know this because I helped her negotiate and settle the bills. On the morning of the surgery I gave the hospital $1,000.00. She had the surgery. This was pre-ACA.
I have worked through the process, and I do not make factual assertions unless I know them to be true, unlike 95% of you here.
Same thing with my late neighbor. She developed lung cancer and also had no insurance. She didn't make much money so she opted for cash instead of her work insurance program.
They took good care of her and even provided transportation to and from the hospital for chemo treatments. Unfortunately, she didn't make it. She died a little over two years ago. But she willed her house to her son and nobody ever tried to take it from him or her.. And the immoral party in which has the democrats name written all over it as well... No wait lets not fool ourselves by all this party verses party crap... How about just getting the bad out of both parties ? I mean it's not hard to know who that bad is, because it is the one trying to lead the parties off a cliff....But as we know, trial lawyers are big donors to the Democrat party come election time, so we will never see a law like that in the US.
As I've said before, you'll never get anything done unless you get rid of the corporate party....
We are trying on the right side. The left seems to keep moving more and more left with each election.
Getting rid of all the bad is easier said than done. Unfortunately, many Americans use the same criteria to vote their representatives in as they do their favorite American Idol contestants: how do they look, how do they dress, how nice does their family look, how well do they speak????
The most influence over people when it comes to politics is the media hands down. Teacher say--Student do. Look at what many on the left post here on USMB. They blame Fox, Hannity or Limbaugh for every stance the right takes. They actually believe that many problems we have today is Reagan's fault, and the guy left office almost 30 years ago.
Not everybody can be this vacant when it comes to understanding politics. This is learned behavior. This brainwashing has to come from somewhere.
Your disobedience comes through freedom of speech, freedom of the press , your right to voteI have never seen a worse interpretation of our ConstitutionThe Constitution in no way requires unlimited obedience to majority rule. Indeed, it flat out denies it. I can't imagine what kind of authoritarian zealot would claim otherwise.
How so? Do you believe it does require unlimited obedience to majority rule?
Sent from my SPH-L720T using Tapatalk
<note I left off right to bear arms>
I note you leave off any freedom that you don't like, which is the hypocrisy your view is based on. It seems odd you wear it like a badge of honor.
If you have a strong First Amendment, you have no need for a second
What is the media?The worst problem is that the feds have resided over the empowering of idiots all across this land when it came to influencing elections by use of it's authority and power wrongfully. This area of the federal government I do not like nor agree with because it has failed us in these areas badly. I mean look at the results.. When the fed acts in a bipartisan and more harmonious way, good things happen, but when it acts on the notions of a few we all get hammered.Same thing with my late neighbor. She developed lung cancer and also had no insurance. She didn't make much money so she opted for cash instead of her work insurance program.
They took good care of her and even provided transportation to and from the hospital for chemo treatments. Unfortunately, she didn't make it. She died a little over two years ago. But she willed her house to her son and nobody ever tried to take it from him or her.. And the immoral party in which has the democrats name written all over it as well... No wait lets not fool ourselves by all this party verses party crap... How about just getting the bad out of both parties ? I mean it's not hard to know who that bad is, because it is the one trying to lead the parties off a cliff.As I've said before, you'll never get anything done unless you get rid of the corporate party....
We are trying on the right side. The left seems to keep moving more and more left with each election.
Getting rid of all the bad is easier said than done. Unfortunately, many Americans use the same criteria to vote their representatives in as they do their favorite American Idol contestants: how do they look, how do they dress, how nice does their family look, how well do they speak????
The most influence over people when it comes to politics is the media hands down. Teacher say--Student do. Look at what many on the left post here on USMB. They blame Fox, Hannity or Limbaugh for every stance the right takes. They actually believe that many problems we have today is Reagan's fault, and the guy left office almost 30 years ago.
Not everybody can be this vacant when it comes to understanding politics. This is learned behavior. This brainwashing has to come from somewhere.
TV, Radio, Newspapers, Internet, USMB?
We have more open access to political thoughts of all the political spectrum than in any time in history
So it's the socialists that draft young men into the military and put their lives at risk.I guess I will never understand, socialists want everyone else to pay for their shit.
A suck ass, kiss ass way to live...
Na, not really.
There is nothing civilized about socialism. Dumbass
Hitler, Stalin etc. all products of socialism...
Lol
Oh, and that's another problem with you Ayn Rand worshippers, you don't have the slightest clue what socialism actually is.
If there is no profit in people's health problems what good are health problems?always better to have the free market produce the best health care in the word then have the government steal all of the work and investment of those companies.
Of course you see nothing wrong with this
US healthcare is a joke in the first world....most European countries, Canada and Aust/NZ have much better and fairer systems. A capitalistic health care system is doomed to fail and only helps the elite....You need a mixture of both socialist and capitalist.
I have a professional tax preparer take care of my taxes Short Bus. My taxes are too complicated to take advice from internet trolls.
It's a disease...Na, not really.
There is nothing civilized about socialism. Dumbass
Hitler, Stalin etc. all products of socialism...
Lol
Oh, and that's another problem with you Ayn Rand worshippers, you don't have the slightest clue what socialism actually is.
I'd be very surprised if Rustic actually knew who Ayn Rand was.
Socialism has never been proven to work, long termIt's not the federal governments money, and it's not the federal governments place to determine who makes what. It's none of their business, the federal governments credibility is shit and piss when comes to financial responsibility. Mandatory insurance is nothing more than legalized extortion. Dumbass
Eh, the idea isn't mandatory insurance but simply healthcare for everyone financed by taxes. The idea that healthcare is a consumer good just like pizzas that should be provided by the free market to ensure "efficiency" is simply stupid. Like you would go shopping, looking for the cheapest hospital when you have a heart attack.
But organizing it that way would be evil socialism and the first step on the way to a communist dictatorship, right?
The government has no place in the people's businessThey favor it because they think they will get it for free. Or if liberals are in charge, make some wealthy people pay for it.
The wor$hipping of $billionaires by you cultists is really scary, who cares if the Koch brothers or Bill Gates would have to pay a few $million more in taxes to ensure everyone got healthcare? They wouldn't even notice it, it would just be a rounding error on their income statements.
