Ray From Cleveland
Diamond Member
- Aug 16, 2015
- 97,215
- 37,439
- 2,290
A primary is a state election, not a federal election. There is no constitutional violation. States can put whatever requirements they choose on candidates as long it applies to all candidates.Yet the Constitution grants states the authority to determine how their electors are chosen, and California is well within its constitutional right to include this requirement. California already requires candidates to make disclosures about themselves to better inform voters so they can make intelligent choices. How can adding a requirement that all candidates disclose their tax forms be illegally?Remember this is not the general election, it's the republican primary. Assuming Trump is the republican candidate, he will still appear on the ballot in general elections. This is nothing but a political move aimed at getting Trump to release his tax forms.This isn’t about disqualify him for office. That has nothing to do with the language of the bill. It’s stated in the constitution that states can make their own rules on their own ballots. It’s simply a rule of appearing on the ballot.
That's exactly why the courts will bitch slap them. It's pure politics, not a proper State interest.
.
Because it puts another requirement above and beyond those listed in the Constitution. 35 years or older, Natural Born Citizen,
That's it.
It's still blackmail. If CA has another slug around, they can get him or her to challenge Trump in a primary even if they know they're going to lose. If a court didn't shoot this stupidity down (and I'm sure they will) then that would disqualify Trump from running in CA.