Nobody is above the law, Sheriff Joe.

i just read the stephan lemons hit piece, the hack writer has been at this for awhile, smearing sheriff Joe.

this is an extension of obama's war on cops, the cops that enforce the laws.

we are still unclear from this whether or not crossing the border from mexico is illegal, the libs want it to be fine. the Kate's law people like me don't. Trump says either we a country or we don't.

but it's not fine. sheriff joe is doing his job. a lot of this story is rooted in obama's fake identity.

Arpaio says that's not over, i agree.
 
Last edited:
Loyal Americans who despise Internationalists and Open Border advocates oftentimes hold up Sheriff Joe Arpaio as an American Folk Hero...

Someone willing to thumb his nose at an unaccountable activist judicial branch and a Federal government that refuses to enforce its own laws...

He may very well come off looking like a prick to Illegal Aliens, and those Hispanics with more loyalty to their Mexican and Central American ethnic brethren than their own country, and those Cultural Suicide -prone misguided Anglo Liberals who routinely offer their backsides to 11-12,000,000 Illegal Aliens and their Anchor Baby spawn...

Good on him...

God bless, Sheriff Joe... stay strong... keep up the good work...
 
Last edited:
i just read the stephan lemons hit piece. this hack writer has been at it for awhile. this is an extension of obama's war on cops that enforce the laws. we are still unclear from this whether or not crossing the border from mexico is illegal, the libs want it to be fine. but it's not fine. sheriff joe is doing his job.
It's not about whether a border crossing was illegal, but disobeying a judge's order. What if Hillary refused to answer the questions from JW that a judge has ordered?
 
We hear about Hillary's supposed "crimes" all the time, but it looks like Sheriff Joe might finally have his actions catch up to him. Should have retired in Hawaii..

Judge seeks criminal contempt charges against Sheriff Joe Arpaio - CNN.com

Joe Arpaio - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
From your link...

Arpaio, who has made national headlines in the past for his uncompromising views against illegal immigration, invited Donald Trump to speak in Phoenix for acampaign rally last weekend that attracted thousands. Trump has attracted controversy for comments he's made about undocumented immigrants from Mexico, calling some of them "rapists" and "killers."
Thousands of supporters and protesters attended the event, which had to move locations to accommodate the crowd.


Sounds more like the Democrats are criminalizing support of the opposing political party, from the timing...
 
From your link...Arpaio, who has made national headlines in the past for his uncompromising views against illegal immigration, invited Donald Trump to speak in Phoenix for a campaign rally last weekend that attracted thousands. Trump has attracted controversy for comments he's made about undocumented immigrants from Mexico, calling some of them "rapists" and "killers." Thousands of supporters and protesters attended the event, which had to move locations to accommodate the crowd. Sounds more like the Democrats are criminalizing support of the opposing political party, from the timing...
Judge Snow was appointed by George W. Bush and worked for a judge appointed by Reagan. I guess the way the Trump party has been throwing aside traditional Republicans, they're both Democrats now!
 
i just read the stephan lemons hit piece. this hack writer has been at it for awhile. this is an extension of obama's war on cops that enforce the laws. we are still unclear from this whether or not crossing the border from mexico is illegal, the libs want it to be fine. but it's not fine. sheriff joe is doing his job.
It's not about whether a border crossing was illegal, but disobeying a judge's order. What if Hillary refused to answer the questions from JW that a judge has ordered?
Well, she sure disobeyed a subpeona from Congress when she decided to delete thousands of work related emails (some of them containing classified information), didn't she???

Did you know that destroying evidence after it has been subpeonaed is a FELONY???

Gee, won't it be great to see Trump toss the Democrats out of the White House before the statute of limitations expires!!!
 
Well, she(Hillary) sure disobeyed a subpeona from Congress when she decided to delete thousands of work related emails (some of them containing classified information), didn't she??? Did you know that destroying evidence after it has been subpeonaed is a FELONY??? Gee, won't it be great to see Trump toss the Democrats out of the White House before the statute of limitations expires!!!
How does any of that exonerate Sheriff Joe?
 
Well, she sure disobeyed a subpeona from Congress when she decided to delete thousands of work related emails (some of them containing classified information), didn't she???

Did you know that destroying evidence after it has been subpeonaed is a FELONY???

Gee, won't it be great to see Trump toss the Democrats out of the White House before the statute of limitations expires!!!
Uhm, none of your wild accusations are truthful. You must be a Trumpeteer
 
Last edited:
God bless, Sheriff Joe... stay strong... keep up the good work...
Nah, Joe is going to follow Baca

First we had this jerk facing justice "Former Los Angeles County Sheriff Lee Baca withdrew his guilty plea Monday to a charge of lying during an FBI investigation into the county’s jails, opting instead to take his chances at a high-stakes trial." -- Hopefully he gets the book thrown at him during sentencing, and we get the next biggest asswipe in law enforcement facing justice.

Judge Refers Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpaio for Criminal Prosecution
“When a federal court finds that a law enforcement official has lied to the court in an effort to cover up misconduct, and willfully flouted court orders, that official must be held to account.”

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/20/us/arizona-sheriff-joe-arpaio.html



What a fraud

Ex-L.A. County Sheriff Lee Baca pleads not guilty to new obstruction charges
 
refused to answer the questions from JW that a judge has ordered?
Well, she sure disobeyed a subpeona from Congress when she decided to delete thousands of work related emails (some of them containing classified information), didn't she???

Did you know that destroying evidence after it has been subpeonaed is a FELONY???

Gee, won't it be great to see Trump toss the Democrats out of the White House before the statute of limitations expires!!!
Uhm, none of your wild accusations are truthful. You must be a Trumpeteer[/QUOTE]
Wow...

Guess you missed the video of Gowdy interviewing Comey, didn't you???
 
Nobody is above the law, Sheriff Joe.

I was at one time, did some work on the roof of the Supreme Court decades ago........ :eusa_whistle:
 
Congressman >> THE QUESTION IS, DO YOU AGREE WITH THE CLAIM THAT GENERAL PETRAEUS, AND I QUOTE, GOT IN TROUBLE FOR FAR LESS, END OF QUOTE? DO YOU AGREE WITH THAT...

FBI Director Comey >> NO, IT'S THE REVERSE.


Congressman >> AND SHE KNOWINGLY CLEARLY SET UP HER OWN PRIVATE SERVER IN ORDER TO -- LET ME ASK YOU THAT. WAS THE REASON SHE SET UP HER OWN PRIVER SERVER IN YOUR JUDGMENT BECAUSE SHE WANTED TO SHIELD COMMUNICATIONS FROM CONGRESS AND THE PUBLIC?

Comey >> I CAN'T SAY THAT. OUR BEST INFORMATION IS THAT SHE SET IT UP AS A MATTER OF CONVENIENCE. IT WAS AN EXISTING SYSTEM HER HUSBAND HAD AND SHE DECIDED TO HAVE A DOMAIN ON THAT SYSTEM.


Then we have Sheriff Joe lying to the court in an effort to cover up misconduct, and willfully flouting court orders
 
I should add here that we found no evidence that any of the additional work-related e-mails were intentionally deleted in an effort to conceal them. Our assessment is that, like many e-mail users, Secretary Clinton periodically deleted e-mails or e-mails were purged from the system when devices were changed. Because she was not using a government account—or even a commercial account like Gmail—there was no archiving at all of her e-mails, so it is not surprising that we discovered e-mails that were not on Secretary Clinton’s system in 2014, when she produced the 30,000 e-mails to the State Department.

It could also be that some of the additional work-related e-mails we recovered were among those deleted as “personal” by Secretary Clinton’s lawyers when they reviewed and sorted her e-mails for production in 2014.

The lawyers doing the sorting for Secretary Clinton in 2014 did not individually read the content of all of her e-mails, as we did for those available to us; instead, they relied on header information and used search terms to try to find all work-related e-mails among the reportedly more than 60,000 total e-mails remaining on Secretary Clinton’s personal system in 2014. It is highly likely their search terms missed some work-related e-mails, and that we later found them, for example, in the mailboxes of other officials or in the slack space of a server.

It is also likely that there are other work-related e-mails that they did not produce to State and that we did not find elsewhere, and that are now gone because they deleted all e-mails they did not return to State, and the lawyers cleaned their devices in such a way as to preclude complete forensic recovery.

We have conducted interviews and done technical examination to attempt to understand how that sorting was done by her attorneys. Although we do not have complete visibility because we are not able to fully reconstruct the electronic record of that sorting, we believe our investigation has been sufficient to give us reasonable confidence there was no intentional misconduct in connection with that sorting effort.


and then there is Sheriff Joe lying to the court in an effort to cover up misconduct, and willfully flouting court orders
 
Wasn't Sheriff Joe one of those like Trump who spent months investigating Obama's presidential legitimacy to only come up with nothing? Yeah, reelect this fucking guy.
 
Wasn't Sheriff Joe one of those like Trump who spent months investigating Obama's presidential legitimacy to only come up with nothing? Yeah, reelect this fucking guy.
Shit, the country is full of crazy elected officials. Why break the pattern now? :dunno:
 
i just read the stephan lemons hit piece. this hack writer has been at it for awhile. this is an extension of obama's war on cops that enforce the laws. we are still unclear from this whether or not crossing the border from mexico is illegal, the libs want it to be fine. but it's not fine. sheriff joe is doing his job.
It's not about whether a border crossing was illegal, but disobeying a judge's order. What if Hillary refused to answer the questions from JW that a judge has ordered?
Well, she sure disobeyed a subpeona from Congress when she decided to delete thousands of work related emails (some of them containing classified information), didn't she???

Did you know that destroying evidence after it has been subpeonaed is a FELONY???

Gee, won't it be great to see Trump toss the Democrats out of the White House before the statute of limitations expires!!!
How's those indictments coming?
 

Forum List

Back
Top