Not a single Trumper here has read a word of the Mueller report.

[deanrd]

Waiting for the movie ...

Trump said he talked to Vlad and told him the Russian Hoax was over. Today.

 

[miketx]

Waiting for the movie ...

Trump said he talked to Vlad and told him the Russian Hoax was over. Today.

Why didn't opecker smoker and Lynch act, they were in charge?

 

[fncceo]

Waiting for the movie ...

Trump said he talked to Vlad and told him the Russian Hoax was over. Today.

You should probably stick to the more traditional Russian Conspiracies ...

 

[toobfreak]

Not a single Trumper here has read a word of the Mueller report

Got it right here, Cheeseball, I guess you just get to different conclusions when you actually know what words mean!

 

[Aponi]

Its painfully obvious from all the stupid shit they say .

Hey, no one is asking to read the whole 400 page thing. How about the 18 page summary from the man himself . Perhaps you can have some elementary students read it to you !

Really . Fed up . Who’s read the thing ?

https://www.snopes.com/uploads/2019/05/Mueller-Summaries.pdf

You need to stop suck8ng your pwn pecker and sober up tim

 

[BluesLegend]

Not a single Trumper here has read a word of the Mueller report.

Barr briefed us, Trump is in the clear and Dem's heads exploded. Good times

 

[basquebromance]

i read it in print 6 times and as an audiobook 17 times. that doesnt mean others have read it though. i'm an out of work oppo researcher!

 

[jc456]

The conclusion :

Because we determined not to make a traditional prosecutorial judgment , we did not draw ultimate conclusions about the President's conduct. The evidence we obtained about the President's actions and intent presents difficult issues that would need to be resolved if we were making a traditional prosecutorial judgment. At the same time, if we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President clearly did not commit obstruction of justice, we would so state. Based on the facts and the applicable legal standards, we are unable to reach that judgment. Accordingly, while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.

Which shows that it was a witch hunt that became a failed witch hunt.


A real investigation would not have felt any need to spout shit like that.

Witch hunt ?? How many in Trumps circle got busted ? Oh and they were busy covering their tracks

Mueller :
Further, the Office learned that some of the individuals we interviewed or whose conduct we investigated-including some associated with the Trump Campaign---deleted relevant communications or communicated during the relevant period using applications that feature encryption or that do not provide for long-term retention of data or communications records. In such cases, the Office was not able to corroborate witness statements through comparison to contemporaneous communications or fully question witnesses about statements that appeared inconsistent with other known facts.
Accordingly, while this report embodies factual and legal determinations that the Office believes to be accurate and complete to the greatest extent possible, given these identified gaps, the Office cannot rule out the possibility that the unavailable information would shed additional light on (or cast in a new light) the events described in the report.

What was the purpose of the investigation? Anyone collude?

 

[Uncensored2008]

It doesn't matter, they will follow this guy off a cliff. Anyone who is still a proud Trump supporter only cares about two things: Worshiping the king of the republicans and liberal tears.

Liberal tears are just a bonus.

You're all idiots.

{I begin with the SCO's stated conclusion on the obstruction question: The SCO
concluded that the evidence prevent[ed] [it] from conclusively determining that no criminal
conduct occurred." 300 Report v.2. p2. But conclusively determining that no criminal
conduct occurred was not the SCO's assigned task. because making conclusive determinations
of innocence is never the task of the federal prosecutor.

What prosecutors are supposed to do is complete an investigation and then either ask the
grand jury to return an indictment or decline to charge the case. When prosecutors decline to
charge. they make that decision not because they have conclusively determin[ed] that no
criminal conduct occurred, but rather because they do not believe that the investigated conduct
constitutes a crime for which all the elements can be proven to the satisfaction of a jury beyond a
reasonable doubt. Prosecutors simply are not in the business of establishing innocence. any more
than they are in the business of "exonerating" investigated persons. In the American justice
system, innocence is presumed; there is never any need for prosecutors to "conclusively
determine" it. Nor is there any place for such a determination. Our country would be a very
different (and very dangerous) place if prosecutors applied the SCO standard and citizens were
obliged to prove conclusively . . . that no criminal conduct occurred.}

 

[Hale]

The conclusion :

Because we determined not to make a traditional prosecutorial judgment , we did not draw ultimate conclusions about the President's conduct. The evidence we obtained about the President's actions and intent presents difficult issues that would need to be resolved if we were making a traditional prosecutorial judgment. At the same time, if we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President clearly did not commit obstruction of justice, we would so state. Based on the facts and the applicable legal standards, we are unable to reach that judgment. Accordingly, while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.

You may have read the report, but you obviously don't understand it. Mueller doesn't have the power to "exonerate" Trump any more than he has the power to bestow a knighthood upon him. This is merely cheerleading for rabid Dems and a sad attempt at buttcovering.

 

[Olde Europe]

None of our Trumpletons so much as claimed (s)he read the report, as far as I have seen. None demonstrated an understanding of the report that would indicate (s)he read at least a big chunk of it.

That's an unexpected instance of honesty.

Then, you'd also expect to find some humility in their pronouncements as to the reports content.

But no, they're doing the mother of irony AND chutzpah in one fell swoop, advising those who read the report as to their defective understanding of the report they haven't read. Based, as far as I can tell, on the hordes of Trump shills telling them what to rebleat over and over and over again.

Most notorious, upon Trump claiming "complete exoneration", AND vigorously agreeing with the Dear Leader, they endlessly rebleat it isn't within Mueller's purview to exonerate.

(Gotta find whatever funny there is in that sordid spectacle.)

 

[Timmy]

The conclusion :

Because we determined not to make a traditional prosecutorial judgment , we did not draw ultimate conclusions about the President's conduct. The evidence we obtained about the President's actions and intent presents difficult issues that would need to be resolved if we were making a traditional prosecutorial judgment. At the same time, if we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President clearly did not commit obstruction of justice, we would so state. Based on the facts and the applicable legal standards, we are unable to reach that judgment. Accordingly, while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.

Which shows that it was a witch hunt that became a failed witch hunt.


A real investigation would not have felt any need to spout shit like that.

Witch hunt ?? How many in Trumps circle got busted ? Oh and they were busy covering their tracks

Mueller :
Further, the Office learned that some of the individuals we interviewed or whose conduct we investigated-including some associated with the Trump Campaign---deleted relevant communications or communicated during the relevant period using applications that feature encryption or that do not provide for long-term retention of data or communications records. In such cases, the Office was not able to corroborate witness statements through comparison to contemporaneous communications or fully question witnesses about statements that appeared inconsistent with other known facts.
Accordingly, while this report embodies factual and legal determinations that the Office believes to be accurate and complete to the greatest extent possible, given these identified gaps, the Office cannot rule out the possibility that the unavailable information would shed additional light on (or cast in a new light) the events described in the report.

What was the purpose of the investigation? Anyone collude?

Yes . There was a lot of collusion. Russia purposely messed with out election in order to favor Trump .

 

[jc456]

The conclusion :

Because we determined not to make a traditional prosecutorial judgment , we did not draw ultimate conclusions about the President's conduct. The evidence we obtained about the President's actions and intent presents difficult issues that would need to be resolved if we were making a traditional prosecutorial judgment. At the same time, if we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President clearly did not commit obstruction of justice, we would so state. Based on the facts and the applicable legal standards, we are unable to reach that judgment. Accordingly, while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.

Which shows that it was a witch hunt that became a failed witch hunt.


A real investigation would not have felt any need to spout shit like that.

Witch hunt ?? How many in Trumps circle got busted ? Oh and they were busy covering their tracks

Mueller :
Further, the Office learned that some of the individuals we interviewed or whose conduct we investigated-including some associated with the Trump Campaign---deleted relevant communications or communicated during the relevant period using applications that feature encryption or that do not provide for long-term retention of data or communications records. In such cases, the Office was not able to corroborate witness statements through comparison to contemporaneous communications or fully question witnesses about statements that appeared inconsistent with other known facts.
Accordingly, while this report embodies factual and legal determinations that the Office believes to be accurate and complete to the greatest extent possible, given these identified gaps, the Office cannot rule out the possibility that the unavailable information would shed additional light on (or cast in a new light) the events described in the report.

What was the purpose of the investigation? Anyone collude?

Yes . There was a lot of collusion. Russia purposely messed with out election in order to favor Trump .

Dude, then why didn’t mueller find any? So, you tummy have what a two year investigation doesn’t. Amazing you should go to dc then and give them that evidence . I love it when stoops like you go off the rails

 

[skews13]

The conclusion :

Because we determined not to make a traditional prosecutorial judgment , we did not draw ultimate conclusions about the President's conduct. The evidence we obtained about the President's actions and intent presents difficult issues that would need to be resolved if we were making a traditional prosecutorial judgment. At the same time, if we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President clearly did not commit obstruction of justice, we would so state. Based on the facts and the applicable legal standards, we are unable to reach that judgment. Accordingly, while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.

You don't prove negatives, halfwit...Either the Mule had evidence of obstruction or he didn't.

According to his report he didn't have such evidence.

Case closed....You lose, loser.

Obviously, words are to complicated for you. Lets try pictures.

 

[jc456]

The conclusion :

Because we determined not to make a traditional prosecutorial judgment , we did not draw ultimate conclusions about the President's conduct. The evidence we obtained about the President's actions and intent presents difficult issues that would need to be resolved if we were making a traditional prosecutorial judgment. At the same time, if we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President clearly did not commit obstruction of justice, we would so state. Based on the facts and the applicable legal standards, we are unable to reach that judgment. Accordingly, while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.

You don't prove negatives, halfwit...Either the Mule had evidence of obstruction or he didn't.

According to his report he didn't have such evidence.

Case closed....You lose, loser.

Obviously, words are to complicated for you. Lets try pictures.

 

[Deplorable Yankee]

The conclusion :

Because we determined not to make a traditional prosecutorial judgment , we did not draw ultimate conclusions about the President's conduct. The evidence we obtained about the President's actions and intent presents difficult issues that would need to be resolved if we were making a traditional prosecutorial judgment. At the same time, if we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President clearly did not commit obstruction of justice, we would so state. Based on the facts and the applicable legal standards, we are unable to reach that judgment. Accordingly, while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.

I assume you have a point when re-posting this paragraph that everyone actually has read...

Not everyone . Roko said so himself .

I read it
It said hes guilty of collusion
congratulations guys
you got him
whats your next move ?

 

[Timmy]

The conclusion :

Because we determined not to make a traditional prosecutorial judgment , we did not draw ultimate conclusions about the President's conduct. The evidence we obtained about the President's actions and intent presents difficult issues that would need to be resolved if we were making a traditional prosecutorial judgment. At the same time, if we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President clearly did not commit obstruction of justice, we would so state. Based on the facts and the applicable legal standards, we are unable to reach that judgment. Accordingly, while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.

Which shows that it was a witch hunt that became a failed witch hunt.


A real investigation would not have felt any need to spout shit like that.

Witch hunt ?? How many in Trumps circle got busted ? Oh and they were busy covering their tracks

Mueller :
Further, the Office learned that some of the individuals we interviewed or whose conduct we investigated-including some associated with the Trump Campaign---deleted relevant communications or communicated during the relevant period using applications that feature encryption or that do not provide for long-term retention of data or communications records. In such cases, the Office was not able to corroborate witness statements through comparison to contemporaneous communications or fully question witnesses about statements that appeared inconsistent with other known facts.
Accordingly, while this report embodies factual and legal determinations that the Office believes to be accurate and complete to the greatest extent possible, given these identified gaps, the Office cannot rule out the possibility that the unavailable information would shed additional light on (or cast in a new light) the events described in the report.

What was the purpose of the investigation? Anyone collude?

Yes . There was a lot of collusion. Russia purposely messed with out election in order to favor Trump .

Dude, then why didn’t mueller find any? So, you tummy have what a two year investigation doesn’t. Amazing you should go to dc then and give them that evidence . I love it when stoops like you go off the rails

They didn’t find proof that TRUMP himself was colluding . Different story for many of the others on Team Trump .

 

[Anathema]

Its painfully obvious from all the stupid shit they say...

Why would I waste my time reading a political hit-piece? Especially when my view of the POTUS will not be chsnged, no matter what is in there.

 

[Correll]

Which shows that it was a witch hunt that became a failed witch hunt.


A real investigation would not have felt any need to spout shit like that.

Witch hunt ?? How many in Trumps circle got busted ? Oh and they were busy covering their tracks

Mueller :
Further, the Office learned that some of the individuals we interviewed or whose conduct we investigated-including some associated with the Trump Campaign---deleted relevant communications or communicated during the relevant period using applications that feature encryption or that do not provide for long-term retention of data or communications records. In such cases, the Office was not able to corroborate witness statements through comparison to contemporaneous communications or fully question witnesses about statements that appeared inconsistent with other known facts.
Accordingly, while this report embodies factual and legal determinations that the Office believes to be accurate and complete to the greatest extent possible, given these identified gaps, the Office cannot rule out the possibility that the unavailable information would shed additional light on (or cast in a new light) the events described in the report.

What was the purpose of the investigation? Anyone collude?

Yes . There was a lot of collusion. Russia purposely messed with out election in order to favor Trump .

Dude, then why didn’t mueller find any? So, you tummy have what a two year investigation doesn’t. Amazing you should go to dc then and give them that evidence . I love it when stoops like you go off the rails

They didn’t find proof that TRUMP himself was colluding . Different story for many of the others on Team Trump .

 

[mikegriffith1]

Its painfully obvious from all the stupid shit they say .

Hey, no one is asking to read the whole 400 page thing. How about the 18 page summary from the man himself . Perhaps you can have some elementary students read it to you !

Really . Fed up . Who’s read the thing ?

https://www.snopes.com/uploads/2019/05/Mueller-Summaries.pdf

Uh-huh. Well, actually, there are two executive summaries, one for volume 1 and another for volume 2. I've read both executive summaries. Mueller could find no evidence that Trump or any of his campaign aides colluded with Russia. That's the bottom line. It's right there in black and white.