Noticed something.

[Tijn Von Ingersleben]

The Omnibus Bill was signed yesterday and a couple of figures just popped out at me.
Israel Aid $3.1B
The Wall $1.6B
The US...Israel's bottom bitch.

As you were.

Fun Facts re how American 'Aid' works, and not just for Israel, but everybody else on the planet.

Of the military financial aid Israel receives, it is obligated to spend all but 26.3% of it in the US, something that is not expected to change under the new framework.

Reported details emerge on aid package to Israel from Obama administration

They also provide intelligence and police and defense services worth a lot more than $3.1 Billion for us in the region as well, including storage depots, maintenance capabilities for our aircraft, AWACs type early warning services over the entire region. It's a very good deal for us.

Also note the current Bill is some $700 million less than the original, under Obama.

For the record I am against Western nations also giving all this aid to other nations, for example I see no reason why Western nations are giving aid to India, China etc

For one, we get to find out how well our equipment works in the field, without suffering any losses of our own. Iron Dome tech comes to mind here, re Syria, Hexbollah, etc. I can go on, but then it's just about good old fashioned antisemitism for Euros, so no need to waste time on facts.

Nothing Anti-Semitic about any of this.

And heeeeeere we go. If you are not for giving another sovereign nation billions in 'aid' then you are an anti-semite.

 

[Lucy Hamilton]

The Omnibus Bill was signed yesterday and a couple of figures just popped out at me.
Israel Aid $3.1B
The Wall $1.6B
The US...Israel's bottom bitch.

As you were.

As long as the US quits donating to fund Palestinian terrorists, ok.

"AIPAC applauds Congress for including key provisions to help Israel address critical security challenges in the Fiscal Year 2018 Omnibus Appropriations bill. The bill provides $3.1 billion in overall security assistance to Israel. The bill also includes the Taylor Force Act—bipartisan legislation that would eliminate funding that directly benefits the Palestinian Authority (PA) if it continues its abhorrent practice of paying salaries to terrorists or their families."
https://www.aipac.org/learn/resources/aipac-publications/publication?pubpath=PolicyPolitics/Press/AIPAC Statements/2018/04/Omnibus
Your dreams have come true Marion...the Palestinian Authority no longer receives the Benjamins.
Are you all behind cutting Israeli aid now?

You're complaining about Islamo-vermin terrorists getting defunded?

All the weird sniveling about imaginary freebies to Israel is always hilarious.

If you had a modicum of reading comprehension you would see that I was answering a poster's (Marion) question. I have personally initiated no statement regarding the Palestinians. The Palestinians are Israel's problem, not the United State's.

For picaro, here is the question of Marion's that you were responding to, the link to the post.

Post # 38

Noticed something.

 

[Picaro]

The Omnibus Bill was signed yesterday and a couple of figures just popped out at me.
Israel Aid $3.1B
The Wall $1.6B
The US...Israel's bottom bitch.

As you were.

Fun Facts re how American 'Aid' works, and not just for Israel, but everybody else on the planet.

Of the military financial aid Israel receives, it is obligated to spend all but 26.3% of it in the US, something that is not expected to change under the new framework.

Reported details emerge on aid package to Israel from Obama administration

They also provide intelligence and police and defense services worth a lot more than $3.1 Billion for us in the region as well, including storage depots, maintenance capabilities for our aircraft, AWACs type early warning services over the entire region. It's a very good deal for us.

Also note the current Bill is some $700 million less than the original, under Obama.

For the record I am against Western nations also giving all this aid to other nations, for example I see no reason why Western nations are giving aid to India, China etc

For one, we get to find out how well our equipment works in the field, without suffering any losses of our own. Iron Dome tech comes to mind here, re Syria, Hexbollah, etc. I can go on, but then it's just about good old fashioned antisemitism for Euros, so no need to waste time on facts.

Nothing Anti-Semitic about any of this.

Of course it is. As for isolationism, it never worked in our entire history, and it won't work now, either. That is just a fact of life on planet Earth. Nobody ever leaves anybody else alone, never have and never will.

 

[Lucy Hamilton]

The Omnibus Bill was signed yesterday and a couple of figures just popped out at me.
Israel Aid $3.1B
The Wall $1.6B
The US...Israel's bottom bitch.

As you were.

Fun Facts re how American 'Aid' works, and not just for Israel, but everybody else on the planet.

Of the military financial aid Israel receives, it is obligated to spend all but 26.3% of it in the US, something that is not expected to change under the new framework.

Reported details emerge on aid package to Israel from Obama administration

They also provide intelligence and police and defense services worth a lot more than $3.1 Billion for us in the region as well, including storage depots, maintenance capabilities for our aircraft, AWACs type early warning services over the entire region. It's a very good deal for us.

Also note the current Bill is some $700 million less than the original, under Obama.

For the record I am against Western nations also giving all this aid to other nations, for example I see no reason why Western nations are giving aid to India, China etc

For one, we get to find out how well our equipment works in the field, without suffering any losses of our own. Iron Dome tech comes to mind here, re Syria, Hexbollah, etc. I can go on, but then it's just about good old fashioned antisemitism for Euros, so no need to waste time on facts.

Nothing Anti-Semitic about any of this.

And heeeeeere we go. If you are not for giving another sovereign nation billions in 'aid' then you are an anti-semite.

The entire slur of being an Anti-Semite is getting a bit old now, it's as bad as when someone doesn't agree with a SJW they call everyone a racist bigot or whatever, these slurs have now been so overused they are being rendered basically meaningless.

 

[Picaro]

The Omnibus Bill was signed yesterday and a couple of figures just popped out at me.
Israel Aid $3.1B
The Wall $1.6B
The US...Israel's bottom bitch.

As you were.

Fun Facts re how American 'Aid' works, and not just for Israel, but everybody else on the planet.

Of the military financial aid Israel receives, it is obligated to spend all but 26.3% of it in the US, something that is not expected to change under the new framework.

Reported details emerge on aid package to Israel from Obama administration

They also provide intelligence and police and defense services worth a lot more than $3.1 Billion for us in the region as well, including storage depots, maintenance capabilities for our aircraft, AWACs type early warning services over the entire region. It's a very good deal for us.

Also note the current Bill is some $700 million less than the original, under Obama.

For the record I am against Western nations also giving all this aid to other nations, for example I see no reason why Western nations are giving aid to India, China etc

For one, we get to find out how well our equipment works in the field, without suffering any losses of our own. Iron Dome tech comes to mind here, re Syria, Hexbollah, etc. I can go on, but then it's just about good old fashioned antisemitism for Euros, so no need to waste time on facts.

Nothing Anti-Semitic about any of this.

And heeeeeere we go. If you are not for giving another sovereign nation billions in 'aid' then you are an anti-semite.

Obviously you're upset about your lack of any pretense otherwise being pointed out. there is no reason to be sniveling about it, and the arguments being made are just stupid, as if your pet Islamo-thugs will suddenly leave everybody alone if w only let them genocide Da Joos. or something. lol ridiculous.

 

[Tijn Von Ingersleben]

The Omnibus Bill was signed yesterday and a couple of figures just popped out at me.
Israel Aid $3.1B
The Wall $1.6B
The US...Israel's bottom bitch.

As you were.

Fun Facts re how American 'Aid' works, and not just for Israel, but everybody else on the planet.

Of the military financial aid Israel receives, it is obligated to spend all but 26.3% of it in the US, something that is not expected to change under the new framework.

Reported details emerge on aid package to Israel from Obama administration

They also provide intelligence and police and defense services worth a lot more than $3.1 Billion for us in the region as well, including storage depots, maintenance capabilities for our aircraft, AWACs type early warning services over the entire region. It's a very good deal for us.

Also note the current Bill is some $700 million less than the original, under Obama.

For the record I am against Western nations also giving all this aid to other nations, for example I see no reason why Western nations are giving aid to India, China etc

For one, we get to find out how well our equipment works in the field, without suffering any losses of our own. Iron Dome tech comes to mind here, re Syria, Hexbollah, etc. I can go on, but then it's just about good old fashioned antisemitism for Euros, so no need to waste time on facts.

Nothing Anti-Semitic about any of this.

Of course it is. As for isolationism, it never worked in our entire history, and it won't work now, either. That is just a fact of life on planet Earth. Nobody ever leaves anybody else alone, never have and never will.

We were never isolationalist...the DPRK is isolationalist. We were non-interventionalist....distinct difference.

 

[Lucy Hamilton]

The Omnibus Bill was signed yesterday and a couple of figures just popped out at me.
Israel Aid $3.1B
The Wall $1.6B
The US...Israel's bottom bitch.

As you were.

Fun Facts re how American 'Aid' works, and not just for Israel, but everybody else on the planet.

Of the military financial aid Israel receives, it is obligated to spend all but 26.3% of it in the US, something that is not expected to change under the new framework.

Reported details emerge on aid package to Israel from Obama administration

They also provide intelligence and police and defense services worth a lot more than $3.1 Billion for us in the region as well, including storage depots, maintenance capabilities for our aircraft, AWACs type early warning services over the entire region. It's a very good deal for us.

Also note the current Bill is some $700 million less than the original, under Obama.

For the record I am against Western nations also giving all this aid to other nations, for example I see no reason why Western nations are giving aid to India, China etc

For one, we get to find out how well our equipment works in the field, without suffering any losses of our own. Iron Dome tech comes to mind here, re Syria, Hexbollah, etc. I can go on, but then it's just about good old fashioned antisemitism for Euros, so no need to waste time on facts.

Nothing Anti-Semitic about any of this.

Of course it is. As for isolationism, it never worked in our entire history, and it won't work now, either. That is just a fact of life on planet Earth. Nobody ever leaves anybody else alone, never have and never will.

No nothing Anti-Semitic about any of this.

IMHO nations should only get involved in situations when the situation DIRECTLY is a threat to their own nation, if not they should keep out.

 

[Lucy Hamilton]

Fun Facts re how American 'Aid' works, and not just for Israel, but everybody else on the planet.

Reported details emerge on aid package to Israel from Obama administration

They also provide intelligence and police and defense services worth a lot more than $3.1 Billion for us in the region as well, including storage depots, maintenance capabilities for our aircraft, AWACs type early warning services over the entire region. It's a very good deal for us.

Also note the current Bill is some $700 million less than the original, under Obama.

For the record I am against Western nations also giving all this aid to other nations, for example I see no reason why Western nations are giving aid to India, China etc

For one, we get to find out how well our equipment works in the field, without suffering any losses of our own. Iron Dome tech comes to mind here, re Syria, Hexbollah, etc. I can go on, but then it's just about good old fashioned antisemitism for Euros, so no need to waste time on facts.

Nothing Anti-Semitic about any of this.

And heeeeeere we go. If you are not for giving another sovereign nation billions in 'aid' then you are an anti-semite.

Obviously you're upset about your lack of any pretense otherwise being pointed out. there is no reason to be sniveling about it, and the arguments being made are just stupid, as if your pet Islamo-thugs will suddenly leave everybody alone if w only let them genocide Da Joos. or something. lol ridiculous.

"as if your pet Islamo-thugs will suddenly leave everybody alone if w only let them genocide Da Joos. or something."

Which would not happen because Israel has a full Nuclear Programme, hundreds of Nuclear Warheads, Nuclear Submarines and a Nuclear Bomb. As I have already stated Israel can protect and defend itself.

 

[Tijn Von Ingersleben]

Obviously you're upset about your lack of any pretense otherwise being pointed out.

Please look up the definition of the word 'pretense' and then resubmit. Your comment makes no sense.

 

[Snouter]

The question is....is The Swamp, ZOG?

 

[Markle]

America is NOT fully funding all NATO nations.

I already answered your question:

You could easily abandon Israel, they can take care of themselves they have a full Nuclear Programme, they have Nuclear Submarines, they have a Nuclear Bomb, why do you need to keep being their Wet Nurse? Or do you just like being Israel's Whore?

Where did I say the US FULLY FUNDED any nations defense but our own?

No, you did not answer my question as to who would fill the vacuum if we were to abandon all our allies?

We saw in Iraq who filled the vacuum when President Barack Hussein Obama went against all military advisors when he pulled all our troops out of that country. ISIS filled the vacuum, whereupon he put our troops back in, in a sort of half-hearted manner which led to the ISIS Caliphate in Iraq.

Why do you hate a stable, democratic ally in such a volatile area of the world?

 

[my2¢]

Before the 2016 elections the Obama administration signed a deal that promised Israel $38 billion in aid over 10 years. Not sure what we got in return? I think the money goes towards their purchase of U.S. military equipment. Personally any money spent is not a pleasant story for me during tax filing season. Or when hearing about the return of a $1 trillion deficit.

 

[Lucy Hamilton]

America is NOT fully funding all NATO nations.

I already answered your question:

You could easily abandon Israel, they can take care of themselves they have a full Nuclear Programme, they have Nuclear Submarines, they have a Nuclear Bomb, why do you need to keep being their Wet Nurse? Or do you just like being Israel's Whore?

Where did I say the US FULLY FUNDED any nations defense but our own?

No, you did not answer my question as to who would fill the vacuum if we were to abandon all our allies?

We saw in Iraq who filled the vacuum when President Barack Hussein Obama went against all military advisors when he pulled all our troops out of that country. ISIS filled the vacuum, whereupon he put our troops back in, in a sort of half-hearted manner which led to the ISIS Caliphate in Iraq.

Why do you hate a stable, democratic ally in such a volatile area of the world?

"No, you did not answer my question as to who would fill the vacuum if we were to abandon all our allies?"

It's now in plural? So who is your other ally....Saudi Arabia? Did Israel put boots on the ground considering they are such a great ally, boots on the ground with American boots in Iraq and Afghanistan? That's what an ally does, fights in the trenches with you and if they have to they die in the trenches with your own troops, that's an ally.

"We saw in Iraq who filled the vacuum when President Barack Hussein Obama went against all military advisors when he pulled all our troops out of that country. ISIS filled the vacuum, whereupon he put our troops back in, in a sort of half-hearted manner which led to the ISIS Caliphate in Iraq."

We completely agree about this, IMHO there was no need to invade Iraq to begin with, the reasoning used was on the back of September 11 when Iraq and Saddam had nothing to do with that happening, personally Saudi Arabia should have been invaded the oil fields secured and The House of Saud reduced to glass.

"Why do you hate a stable, democratic ally in such a volatile area of the world?"

Who mentioned hate? Bizarro thinking you have, saying that Israel should use it's own money and stop being a Welfare Queen = hate.

 

[Markle]

The entire slur of being an Anti-Semite is getting a bit old now, it's as bad as when someone doesn't agree with a SJW they call everyone a racist bigot or whatever, these slurs have now been so overused they are being rendered basically meaningless.

Singling out one, Jewish State, out of the hundreds of nations we protect with our money, troops and influence. How is that NOT anti-semitism?

 

[Lucy Hamilton]

America is NOT fully funding all NATO nations.

I already answered your question:

You could easily abandon Israel, they can take care of themselves they have a full Nuclear Programme, they have Nuclear Submarines, they have a Nuclear Bomb, why do you need to keep being their Wet Nurse? Or do you just like being Israel's Whore?

Where did I say the US FULLY FUNDED any nations defense but our own?

No, you did not answer my question as to who would fill the vacuum if we were to abandon all our allies?

We saw in Iraq who filled the vacuum when President Barack Hussein Obama went against all military advisors when he pulled all our troops out of that country. ISIS filled the vacuum, whereupon he put our troops back in, in a sort of half-hearted manner which led to the ISIS Caliphate in Iraq.

Why do you hate a stable, democratic ally in such a volatile area of the world?

Sorry if you are behaving like a Troll then I see no reason why anyone should respond to you anymore. The Funny is what Trolls do:

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Israel can kill a shitload of Palestinian and Hamas shitheads with that $3.1 billion.

I love it when my tax money goes to a good cause.

Yes but Israel is not an American State, you need that 3.1 billion for that wall to keep out Mexican bandits which is more important as that affects you DIRECTLY not what happens in some Shit Hole in the Middle East.

Waste of your tax money, Israel should be told to fund themselves or better still the WJC has enough money they shakedown more than 3 billion a year, they could give it to Israel.

Better Israel than the illegals
Starve the fuckers out.

 

[Lucy Hamilton]

The entire slur of being an Anti-Semite is getting a bit old now, it's as bad as when someone doesn't agree with a SJW they call everyone a racist bigot or whatever, these slurs have now been so overused they are being rendered basically meaningless.

Singling out one, Jewish State, out of the hundreds of nations we protect with our money, troops and influence. How is that NOT anti-semitism?

Go away Troll Boi and stick the Anti-Semitism shit back up your buttocks where you pulled it from, that thing does not work on me go and pull it on someone who cares.

 

[Lucy Hamilton]

Israel can kill a shitload of Palestinian and Hamas shitheads with that $3.1 billion.

I love it when my tax money goes to a good cause.

Yes but Israel is not an American State, you need that 3.1 billion for that wall to keep out Mexican bandits which is more important as that affects you DIRECTLY not what happens in some Shit Hole in the Middle East.

Waste of your tax money, Israel should be told to fund themselves or better still the WJC has enough money they shakedown more than 3 billion a year, they could give it to Israel.

Better Israel than the illegals
Starve the fuckers out.

But you should have that 3.1 BILLION to go towards The Wall to keep the Mexican illegals out.

 

[Lucy Hamilton]

The entire slur of being an Anti-Semite is getting a bit old now, it's as bad as when someone doesn't agree with a SJW they call everyone a racist bigot or whatever, these slurs have now been so overused they are being rendered basically meaningless.

Singling out one, Jewish State, out of the hundreds of nations we protect with our money, troops and influence. How is that NOT anti-semitism?

Troll Boi's have reading comprehension problems we know, note in my below post India and China, so as I said stick that Anti-Semitism crap back up your buttocks where you pulled it from and go and pull it on someone who cares.

Post # 74

Noticed something.

 

[Markle]

We completely agree about this, IMHO there was no need to invade Iraq to begin with, the reasoning used was on the back of September 11 when Iraq and Saddam had nothing to do with that happening, personally Saudi Arabia should have been invaded the oil fields secured and The House of Saud reduced to glass.

We did invade Iraq with the support of all Congress. It was the right thing to do at the time.

"The community of nations may see more and more of the very kind of threat Iraq poses now: a rogue state with weapons of mass destruction, ready to use them or provide them to terrorists. If we fail to respond today, Saddam and all those who would follow in his footsteps will be emboldened tomorrow."
- President Clinton in 1998 “

[…], when I say to Saddam Hussein, "You cannot defy the will of the world", and when I say to him, "You have used weapons of mass destruction before; we are determined to deny you the capacity to use them again.”
- President Clinton , Jan. 27, 1998 – State of the Union

"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line."
- President Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998 .

"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."
- President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998.

“Earlier today, I ordered America’s armed forces to strike military and security targets in Iraq. They are joined by British forces. Their mission is to attack Iraqis nuclear, chemical and biological weapons programs and its military capacity to threaten its neighbors.”

“Their purpose is to protect the national interest of the United States, and indeed the interests of people throughout the Middle East and around the world.”

“Saddam Hussein must not be allowed to threaten his neighbors or the world with nuclear arms, poison gas or biological weapons.”

- President Bill Clinton, Dec. 16, 1998


"We must stop Saddam from ever again jeopardizing the stability and security of his neighbors with weapons of mass destruction."
- Madeline Albright, Feb 1, 1998 Clinton Secretary of State

"Saddam's goal ... is to achieve the lifting of U.N. sanctions while retaining and enhancing Iraq's weapons of mass destruction programs. We cannot, we must not and we will not let him succeed."
- Madeline Albright, 1998 Clinton Secretary of State

"(Saddam) will rebuild his arsenal of weapons of mass destruction and some day, some way, I am certain he will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983."
- Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998 "

Update: September 8, 2005 - Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser was sentenced to community service and probation and fined $50,000 for illegally removing highly classified documents from the National Archives and intentionally destroying some of them..

[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs." Letter to President Clinton.
- (D) Senators Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, others, Oct. 9, 1998 .

"As a member of the House Intelligence Committee, I am keenly aware that the proliferation of chemical and biological weapons is an issue of grave importance to all nations. Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
- Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998 .

"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies."
- Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999 .


"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and the means of delivering them."
- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002

"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country."
- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002 .

"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power."
- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002.

"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction."
- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002 .

"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons but has not yet achieved nuclear capability."
- Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002.

"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force -- if necessary -- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."
- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002 .

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002.

"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction."
- Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002.

"Saddam Hussein's regime represents a grave threat to America and our allies, including our vital ally, Israel. For more than two decades, Saddam Hussein has sought weapons of mass destruction through every available means. We know that he has chemical and biological weapons. He has already used them against his neighbors and his own people, and is trying to build more. We know that he is doing everything he can to build nuclear weapons, and we know that each day he gets closer to achieving that goal."
- John Edwards, Oct 10, 2002

"The debate over Iraq is not about politics. It is about national security. It should be clear that our national security requires Congress to send a clear message to Iraq and the world: America is united in its determination to eliminate forever the threat of Iraq's weapons of mass destruction."
- John Edwards, Oct 10, 2002

“We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction."
- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002 .

"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America’s response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction. That is why the world, through the United Nations Security Council, has spoken with one voice, demanding that Iraq disclose its weapons programs and disarm. So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real, but it is not new. It has been with us since the end of the Persian Gulf War."
- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003" (Currently President Barack Hussein Obama’s Secretary of State)

I am absolutely convinced that there are weapons...I saw evidence back in 1998 when we would see the inspectors being barred from gaining entry into a warehouse for three hours with trucks rolling up and then moving those trucks out."
- Clinton's Secretary of Defense William Cohen in April of 2003


"Saddam is gone and good riddance," former President Bill Clinton said yesterday, but he urged President Bush to resist trying to get even with nations that opposed the war.


"There are German and French soldiers in Afghanistan today. Does the President want them to come home?" Clinton said at a Manhattan forum on corporate integrity.


Democrats on Iraq + WMD's (Weapons of Mass Destruction)





He [President Clinton] praised Bush and Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld for their handling of the war, but said Bush should have waited longer before attacking for the "chance that either [Saddam Hussein] would have disarmed or . . . we would have had far more members of the Security Council with us."


Clinton also said Bush should not be faulted if banned weapons of mass destruction aren't found.


"I don't think you can criticize the President for trying to act on the belief that they have a substantial amount of chemical and biological stock. . . . That is what I was always told," Clinton said.

- Former President Clinton Wednesday, April 16, 2003

"Could Be One of the Great Achievements of This Administration" The vice president said he’d been to Iraq 17 times and visits the country every three months or so. "I know every one of the major players in all the segments of that society" he said. "It's impressed me. I've been impressed how they have been deciding to use the political process rather than guns to settle their differences."

- Vice President Joe Biden (D) Feb. 10, 2010

How has the war President Barack Hussein Obama said we SHOULD have been fighting going? How is the Middle East going now that President Obama is President? Oh, Afghanistan just crossed 2,330 American fatalities. Seventy percent of whom died since President Obama took office.



And then the Obama administration wanted to TAKE CREDIT for the Iraq war…whew….