Noticed something.

[Markle]

The entire slur of being an Anti-Semite is getting a bit old now, it's as bad as when someone doesn't agree with a SJW they call everyone a racist bigot or whatever, these slurs have now been so overused they are being rendered basically meaningless.

Singling out one, Jewish State, out of the hundreds of nations we protect with our money, troops and influence. How is that NOT anti-semitism?

Go away Troll Boi and stick the Anti-Semitism shit back up your buttocks where you pulled it from, that thing does not work on me go and pull it on someone who cares.

 

[Snouter]

The fact the zionists demand direct money from US taxpayers is pretty insulting. They get so much cash in a variety of ways.

 

[Lucy Hamilton]

We completely agree about this, IMHO there was no need to invade Iraq to begin with, the reasoning used was on the back of September 11 when Iraq and Saddam had nothing to do with that happening, personally Saudi Arabia should have been invaded the oil fields secured and The House of Saud reduced to glass.

We did invade Iraq with the support of all Congress. It was the right thing to do at the time.

"The community of nations may see more and more of the very kind of threat Iraq poses now: a rogue state with weapons of mass destruction, ready to use them or provide them to terrorists. If we fail to respond today, Saddam and all those who would follow in his footsteps will be emboldened tomorrow."
- President Clinton in 1998 “

[…], when I say to Saddam Hussein, "You cannot defy the will of the world", and when I say to him, "You have used weapons of mass destruction before; we are determined to deny you the capacity to use them again.”
- President Clinton , Jan. 27, 1998 – State of the Union

"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line."
- President Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998 .

"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."
- President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998.

“Earlier today, I ordered America’s armed forces to strike military and security targets in Iraq. They are joined by British forces. Their mission is to attack Iraqis nuclear, chemical and biological weapons programs and its military capacity to threaten its neighbors.”

“Their purpose is to protect the national interest of the United States, and indeed the interests of people throughout the Middle East and around the world.”

“Saddam Hussein must not be allowed to threaten his neighbors or the world with nuclear arms, poison gas or biological weapons.”

- President Bill Clinton, Dec. 16, 1998


"We must stop Saddam from ever again jeopardizing the stability and security of his neighbors with weapons of mass destruction."
- Madeline Albright, Feb 1, 1998 Clinton Secretary of State

"Saddam's goal ... is to achieve the lifting of U.N. sanctions while retaining and enhancing Iraq's weapons of mass destruction programs. We cannot, we must not and we will not let him succeed."
- Madeline Albright, 1998 Clinton Secretary of State

"(Saddam) will rebuild his arsenal of weapons of mass destruction and some day, some way, I am certain he will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983."
- Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998 "

Update: September 8, 2005 - Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser was sentenced to community service and probation and fined $50,000 for illegally removing highly classified documents from the National Archives and intentionally destroying some of them..

[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs." Letter to President Clinton.
- (D) Senators Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, others, Oct. 9, 1998 .

"As a member of the House Intelligence Committee, I am keenly aware that the proliferation of chemical and biological weapons is an issue of grave importance to all nations. Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
- Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998 .

"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies."
- Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999 .


"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and the means of delivering them."
- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002

"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country."
- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002 .

"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power."
- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002.

"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction."
- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002 .

"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons but has not yet achieved nuclear capability."
- Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002.

"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force -- if necessary -- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."
- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002 .

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002.

"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction."
- Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002.

"Saddam Hussein's regime represents a grave threat to America and our allies, including our vital ally, Israel. For more than two decades, Saddam Hussein has sought weapons of mass destruction through every available means. We know that he has chemical and biological weapons. He has already used them against his neighbors and his own people, and is trying to build more. We know that he is doing everything he can to build nuclear weapons, and we know that each day he gets closer to achieving that goal."
- John Edwards, Oct 10, 2002

"The debate over Iraq is not about politics. It is about national security. It should be clear that our national security requires Congress to send a clear message to Iraq and the world: America is united in its determination to eliminate forever the threat of Iraq's weapons of mass destruction."
- John Edwards, Oct 10, 2002

“We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction."
- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002 .

"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America’s response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction. That is why the world, through the United Nations Security Council, has spoken with one voice, demanding that Iraq disclose its weapons programs and disarm. So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real, but it is not new. It has been with us since the end of the Persian Gulf War."
- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003" (Currently President Barack Hussein Obama’s Secretary of State)

I am absolutely convinced that there are weapons...I saw evidence back in 1998 when we would see the inspectors being barred from gaining entry into a warehouse for three hours with trucks rolling up and then moving those trucks out."
- Clinton's Secretary of Defense William Cohen in April of 2003


"Saddam is gone and good riddance," former President Bill Clinton said yesterday, but he urged President Bush to resist trying to get even with nations that opposed the war.


"There are German and French soldiers in Afghanistan today. Does the President want them to come home?" Clinton said at a Manhattan forum on corporate integrity.


Democrats on Iraq + WMD's (Weapons of Mass Destruction)





He [President Clinton] praised Bush and Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld for their handling of the war, but said Bush should have waited longer before attacking for the "chance that either [Saddam Hussein] would have disarmed or . . . we would have had far more members of the Security Council with us."


Clinton also said Bush should not be faulted if banned weapons of mass destruction aren't found.


"I don't think you can criticize the President for trying to act on the belief that they have a substantial amount of chemical and biological stock. . . . That is what I was always told," Clinton said.

- Former President Clinton Wednesday, April 16, 2003

"Could Be One of the Great Achievements of This Administration" The vice president said he’d been to Iraq 17 times and visits the country every three months or so. "I know every one of the major players in all the segments of that society" he said. "It's impressed me. I've been impressed how they have been deciding to use the political process rather than guns to settle their differences."

- Vice President Joe Biden (D) Feb. 10, 2010

How has the war President Barack Hussein Obama said we SHOULD have been fighting going? How is the Middle East going now that President Obama is President? Oh, Afghanistan just crossed 2,330 American fatalities. Seventy percent of whom died since President Obama took office.



And then the Obama administration wanted to TAKE CREDIT for the Iraq war…whew….

Why have you got all the quotes from Leftists that you are posting at me, considering I'm not a Leftist, bizarro you post that.

 

[Lucy Hamilton]

The entire slur of being an Anti-Semite is getting a bit old now, it's as bad as when someone doesn't agree with a SJW they call everyone a racist bigot or whatever, these slurs have now been so overused they are being rendered basically meaningless.

Singling out one, Jewish State, out of the hundreds of nations we protect with our money, troops and influence. How is that NOT anti-semitism?

Go away Troll Boi and stick the Anti-Semitism shit back up your buttocks where you pulled it from, that thing does not work on me go and pull it on someone who cares.

You slandered me Troll Boi with the usual slander of Anti-Semite, so as Socrates said when the debate is over slander becomes the tool of the loser, YOU being the loser YOU being the one who slandered me with that tired old slur that is being rendered meaningless and what should tell you it is now all but meaningless is that people like me don't give a crap anymore that you use it, you have nothing else. Tragic.

If you call us White Supremacist/Racist/Nazi/Bigot/Fascist/Anti-Semitic we don't give a crap, they are just words and terms and they have been all so over used they all are becoming meaningless.

 

[flacaltenn]

Israel can kill a shitload of Palestinian and Hamas shitheads with that $3.1 billion.

I love it when my tax money goes to a good cause.

Yes but Israel is not an American State, you need that 3.1 billion for that wall to keep out Mexican bandits which is more important as that affects you DIRECTLY not what happens in some Shit Hole in the Middle East.

Waste of your tax money, Israel should be told to fund themselves or better still the WJC has enough money they shakedown more than 3 billion a year, they could give it to Israel.

That's not the ONLY 3.1Bill that didn't NEED to be spent. There's probably 100 other items in the budget that could fund the stupid wall. Only hot heads would make the connection to Israel. For instance, I KNOW there's MORE BILLIONS in there for infrastructure to Arab shitholes yet the OP doesn't seem to care. And most of that money will be pocketed by petty dictators and ruling elite.

 

[Lucy Hamilton]

Israel can kill a shitload of Palestinian and Hamas shitheads with that $3.1 billion.

I love it when my tax money goes to a good cause.

Yes but Israel is not an American State, you need that 3.1 billion for that wall to keep out Mexican bandits which is more important as that affects you DIRECTLY not what happens in some Shit Hole in the Middle East.

Waste of your tax money, Israel should be told to fund themselves or better still the WJC has enough money they shakedown more than 3 billion a year, they could give it to Israel.

That's not the ONLY 3.1Bill that didn't NEED to be spent. There's probably 100 other items in the budget that could fund the stupid wall. Only hot heads would make the connection to Israel. For instance, I KNOW there's MORE BILLIONS in there for infrastructure to Arab shitholes yet the OP doesn't seem to care. And most of that money will be pocketed by petty dictators and ruling elite.

Well I was commenting specifically on what the OP says, it only mentions 1 billion for the Wall and 3.1 billion for Israel there is no mention of anything else, so how can we be expected to comment on things if they are not included already in the OP or subsequent posts?

My post # 74 is quite specific where I comment I am against ALL Western nations giving basically Welfare handouts to nations, I mentioned China and India as examples.

 

[Marion Morrison]

We completely agree about this, IMHO there was no need to invade Iraq to begin with, the reasoning used was on the back of September 11 when Iraq and Saddam had nothing to do with that happening, personally Saudi Arabia should have been invaded the oil fields secured and The House of Saud reduced to glass.

We did invade Iraq with the support of all Congress. It was the right thing to do at the time.

"The community of nations may see more and more of the very kind of threat Iraq poses now: a rogue state with weapons of mass destruction, ready to use them or provide them to terrorists. If we fail to respond today, Saddam and all those who would follow in his footsteps will be emboldened tomorrow."
- President Clinton in 1998 “

[…], when I say to Saddam Hussein, "You cannot defy the will of the world", and when I say to him, "You have used weapons of mass destruction before; we are determined to deny you the capacity to use them again.”
- President Clinton , Jan. 27, 1998 – State of the Union

"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line."
- President Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998 .

"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."
- President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998.

“Earlier today, I ordered America’s armed forces to strike military and security targets in Iraq. They are joined by British forces. Their mission is to attack Iraqis nuclear, chemical and biological weapons programs and its military capacity to threaten its neighbors.”

“Their purpose is to protect the national interest of the United States, and indeed the interests of people throughout the Middle East and around the world.”

“Saddam Hussein must not be allowed to threaten his neighbors or the world with nuclear arms, poison gas or biological weapons.”

- President Bill Clinton, Dec. 16, 1998


"We must stop Saddam from ever again jeopardizing the stability and security of his neighbors with weapons of mass destruction."
- Madeline Albright, Feb 1, 1998 Clinton Secretary of State

"Saddam's goal ... is to achieve the lifting of U.N. sanctions while retaining and enhancing Iraq's weapons of mass destruction programs. We cannot, we must not and we will not let him succeed."
- Madeline Albright, 1998 Clinton Secretary of State

"(Saddam) will rebuild his arsenal of weapons of mass destruction and some day, some way, I am certain he will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983."
- Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998 "

Update: September 8, 2005 - Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser was sentenced to community service and probation and fined $50,000 for illegally removing highly classified documents from the National Archives and intentionally destroying some of them..

[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs." Letter to President Clinton.
- (D) Senators Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, others, Oct. 9, 1998 .

"As a member of the House Intelligence Committee, I am keenly aware that the proliferation of chemical and biological weapons is an issue of grave importance to all nations. Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
- Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998 .

"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies."
- Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999 .


"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and the means of delivering them."
- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002

"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country."
- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002 .

"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power."
- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002.

"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction."
- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002 .

"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons but has not yet achieved nuclear capability."
- Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002.

"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force -- if necessary -- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."
- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002 .

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002.

"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction."
- Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002.

"Saddam Hussein's regime represents a grave threat to America and our allies, including our vital ally, Israel. For more than two decades, Saddam Hussein has sought weapons of mass destruction through every available means. We know that he has chemical and biological weapons. He has already used them against his neighbors and his own people, and is trying to build more. We know that he is doing everything he can to build nuclear weapons, and we know that each day he gets closer to achieving that goal."
- John Edwards, Oct 10, 2002

"The debate over Iraq is not about politics. It is about national security. It should be clear that our national security requires Congress to send a clear message to Iraq and the world: America is united in its determination to eliminate forever the threat of Iraq's weapons of mass destruction."
- John Edwards, Oct 10, 2002

“We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction."
- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002 .

"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America’s response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction. That is why the world, through the United Nations Security Council, has spoken with one voice, demanding that Iraq disclose its weapons programs and disarm. So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real, but it is not new. It has been with us since the end of the Persian Gulf War."
- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003" (Currently President Barack Hussein Obama’s Secretary of State)

I am absolutely convinced that there are weapons...I saw evidence back in 1998 when we would see the inspectors being barred from gaining entry into a warehouse for three hours with trucks rolling up and then moving those trucks out."
- Clinton's Secretary of Defense William Cohen in April of 2003


"Saddam is gone and good riddance," former President Bill Clinton said yesterday, but he urged President Bush to resist trying to get even with nations that opposed the war.


"There are German and French soldiers in Afghanistan today. Does the President want them to come home?" Clinton said at a Manhattan forum on corporate integrity.


Democrats on Iraq + WMD's (Weapons of Mass Destruction)





He [President Clinton] praised Bush and Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld for their handling of the war, but said Bush should have waited longer before attacking for the "chance that either [Saddam Hussein] would have disarmed or . . . we would have had far more members of the Security Council with us."


Clinton also said Bush should not be faulted if banned weapons of mass destruction aren't found.


"I don't think you can criticize the President for trying to act on the belief that they have a substantial amount of chemical and biological stock. . . . That is what I was always told," Clinton said.

- Former President Clinton Wednesday, April 16, 2003

"Could Be One of the Great Achievements of This Administration" The vice president said he’d been to Iraq 17 times and visits the country every three months or so. "I know every one of the major players in all the segments of that society" he said. "It's impressed me. I've been impressed how they have been deciding to use the political process rather than guns to settle their differences."

- Vice President Joe Biden (D) Feb. 10, 2010

How has the war President Barack Hussein Obama said we SHOULD have been fighting going? How is the Middle East going now that President Obama is President? Oh, Afghanistan just crossed 2,330 American fatalities. Seventy percent of whom died since President Obama took office.



And then the Obama administration wanted to TAKE CREDIT for the Iraq war…whew….

TL; DR


I'm not gonna fuss about having the freedom to post that much crap at once. Just because you have that freedom here, doesn't mean you should abuse it.

 

[flacaltenn]

Israel can kill a shitload of Palestinian and Hamas shitheads with that $3.1 billion.

I love it when my tax money goes to a good cause.

Yes but Israel is not an American State, you need that 3.1 billion for that wall to keep out Mexican bandits which is more important as that affects you DIRECTLY not what happens in some Shit Hole in the Middle East.

Waste of your tax money, Israel should be told to fund themselves or better still the WJC has enough money they shakedown more than 3 billion a year, they could give it to Israel.

That's not the ONLY 3.1Bill that didn't NEED to be spent. There's probably 100 other items in the budget that could fund the stupid wall. Only hot heads would make the connection to Israel. For instance, I KNOW there's MORE BILLIONS in there for infrastructure to Arab shitholes yet the OP doesn't seem to care. And most of that money will be pocketed by petty dictators and ruling elite.

Well I was commenting specifically on what the OP says, it only mentions 1 billion for the Wall and 3.1 billion for Israel there is no mention of anything else, so how can we be expected to comment on things if they are not included already in the OP or subsequent posts?

My post # 74 is quite specific where I comment I am against ALL Western nations giving basically Welfare handouts to nations, I mentioned China and India as examples.

Don't feel bad. I've read more about the Funding bill than most members of Congress have. Certainly NONE of them read it. Not picking on you. We do things foolishly with money here in American Politics. It's just voodoo bookkeeping.

There is PORK all OVER that POS spineless act..

 

[TheDude]

Trumptards will drink his piss all day and call it lemonade

Funny coming from the lips of a trans.

 

[Marion Morrison]

Israel can kill a shitload of Palestinian and Hamas shitheads with that $3.1 billion.

I love it when my tax money goes to a good cause.

Yes but Israel is not an American State, you need that 3.1 billion for that wall to keep out Mexican bandits which is more important as that affects you DIRECTLY not what happens in some Shit Hole in the Middle East.

Waste of your tax money, Israel should be told to fund themselves or better still the WJC has enough money they shakedown more than 3 billion a year, they could give it to Israel.

That's not the ONLY 3.1Bill that didn't NEED to be spent. There's probably 100 other items in the budget that could fund the stupid wall. Only hot heads would make the connection to Israel. For instance, I KNOW there's MORE BILLIONS in there for infrastructure to Arab shitholes yet the OP doesn't seem to care. And most of that money will be pocketed by petty dictators and ruling elite.

Well I was commenting specifically on what the OP says, it only mentions 1 billion for the Wall and 3.1 billion for Israel there is no mention of anything else, so how can we be expected to comment on things if they are not included already in the OP or subsequent posts?

My post # 74 is quite specific where I comment I am against ALL Western nations giving basically Welfare handouts to nations, I mentioned China and India as examples.

Don't feel bad. I've read more about the Funding bill than most members of Congress have. Certainly NONE of them read it. Not picking on you. We do things foolishly with money here in American Politics. It's just voodoo bookkeeping.

There is PORK all OVER that POS spineless act..

Now I'm getting a headache..

 

[Issa]

The Omnibus Bill was signed yesterday and a couple of figures just popped out at me.
Israel Aid $3.1B
The Wall $1.6B
The US...Israel's bottom bitch.

As you were.

Good morning.

 

[Issa]

Israel can kill a shitload of Palestinian and Hamas shitheads with that $3.1 billion.

I love it when my tax money goes to a good cause.

So you rather give a terrorist state money...rather than:

Building the wall to stop killers, rapists, drugs, illegals (according to you)
Veterans who die suffering
Infrastructure
Schools
And lot of other things....what happened to America first?

 

[Tijn Von Ingersleben]

Israel can kill a shitload of Palestinian and Hamas shitheads with that $3.1 billion.

I love it when my tax money goes to a good cause.

Yes but Israel is not an American State, you need that 3.1 billion for that wall to keep out Mexican bandits which is more important as that affects you DIRECTLY not what happens in some Shit Hole in the Middle East.

Waste of your tax money, Israel should be told to fund themselves or better still the WJC has enough money they shakedown more than 3 billion a year, they could give it to Israel.

That's not the ONLY 3.1Bill that didn't NEED to be spent. There's probably 100 other items in the budget that could fund the stupid wall. Only hot heads would make the connection to Israel. For instance, I KNOW there's MORE BILLIONS in there for infrastructure to Arab shitholes yet the OP doesn't seem to care. And most of that money will be pocketed by petty dictators and ruling elite.

Parsing hairs about what could be or what should be is subjective. This OP chose this particular subject because this OP knew that every ass sucker on the board would flock to support their favorite pimp and master. Yours being post #105.
This Op chose the $3.1B subject because he feels that the recipient of those funds is a direct driver of much of the remaining budget. Most importantly, the multi hundred billion dollar (not to include CIA Black budget) allocation for US military infrastructure, equipment, operations et al.,.
Our foreign policy with regard to the ME is a direct result and tie in to those threats which we perceive not only to be a threat to us, but our 'greatest friend and ally'.
Our war in Iraq and our proxy wars in Syria and Yemen as well as our position towards Iran are intrinsically connected to our support of Israel as much as they are a direct reflection of Israeli foreign policy. As a result, Israel is a prime driver of our foreign policy. Thus...we become Israel's bitch.

 

[Issa]

Israel has the most powerful military in the region. I don't mind giving the some aid, but the amount they receive is ridiculous. Maybe after decades of aiding them they should learn to stand on their own two feet.

Well yes and they should use that military that AMERICAN TAXPAYERS have paid for and CONTINUE to pay for to assist America when the Neo-Conservatives get America into more wars in the Middle East where there are NO American National Interests....um or is Israel now an American State and I had not noticed the announcement?

Why should American soldiers continue to die in Middle Eastern Wars, WHO and WHAT exactly are they dying for?

In 1996 Warmongers , Neocrazies and Likudnicks promised Israel that they would destroy Iraq and Syria:

A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm

.

I think Israel has a right to defend itself like EVERY nation has a right to defend itself, but like the majority of nations do Israel should fund it's own defence, it's time they grew up or were forced to grow up by America stopping the Welfare to them, I mean if America stopped the Welfare what are Israel going to do have a tantrum? Threaten to bomb America or whatever?

The Zionists control the US the media, the banks, the special interest groups,.etc....
Also the evangelicals beleive in protecting Israel for the messiah to come back. But of course they don't tell the Jews what will be their faith when the Messiah comes back...same with the Zionists they don't tell the evangelicals what they really think about them the virgin Mary and Jesus.

 

[Issa]

The Omnibus Bill was signed yesterday and a couple of figures just popped out at me.
Israel Aid $3.1B
The Wall $1.6B
The US...Israel's bottom bitch.

As you were.

That money is a great investment quite frankly. Not only does it go towards a close ally dealing with the threats there and spying efforts on U.S greatest enemies in the region, but, Israel uses that money to purchase U.S military weapons and gear. So ultimately, most of it will be back in the U.S.

Oh, and at risk of being tossed out of a helicopter, let me share with you all a little secret. Some of the funding of foreign operations around the world are stated as one thing, but a portion of that funding often goes towards efforts by U.S intelligence in those countries. It's a way to covertly operate for a cause while also achieving another National Security objective with the funds in addition to the regular funding.

This isn't particularly in regards to money given to Israel, but for some of countries on the list, it's a great way to operate there under the guise of philanthropy.

So we give them money and they buy our weapons and you call it a good deal ?
Israel spy on our enemies ? Lol...are you aware of how many times the Israelis got caught spying on us ?
And why would we have enemies that are thousands of miles away from us and never attacked us if it wasn't for Israel?

 

[Ringel05]

The Omnibus Bill was signed yesterday and a couple of figures just popped out at me.
Israel Aid $3.1B
The Wall $1.6B
The US...Israel's bottom bitch.

As you were.

 

[Snouter]

The Swamp = ZOG. Is draining the Swamp "anti-demitic?"

 

[Seawytch]

I guess the relevant question would be what the 3.1 B is being used for... anybody know?

Abortions? Israeli government offers women aged 20 to 33 free abortions

 

[deltex1]

Ok by me...under obama, the US was Iran's bottom bitch.

What the hell is that post supposed to mean?

If you don't know, why are you here?

 

[Coyote]

Israel can kill a shitload of Palestinian and Hamas shitheads with that $3.1 billion.

I love it when my tax money goes to a good cause.

Yes but Israel is not an American State, you need that 3.1 billion for that wall to keep out Mexican bandits which is more important as that affects you DIRECTLY not what happens in some Shit Hole in the Middle East.

Waste of your tax money, Israel should be told to fund themselves or better still the WJC has enough money they shakedown more than 3 billion a year, they could give it to Israel.

mexico is paying for the wall.

the cheeto said so

There is going to be NO Wall, only the deluded think there is going to be a Wall, time to wake up and smell the coffee.

There will be a lot more border security, electronic, high tech, and manpower...I think that will be more affective then a wall.