Now Missouri

Nope. The Constitution makes no such distinction
That's because elections are purely a state function. Congress may dictate rules, like the date the election is to be held on.
 
Nope. The Constitution makes no such distinction

It is basic common sense.

A local election board can remove a local city official from the ballot but they could not remove someone running for State Senator, that would require action by a state level official. Or do you think that your local election board could remove Trump from the ballot all by themselves?

The Constitution does not list every, single rule that has to be followed
 
You wouldn't be having to ask that question had the petulant child known as Don not tried to subvert the will of the voters.
Actually subverting the will of the voters is a long standing tradition of both parties.
Start with gerrymandering. Where electors chose their voters. instead of voters choosing their electors.
 
The will of the people is often subverted. As we have a republic with an electoral college, instead of a democracy.
 
Fuck you right back Traitor.
Your the traitor, dumbass.

1704636951448.png


Wasn't democrats doing this, it was Trump and his cult.
Your side is trying to rig another election.
Sure..............

Recordings, emails show how Trump team flew fake ...​

1704637173855.png
CNN.com
https://www.cnn.com › 2023/12/28 › politics › recording...

Dec 28, 2023 — Two days before the January 6 insurrection, the Trump campaign's plan to use fake electors to block President-elect Joe Biden from taking ...




Here's the 19 people charged in Georgia election fraud case​

1704637299928.png
AP News
https://apnews.com › article › trump-georgia-fraud-de...

Oct 24, 2023 — 3, 2020, hearing hosted by state Republican lawmakers at the Georgia Capitol during which false allegations of election fraud were made. Ellis ...
Your side is violent as fuck too. Being the good little Fascist you have become.

1704637361293.png
 
People throw out terms like "due process" and "procedures" without saying what they actually entail?

Does the process require one hearing, or a dozen hearings. Can the decision be made at the local level, or does it have to be a state official?

That's what i'm asking, since the rules may be completely different from state to state.
Show me the conviction of that exact charge.


I cannot agree with the majority that the chimeric proceedings below gave President Trump process commensurate to the interest of which he has been deprived. Nor did the proceedings below protect the interest Coloradans have in voting for a candidate of their choosing. Of course, if President Trump committed a heinous act worthy of disqualification, he should be disqualified for the sake of protecting our hallowed democratic system, regardless of whether citizens may wish to vote for him in Colorado. But such a determination must follow the appropriate procedural avenues. Absent adequate due process, it is improper for our state to bar him from holding public office. More broadly, I am disturbed about the potential chaos wrought by an imprudent, unconstitutional, and standardless system in which each state gets to adjudicate Section Three disqualification cases on an ad hoc basis. Surely, this enlargement of state power is antithetical to the framers’ intent.”

Justice Carlos Samour Jr.
 
The will of the people is often subverted. As we have a republic with an electoral college, instead of a democracy.
The founders hated a pure Democracy. The chose a Republic instead to avoid the Tyranny of 50 plus 1
 
Your the traitor, dumbass.

View attachment 884689

Wasn't democrats doing this, it was Trump and his cult.

Sure..............

Recordings, emails show how Trump team flew fake ...



View attachment 884691
CNN.com
https://www.cnn.com › 2023/12/28 › politics › recording...
Dec 28, 2023 — Two days before the January 6 insurrection, the Trump campaign's plan to use fake electors to block President-elect Joe Biden from taking ...




Here's the 19 people charged in Georgia election fraud case

View attachment 884692
AP News
https://apnews.com › article › trump-georgia-fraud-de...
Oct 24, 2023 — 3, 2020, hearing hosted by state Republican lawmakers at the Georgia Capitol during which false allegations of election fraud were made. Ellis ...


View attachment 884693
 
Show me the conviction of that exact charge.


I cannot agree with the majority that the chimeric proceedings below gave President Trump process commensurate to the interest of which he has been deprived. Nor did the proceedings below protect the interest Coloradans have in voting for a candidate of their choosing. Of course, if President Trump committed a heinous act worthy of disqualification, he should be disqualified for the sake of protecting our hallowed democratic system, regardless of whether citizens may wish to vote for him in Colorado. But such a determination must follow the appropriate procedural avenues. Absent adequate due process, it is improper for our state to bar him from holding public office. More broadly, I am disturbed about the potential chaos wrought by an imprudent, unconstitutional, and standardless system in which each state gets to adjudicate Section Three disqualification cases on an ad hoc basis. Surely, this enlargement of state power is antithetical to the framers’ intent.”

Justice Carlos Samour Jr.
The problem with the judges opinion is that it completely divests the state of it's sovereignty, when it comes to holding their elections. That the state is incapable of handling it's election controversies, and must instead hand the decision making to the federal courts instead.
 
The founders hated a pure Democracy. The chose a Republic instead to avoid the Tyranny of 50 plus 1
Actually they chose a republic as a practical form of representation. As you couldn't have 4 million people sitting in congress.
 
The problem with the judges opinion is that it completely divests the state of it's sovereignty, when it comes to holding their elections. That the state is incapable of handling it's election controversies, and must instead hand the decision making to the federal courts instead.
Balony. The Bill of Rights are guaranteed by the Constitution. They have been violated and this publicity stunt will end overturned by SCOTUS
 

Forum List

Back
Top