The insurrection of the Confederacy was DECLARED.The same could be said of the Civil War. Since nobody was convicted.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The insurrection of the Confederacy was DECLARED.The same could be said of the Civil War. Since nobody was convicted.
The same could be said of the Civil War. Since nobody was convicted.
Actually it's based on the conclusion of the state you're trying to get on the ballot of. Since states are in charge of their elections.
People throw out terms like "due process" and "procedures" without saying what they actually entail?You could do your own homework.
Congratulations, you're aPeople throw out terms like "due process" and "procedures" without saying what they actually entail?
Does the process require one hearing, or a dozen hearings. Can the decision be made at the local level, or does it have to be a state official?
That's what i'm asking, since the rules may be completely different from state to state.
But no court ever convicted anybody of insurrection after the Civil War.The insurrection of the Confederacy was DECLARED.
You know Biden didn't engage in insurrection, and Trump did. But since you're a screaming toddler, you can't admit it. All the other kewl kidz are lying, and you don't have the guts to refuse to lie along with them.
But no court ever convicted anybody of insurrection after the Civil War.
Therefore there was no insurrection? At least in the eyes of many people here.
“Based upon what office..”And who gets to decide if there was insurrection is based upon what office they are running for.
Then keep him out of office by not electing him.
Was anybody after the Civil War charged with insurrection?Has Trump been charged with insurrection?
“Based upon what office..”
Nope. Anyone who violates section 3 should get the same treatment.
I'm starting to hear bells ringing. As an office covered by a single election board, may only require the decision of that election board.They do, but that treatment can come from different sources. The Alderman being barred is likely not going to take a state SC ruling
Not getting your pointThey do, but that treatment can come from different sources. The Alderman being barred is likely not going to take a state SC ruling
The due process afforded Trump was in compliance with the CO statute for reviewing ballot qualification. It was a civil, not criminal proceeding.Nope. The (3) dissenting CO justices, including the Chief Justice, said that there was inadequate due process.
See my post #133Not getting your point
Not getting your point
Language to that effect is found nowhere in Sec 3 of the 14th.The point is that the level of office dictates the level of who can keep someone off the ballot.
The Bill of Rights is for all states.People throw out terms like "due process" and "procedures" without saying what they actually entail?
Does the process require one hearing, or a dozen hearings. Can the decision be made at the local level, or does it have to be a state official?
That's what i'm asking, since the rules may be completely different from state to state.
Instead of saying level, you should say scope. Since it depends on how many election districts it covers.The point is that the level of office dictates the level of who can keep someone off the ballot.
Why do elected officials act like children?This is getting ridiculous.
Let the people decide. SCOTUS needs to address this
Missouri official threatens to remove Biden from 2024 presidential ballot if 'new legal standard' boots Trump
![]()
Missouri official threatens to remove Biden from 2024 presidential ballot if 'new legal standard' boots Trump
Missouri Secretary of State Jay Ashcroft says he'll remove President Biden from the presidential ballot if Trump is disqualified to appear in other states.www.foxnews.com