Obama admin on the verge of signing a nuke agreement with Iran

[BlindBoo]

Well this is retarded, you guys will never forgive him for stopping the war you've wanted for 35 years.

Who, Obama? He didn't "stop" anything. If anything, he ramped up the drone strikes in the Middle East, murdering more innocent woman and children than Bush's drone strikes did. If anything, the Middle East is a worse place than it was pre-Obama, and this country is less safe than it ever was.

You dumbasses have been wanting to carpet bomb Iran for decades, Bush tried to get a third war going over there or have you already forgotten? I think you have. None of you remember how your wars get started and have no clue how to wrap them up.

If Jimmy Carter had had the balls to deal with Iran like a real leader would, this whole "radical fundamentalist Islam" thing would have been nipped in the bud. Instead, he advocated that the Shah of Iran abdicate, giving rise to those shithead radicals. Then they took American embassy workers hostage for hundreds of days, and brave U.S. troops died trying the rescue them. Obama's policies are following in the footsteps of Carter only this time, there's alot more at stake. He's allowing Iran to ramp up their quest for a nuclear weapon. which will undoubtedly be used to fulfill what's written in Iran's own charter. That it, the wiping of Israel off the map.

A frightening mishmash of gobbledegook sprinkled with just enough truth to fool an American High School Grad.

 

[ogibillm]

. He's allowing Iran to ramp up their quest for a nuclear weapon. which will undoubtedly be used to fulfill what's written in Iran's own charter. That it, the wiping of Israel off the map.

couple things. 1) how do you get to the idea that a deal that disallows the building of a nuclear weapon allows iran to 'ramp up their quest' for one 2) i'd like to see that part of iran's charter. can you cite it?

Where do you keep coming up with this nonsense that this deal will not allow Iran to have a nuclear weapon?

where do you come up with the nonsense that the deal will allow iran to have one?

it's been stated over and over that the deal will prevent development of a nuclear weapon. where do you get the idea that it actually does the opposite?

Iran currently has over $100 billion in oil revenues frozen by the sanctions put against them. The deal Iran is trying to strike is to have those sanctions removed. Just what do you think Iran would buy with that $100 billion dollars? Ice cream and lollipops?

food. housing.
their economy isn't doing so hot.

 

[Moonglow]

. He's allowing Iran to ramp up their quest for a nuclear weapon. which will undoubtedly be used to fulfill what's written in Iran's own charter. That it, the wiping of Israel off the map.

couple things. 1) how do you get to the idea that a deal that disallows the building of a nuclear weapon allows iran to 'ramp up their quest' for one 2) i'd like to see that part of iran's charter. can you cite it?

Where do you keep coming up with this nonsense that this deal will not allow Iran to have a nuclear weapon?

where do you come up with the nonsense that the deal will allow iran to have one?

it's been stated over and over that the deal will prevent development of a nuclear weapon. where do you get the idea that it actually does the opposite?

Iran currently has over $100 billion in oil revenues frozen by the sanctions put against them. The deal Iran is trying to strike is to have those sanctions removed. Just what do you think Iran would buy with that $100 billion dollars? Ice cream and lollipops?

food. housing.
their economy isn't doing so hot.

Maybe a nice Turkish bath house...

 

[BlindBoo]

Who, Obama? He didn't "stop" anything. If anything, he ramped up the drone strikes in the Middle East, murdering more innocent woman and children than Bush's drone strikes did. If anything, the Middle East is a worse place than it was pre-Obama, and this country is less safe than it ever was.

You dumbasses have been wanting to carpet bomb Iran for decades

And we get more lies and insults from the usual liberals. Some things never change.

And more lies and ad homien from yous guys..
So smerty pants, what is in the final agreement? The one the Senate must approve of?.

You're disputing the fact that under the Nobel Peace Prize winner Obama, more civilians have been killed by drone strikes than under Bush?

Forget drone strikes, who killed more innocent civilians?

 

[JGalt]

Who, Obama? He didn't "stop" anything. If anything, he ramped up the drone strikes in the Middle East, murdering more innocent woman and children than Bush's drone strikes did. If anything, the Middle East is a worse place than it was pre-Obama, and this country is less safe than it ever was.

You dumbasses have been wanting to carpet bomb Iran for decades

And we get more lies and insults from the usual liberals. Some things never change.

And more lies and ad homien from yous guys..
So smerty pants, what is in the final agreement? The one the Senate must approve of?.

You're disputing the fact that under the Nobel Peace Prize winner Obama, more civilians have been killed by drone strikes than under Bush?

Forget drone strikes, who killed more innocent civilians?

I know it probably have nothing but utter disdain for the American military and it probably slipped your mind but have you ever considered that it was Al Qaeda, the Taliban, and ISIS who have killed more? Considering that Obama's failed policy in Libya and Syria created ISIS, I'm still blaming him.

 

[Darkwind]

. He's allowing Iran to ramp up their quest for a nuclear weapon. which will undoubtedly be used to fulfill what's written in Iran's own charter. That it, the wiping of Israel off the map.

couple things. 1) how do you get to the idea that a deal that disallows the building of a nuclear weapon allows iran to 'ramp up their quest' for one 2) i'd like to see that part of iran's charter. can you cite it?

Where do you keep coming up with this nonsense that this deal will not allow Iran to have a nuclear weapon?

where do you come up with the nonsense that the deal will allow iran to have one?

it's been stated over and over that the deal will prevent development of a nuclear weapon. where do you get the idea that it actually does the opposite?

Its been stated. However, no one has read the actual deal, and those who have inside track on the kinds of deals being made all state that the alleged deal, will allow them to have one in 5 to 10 years.

Factor in that this administration and the people who work for it are known liars, cheats, and outright idiots.

So, you get back to us when you have PROOF that this deal will prevent Iran from acquiring or building a nuke.

 

[g5000]

Who, Obama? He didn't "stop" anything. If anything, he ramped up the drone strikes in the Middle East, murdering more innocent woman and children than Bush's drone strikes did. If anything, the Middle East is a worse place than it was pre-Obama, and this country is less safe than it ever was.

You dumbasses have been wanting to carpet bomb Iran for decades

And we get more lies and insults from the usual liberals. Some things never change.

 

[JGalt]

Oh. And did I mention that one of the stipulations Iran wants, is the lifting of the UN arms embargo against them? So they'd be free to purchase all the weapons they want, with that $100 billion of freed-up oil reserves. Figure it any way you want to but in the end, that just means more dead Americans.

 

[BlindBoo]

You dumbasses have been wanting to carpet bomb Iran for decades

And we get more lies and insults from the usual liberals. Some things never change.

And more lies and ad homien from yous guys..
So smerty pants, what is in the final agreement? The one the Senate must approve of?.

You're disputing the fact that under the Nobel Peace Prize winner Obama, more civilians have been killed by drone strikes than under Bush?

Forget drone strikes, who killed more innocent civilians?

I know it probably have nothing but utter disdain for the American military and it probably slipped your mind but have you ever considered that it was Al Qaeda, the Taliban, and ISIS who have killed more? Considering that Obama's failed policy in Libya and Syria created ISIS, I'm still blaming him.

Way to pull that ball away, Lucy.

 

[Moonglow]

Oh. And did I mention that one of the stipulations Iran wants, is the lifting of the UN arms embargo against them? So they'd be free to purchase all the weapons they want, with that $100 billion of freed-up oil reserves. Figure it any way you want to but in the end, that just means more dead Americans.

 

[Kondor3]

Who, Obama? He didn't "stop" anything. If anything, he ramped up the drone strikes in the Middle East, murdering more innocent woman and children than Bush's drone strikes did. If anything, the Middle East is a worse place than it was pre-Obama, and this country is less safe than it ever was.

You dumbasses have been wanting to carpet bomb Iran for decades

And we get more lies and insults from the usual liberals. Some things never change.

And more lies and ad homien from yous guys..
So smerty pants, what is in the final agreement? The one the Senate must approve of?.

You're disputing the fact that under the Nobel Peace Prize winner Obama, more civilians have been killed by drone strikes than under Bush?

Oh, yeah, ya know... I forgot that Obama won a Nobel Prize there for a while.

For doing nothing, wasn't it?

 

[ogibillm]

. He's allowing Iran to ramp up their quest for a nuclear weapon. which will undoubtedly be used to fulfill what's written in Iran's own charter. That it, the wiping of Israel off the map.

couple things. 1) how do you get to the idea that a deal that disallows the building of a nuclear weapon allows iran to 'ramp up their quest' for one 2) i'd like to see that part of iran's charter. can you cite it?

Where do you keep coming up with this nonsense that this deal will not allow Iran to have a nuclear weapon?

where do you come up with the nonsense that the deal will allow iran to have one?

it's been stated over and over that the deal will prevent development of a nuclear weapon. where do you get the idea that it actually does the opposite?

Its been stated. However, no one has read the actual deal, and those who have inside track on the kinds of deals being made all state that the alleged deal, will allow them to have one in 5 to 10 years.

Factor in that this administration and the people who work for it are known liars, cheats, and outright idiots.

So, you get back to us when you have PROOF that this deal will prevent Iran from acquiring or building a nuke.

so the deal is supposed to push back the date that they would be able to have a viable weapon and you have a problem with it because... what, exactly?

 

[occupied]

If Iran was ever going to pick a fight with the US by directly attacking us on our soil they would have done so already. They have lived in fear of an eminent attack from the US for 35 years, it's what keeps the hard-liners in power. Just as conservative leaders do here, they stoke the fear and paranoia. We used to make it so easy too, not a month went by that Bushco did not issue some sort of threat against them and so they had to issue equally dire threats. There has to be some way to step back from the constant fear on both sides. I do not buy it for a minute that Iran is trying to get a Bomb just to become a suicide bomber on a national scale, they want one because no one invades a country that has them.

 

[g5000]

they want one because no one invades a country that has them.

That's probably the number one reason they want the Bomb.

 

[occupied]

they want one because no one invades a country that has them.

That's probably the number one reason they want the Bomb.

It's the only reason anyone wants the Bomb. The things are useless if you use them, much more strategically powerful if they are just sitting there not exploding. Iran knows that to explode a bomb means the death of their country, the whole world will come down on their heads and there will not be one brick left on top of another. They have a pretty nice modernized country that is more progressive than our supposed friend Saudi Arabia. I do not think they want it fucked up.

 

[JGalt]

If Iran was ever going to pick a fight with the US by directly attacking us on our soil they would have done so already. They have lived in fear of an eminent attack from the US for 35 years, it's what keeps the hard-liners in power. Just as conservative leaders do here, they stoke the fear and paranoia. We used to make it so easy too, not a month went by that Bushco did not issue some sort of threat against them and so they had to issue equally dire threats. There has to be some way to step back from the constant fear on both sides. I do not buy it for a minute that Iran is trying to get a Bomb just to become a suicide bomber on a national scale, they want one because no one invades a country that has them.

They have already been responsible for the deaths of an undetermined numbers of Americans. They not only give or have given material support and training to terrorist organizations like Hamas, and Hezbollah, but AL-Queda which has been responsible for the deaths of many American soldiers.

 

[occupied]

If Iran was ever going to pick a fight with the US by directly attacking us on our soil they would have done so already. They have lived in fear of an eminent attack from the US for 35 years, it's what keeps the hard-liners in power. Just as conservative leaders do here, they stoke the fear and paranoia. We used to make it so easy too, not a month went by that Bushco did not issue some sort of threat against them and so they had to issue equally dire threats. There has to be some way to step back from the constant fear on both sides. I do not buy it for a minute that Iran is trying to get a Bomb just to become a suicide bomber on a national scale, they want one because no one invades a country that has them.

They have already been responsible for the deaths of an undetermined numbers of Americans. They not only give or have given material support and training to terrorist organizations like Hamas, and Hezbollah, but AL-Queda which has been responsible for the deaths of many American soldiers.

Yeah we've killed a shit load of people over there too, it's got to end somehow, killing more people does not seem to be working.

 

[Political Junky]

Just heard a deal has been reached and might be announced tonight.

 

[browsing deer]

. He's allowing Iran to ramp up their quest for a nuclear weapon. which will undoubtedly be used to fulfill what's written in Iran's own charter. That it, the wiping of Israel off the map.

couple things. 1) how do you get to the idea that a deal that disallows the building of a nuclear weapon allows iran to 'ramp up their quest' for one 2) i'd like to see that part of iran's charter. can you cite it?

Where do you keep coming up with this nonsense that this deal will not allow Iran to have a nuclear weapon?

where do you come up with the nonsense that the deal will allow iran to have one?

it's been stated over and over that the deal will prevent development of a nuclear weapon. where do you get the idea that it actually does the opposite?

Its been stated. However, no one has read the actual deal, and those who have inside track on the kinds of deals being made all state that the alleged deal, will allow them to have one in 5 to 10 years.

Factor in that this administration and the people who work for it are known liars, cheats, and outright idiots.

So, you get back to us when you have PROOF that this deal will prevent Iran from acquiring or building a nuke.

so the deal is supposed to push back the date that they would be able to have a viable weapon and you have a problem with it because... what, exactly?

It does no such thing. They don;t permit inspections, get fancy centrifuges and get the money froze by Jimmy Carter in exchange for what? Nothing. Not even a promise to behave, instead promises to do wrong.

 

[JGalt]

If Iran was ever going to pick a fight with the US by directly attacking us on our soil they would have done so already. They have lived in fear of an eminent attack from the US for 35 years, it's what keeps the hard-liners in power. Just as conservative leaders do here, they stoke the fear and paranoia. We used to make it so easy too, not a month went by that Bushco did not issue some sort of threat against them and so they had to issue equally dire threats. There has to be some way to step back from the constant fear on both sides. I do not buy it for a minute that Iran is trying to get a Bomb just to become a suicide bomber on a national scale, they want one because no one invades a country that has them.

They have already been responsible for the deaths of an undetermined numbers of Americans. They not only give or have given material support and training to terrorist organizations like Hamas, and Hezbollah, but AL-Queda which has been responsible for the deaths of many American soldiers.

Yeah we've killed a shit load of people over there too, it's got to end somehow, killing more people does not seem to be working.

Well why don't you do this: Go over there and sit down with them around a campfire. You can make smores and sing a round of "Kumbaya". Let us know how that works out for ya.

As for myself, I'll just stay here and continue engraving the names of terrorists on the noses of bullets which is no mean feat, given the squiggly nature of Arabic writing.