Obama admin on the verge of signing a nuke agreement with Iran

[ogibillm]

Okay so how many nukes and subs are we giving Iran? Do people know Iran has continued breaking their existing agreements and doing end runs around the sanctions while negotiating this deal?

i can't tell if this is written in jest or if the poster is serious. help please.

Are you a liberal? That would explain it.

so it's your belief that the deal with iran will involve the transfer of a nuclear weapon from the united states to iran?

Did you actually purchase the beach front property in Kansas?

i don't know what you mean by that. could you please just answer yes or no - do you believe that a deal with iran will involve the transfer of nuclear weapons from the united states to them?

 

[bendog]

Well this is retarded, you guys will never forgive him for stopping the war you've wanted for 35 years.

Who, Obama? He didn't "stop" anything. If anything, he ramped up the drone strikes in the Middle East, murdering more innocent woman and children than Bush's drone strikes did. If anything, the Middle East is a worse place than it was pre-Obama, and this country is less safe than it ever was.

You dumbasses have been wanting to carpet bomb Iran for decades, Bush tried to get a third war going over there or have you already forgotten? I think you have. None of you remember how your wars get started and have no clue how to wrap them up.

If Jimmy Carter had had the balls to deal with Iran like a real leader would, this whole "radical fundamentalist Islam" thing would have been nipped in the bud. Instead, he advocated that the Shah of Iran abdicate, giving rise to those shithead radicals. Then they took American embassy workers hostage for hundreds of days, and brave U.S. troops died trying the rescue them. Obama's policies are following in the footsteps of Carter only this time, there's alot more at stake. He's allowing Iran to ramp up their quest for a nuclear weapon. which will undoubtedly be used to fulfill what's written in Iran's own charter. That it, the wiping of Israel off the map.

There's the irony. Netanyahoo has so little credibility with Europe that we can't maintain sanctions even if we wanted to. We cannot unilaterally continue sanctions. The deal may be less than we should get, but Bibi and the Gop undercut Obama's power to push for a better deal.

 

[ogibillm]

Okay so how many nukes and subs are we giving Iran? Do people know Iran has continued breaking their existing agreements and doing end runs around the sanctions while negotiating this deal?

i can't tell if this is written in jest or if the poster is serious. help please.

Are you a liberal? That would explain it.

so it's your belief that the deal with iran will involve the transfer of a nuclear weapon from the united states to iran?

Not the transfer , but it opens a pathway for their development of such weapon. Iran has already supported several terrorist organizations and supplied armament to those factions which have been responsible for the deaths of your own countrymen. Make no mistake about Iran's intentions: They are taking whatever concessions Obama and Kerry is giving them, all the while stating "Death to America".

opens up a pathway more so than no deal? wouldn't any deal that put restrictions on nuclear development be more restrictive than the current arrangement, which is no restriction at all?

 

[Rozman]

Well this is retarded, you guys will never forgive him for stopping the war you've wanted for 35 years.

As usual, the liberal "responds" by changing the subject, telling lies, and insulting the other posters.

Yeah...Why is it the Libs can't stay on topic....

 

[JGalt]

Well this is retarded, you guys will never forgive him for stopping the war you've wanted for 35 years.

Who, Obama? He didn't "stop" anything. If anything, he ramped up the drone strikes in the Middle East, murdering more innocent woman and children than Bush's drone strikes did. If anything, the Middle East is a worse place than it was pre-Obama, and this country is less safe than it ever was.

You dumbasses have been wanting to carpet bomb Iran for decades, Bush tried to get a third war going over there or have you already forgotten? I think you have. None of you remember how your wars get started and have no clue how to wrap them up.

If Jimmy Carter had had the balls to deal with Iran like a real leader would, this whole "radical fundamentalist Islam" thing would have been nipped in the bud. Instead, he advocated that the Shah of Iran abdicate, giving rise to those shithead radicals. Then they took American embassy workers hostage for hundreds of days, and brave U.S. troops died trying the rescue them. Obama's policies are following in the footsteps of Carter only this time, there's alot more at stake. He's allowing Iran to ramp up their quest for a nuclear weapon. which will undoubtedly be used to fulfill what's written in Iran's own charter. That it, the wiping of Israel off the map.

There's the irony. Netanyahoo has so little credibility with Europe that we can't maintain sanctions even if we wanted to. We cannot unilaterally continue sanctions. The deal may be less than we should get, but Bibi and the Gop undercut Obama's power to push for a better deal.

Why can't we continue sanctions? It seems kinda stupid to give someone who hates you, the hammer to beat your brains out with. That's the ultimate result of Obama's and Kerry's deal, make no mistake about that.

 

[JGalt]

Okay so how many nukes and subs are we giving Iran? Do people know Iran has continued breaking their existing agreements and doing end runs around the sanctions while negotiating this deal?

i can't tell if this is written in jest or if the poster is serious. help please.

Are you a liberal? That would explain it.

so it's your belief that the deal with iran will involve the transfer of a nuclear weapon from the united states to iran?

Not the transfer , but it opens a pathway for their development of such weapon. Iran has already supported several terrorist organizations and supplied armament to those factions which have been responsible for the deaths of your own countrymen. Make no mistake about Iran's intentions: They are taking whatever concessions Obama and Kerry is giving them, all the while stating "Death to America".

opens up a pathway more so than no deal? wouldn't any deal that put restrictions on nuclear development be more restrictive than the current arrangement, which is no restriction at all?

The deal they're working on, eases restrictions on Iran.

 

[B. Kidd]

Well this is retarded, you guys will never forgive him for stopping the war you've wanted for 35 years.

Who, Obama? He didn't "stop" anything. If anything, he ramped up the drone strikes in the Middle East, murdering more innocent woman and children than Bush's drone strikes did. If anything, the Middle East is a worse place than it was pre-Obama, and this country is less safe than it ever was.

You dumbasses have been wanting to carpet bomb Iran for decades, Bush tried to get a third war going over there or have you already forgotten? I think you have. None of you remember how your wars get started and have no clue how to wrap them up.

If Jimmy Carter had had the balls to deal with Iran like a real leader would, this whole "radical fundamentalist Islam" thing would have been nipped in the bud. Instead, he advocated that the Shah of Iran abdicate, giving rise to those shithead radicals. Then they took American embassy workers hostage for hundreds of days, and brave U.S. troops died trying the rescue them. Obama's policies are following in the footsteps of Carter only this time, there's alot more at stake. He's allowing Iran to ramp up their quest for a nuclear weapon. which will undoubtedly be used to fulfill what's written in Iran's own charter. That it, the wiping of Israel off the map.

There's the irony. Netanyahoo has so little credibility with Europe that we can't maintain sanctions even if we wanted to. We cannot unilaterally continue sanctions. The deal may be less than we should get, but Bibi and the Gop undercut Obama's power to push for a better deal.

Specifically, how does Bibi and the GOP undercut Obies' power? Are Bibi and the GOP directly involved in the negotiations?

 

[BluesLegend]

Okay so how many nukes and subs are we giving Iran? Do people know Iran has continued breaking their existing agreements and doing end runs around the sanctions while negotiating this deal?

i can't tell if this is written in jest or if the poster is serious. help please.

Are you a liberal? That would explain it.

so it's your belief that the deal with iran will involve the transfer of a nuclear weapon from the united states to iran?

Did you actually purchase the beach front property in Kansas?

i don't know what you mean by that. could you please just answer yes or no - do you believe that a deal with iran will involve the transfer of nuclear weapons from the united states to them?

Ahahaha

 

[HenryBHough]

Stock up on Vaseline before prices go up.

As this deal is being worked out the demand for that stuff is off the charts!

 

[Moonglow]

Well this is retarded, you guys will never forgive him for stopping the war you've wanted for 35 years.

Who, Obama? He didn't "stop" anything. If anything, he ramped up the drone strikes in the Middle East, murdering more innocent woman and children than Bush's drone strikes did. If anything, the Middle East is a worse place than it was pre-Obama, and this country is less safe than it ever was.

You dumbasses have been wanting to carpet bomb Iran for decades, Bush tried to get a third war going over there or have you already forgotten? I think you have. None of you remember how your wars get started and have no clue how to wrap them up.

They like to see stuff blowed up real good...

 

[bendog]

Well this is retarded, you guys will never forgive him for stopping the war you've wanted for 35 years.

Who, Obama? He didn't "stop" anything. If anything, he ramped up the drone strikes in the Middle East, murdering more innocent woman and children than Bush's drone strikes did. If anything, the Middle East is a worse place than it was pre-Obama, and this country is less safe than it ever was.

You dumbasses have been wanting to carpet bomb Iran for decades, Bush tried to get a third war going over there or have you already forgotten? I think you have. None of you remember how your wars get started and have no clue how to wrap them up.

If Jimmy Carter had had the balls to deal with Iran like a real leader would, this whole "radical fundamentalist Islam" thing would have been nipped in the bud. Instead, he advocated that the Shah of Iran abdicate, giving rise to those shithead radicals. Then they took American embassy workers hostage for hundreds of days, and brave U.S. troops died trying the rescue them. Obama's policies are following in the footsteps of Carter only this time, there's alot more at stake. He's allowing Iran to ramp up their quest for a nuclear weapon. which will undoubtedly be used to fulfill what's written in Iran's own charter. That it, the wiping of Israel off the map.

There's the irony. Netanyahoo has so little credibility with Europe that we can't maintain sanctions even if we wanted to. We cannot unilaterally continue sanctions. The deal may be less than we should get, but Bibi and the Gop undercut Obama's power to push for a better deal.

Why can't we continue sanctions? It seems kinda stupid to give someone who hates you, the hammer to beat your brains out with. That's the ultimate result of Obama's and Kerry's deal, make no mistake about that.

The sanctions only exist because Hillary convince Europe to impose them. If they choose not to, there are no sanctions to be enforced except our unilateral sanctions which would be meaningless, because Europe and Russia will sell Iran anything it wants. And, Europe is convinced Bibi doesn't want a two state peace, so anything he cries about is seen by Europe to be boolshite.

 

[Darkwind]

. He's allowing Iran to ramp up their quest for a nuclear weapon. which will undoubtedly be used to fulfill what's written in Iran's own charter. That it, the wiping of Israel off the map.

couple things. 1) how do you get to the idea that a deal that disallows the building of a nuclear weapon allows iran to 'ramp up their quest' for one 2) i'd like to see that part of iran's charter. can you cite it?

Where do you keep coming up with this nonsense that this deal will not allow Iran to have a nuclear weapon?

 

[Moonglow]

Who, Obama? He didn't "stop" anything. If anything, he ramped up the drone strikes in the Middle East, murdering more innocent woman and children than Bush's drone strikes did. If anything, the Middle East is a worse place than it was pre-Obama, and this country is less safe than it ever was.

You dumbasses have been wanting to carpet bomb Iran for decades

And we get more lies and insults from the usual liberals. Some things never change.

And more lies and ad homien from yous guys..
So smerty pants, what is in the final agreement? The one the Senate must approve of?.

 

[Moonglow]

i can't tell if this is written in jest or if the poster is serious. help please.

Are you a liberal? That would explain it.

so it's your belief that the deal with iran will involve the transfer of a nuclear weapon from the united states to iran?

Not the transfer , but it opens a pathway for their development of such weapon. Iran has already supported several terrorist organizations and supplied armament to those factions which have been responsible for the deaths of your own countrymen. Make no mistake about Iran's intentions: They are taking whatever concessions Obama and Kerry is giving them, all the while stating "Death to America".

opens up a pathway more so than no deal? wouldn't any deal that put restrictions on nuclear development be more restrictive than the current arrangement, which is no restriction at all?

The deal they're working on, eases restrictions on Iran.

ahem,,,Proof...

 

[ogibillm]

. He's allowing Iran to ramp up their quest for a nuclear weapon. which will undoubtedly be used to fulfill what's written in Iran's own charter. That it, the wiping of Israel off the map.

couple things. 1) how do you get to the idea that a deal that disallows the building of a nuclear weapon allows iran to 'ramp up their quest' for one 2) i'd like to see that part of iran's charter. can you cite it?

Where do you keep coming up with this nonsense that this deal will not allow Iran to have a nuclear weapon?

where do you come up with the nonsense that the deal will allow iran to have one?

it's been stated over and over that the deal will prevent development of a nuclear weapon. where do you get the idea that it actually does the opposite?

 

[g5000]

People think I'm joking when I say you retards have the intellectual bandwidth of a bumper sticker, and then you go and post a cartoon.

Thanks for proving my point.

Would you please quote the parts of the agreement which make any part of this cartoon true? Thanks.

 

[g5000]

EBOLAZ GONNA GIT YA!

OBAMAZ CUMMIN FER YER GUNZ!

1.6 BILLION ROUNDZ A AMMO!

600 FEMA CAMPS!

DA ARMEEZ GOIN TA LOCK YOO UP IN WALMART'S BASEMENT!

DEAD MEXICAN FELONZ ARE A'VOTIN BY THE MILLIONZ!

THE DARKIES ARE IN THE WIRE!

TH3 GAYZ! TH3 GAYZ! TH3 GAYZ!

BOOOOMMMM! SWOOOOSHHHHH! THIS JUST IN: THE IRANIACS ARE AGONNA NUCLEATE THE JEWZ!

 

[JGalt]

Who, Obama? He didn't "stop" anything. If anything, he ramped up the drone strikes in the Middle East, murdering more innocent woman and children than Bush's drone strikes did. If anything, the Middle East is a worse place than it was pre-Obama, and this country is less safe than it ever was.

You dumbasses have been wanting to carpet bomb Iran for decades

And we get more lies and insults from the usual liberals. Some things never change.

And more lies and ad homien from yous guys..
So smerty pants, what is in the final agreement? The one the Senate must approve of?.

You're disputing the fact that under the Nobel Peace Prize winner Obama, more civilians have been killed by drone strikes than under Bush?

 

[Moonglow]

Who, Obama? He didn't "stop" anything. If anything, he ramped up the drone strikes in the Middle East, murdering more innocent woman and children than Bush's drone strikes did. If anything, the Middle East is a worse place than it was pre-Obama, and this country is less safe than it ever was.

You dumbasses have been wanting to carpet bomb Iran for decades

And we get more lies and insults from the usual liberals. Some things never change.

And more lies and ad homien from yous guys..
So smerty pants, what is in the final agreement? The one the Senate must approve of?.

You're disputing the fact that under the Nobel Peace Prize winner Obama, more civilians have been killed by drone strikes than under Bush?

 

[JGalt]

. He's allowing Iran to ramp up their quest for a nuclear weapon. which will undoubtedly be used to fulfill what's written in Iran's own charter. That it, the wiping of Israel off the map.

couple things. 1) how do you get to the idea that a deal that disallows the building of a nuclear weapon allows iran to 'ramp up their quest' for one 2) i'd like to see that part of iran's charter. can you cite it?

Where do you keep coming up with this nonsense that this deal will not allow Iran to have a nuclear weapon?

where do you come up with the nonsense that the deal will allow iran to have one?

it's been stated over and over that the deal will prevent development of a nuclear weapon. where do you get the idea that it actually does the opposite?

Iran currently has over $100 billion in oil revenues frozen by the sanctions put against them. The deal Iran is trying to strike is to have those sanctions removed. Just what do you think Iran would buy with that $100 billion dollars? Ice cream and lollipops?