SeniorChief_Polock
Gold Member
A little too close to home Chief? Why should I limit my response on a complicated subject? Because your pea brain can only process two sentences at a time. If you don't have time to read a couple of paragraphs you must read pretty slowly. You seem to have the time to post stupid shit, but not the time to deal with the blowback.I'm sure that you are real concerned about how gays are treated in the middle east. I'm going to call bullshit on that. I doubt if you would be protesting their being tossed off of roof tops here at home. You people just use that for a chance to slam Obama and make it sound like gays have nothing to complain about in the USMeanwhile, in Syria, they continue to throw gays from rooftops. In Iraq, they string them up on cranes. Obama can continue to turn a blind eye to the fucking problem, just like the world allowed Hitler to murder Jews. As soon as the "Jihad" reaches the streets of Anytown, USA, the gays will be the first to be strung up in the public square or castrated in public. How about that for a sex change, idiots.
Yeah - celebrate, assholes.
How about waking the fuck up?
The fact is that we have to be realistic about the extent to which we can influence and shape the internal, domestic affairs of other countries, especially those where there is a vastly different culture, and no tradition of democracy or the rule of law.
Consider how unsuccessful we have been in trying to change the behavior of North Korea – a country that has little to offer us- with massive sanctions. Now consider Saudi Arabia- and important military ally and trade partner, and one of the few stable governments in the region. I would like just one of you numb nuts to explain exactly what you would do about their human rights issues. Something that is effective and workable and that does not compromise our national interests. Give it a shot. And don’t try to tell us that we should put human rights for gays ahead of our national interests because coming from people like you, it would obviously just be a load of crap. And if your advocating nation building, ask yourself- How well did that go in Iraq?
Lastly, just bringing up the treatment of gays in Islamic countries is a dishonest, sleazy and desperate logical fallacy in the form of a red herring as more so- a tu quoque (To kwok we )(Latin for "you, too" or "you, also") or the appeal to hypocrisy.
It is a logical fallacy that attempts to discredit the opponent's position by asserting the opponent's failure to act consistently in accordance with that position; it attempts to show that a criticism or objection applies equally to the person making it. This dismisses someone's point of view based on criticism of the person's inconsistency and not the position presented whereas a person's inconsistency should not discredit the position. Thus, it is a form of the ad hominem argument. To clarify, although the person being attacked might indeed be acting inconsistently or hypocritically, this does not invalidate their argument."
The fact that these tactics have to be employed, along with that idiotic pyramid cartoon seriously undermines the credibility of the entire argument.
Asshole - kindly limit your responses to a sentence or two. I don't have time - nor the desire - to read your fucking manifesto on men sucking each other's dicks. I get it. You're a cocksucker. Keep it succinct, stupid.
In addition, your need to make assumptions about me and to call me names tells me all that I need to know about you.
Ah, it seems that I struck a nerve!
That's as far as I get with your posts, shitforbrains.
What part of succinct do you fail to understand.
If you want to bloviate - I recommend removing your mouth from whatever cock it's fastened to, and take to a podium, shitforbrains.
Maybe some idiot will give you 5 minutes of their time.
It would indeed take an idiot.
Go to a Clinton rally to increase your odds of finding an audience for your gay-slanted, cum-dripping blather.