Obama's 48hr Strike Plan Revealed: 200 Tomahawks, B-52's, B-2's And B-1's To Be Used

[Steve_McGarrett]

It is now being revealed that it wont be a limited strike on Syria but rather a massive strike using our top military hardware in our arsenal. This type of strike will level Syria's military capability and command structure allowing the Al-Qaeda/Muslim Brotherhood Rebels to topple Bashir Assad. The revelation reveals that we are still being lied too.



Report: US strike on Syria to be 'significantly larger than expected' | JPost | Israel News



Despite statements from both US President Barack Obama and Secretary of State John Kerry that a US-led strike on Syria would be a "limited and tailored" military attack, ABC News reported on Thursday that the strike planned by Obama's national security team is "significantly larger" than most have anticipated.

According to ABC News, in additional to a salvo of 200 Tomahawk cruise missiles fired from four Navy destroyers stationed in the eastern Mediterranean, the US is also planning an aerial campaign that is expected to last two days.

This campaign potentially includes an aerial bombardment of missiles and long range bombs from US-based B-2 stealth bombers that carry satellite-guided bombs, B-52 bombers, that can carry air-launched cruise missiles and Qatar-based B-1s that carry long-range, air-to-surface missiles, both ABC News and The New York Times reported.

"This military strike will do more damage to [Syrian President Bashar] Assad's forces in 48 hours than the Syrian rebels have done in two years," a national security official told ABC News.

 

[The2ndAmendment]

Shock and Awe 2.0

 

[Samson]

Here is the ABC link to the story:

US Eyes Broader Syrian Strike to Include Bombers - ABC News

 

[waltky]

Leave it to the lefty lib'ral yankee type media...

... to give away the game plan...

... buncha Eric Snowdens.

 

[Steve_McGarrett]

I read where each destroyer carries 200 cruise missiles and we have 4 in the region.


Edit. Each one carries 56.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

USS Obama, destabilizing one Middle East country after another: Egypt, Iraq, Libya and now Syria

 

[percysunshine]

USS Obama, destabilizing one Middle East country after another: Egypt, Iraq, Libya and now Syria

He needs the price of oil at $800/bbl so that solar energy can compete.

 

[Samson]

Leave it to the lefty lib'ral yankee type media...

... to give away the game plan...

... buncha Eric Snowdens.

President Obama's national security team is considering a significantly expanded air campaign over Syria to include long range bombers in addition to sea-launched Tomahawk missiles, ABC News has learned.

A senior national security official told ABC News that a U.S. military strike on Syria will do more damage to the forces of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad in 48 hours than Syrian rebels have done in two years of civil war.

Saber Rattling

 

[QuickHitCurepon]

Here is the ABC link to the story:

US Eyes Broader Syrian Strike to Include Bombers - ABC News

A U.S. official confirms that the White House is also considering a separate proposal to have the U.S. military begin training Syrian rebel fighters in Jordan. Currently the CIA is running a small training program for vetted Syrian rebel fighters there . The thinking is that the U.S. military could broaden that training. The official says the proposal had been presented prior to the discussion of a limited military strike against Syria and is not tied to the current congressional debate.

Gee, all roads lead to Damascus all of a sudden.

 

[QuickHitCurepon]

We are becoming experts on fueling insurrection.

 

[007]

It is now being revealed that it wont be a limited strike on Syria but rather a massive strike using our top military hardware in our arsenal. This type of strike will level Syria's military capability and command structure allowing the Al-Qaeda/Muslim Brotherhood Rebels to topple Bashir Assad. The revelation reveals that we are still being lied too.

Report: US strike on Syria to be 'significantly larger than expected' | JPost | Israel News

Well that ought to kick off WWIII. I hope that makes all the libtards REAL HAPPY with their fucking PEACE PRIZE messiah.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Here is the ABC link to the story:

US Eyes Broader Syrian Strike to Include Bombers - ABC News

A U.S. official confirms that the White House is also considering a separate proposal to have the U.S. military begin training Syrian rebel fighters in Jordan. Currently the CIA is running a small training program for vetted Syrian rebel fighters there . The thinking is that the U.S. military could broaden that training. The official says the proposal had been presented prior to the discussion of a limited military strike against Syria and is not tied to the current congressional debate.

Gee, all roads lead to Damascus all of a sudden.

That whole "training Al Qaeda rebel" strategy worked out great at Benghazi didntit?

 

[Missourian]

At this point, it's a waste of time and resources.

If Obama wanted a strike, he should have had the balls to just do it.

What do we accomplish by a strike now?

Little to nothing.

A strong leader understands that when the risk is high and the benefit is low, it's NOT a defensible strategy.

Unfortunately, Obama is not a strong leader.

 

[Katzndogz]

According to the pentagon planners obama has changed his mind more than 50 times leaving the pentagon in disarray, confusion and chaos.

 

[Samson]

Here is the ABC link to the story:

US Eyes Broader Syrian Strike to Include Bombers - ABC News

A U.S. official confirms that the White House is also considering a separate proposal to have the U.S. military begin training Syrian rebel fighters in Jordan. Currently the CIA is running a small training program for vetted Syrian rebel fighters there . The thinking is that the U.S. military could broaden that training. The official says the proposal had been presented prior to the discussion of a limited military strike against Syria and is not tied to the current congressional debate.

Gee, all roads lead to Damascus all of a sudden.

Increasing military aid and spending for Syria is necessary to maintain the relevance of the industrial/military complex as the US reduces its forces in Iraq and A'stan.

oh, and...yeah there's that chemical weapons thingy to consider.

 

[Katzndogz]

At this point, it's a waste of time and resources.

If Obama wanted a strike, he should have had the balls to just do it.

What do we accomplish by a strike now?

Little to nothing.

A strong leader understands that when the risk is high and the benefit is low, it's NOT a defensible strategy.

Unfortunately, Obama is not a strong leader.

Now that Russia and China have had an opportunity to move ships into the area don't count on little to nothing.

 

[Samson]

According to the pentagon planners obama has changed his mind more than 50 times leaving the pentagon in disarray, confusion and chaos.

Government Departments in CONFUSION???!!!




Next we'll here there's no Santa Claus.

 

[Samson]

At this point, it's a waste of time and resources.

If Obama wanted a strike, he should have had the balls to just do it.

What do we accomplish by a strike now?

Little to nothing.

A strong leader understands that when the risk is high and the benefit is low, it's NOT a defensible strategy.

Unfortunately, Obama is not a strong leader.

Now that Russia and China have had an opportunity to move ships into the area don't count on little to nothing.

Why? When was the last time Russia or China fought a sea battle?

 

[Missourian]

At this point, it's a waste of time and resources.

If Obama wanted a strike, he should have had the balls to just do it.

What do we accomplish by a strike now?

Little to nothing.

A strong leader understands that when the risk is high and the benefit is low, it's NOT a defensible strategy.

Unfortunately, Obama is not a strong leader.

Now that Russia and China have had an opportunity to move ships into the area don't count on little to nothing.

I wouldn't call armed conflict with Russia and China an accomplishment.

That result is deeply etched in the "RISK" column of the balance sheet.

 

[Samson]

.....A strong leader understands that when the risk is high and the benefit is low, it's NOT a defensible strategy.

Unfortunately, Obama is not a strong leader.

Well, every strategy cannot be based on invading Granada or Panama.